Pitert
Image:Bighornbattle nowy pl.svg deletion
editHi Pitert, I see you marked this for deletion. Did you know you can just upload over the top of an old image, if the name is OK? I think you must know, because you did it on this image. :) So I'll just assume that you wanted to give it a better name. cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:HenriCornet.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:HenriCornet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Howcheng 19:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that the original photograph is most likely public domain, but the addition of his name to it has to be more recent and its inclusion would mean it's a new image and therefore subject to copyright by whomever put it there. I tried to do a Google search but was unable to find an unaltered version of it myself. Howcheng 17:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Your flag images
editPlease re-upload them without borders. Borders defined in the SVG are redundant, as they can be added to images in the wikicode. Denelson83 22:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I see you requested speedy deletion for this image, but you didn't give a reason. Speedy deletion only applies in a few cases defined in Commons:Deletion guidelines, so please read that and once you know the reason, you can tag it for deletion again. Thanks -- pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Michaelowen.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Michaelowen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 17:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've now deleted it.
- James F. (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Myszków
editZ tego co wiem w herbie Myszkowa jest godło PRLu bez korony. Czy mógłbyś to poprawić? Pozdrawiam --Poznaniak 18:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Eknomos battle.svg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Eknomos battle.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 19:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Zmiana licencji z GFDL na CC-BY-SA
editJeśli wolisz dać także licencję Creative Commons, to nie usuwaj ze zdjęć licencji GFDL. Podwójna licencja jest lepszym rozwiązaniem, gdyż licencje CC nie są kompatybilne z GFDL. A.J. 08:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Is there any reason why this image shows dim yellow on dim gray, instead of bright gold on white? AnonMoos 14:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- OK, but Image:Armoiries Jérusalem.png sacrifices accurate colors in favor of a fancy gradient color shading effect, while Image:Armoiries Jérusalem.svg has inaccurate colors without the fancy effect... Image Image:Kingdom of Jerusalem COA.svg has better colors. AnonMoos 17:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Wrocław flaga
editFlagą Miasta jest prostokątny płat tkaniny w kolorach czerwonym i żółtym. Stosunek szerokości flagi do jej długości wynosi: 5:8. Zezwala się na umieszczenie herbu Miasta na tle flagi (Źródło:Statut Wrocławia) o fladzie i wzór Herb, Logo, Barwy Wrocławia znajduje się tam wzór w postaci grafiki. Bankotravel 17:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Richard-Virenque-TdF2004_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Morten LJ 08:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Pantani.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Witaj! Widzę, że masz na koncie kilka flag (bardzo ładnych :)). Tak więc, mógłbyś poprawić, skorygować flagę podaną w tytule? Ja nie mogę się zdecydować na kolor flagi, bo w dzienniku ustaw [1] jest jedynie słaby skan, który lekko zniekształca kolory. Ja tam się zbytnio nie znam na tych wszystkich kolorach a chciałbym żeby moja gmina miała flagę na wiki. Pozdrawiam i liczę na pomoc eksperta :) Bandurr 16:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
BMX / Acrobatic bicycle
editI see that some time ago you made Category:Acrobatic bicycle a subcategory of Category:BMX. That doesn't make sense to me: shouldn't it be the other way around? Presumably every BMX is an acrobatic bicycle, but there are acrobatic bicycles that are not BMXs. - Jmabel ! talk 02:53, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Gmina_wasniow_flaga.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Gmina Lichnowy flaga.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 10:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This is a really cool map. What program did you use to make it? What tools? Jade Knight (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Piotr. I'm working on a textbook on sustainable developement and would like to include your photo of the Draisienne. The book will be sold by a university press, so it is a commercial operation which falls outside of the current licence (I think). Would it still be possible to obtain the permission to use it (with due credit, of course). You can contact me at efranc65<at>yahoo.com . Best, Eric
Copyright status: Image:Cs1920a.svg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Cs1920a.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
File:Czeslawlang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Rikvansteenbergen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:21, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Gmina_kolbuszowa_flaga.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Eknomosbitwa 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |