User talk:Prenn/2013

Languages vi Thành viên này dùng tiếng Việt như ngôn ngữ mẹ đẻ. en-4 This user speaks English at a near-native level. fr-2 Cette personne peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire de français. Archives 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Contents

Talk Dịch POTY Bạn coi thử vì sao trang Galleries khi chọn tiếng Việt thì ô Index lại vừa có cả tiếng Anh với bản dịch của mình thế? Tuankiet65 (talk) 10:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC) P/s: Ta dịch luôn trang FAQ được không Tuankiet65 (talk) 10:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC) Picture of the Year voting round 1 open Dear Wikimedians, Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria: Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL). Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors. For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year. To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013. Thanks, the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capsicum annuum var 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and util, Please, fix the notes maybe cloning --The Photographer 16:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Done. Please review again. Thanks! Prenn 17:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)  Info Please fix the  Underexposed too --The Photographer 18:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC) I fixed the UE zone too. Can't seem to do more without making it look visibly "fake". Prenn 00:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)  Info Lightroom, ++shadonws and noise reduction are the way --The Photographer 02:41, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Oh thanks, forgot about that. I've reworked the image from the original one. Prenn 05:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)  Info Well done, please remember add geotag --The Photographer 17:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clitoria ternatea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 15:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron simsii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC) Nominate for deletion Chúng ta nên dịch giao diện của công cụ này sang tiếng Việt. Tranminh360 (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochna integerrima 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabilis jalapa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clitoria ternatea 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}} Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantana montevidensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerbera × hybrida 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 20:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plumbago zeylanica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agapanthus africanus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Ochna serrulata Hi, I am quite sure that this photo is not Ochna serrulata. The following photos show typical Ochna serrulata: File:Starr 020815-0057 Ochna serrulata.jpg, File:Ochna serrulata fg01.JPG. The leaves are densely and sharply serrate and there are no white bristles at the basal margin of the leaves as in your plant. Also shape and consistency of the leaves look a bit different and also the nervature. I am not yet sure about your plant, but I think it is Category:Ochna thomasiana (or maybe Category:Ochna kirkii). Both these species are from Eastern Africa and at least Ochna thomasiana is cultivated and has become naturalised in Hawaii (PDF) and French Polynesia. So, it is not unlikely that it is also cultivated in Asia. Regards --Franz Xaver (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus radiatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AmaryllisGardener 20:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psophocarpus tetragonolobus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)