Image:Haeckel Prosobranchia big spots.jpg

edit

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to same categories as original image.

EugeneZelenko 16:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Category:Snodgrass

edit

Can you explain the rational on why these images are in the public domain? As far as I can tell they are from a book that was published with a copyright notice in 1930. I really hope you know something I don't because that book is great, but I can't see why it is PD.--BirgitteSB 23:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Ofo1.png

edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ofo1.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 10:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Status_ESA_Delisted.svg

edit

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 12:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Publish-by-type.svg

edit

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 15:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your images

edit

Did you really mean for all images using Template:IUCN_Pengo to be deleted or did you just accidentally edit the template instead of a specific image page? Here is a list of all the images that are to be deleted if you want all the images using that template using that template to be deleted.

Also, please subst templates if you're using user-specific ones and keep your specific templates in your userspace. Thanks, Yonatanh 20:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Image-Biological_classification_S_Pengo.svg

edit

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 12:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Chimp3,_Pengo.svg

edit
Image deletion warning Image:Chimp3,_Pengo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yonatan talk 01:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dryococelus australis

edit

Pershaps you like to read here: http://waste.ideal.es/insectojurasico.htm --Tano4595 14:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Aquila audax nest 01 Pengo.jpg

edit

You couldn't rotate that photo, could you?--Robek (talk|contribs) 10:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done already. Pengo 10:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victorian Central Highlands log dump 03 Pengo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Image Tagging Image:Phosphor burn-in Pengo.jpg

edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Phosphor burn-in Pengo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 78.49.168.214 06:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The image Image:Phosphor burn-in Pengo.jpg contains the tag {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}}. Why have you tagged it as lacking a license? Pengo 02:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Butterfly

edit

Dear Pengo, i nominated a new version of my Butterfly on COM:FPC and withdrawn the old nomination. Maybe you want to drop an eye on it again ? :-) Thanks Richard --Richard Bartz 11:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Status_iucn2.3_EW.svg

edit
Image deletion warning Image:Status_iucn2.3_EW.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

208.108.159.19 19:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Biological classification L Pengo.svg

edit

Hi, Pengo. Do you have an unlabelled version of Image:Biological classification L Pengo.svg? If so, could you please upload it. I'd like to use it within Template:Annotated image, which has some big advantages: the text is just text, so translation to another language does not require a new version of the image; most images are typically used as thumbnails, and Template:Annotated image makes it easier to ensure that the text is legible at thumbnail size; wikilinks can be added without the hassle of imagemaps. See examples at Template:Annotated image/doc/Samples. Dutch Wikipeida is now using Template:Annotated image after I had a discussion with a Dutch editor, see for example Sjabloon:Mariene extincties. This way artists like you are freed of a lot of chores which can be handled by non-artistic editors like me.

I'd prefer a version with no boxes for the labels, as the boxes might cause problems at smaller sizes - I can add boxes by wrapping the level names in HTML SPAN tags with suitable background-color and border properties (I'm useless at art but OK with HTML and CSS). -- Philcha (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Pengo!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Buttered cat.png

edit

Hi Pengo,

The cropped cartoon license was invalid. The original you cropped was under cc-by-sa licence you can't add the GFDL licence. Just to inform you that I ve corrected it. ;) --Pixeltoo (talk) 17:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oops, dunno how I did that. Thanks, btw. Pengo (talk) 06:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template:Pengo DECF

edit

As part of the GFDL 1.3 license migration project, I've edited Template:Pengo DECF to mark any files tagged with it as eligible for relicensing under CC-BY-SA-3.0. As you'd already multilicensed the files under CC-BY-2.5, I assume you probably have no objection to this. However, if you do, feel free to revert my edit and please see the links above for instructions on how to tag the files individually. Thank you for your contributions, and have a nice day. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problems. Pengo (talk) 06:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Upload_howto_en_screenshot.png

edit
 
File:Upload_howto_en_screenshot.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Create graphics for stubs?

edit

I created a couple of stub templates at en.wiki that could use a graphic similar to this one. (Its stub template on en.wiki can be seen here.) There is a file you created that has two graphics that would be perfect for the recently created stub templates, and I was wondering if you would create the Commons stub graphics from your large graphic and add them to the en.wiki stub templates when you get some time?

Your graphic. The stub templates requiring a graphic can be found here: Red alga and here: Brown alga.

If you don't have time, I will ask someone else to do so. The graphics are perfect for the stub templates, and I'm glad I came across them. Thanks for creating them. --Kleopatra (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I use some of your photos

edit

Hi Peter!

I have use two photos of Pleurodeles walti from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directy in the follow links and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") twice:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33364

If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Peter%20Halasz

This is my "contributor card", for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn


In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón --Fernando.lison (talk)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

File:Salt water fish with Finnish text.jpg

edit
 
File:Salt water fish with Finnish text.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Chub Pengo.jpg

edit
 
File:Chub Pengo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.138.4.211 13:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Preferred values 05 Pengo.svg

edit

I've added a note about the color choices in this image. (The same note applies to the other images in the series that use resistor color codes.) Specifically, the violet bands render more as pink than violet. I am unable to correct the images because Commons doesn't appear to recognize my SVG files. If you are able to correct the issue, please do. WikiDan61 (talk) 12:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi @WikiDan61: The files were created in Inkscape, but if you're having trouble editing them you can just use a text editor. The colour in question is #ee82ee so you can search and replace that with another hex color code. It only appears twice in this file. Pengo (talk) 00:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  Done For all three files in the series that included the resistor color code (02, 03 and 05). WikiDan61 (talk) 12:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Pimelea spicata

edit

Hello Pengo,

Thanks for your fantastic images in commons.

In 2007, you uploaded three images labelled Pimelea spicata, photographed in the Australian National Botanic Gardens. One of those images was considered a "featured picture". Unfortunately, the images are of another endangered Australian plant, Zieria baeuerlenii. Possibly the two species were growing together in the Gardens and the labels were swapped, or poorly located. Pimelea spicata has tubular flowers with sparsely hairy sepals, whereas Zieria baeuerlenii has velvety, triangular sepals. You might also notice the similarity of the leaves in your images with those in the Royal Botanic Gardens article.

The images can stay as they are of course, but in the interest of accuracy, it would perhaps be better to request a move.

Best wishes to you. Gderrin (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Gderrin: Oops! Thanks for letting me know. I'll get the images moved. Pengo (talk) 01:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ravens

edit

Thanks mate. I'll see what I can do. Sardaka (talk) 07:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Sardaka: Cheers! Thanks for having a look —Pengo (talk) 11:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:User-info.svg

edit
 
File:User-info.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KUZANGAMANA Christian (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply