SBB Historic

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SBB Historic!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome, and, about dates.

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Welcome to Wikimedia Commons! I see you upload a fair few pictures with an undetermined date. Please review Template:Other date. If you put in {{Before|1922}} instead of <1922, the "before" part gets translated into all the languages Wikimedia Commons is supported in. Full dates are formatted Year-Month-Day. I'll fix that in the uploads you've already made, and the latest version of Pattypan (please update) should do so too, but please keep this in mind. Thank you for contributing to Wikimedia Commons. --Vera ^(talk) 11:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Illegale Daten auf Wikipedia?

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Es wäre vielleicht einmal klug zu klären wer hinter dem Benutzer SBB Historic steht. Wenn es sich in der Tat um ein Benutzer Account von SBB Historic handelt, warum ist die Seite anonym und ohne Kontaktdaten? Meines Erachtens sind hier Datensätze aus jüngerer Zeit illegal im Netz. André --81.189.70.246 19:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Auch mir scheint der Account wie auch der Ursprung der hochgeladenen Dateien fragwürdig. Es ist eine berechtigte Frage wer hinter diesem Account SBB Historic steht. SBB Historic selber wohl kaum, denn die würden hier nicht anonym auftreten. Ich bitte desshalb den Benutzer SBB Historic sich umgehend mit den Kontaktdaten zu identifizieren, ansonsten allenfalls davon ausgegangen werden muss, dass hier zumindest ein Namensmissbrauch besteht. --Muni 1966 (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Guten Tag, dieser User ist der offizielle Account von SBB Historic. Die bisherigen Uploads sind alles Medien, die im Besitz von SBB Historic sind und durch SBB Historic hochgeladen wurden. Wir sind jedoch noch neu bei Wikimedia und werden unseren Auftritt auf Wikimedia ständig verbessern. Gewisse Kontaktdaten sind unter User:SBB Historic zu finden. Alle Kontaktdaten finden Sie auf unserer Homepage. --SBB Historic

Danke für die rasche Antwort. Ein Kollege und ich haben heute intensive recherchiert und es kann in aller Ruhe davon ausgegangen werden, dass das Account SBB Historic zuzuordnen ist. Na dann, herzlich willkommen auf Wikipedia! Ich (wir) schätze das sehr, dass sich eine kompetente Institution wie SBB Historic nun auch auf Wikipedia einbringt. Lassen Sie sich nicht durch die anonym arbeitenden Benutzer aus der Ruhe bringen mit denen nicht immer einfach umzugehen ist. Meines Erachtens haben sich in den vergangen Jahren allzuviele Nutzer nur noch wenig eingebracht, oder gar verabschiedet, der einzelnen Spinner wegen, die glauben alles besser zu wissen.

Beiliegend ein paar Links zum Thema Account SBB Historic:

* SBB Historic auf Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sbbhistoric/?hc_ref=PAGES_TIMELINE&fref=nf hier finden sich die entscheidenden Hinweise, dass der Account SBB Historic SBB Historic zuzuordnen ist

* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Schweiz/Schreibwerkstatt_2016_im_Bundesarchiv ein weiterer interessanter Link zum Thema

* http://wiki.glamwiki.ch/index.php?title=Wiki_on_Rails_2016 und gleich noch einer

--Muni 1966 (talk) 15:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:SBB Historic - 21 66 05 b - Elektrischer Zahnrad-Doppeltriebwagen BDhe 4 8 für die Jungfrau-Bahn.tif

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - 21 66 05 b - Elektrischer Zahnrad-Doppeltriebwagen BDhe 4 8 für die Jungfrau-Bahn.tif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, DAJF (talk) 08:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Benutzerverifizierung

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo zusammen; wie schon bei der Führung für den Wikipedia-Stammtisch Zürich (besten Dank nochmal!) angesprochen, wäre (auch angesichts der Zweifel an eurem Account, die hier vorgebracht wurden), eine Benutzerverifizierung nach dem System der deutschen Wikipedia vorsorglich sinnvoll. Siehe dazu de:Wikipedia:Benutzerverifizierung. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lieber Gestumblindi, wir haben diese Verifizierung nach der Führung gerade beantragt und unser Benutzerkonto ist nun auf der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia verifiziert. Besten Dank nochmals für den Hinweis. SBB Historic

