Lucasbosch

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Some of the best photography of objects, along with your SVGs, I've seen. WClarke (talk) 01:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotions

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AKG C214 Condenser microphone.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AKG C214 Condenser microphone.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Standardgraph 2522 2.5 to 7mm lettering guides.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Standardgraph 2522 2.5 to 7mm lettering guides.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rotring Isograph and Rapidograph Technical Pens disassembled.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Rotring Technical Pens by Lucasbosch has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rotring Isograph 0.35 mm Technical Pen.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Rotring Technical Pens by Lucasbosch has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rotring Rapidograph 0.35 mm Technical Pen.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Rotring Technical Pens by Lucasbosch has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rotring Rapidograph Technical Pens 0.1–2.0 mm.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Rotring Technical Pens by Lucasbosch has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Mahr Micromar 40A 0-25mm Micrometer.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM DSLR lens, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM DSLR lens has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gedore No. 7 combination wrenches 6–19 mm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gedore No. 7 combination wrenches 6–19 mm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Glardon Vallorbe LA2442-0 140 mm Swiss cut 0 6-piece needle file set.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glardon Vallorbe LA2442-0 140 mm Swiss cut 0 6-piece needle file set.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juchheim Laborgeräte lifting stage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahr Micromar 40A 0–25 mm Micrometer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 20:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universal clamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stainless steel laboratory bossheads 13mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duran Group GL45 thread PBT screw caps with PTFE coated seal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DURAN® laboratory bottle 500ml.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me and useful --DKrieger 21:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DURAN® laboratory bottle amber 100ml.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light source on the right too invasive --Poco a poco 21:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)  Done I've fixed the issue now. Please vote again if it's a QI for you. --Lucasbosch 22:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC) Good job, QI, Poco a poco 22:51, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RCT basic IKAMAG® safety control magnetic stirrer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RCT basic IKAMAG® safety control magnetic stirrer backside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exploding E Match.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 09:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DURAN® laboratory bottle 500ml 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO QI --The Photographer 12:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DURAN® laboratory bottle 250ml.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Kadellar 14:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silicon nitride Si3N4 bearing balls 1–20 mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo SkywalkerPL 09:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pepperl+Fuchs capacitive sensor CJ8-18GM-E2-V1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Can you add in the description an indication about the size? Jastrow 08:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pepperl+Fuchs inductive proximity switch 3RG4113-3AG33-PF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Can you add in the description an indication about the size? Jastrow 08:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stainless steel 1.4034 X46Cr13 bearing ball 60mm G100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed stainless. --Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silicon nitride Si3N4 bearing ball 10 mm G10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silicon nitride Si3N4 bearing ball 20 mm G28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zirconium dioxide ZrO2 bearing ball 6 mm G10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manfrotto MH054M0-Q2 magnesium ball head.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahr Millimess 1003 4334000 mechanical dial comparator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SICK WL12G-3B2531 Photoelectric reflex switch angled3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SICK WL12G-3B2531 Photoelectric reflex switch flat.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SICK WL12G-3B2531 Photoelectric reflex switch angled upright.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SICK WL12G-3B2531 Photoelectric reflex switch angled2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AKG C214 condenser microphone with H85 shock mount.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AKG C214 Condenser microphone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 20:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raspberry Pi B+ top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raspberry Pi B+ bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahr MarCator 810 A dial indicator.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit unusual with the png format, but I suppose that is allow transparency. --Slaunger 19:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LED LENSER T7M LED flashlight.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Standardgraph 2522 2.5 to 7mm lettering guides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure, if a scan of an object is eligible for QIC. --Cccefalon 15:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality -> QI. --Coyau 16:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC) These are real studio photographs stitched together, no scans. --Lucasbosch 16:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC)  Support No need to send to CR, Lucas, I trust your word. The EXIF was just not clear about this issue. --Cccefalon 19:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Standardgraph 1309 metric nut stencil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Standardgraph 1310 radius stencil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Standardgraph 1186 isometric dimetric stencil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Standardgraph 1316 circle stencil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zirconium dioxide ZrO2 bearing balls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TrueRC X²-AIR 5.8 GHz crosshair antenna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahr Millimess 1003 4334000 mechanical dial comparator transparent.