Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pierrette13!

File:Logo Fréquence Protestante 2014.jpg

edit
 
File:Logo Fréquence Protestante 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thomas Schiex.jpg

edit

La photo est effectivement celle de T. Schiex (facilement comparable à celle accessible ici: https://www.echosciences-sud.fr/articles/thomas-schiex-recoit-le-eurai-fellows-pour-ses-travaux-exceptionnels-au-service-de-l-intelligence-artificielle) et est libre de droit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tschiex (talk • contribs) 11:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour @Tschiex: , si vous êtes effectivement Thomas Schiex, ce n'est pas ici que vous devez argumenter mais sur la page de la photo. Par ailleurs, si vous êtes TS, n'avez-vous pas une photo de meilleure résolution ?? --Pierrette13 (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour @Pierette13: , oui, je suis bien moi :-) J'ai une photo de bonne résolution (demandée par AAAI), prise par le service de comm. de mon entreprise, avec un copyright INRAE mais libre de droit. Cela conviendrait (désolé, je suis un débutant en wikimédia). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tschiex (talk • contribs) 10:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour @Tschiex: ben oui, mettez-la en ligne comme vous avez fait pour la précédente, bonne journée à vous, --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 10:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Vera, no problem for me, already some licence problem with the Rotterdam Museum, best regards, --Pierrette13 (talk) 11:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

votre contribution article Evelyne Josse

edit

Bonjour vous proposez la suppression de la photo pour l'article Evelyne Josse. je ne comprend pas pourquoi, nous en avons les droits, elle est utilisée sur notre site internet. pouvez vous m'expliquer ? Merci — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:E0A:472:2E90:A497:C732:921C:FB09 (talk) 17:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Vous devez prouver vos droits sur la photo de cette personne, je vous invite à le faire sans tarder, vous trouverez des indications sur la page Commons:Contribuer avec vos propres travaux, cordialement, --Pierrette13 (talk) 17:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
et vous faites de meme sur le photo de Jean Godin que j'ai pris moi même il y a plus de 20 ans... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:E0A:472:2E90:A497:C732:921C:FB09 (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Bonsoir, là aussi, vous devez attester de vos droits à publier cette photo, suivez le lien que je vous ai indiqué, cordialement, --Pierrette13 (talk) 19:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 09:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Merci Racconish, c'est seulement après avoir modifié la photo que j'ai constaté qu'elle ne respectait vraisemblablement les droits, bonne journée à toi, --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oui, c'est un peu bizarre de te notifier, certes automatiquement, un problème que tu m'as toi-même signalé... Cordialement, — Racconish💬 10:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oui mais je te consultais n'étant pas sûre de mes compétences dans ce domaine..., merci + --Pierrette13 (talk) 10:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Celia Hodent photo libre de droits (cropped).jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Celia Hodent photo libre de droits (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Celia Hodent photo libre de droits (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello EugeneZelenko, as far as I am concerned, you can delete this picture : I just cropped it because it was very large, best regards, --Pierrette13 (talk) 16:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I tagged this photo with original. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Agnes maitland (cropped).jpg

edit
 
File:Agnes maitland (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The artist died in 1964. This work was not commissioned by the UK Government or another equivalent institution, so the standard UK copyright protection (70 years pma) applies here. This work would be out of copyright on January 1, 2035.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

83.61.243.178 21:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, as far as I am concerned, no problem, I created a cropped version of an existing file, best regards, --Pierrette13 (talk) 06:04, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Copyright status: File:Pierre Delion.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pierre Delion.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, j'ai ajouté la licence {{Cc-by-4.0}} --Pierrette13 (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello Racconish, si tu passes par là, j'ai essayé de me débrouiller seule, je ne sais pas si cela convient, bonne fin de journée et merci, --Pierrette13 (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, il y a deux aspects. Tout d'abord, quand tu téléverses un fichier provenant d'une page trouvée sur internet où elle a été mise à disposition sous une licence compatible avec Commons, il est préférable d'ajouter le modèle {{LicenseReview}} pour qu'un vérificateur de licence vérifie cette conformité. Cette vérification offre l'avantage, la licence CC-BY étant irrévocable, que le maintien sur Commons sera assuré, même si la licence change ultérieurement sur la page d'origine. Au cas particulier, je n'ai pas trouvé de licence CC-BY sur le site des Editions Eres. Où l'as-tu vue ? Cordialement, — Racconish💬 18:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello Racconish, il y a eu cette discussion [1] avec l'indication que les photos d'auteurs Erès disponibles sur leur site étaient libres de droit et en effet, ils l'indiquent sur leur page mentions légales - Propriété intellectuelle : "Les photos de nos auteurs figurant sur notre site sont libres de droit". --Pierrette13 (talk) 18:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Cela me semble suffisant, bien que pas très bien fait : il y a une contradiction entre la mention "libre de droits" et la nécessité d'une autorisation. Mais bon, je pense que ça peut passer. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 18:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Merci Racconish, oui en effet, mais comme ils ne proposent que trois photos, je n'essaye pas de les contacter (surtout que je ne suis pas vraiment intéressée par deux d'entre elles). Bonne soirée et à la prochaine, --Pierrette13 (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

edit
 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Fanque at Astley's.jpg

edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Fanque at Astley's.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Fanque at Astley's.jpg

edit

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Fanque at Astley's.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Magog the Ogre, est-ce que c'est ok maintenant ou est-ce que je dois faire quelque chose ? Merci à vous, @Racconish, best regards, --Pierrette13 (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The file is fine now. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:AyaNakamura-Sep232019 (cropped).jpg

edit
 
File:AyaNakamura-Sep232019 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Crop of an image deleted per COM:NETCOPYVIO
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Nacaru (talk) 07:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Nacaru, I just cropped this image. As far as I am concerned, it can be deleted, best regards, --Pierrette13 (talk) 08:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Mural Belfast.jpg

edit
 
File:Mural Belfast.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 20:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply