Reptilien.19831209BE1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Reptilien.19831209BE1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Reptilien.19831209BE1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Reptilien.19831209BE1,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Photos d'oeuvres de plus de 100 ans

Bonsoir, Merci de votre précédente réponse. Pour les oeuvres dont je connaissais l'auteur et que je savais être plus que centenaires, j'ai mis le nom d'auteur avec ses dates et j'ai ajouté à la suite de permission

	This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.
	This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.

https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse

comme vous l'avez indiqué : Je suppose que c'est suffisant ? Il reste portant des avertissements, notamment pour le droit d'auteur aux USA ? Une autre oeuvre réalisée en 1899 est celle d'un dessinateur canadien mort en 1932. Suivant les règles de domaine public de ce pays (50 ans après la mort de l'auteur ou 75 après l'exécution de l'oeuvre)je suppose donc que le domaine public est avéré mais que faut-il mettre ? et où ? Enfin, certaines oeuvres sont plus que centenaires mais j'ignore le nom et la date du décès de l'auteur, sans doute pourtant antérieure à la limite des 70 ans du domaine public français. Le cas est-il prévu ? et comment le résoudre ?

Je me permets une remarque sur l'aide à l'importation de fichiers que je ne trouve pas très claire pour un néophyte, mais peut-être ne sais-je pas où chercher ? Un tutoriel avec exemple serait un plus (existe-t-il ?) Cordialement --PatBdM (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Ne vous souciez pas des avertissements, je les retirerai une fois toutes les conditions remplies. Pouvez-vous me dire d'où proviennent les images suivantes (revue, livre, ...) :

* Jules-Herbette.jpg

* Ignotus SP1887-2.jpg

* Paul-Perret (1830-1904).jpg

* Louis-Herbette-1895.jpg (1)

Pour ce qui est de Louis-Herbette-Montréal-1899.jpg par Raoul Barré (1874-1932), le modèle à utiliser est {{PD-old-70}}, les conditions me semblent bonnes.

Pour le reste (1), si l'auteur est inconnu (ça arrive) alors c'est la date de publication, quand elle est connue, qui importe.

Concernant le formulaire d'importation, à quel moment avez-vous éprouvé des difficultés ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 22:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Photos d’œuvres de plus de cent ans

Bonjour et merci de votre réponse, J'ai complété les sources et les noms d'auteurs lorsque je les connaissais. J'ai ajouté un fichier Louis Herbette-1903 en renseignant la description, j'ai ajouté postérieurement une catégorie dans la description, elle ne semble pas prise en compte ? Il reste le cas de fichiers pour lesquels les auteurs sont inconnus. Leur ancienneté plus que centenaire est suffisante pour qu'ils soient considérés dans le domaine public ? Les multiples liens ne sont pas toujours d'une aide, il y a tellement de pages que l'on finit par ne plus savoir où retrouver celui qui va bien ! Je suppose que ce n'est pas un problème pour ceux qui pratiquent tous les jours. Merci encore pour votre aide et de me rassurer sur la conservation de ces images, après tout, c'est plus important pour Wikipédia que pour moi. cordialement --PatBdM (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour PatBdM. Tout d'abord, rassurez-vous, généralement tout se passe bien et rares sont les images qui finissent à la poubelle ; quand elles le sont c'est principalement pour des raisons de violation du droit d'auteur ou par manque d'informations sur leur origine de la part de l'importateur (c'est le problème auquel vous avez été confronté).

• Quelle catégorie avez-vous ajoutée ? Moi je vois la catégorie French Third Republic. J'avais créé la catégorie Louis-Herbette, mais après réflexion je pense qu'il faudrait que je la renomme en Louis Herbette. Lorsque vous importez une image à l'aide du formulaire assisté, et que vous inscrivez dans le champ catégories (lors de la deuxième étape) une catégorie qui n'existe pas, elle apparaît en rouge, et une fois que vous validez le formulaire un message d'avertissement apparaît. Ce n'est pas grave, validez le formulaire ! Si vous avez envie, n'hésitez pas à créer la page de la catégorie inexistante. Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien rouge, inscrire dans la zone de texte le wikicode de la ou les catégories parentes (ex: [[Category:French personalities]]), puis enregistrer la page. J'avoue que ce n'est pas aussi évident car les catégories sont en anglais et il faut chercher les catégories qui nous intéresse.
• Les licences, ce n'est simple pour personne ! Là encore rassurez-vous ! Pour les images dont l'auteur est inconnu, c'est la date de publication qui sert au calcul (voir Commons:Licensing/fr, partiellement traduit). Si l'oeuvre a été publiée avant 1923 alors elle est dans le domaine public. Si elle a été publiée en 1924, elle n'entrera dans le domaine public qu'en 2020 (95 ans de protection).

Si vous avez un problème dans une étape en particulier, n'hésitez pas à me recontacter, j'essaierai d'être le plus complet possible. N'ayez pas peur de faire des bêtises, c'est ainsi qu'on apprend. Y'aura toujours quelqu'un pour vous apporter l'aide dont vous avez besoin. De mon coté, je regarde vos contributions et apporterai les corrections si besoin en expliquant mes actions sur votre page de discussion.

Bonne contributions. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 15:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Li vatche d' Ofagne

Waitîz ene miete mes astocas po l' wårder sol pådje di dmande di rsaetchaedje.

Si vos ploz mete l' anêye ki s' pa est cité dins l' BDGLW, ci sereut bén.

--Lucyin (talk) 11:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Possibly spurious deletion request

I had a virtually identical deletion request by a user named User:Nativo Perú as yours. There were no responses and I think it was a spurious one. -V madhu (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC).

Yes I think so. Maybe @Achim: would be kind enough to close all these nonsense requests, as he did for this file. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 14:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Hostin.jpg

File:Hostin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Autopatroller

Bonjour, Je t'ai donné le droit Autopatroller. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Ah, et bien merci pour la confiance accordée. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 12:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lucien Mahin, Bruno Picard - Bruno d’Aurvaye tchante Louline Vôye, 1993 (in Les Cahiers Wallons, num. 10, p. 145-163).djvu

Copyright status: File:Lucien Mahin, Bruno Picard - Bruno d’Aurvaye tchante Louline Vôye, 1993 (in Les Cahiers Wallons, num. 10, p. 145-163).djvu

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lucien Mahin, Bruno Picard - Bruno d’Aurvaye tchante Louline Vôye, 1993 (in Les Cahiers Wallons, num. 10, p. 145-163).djvu. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Fitchî "Bruno d' Årveye..".

Nén co rapexhî: Loukîz roci Lucyin (talk) 16:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Godefroid Halleux - Li mariège d’à Grongtâ, 1892 (in BSLLW s.2-t.19 p.417-458).djvu

Please add a completed {{Book}} template, It helps Wikisource and cataloguing here on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Casimir Guyon de Montlivault - 1770 - 1846.png

File:Casimir Guyon de Montlivault - 1770 - 1846.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De Montlivault Amandine (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)