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TrueRC X-AIR 5.8 GHz crosshair antenna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lerche 4007 scissors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FrSky X9D Taranis plus 2.4 GHz handheld RC transmitter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Categorisation could be better --Ermell 08:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flashlight tail cap switch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumold 1052 geometry set square 225 mm clear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SICK WL12G-3B2531 Photoelectric reflex switch angled1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Young Common Wall Lizard (Podarcis muralis).png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 12:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahr Millimess 1003 4334000 mechanical dial comparator transparent.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SICK WL12G-3B2531 Photoelectric reflex switch angled1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TeamBlacksheep (TBS) Unify Pro HV 5.8 GHz RF video transmitter with RP SMA pigtail front.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universal clamp transparent.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful image. --Peulle 21:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TeamBlacksheep (TBS) Unify Pro 5.8 GHz HV RF video transmitter with RP SMA pigtail back.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 11:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runcam Eagle black FPV camera with bracket.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RP-SMA connectors in WiFi antennas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schott Duran 500 ml clear laboratory flask with PTFE screw cap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahr MarCal 16 N vernier caliper.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foxeer XAT600M HS1177 FPV camera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one is better. Good quality. --W.carter 12:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS 7D DSLR body front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS 7D DSLR body front cap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS 7D DSLR body back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campione del Garda houses with cliffs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campione del Garda house with cliffs 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM rear element.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM switches horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM switches horizontal with tripod ring rotated.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Lens Case LZ1324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM back horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM front angled with tripod ring rotated.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM front horizontal with tripod ring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM front horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM front element.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM back horizontal with tripod ring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Lens Case LP1219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Tripod Mount Ring B (B) back angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirk LP-2 on Canon Tripod Mount Ring B (B) front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EoRdE6 15:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirk LP-2 on Canon Tripod Mount Ring B (B) side angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 16:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Tripod Mount Ring B (B) back angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Really Right Stuff B2-Pro top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Really Right Stuff B2-Pro bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Tripod Mount Ring B (B) bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EoRdE6 18:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM front horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM front horizontal with hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM switches horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM back horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM front angled with hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EW-83E front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Really Right Stuff B2-Pro top angled knob.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though somewhat low resolution for a studio shot. --Smial 10:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Really Right Stuff B2-Pro bottom angled knob.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though somewhat low resolution for a studio shot. --Smial 10:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manfrotto MH054M0-Q2 magnesium ball head with 200PL camera plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Really Right Stuff B2-Pro top angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Really Right Stuff B2-Pro bottom angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM back horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM front horizontal with hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM front horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality, of course. -- Ikan Kekek 03:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM front horizontal with hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM back horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM front angled with tripod ring rotated with hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon ET-78 II front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedore No. 7 combination wrenches 6–19 mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! --Basotxerri 16:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OLFA 5019 SVR-2 9 mm utility knife with ABB blade.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OLFA 5019 SVR-2 9 mm utility knife with SAB blade.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ISDT SC-608 input.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 19:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XLabs Shrike V2 200 mm quadcopter frame with components.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walther CP99 left side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good use of DoF. The transiton between black and white is a bit sharp but otherwise good. --Peulle 09:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walther CP99 right side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good use of DoF. The transiton between black and white is a bit sharp but otherwise good. --Peulle 09:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RP-SMA male soldered to RG316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Tripod Mount Ring B (B) keying with lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ISDT SC-608 knob.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ISDT SC-608 bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