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - 75 Jahre Gottahrdbahn 1957.pdf

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - 75 Jahre Gottahrdbahn 1957.pdf

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - 75 Jahre Gottahrdbahn 1957.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 103 00011 002 Brunnen-Sisikon.tif

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 103 00011 002 Brunnen-Sisikon.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - F 103 00011 002 Brunnen-Sisikon.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:SBB Historic - F 103 00011 001 Brunnen-Sisikon.tif

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 116 00001 046 - Bassersdorf.tif

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 116 00001 046 - Bassersdorf.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - F 116 00001 046 - Bassersdorf.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Megalogastor (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:SBB Historic - F 103 00011 002 Brunnen-Sisikon.tif

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:SBB Historic - F 103 00011 002 Brunnen-Sisikon.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:SBB Historic - F 116 00001 046 - Bassersdorf.tif

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:SBB Historic - F 116 00001 046 - Bassersdorf.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 21:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deleting redirects?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are two redirects:

Do you want we delete these redirects? I guess they are invalid--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13763 - Transportwagen zum Batteriewechsel in Aktion am C4ue 8726.tif

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13763 - Transportwagen zum Batteriewechsel in Aktion am C4ue 8726.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - F 104 13763 - Transportwagen zum Batteriewechsel in Aktion am C4ue 8726.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13869 - Kaminfuss mit Abbruchschutt.tif

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13869 - Kaminfuss mit Abbruchschutt.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - F 104 13869 - Kaminfuss mit Abbruchschutt.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13826 - Untere Partie Heizung in Abteilen des BC4ue 5106.tif

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13826 - Untere Partie Heizung in Abteilen des BC4ue 5106.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - F 104 13826 - Untere Partie Heizung in Abteilen des BC4ue 5106.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13855 - Bandage mit Ausbruch Radsatz 105627 C4ue 8842 Seitenansicht.tif

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:SBB Historic - F 104 13855 - Bandage mit Ausbruch Radsatz 105627 C4ue 8842 Seitenansicht.tif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SBB Historic - F 104 13855 - Bandage mit Ausbruch Radsatz 105627 C4ue 8842 Seitenansicht.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Empty files

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

The following files seem to be empty, do you think you can fix them?

Files

Jonteemil (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edit: They are not empty but have no thumbnail for some reason. Do you think you can fix this by reuploading? Or is it a bug?Jonteemil (talk) 23:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

SBB Historic: Hi there, I've also noticed there was a problem with some of these pictures but I wasnt sure how to fix it. But I will try to re-upload them, thanks!

Hello, wait on the reuploading. I will create a Phabricator task to see if there is a larger problem at play here.Jonteemil (talk) 02:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

SBB Historic: Do you have any news concerning the problem with the Adolph-Brown-Images or do you think they should be replaced by uploading new ones?

Yes, they are trying to fix it at phab:T290462, please don't reupload until they have come to a conclusion.Jonteemil (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. Two years later, but if you think you would be able to reupload the files I think it would be good. phab:T290462 evidently didn't fix the problem. Jonteemil (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks for the update, I'll see if I can upload once again. SBB Historic (talk) 08:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reminder

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi SBB Historic. I noticed that you've made a malformed rename request. When you want to rename a file with the {{Rename}} template (rather than the automatic RenameLink gadget's "move" link), you must follow the instructions in the template, including "a value between 1 and 6 which corresponds to the file renaming criteria!" Otherwise, you create more work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jeff, thanks for the hint, i forgott to put a "1", now it should be ok. SBB Historic (talk) 14:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Station names

Latest comment: 2 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, please have a look at:

