User talk:PetarM/Archive 8

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fire salamander (Salamandra Salamandra).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fire salamander (Salamandra Salamandra).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Badnjak

Zdravo Petre, fale nam kvalitetne fotografije Badnjaka. Ukoliko budeš mogao/želeo, molim te napravi neke, kako ti umeš, tokom narednih praznika. Pozdrav, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 01:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

• Sadkσ: Veoma teško ove godine zbog virusa. A verujem bilo bi to bolje negde u Srbiji ili pravoslavnih krajevima slikati. Kod nas to jedino kod crkve. Verovatno si milsio na paljenje ili same grane ? --Mile (talk) 15:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Разумем; мислим на саме гране, паљење је секундарно. Имамо сјајан чланак на ен.вики на ту тему али не и једнако сјајну фотографију. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 16:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 Slovenia

Slovenščina: Dragi Petar, hvala za tvoj prispevek za drugi natečaj Wiki Loves Monuments v Sloveniji! Žirija je ocenila prispele fotografije in ta torek, 8. decembra, bomo ob 18h razglasili zmagovalce. Priključiš se lahko temu namenjenemu Zoom srečanju in si ogledaš zmagovalne fotografije ter kratko predstavitev natečaja. Vabljen!

English: Dear Petar, thank you for participating in the second Wiki Loves Monuments competition in Slovenia! The jury has completed scoring the contributions and we will announce the winners this Tuesday, 8 December, at 18h. You're invited to tune in to the dedicated Zoom meeting at this time, to see the winning photographs and a short presentation of the competition (it will be in Slovene only). Best,

— Yerpo ^Eh? 17:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

• Yerpo hvala za obvestilo. Ali bo možen tudi poznejši ogled ali samo v živo ?--Mile (talk) 12:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

MZaplotnik je postavil Zoom, on bo vedel, če je možno snemanje. — Yerpo ^Eh? 12:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

::MZaplotnik bilo bi dobro če bo kje še posnetek za kasneje. --Mile (talk) 13:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Živjo! Bom snemal in poskusil kam naložiti za poznejši ogled. Se vidimo! MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Petar, preveri prosim e-mail, tvoj naslov bom rabil, da ti pošljem nagrado. Čestitke še enkrat! :) — Yerpo ^Eh? 06:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Yerpo, MZaplotnik preveril in videl. Lepo je videti pa še kdo drug lahko pogleda. Zato bi tole dal kar na Wikipedijo v ta članek. Ali Youtube. Naj ostane del Wiki Slovenije. Sam pa bom moral kupiti mikrofon. --Mile (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics (Ravenna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, interesting composition --PantheraLeo1359531 15:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics (Ravenna).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics (Ravenna).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, PetarM! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Malindi Elmore (2010).jpg

Copyright status: File:Malindi Elmore (2010).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Malindi Elmore (2010).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asics Gel-Cumulus 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Asics Gel-Cumulus 22.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Asics Gel-Cumulus 22.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Kifli made with spelt flour (Serbian cuisine).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:2007 Tour of California

Category:2007 Tour of California is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Also, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Parboiled rice with chicken, peppers, cucurbita, peas and tomato.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Gotha.JPG

File:Gotha.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 00:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vegetarian Pizza.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vegetarian Pizza.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cup of coffee (Serbian cuisine, Grand kava).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; tight bottom crop but good sharpness. --Peulle 21:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC) I love it! FP for me. -- Ikan Kekek 01:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drop of water on water-resistant textile (100% polyester).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful & very good. --Selbymay 11:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Drop of water on water-resistant textile (100% polyester).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drop of water on water-resistant textile (100% polyester).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serbian Easter breakfast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asparagus soup (spargelsuppe).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Easter breakfast in Serbia (close-up).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Easter breakfast in Serbia (close-up).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Easter breakfast in Serbia (close-up).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mizuno Wave Ibuki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 17:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Asparagus soup (spargelsuppe).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Asparagus soup (spargelsuppe).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mizuno Wave Ibuki 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mizuno Wave Ibuki 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Olympus E-M1 Mark III Zuiko 12-100mm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olympus E-M1 Mark III Zuiko 12-100mm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronze Age applied art and craft 2nd millenium BC (National Museum of Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anchusa officinalis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very detailed! -- Ikan Kekek 08:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ozalphakan2 09:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Mother of God Trenousa (17-18. century).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Šljivovica (Serbian Slivovitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Theotokos Glykofilousa (16th century; Богородица Умиљења).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Velvet 06:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Šareni pasulj obrok (pinto beans).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anchusa officinalis.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anchusa officinalis.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Mother of God Trenousa (17-18. century).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Mother of God Trenousa (17-18. century).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympus E-M1 Mark III Zuiko 12-100mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Good evening PeterM,

Thank you very much for the comments on my photo of the painting. I have updated the list with the brush on your advice. I hope it's that good. But the surface to be worked was not completely level. That also does not work with the pecel.
Kind regards from Friesland.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

• @Agnes Monkelbaan i would probably even cut that wood out, it is not part of the painting, reflections etc. Maybe even not original, so who would care. That insciptions bellow i would write beside od description. --Mile (talk) 07:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you for your advice. I will think about it. As long as the vote lasts, I'll leave it that way. Otherwise it might get too confusing. Have a good evening.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olympus E-M1 Mark III.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deesis with Saints, triptych 18-19 cent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Deesis with Saints, triptych 18-19 cent.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deesis with Saints, triptych 18-19 cent.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pylon Ada Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 15:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram station "Branko's bridge" in 2021 (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very well! Excellent composition. --Mosbatho 15:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ada Bridge pylon (Sava river, Belgrade).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ada Bridge pylon (Sava river, Belgrade).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ada Bridge pylon (Sava river, Belgrade).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Sava (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Church of Saint Sava (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of Saint Sava (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pylon of Ada Bridge by night (Sava river, Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tram station "Branko's bridge" in 2021 (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tram station "Branko's bridge" in 2021 (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Healing of the Blind Man (copy, National Museum of Serbia, 14th Century).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 21:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Good morning PetarM,

Thanks for the note on my photo. Unfortunately I can't detect the pink pixels. Otherwise I would have liked them. deleted. My eyes are probably getting smaller. Sorry.
Greetings--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of Ljubljana Cathedral (strop Cerkev sv. Nikolaja, Ljubljana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dragon on the Dragon Bridge (Ljubljana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling of Ljubljana Cathedral (strop Cerkev sv. Nikolaja, Ljubljana).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Ljubljana Cathedral (strop Cerkev sv. Nikolaja, Ljubljana).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceiling of Ljubljana Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Škofja Loka Castle (Škofjeloški grad, Slovenija).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Škofjeloški grad panorama (panorama of Loka Castle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of the National Museum of Slovenia (Ljubljana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Škofja Loka Castle (Škofjeloški grad, Slovenija).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Škofja Loka Castle (Škofjeloški grad, Slovenija).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Re:Urgent file rename

Hello Mile: Due to an error in the filemover extension, it appears to me that another user was the one who had requested the transfer. Sorry for the inconvenience, I've already done it. MONUMENTA Talk 12:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling of the National Museum of Slovenia (Ljubljana).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of the National Museum of Slovenia (Ljubljana).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Sugar factory (Cukrarna, Ljubljana) v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Divje Babe flute (Late Pleistocene flute).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Divje Babe flute (Late Pleistocene flute).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jekleni most pri Radečah (Iron bridge on Sava river at Radeče; IG. GRIDL fabrik, 1894).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Old Sugar factory (Cukrarna, Ljubljana).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old Sugar factory (Cukrarna, Ljubljana).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)