QI declines

Hi. Thanks for your review of images at QI, but could you please not simply decline by saying "insufficient quality". It's better if you can point out what it is that is wrong with the image (eg bad lighting, chromatic aberrations, composition, dust spots, unsharpness, oversharpness, bad colours, JPEG artifacts, too small...) -mattbuck (Talk) 14:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

File:AKG Perception 120 USB condenser microphone with SH 100 shock mount.jpg

Hi Lucasbosch, I reviewed your file "File:AKG Perception 120 USB condenser microphone with SH 100 shock mount.jpg" a few days ago because of the CAs I found on it. I thought they were easy to fix but when I tried to do the job, I had to admid that it wasn't so easy ! Anyway, I think I've fixed the main problem. Are you going to upload a new version ? If not, I can upload one, but only if you want it, of course. -- Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

It wasn't so easy, indeed, but I've removed the CAs now. Lucasbosch (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Danke, sieh

…[auf Englisch]… the proposal for name change to your image, as an actual "Allihnkühler", not a "Liebigkühler", because the latter is a naming error for this piece of apparatus. See [1] comparing to information at [2] and [3], searching for "Liebig" and "Allihn" at each of these two pages. And pardon me for switching to English, I am time-constrained today. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

File:AbuseMark AfroFlight Naze 32 Flight Controller rev5 white.jpg

File:AbuseMark AfroFlight Naze 32 Flight Controller rev5 white.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Hubertl (talk) 08:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

• Quetsch Moin! MMn sind die Platinenlayouts via Urheberrecht geschuetzt. Oder ist das ein PD/CC Projekt? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 09:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Es obliegt nicht mir, den Tag zu entfernen. Das ist Sache von Administratoren. --Hubertl (talk) 09:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: Der Kommentar zur ursprünglichen Copyright-Meldung war ja, dass das Foto auch auf Imgur hochgeladen ist, und dieses Problem hat sich erledigt, da es mein Foto ist. Du erhebst jetzt ein neues Problem, nämlich das dass Platinendesign nicht CC-lizensiert ist (meines Wissens ist es leider nicht). Wenn das so nicht geht, dann wird das Bild halt deswegen gelöscht, nur der Grund der Löschung müsste angepasst werden. --LB 16:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Ist die Platine von einem im Laden erhaeltlichen kommerziellen Modell? Dann ist die Platine mit an 100%er Sicherheit nicht PD/CC. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Manchmal bin ich auch ein fauler Hund. :-) Auf der Webseite steht unten (c) blablabla. Somit nicht frei. Sorry. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

RE:

Hello! Sorry for the delay! I forgot to answer you! but anyway ... It's very difficult to explain how to make a Set (group of images), but I can show you a model. See here. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

• @ArionEstar: Thanks for answering. I replied your offer on the FP nomination page. Please make sure to set the landscape and portrait tags correctly, two of the four non-FP stencils are portrait oriented. Thanks again. --LB 06:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Kommentare nicht entfernen

Hallo, es ist auf der Seite Commons:QIC "nicht üblich" die Kommentare, die Andere abgegeben haben zu entfernen ;-) Wenn du die angesprochen "Probleme" beseitigt hast, reicht es einen eigenen Kommentar dazu zu schreiben, ggf. eingeleitet mit der Vorlage {{done}}. Dann meldet sich meist auch wieder derjenige, der den ursprünglichen Kommentar abgegeben hatte. So hatte ich heute auch wieder nach meinem gesucht und ihn nicht mehr gefunden. Weiter viel Spaß auf QIC! --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Tut mir Leid, dass ich den Kommentar entfernt hatte, aber ich wusste nicht, wie ich meinen Kommentar darunter einfügen kann. Deswegen habe ich das Bild erneut vorgeschlagen und das alte gelöscht.--Lucasbosch (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glardon Vallorbe LA2442-0 140 mm Swiss cut 0 6-piece needle file set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glardon Vallorbe LA2442-0 140 mm Swiss cut 0 6-piece needle file set.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon Tripod Mount Ring B (B) front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manfrotto 323 quick release clamp closed top angled with 200PL plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manfrotto 323 quick release clamp open bottom angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:AbuseMark AfroFlight Naze 32 Flight Controller rev5 white.jpg