File:SBB Historic - F 122 00005 001 - Aarburg-Oftringen Stationsgebaeude Bahnseite.jpg (Aarberg railway station?)
File:SBB Historic - F 122 00006 001 - Aarwangen OJB Stationsgebaeude mit Reisezuegen Be 4 4.jpg (Aarburg-Oftringen railway station ?)
File:SBB Historic - F 122 00007 001 - Aathal Stationsgebaeude mit Gueterschuppen Bahnseite.jpg (Aarwangen train station?)
File:SBB Historic - F 122 00008 002 - Adliswil_SZU_Stationsgebaeude_mit_Gueterschuppen_Bahnseite.jpg (Aathal railway station?)
File:SBB Historic - F 122 00009 001 - Aesch Stationsgebaeude mit Gueterschuppen Bahnseite.jpg (Adliswil railway station?)
File:SBB Historic - F 122 00010 001 - Aefligen EBT Stationsgebaeude mit Gueterschuppen Bahnseite.jpg (Aesch train station?)
(I didn't check more of them)

Maybe an offset with names? A good thing is that Category:SBB_Historic_-_Berner_Hans-Rudolf_Bahnhofsfotografien has several views, some of which include an image of the station name shield. Thanks for uploading these photographs, most interesting! -- Enhancing999 (talk) 14:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, thank you for your feedback. There was a small shift in the Upload-Excelsheet, I could fix the error now. SBB Historic (talk) 09:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. File:SBB Historic - F 122 00009 001 - Aesch Stationsgebaeude mit Gueterschuppen Strassenseite.jpg still reads "Aesch" instead of "Adliswil" (see the sign in the photo). Enhancing999 (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

my bad, changed that now. SBB Historic (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I added the station categories to a few images: ex: Category:Bad Ragaz railway station. I noticed we are missing a few categories, probably all for closed railway stations, ex: Category:Rüti bei Büren railway station. Eventually, someone might do the remaining ones [1]. If you have a simple way to add them, please do.

As several station buildings have similar designs, maybe a categorization by that could be done. Enhancing999 (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Short update: Most images are now categorized by station. The remaining ones are directly at Category:Railway stations in Switzerland (mostly cases where the category still needs to be created or the name didn't match easily existing ones).

Template:Railway stations in Switzerland and categories like Category:Underground railway stations in Switzerland can help navigate the stations and find visually similar images. If you have ideas for more, you may want add them.

Also, I added Creator:Hans-Rudolf Berner (1938-2013) under "photographer=". It allows to specify the photographer in a more detailed way. Enhancing999 (talk) 06:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for your work, very appreciated. SBB Historic (talk) 09:15, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to @Gürbetaler, the remaining ones are now done. I added a few categories based on the layout (see the template), but not yet based individual building types. A few people added categories for architects.

For coverage on Commons, a picture of each former station could help (preferably from when it was in use). Do you have a way to determine which ones we are still missing and possibly make them available?

To see use of stations, timetables are a good tool. I noticed we have a few individual pages of some editions, but PDF or djvu versions of original books would be good to have (if that is available and compatible with Commons licensing). Enhancing999 (talk) 11:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Timetables since 2006 are available as PDFs from this official site: www.fahrplanfelder.ch/de/archiv/fahrplanfelder. I don' think that it is necessary/useful to copy them to Wiki Commons. Earlier timetabels are so far only available if somebody scanned them-- Gürbetaler (talk) 19:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I got the impression that SBB Historic mostly works on pre-199x material, but maybe I'm wrong. With timetables, I have the ones at Category:Train timetables in Switzerland in mind (currently there are just individual pages). SBB Archives might have versions that are easier to scan than the actual printed ones. Some of the pages in that categories are in use, so they are useful on Commons. What parts are useful varies from one train line to another and not every Wikipedia might have the same view on that, but we don't want to make an editorial choice for all of them. David, what's your view on this? Enhancing999 (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Renaming requests

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi SBB Historic, thanks for your contributions! Just now, I evaluated your renaming requests, but while adding the template you did not add an appropriate reason to your request. I felt the need to inform you about this. Please choose a suitable criterion from the list. Best, Kadı Message 11:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! Thank you for your message. Do you know which file is missing a criterion? I couldnt find one. I used the criterion 1 (at uploaders request) for most of the files with wrong names... maybe I forgott one. Thanks! SBB Historic (talk) 11:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Gallery Bahnhöfe der Schweiz (Hans-Rudolf Berner)

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Good afternoon, above a gallery with a list of the stations included in these pictures. Maybe you want to use it to gather category names. I will try to update it once we finished normalizing the names.

I noticed that Berne and Lucerne aren't included. For Commons, it doesn't matter that much as we get plenty of others. For the many smaller stations, it can be interesting to include also pictures from years where the general architecture hasn't changed, as many of these images are full of details interesting for some observers. In any case, the current collection provides an excellent cross-section by the time period covered and the geographic scope.

Thanks again for uploading these. - Enhancing999 (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, and thanks a lot for creating these lists. We've also noticed, that Berne and Lucerne are missing. We don't know why the photographer didnt take photos of Berne railway station. As for Lucerne, there are some Postcards in this collection showing the old railwaystation that burnt down in 1971, but we cannot upload these with a open-data-license because they were taken by a private photo studio. SBB Historic (talk) 12:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I should try to improve the categorization at Category:Luzern railway station. One should be able to distinguish easily between the old station and the current one.

Now that we started building one stations, would you have more images from SBB Historic photo collection railway stations of Switzerland that you'd want to make available? Enhancing999 (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Years 1905, 1900 in Category:SBB Historic photo collection railway stations of Switzerland

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

files

There might be an issue with the date for the above files. Enhancing999 (talk) 21:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thats right, I guess the error occured in the date-field of the excel-sheet used for the patty-pan upload. I hope we can fix these dates soner or later. Kind regards, SBB Historic (talk) 12:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

It you add a list of the correct dates somewhere here I can update the file description pages. Enhancing999 (talk) 05:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I removed the date for now and added them into Category:Maintenance of Railway stations in Switzerland (date removed). Possibly I missed some. Also, I couldn't fix some edits made based on this (a copy copied the date). Enhancing999 (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

La Tine & Lachen

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The images were switched ([2] and [3]). Enhancing999 (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Enhancing999 many thanks! SBB Historic (talk) 12:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Timetables

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

I'm not sure if you had seen my question about these above (at #Station names). Still like my idea ;) Enhancing999 (talk) 05:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I can't see why the timetables in possession of SBBH should be easier to scan than others. I have scanned single pages from the timetables in our collection and I must say, it is not easy because of the binding. Moreover it is necessary to put a black paper behind the page, as the paper is so thin that the print of the backside would shine through. The big question is, who would do the scanning or pay for the scanning, as there thousands of pages and they need manual operation. What I can offer is a series of -timetables from about 1967 to 2005 that could be cut up for easier scanning. Gürbetaler (talk) 11:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I didn't know you were with SBBH. I thought there could be drafts and versions other than the retail print edition. Enhancing999 (talk) 10:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm not with SBBH. There are other collections of timetables. Gürbetaler (talk) 20:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

For what it's worth, to chime in, I also personally have a collection of Swiss timetables starting in 1947. I have no digitization plans, but I'm happy to provide information if, for example, someone wants to know about specific train connections in a specific year. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hans-Rudolf Berner's photos on a map

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Locations of geocoded photos on map of Switzerland

To make it easier to locate them, I added coordinates to most of them. The map to the right highlights some.

This finds some that still lack coordinates, including more complicated ones (for me), especially former railway stations and signal boxes. Enhancing999 (talk) 11:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Great work, thank you! SBB Historic (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Is it necessary to locate every single photo? See Category:Bern Fischermätteli railway station with five photos of the same old building. Gürbetaler (talk) 14:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Initially I thought it wasn't needed, but some applications seem to rely on coordinates being on the actual images. Thanks for your additions to the categories, I copied them over. Enhancing999 (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Walchwil - dates and descriptions

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

In Category:Walchwil railway station, there is some inconsistency with the years on uploaded photos. They seem to have replaced the goods shed and then the main building. Wikipedia unfortunately lacks dates for this too.

Also the description (and filename) of File:SBB Historic - F 122 01154 005 - Walchwil altes Stationsgebaeude und neuer Gueterschuppen.jpg seems to refer to the image at File:SBB Historic - F 122 01154 006 - Walchwil Stationsgebaeude mit Gueterschuppen Bahnseite.jpg. Enhancing999 (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I suppose I could just move them, but there is a risk that it gets out of sync, between title, filename, date, categories, coordinates and data you keep on these on your side. Enhancing999 (talk) 13:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Stellwerkgebäude & Stellwerke > signal boxes

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Signal boxes (individual buildings), available photos

When trying to geocode photos, I noticed that Commons had very few images of signal boxes and luckily Berner's collections included quite a few. Still, it could be expanded, hopefully into something with a comparable coverage. Where station buildings includes it ("winter garden"), it would generally be covered already.

If you have students looking for topics to investigate, it could interesting to see how their technology evolved over time from manual/mechanical/local to digital/centralized. The change seems to have implemented at different times and some steps skipped. There are a few blogs that give some insight in the question and maybe more already exists. Enhancing999 (talk) 10:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Years

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

2010: File:SBB Historic - F 122 00006 002 - Aarwangen OJB Stationsgebaeude mit Reisezuegen Be 4 4.jpg has 2010, but File:SBB Historic - F 122 00006 002 - Aarwangen OJB Stationsgebaeude Bahnseite und Bahnübergang.jpg also. The later seems more likely, given File:ASm03wiki.jpg. The year might not have corrected when the image was rename. The same may have happened for other. With list of all images and years, I could check or update them. If you want to generate one, please add it at User:Enhanging999/Sandbox/Years.

A few have 1980 (Category:1980 in rail transport in Switzerland), but even with ca. 1980. They may be off far:

File:SBB Historic - F 122 01171 003 - Weesen ehemaliges Stationsgebaeude Bahnseite.jpg has 1980 (I added the "?"). It's an important picture as it shows the station before it was moved to a different location (1969).
File:SBB Historic - F 122 01184 002 - Wiesendangen Stationsgebaeude Bahnseite.jpg. Wikipedia has it that the building was torn done in 1975.

Enhancing999 (talk) 10:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deloading of locomotive in Haifa.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The photo up for deletion — File:Deloading of locomotive in Haifa.jpg — appears to be from a panel at the Israel Railway Museum with a credit there to the SLM-Archiv. Can you weigh in on the discussion? Also, if a better version of the image can be uploaded by SBB Historic with correct information, that would be greatly appreciated. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! This picture is contained in a Fotoalbum of the former company SLM Winterthur. These albums are now in the archives of SBB Historic. You can find the photo mentioned here: [4]https://www.sbbarchiv.ch/detail.aspx?ID=405444 . It would be possible, to upload a better version, if desired. SBB Historic (talk) 13:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fantastic! Thank you so much. If you could upload a new version with the proper info, that would be great and then we can delete this lower quality one. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stations without images (or categories)

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Railway stations without image categories on Wikimedia Commons (May 2023)

As a reverse to the categorization work done on Berner's photos, here a map of stations without images (or at least categories) on Commons. The file description page includes a link to the tool generating this directly (and updating occasionally). Anyways, thanks again for your uploads. Enhancing999 (talk) 10:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Photographie autorail PLM à Vallorbe

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour, pour un article que je suis en train d'écrire sur Wikipédia, je souhaiterais savoir si ces deux photographies : SV_187_13 et SV_187_12 sont libres et s'il est possible de les importer sur Commons ? En vous remerciant par avance, je vous souhaite une bonne journée. VateGV ^{◦ taper la discut’ ◦} 12:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Versenkung der "Säntis"

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Liebe Leute von SBB Historic, könnt ihr vielleicht etwas zu den Fragen in dieser Diskussion sagen? Vielen Dank! Gestumblindi (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]