Hello, I just notice to you that this image that was deleted in 2015 have been restored. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: Thanks for letting me know! Was there a change of rules that allow such PCB photographs now? Can I upload more of them using the same copyright template? – Lucas 21:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Not really a change of rules, it's simply that administrators have a very wide range of copyright protections to check, and it's hard to know all about all. Maybe Heldwig was not aware of the same things that the administrators in this discussion. I think you can upload similar photos with the license(s) of your choice, in the extend that you're the copyright holder of the photos of course. And if someone ask again the deletion of one of your printed circuit boards photo then give him the link of this relevant discussion/decision. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manfrotto 323 quick release clamp open with 200PL plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steschke 22:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotring S0214750 with Rapidograph 0.5 mm drawing 1.5–15 mm circles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro USM collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality, impressive work. --Gyrostat 10:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black anodised aluminium heatsinks 6.5–35 mm width with dimensions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black anodised aluminium heatsinks 6.5–35 mm width.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:05, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotring Isograph 0.7 mm tip with scale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotring Isograph 0.7 mm tip without scale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ISDT SC-608 output.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ImpulseRC Alien 5″ FPV quad with components collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xlabs Shrike-200 V2 5″ FPV quad with components collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cree XLamp XR-E 7090 Q4 top view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salecom T80-STS-13-A12C1R-EH sliding switch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cree XLamp XR-E 7090 Q4 on star top view.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

VI Canon lenses

Please have a look on your VI-nominations of Canon leses, I made a comment, perhaps useful for you --Llez (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

@Llez: Thanks for the help, and I will think about adding them there, but for now I will see how that discussion on the VI candidate discussion turns out. – Lucas^T 13:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

copying from a subcategory up into the parent cat?

Hi Lucas, Can I ask why you are copying from Category:Taken with Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM to Category:Lens focal length 100 mm. Since it is already a subcategory, I don't see much benefit from this, and it makes the parent category unwieldy. --99of9 (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

@99of9: I didn't realise that having that subcategory in place is enough to also associate the files themselves to the focal length 100 mm for all intents and purposes (I should reread the categorisation guides). I though it would be best to assign them the additional, fitting, category so the images could be better found by others and subcategories were there as additional info to browse through categories. I didn't consider that categories with a lot of files are a negative. Do you want me to move these out again? I don't want to cause additional mess. – Lucas^T 23:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Lucas. Yes it would be best to remove them unless there is good reason. COM:OVERCAT might be useful reading to understand the rationale. Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 23:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cross tweezers straight and bent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manfrotto 200PL-14 camera plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rotring S0214750 with Rapidograph 0.5 mm drawing 1.5–15 mm circles.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotring S0214750 with Rapidograph 0.5 mm drawing 1.5–15 mm circles.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM collage.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM collage.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AbuseMark AfroFlight Naze 32 Flight Controller rev5 white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Canon EF 180mm F3.5L Macro USM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be useful that this image is used. . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I agree, and I looked for possible uses but couldn't find any. I still consider it the most valuable as it shows a lot of angles in one image. – Lucas ^T 19:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

• •  Comment Perhaps the Article List of Canon products would be suited for a gallery of Canon lenses, not only this one, but also the others you nominated as VI --Llez (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be useful that this image is used. . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I agree, and I looked for possible uses but couldn't find any. I still consider it the most valuable as it shows a lot of angles in one image. – Lucas ^T 19:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

• •  Comment Perhaps the Article List of Canon products would be suited for a gallery of Canon lenses, not only this one, but also the others you nominated as VI --Llez (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Canon EF 17-40mm F4L USM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be useful that this image is used. . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I agree, and I looked for possible uses but couldn't find any. I still consider it the most valuable as it shows a lot of angles in one image. – Lucas ^T 19:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

• •  Comment Perhaps the Article List of Canon products would be suited for a gallery of Canon lenses, not only this one, but also the others you nominated as VI --Llez (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM back horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM front angled with hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! B+W HTC-PL KSM MRC nano XS-Pro 77 mm collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lezyne Carbon 10 collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rjcastillo 14:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lezyne Carbon 10 collage.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lezyne Carbon 10 collage.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Really Right Stuff B2-Pro collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 14:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
E matches.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope --Tiven2240 (talk)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novoflex Castel-Q bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novoflex Castel-Q front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novoflex Castel-Q side back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novoflex Castel-Q side front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novoflex Castel-Q top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality as usual. -- Ikan Kekek 10:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novoflex Castel-Q collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All these images are incredibly sharp. Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Indeed, but the two in the middle row are tilted. Btw, do you use this macro rail and are happy with it? I need a new one Poco a poco 13:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  Done I corrected the tiltLucasbosch 09:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abfahrende U6 Richtung Harras, Station Implerstraße, München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnsteig U-Bahn-Station Sendlinger Tor, einfahrende U6 Richtung Harras, München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus-Südfassade mit Baum, 2017, Kössener Str. 13, München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus-Westfassade mit Vorgarten und Gehweg, 2017, Faberstr. 8D, München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Green monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus) juvenile head processing experiment.jpg

Hi. You produced this version of my image while trying to improve the background when it was an FPC. The trouble is that this version is now in galleries. What is the process for getting rid of it please? Should you just remove the categories? Many thanks Charles (talk) 08:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Charles, I only see it being used in one bot gallery, and if you don't want it to be placed there you could just edit the gallery page and remove the entry for it there without changing the file itself. Do you see it being used elsewhere? I don't see a good reason to remove the file itself or any categories. – Lucas^T 11:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. It is these two categories: Category:Chlorocebus sabaeus in Bijilo Forest Park Category:2016 photographs of Gambia It does not qualify to be in either gallery as it is simply your editing experiment. Thanks. Charles (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Charles, (these are categories, galleries are a different thing on Commons) These categories describe the content of the image, whether it is a original upload or a processed one like this one. If one would remove these two categories, the image would be uncategorized and placed into a "uncategorised files" maintenance page waiting to be categorised again.... It is totally reasonable to processing experiments in the fitting categories as well. I don't want to hide the image, it might be useful for someone and your source file is clearly linked. You need to live with the fact that your images with the license you use can be edited and continue to exist as regular files, including having fitting categories. – Lucas^T 12:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

ok fine, if that's the way things work. I think a good solution would be for me to produce a new sub-category of processing experiment. Charles (talk) 13:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pregasina tunnel east entrance, Pregasina, Trient, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beleuchteter Tunnel Westseite, U-Bahn-Haltestelle Harras, München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could benefit from a geolocation. --Slaunger 19:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exploding E match collage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalmatian fetching a stick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dalmatian fetching a stick.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dalmatian fetching a stick.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Format at FPC

Just a little note for you. The BOT that counts the votes at FPC does not recognize {{weak oppose}} or{{weak support}} and the vote would not be counted. If you want to express some version of the basic templates, please use the piping instead like {{o|Weak oppose}}. I have formated one of your votes at FPC so it will be ok. Cheers, --cart-Talk 08:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Lucasbosch,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gitzo 1541T Traveler Carbon Fiber Tripod Bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty small but ok for QI I believe --Poco a poco 14:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gitzo 1541T Traveler Carbon Fiber Tripod Collage Horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty small but ok for QI I believe --Poco a poco 14:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gitzo 1541T Traveler Carbon Fiber Tripod Collage Legs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gitzo 1541T Traveler Carbon Fiber Tripod Collage Top Bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gitzo 1541T Traveler Carbon Fiber Tripod Front Angled Opened.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS II USM front angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS II USM switches angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS II USM front horizontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Picture of the Day

Hi Do you know how this image came to be nominated a second time for Picture of the Day? Charles (talk) 12:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Charles, a few months ago I nominated a few of my FPs for PotD and I must have missed that this one already had been nominated by someone else before. I'm curious though, are there rules governing the frequency of PotD nominations? --– Lucas^T 14:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

I've no idea, but there's a long queue, so I think once is enough... Charles (talk) 22:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Hallo, ich hätte eine Frage: Ich finde über die Bildersuche von Google einige Fotografien von Laborgeräten, die ich über Ihre Wikimedia-Seite nicht finden kann. Haben Sie noch mehr Fotos und Vektorgrafiken von Glasgeräten/Laborausrüstung? Die Qualität ist beeindruckend. Ich würde sie gerne für die Lehre einsetzen. Protonpe (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Protonpe, auf meiner Benutzerseite stelle ich nicht alle meine Uploads vor, deswegen kommen vorallem die Vektorgrafiken da nicht vor. Du kannst aber durch die Liste meiner Uploads gehen, da findet sich alles: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles&dir=prev&user=Lucasbosch&ilshowall=1 --– Lucas^T 04:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Springer Science+Business Media S.A. logo.svg

File:Springer Science+Business Media S.A. logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Exploding E match collage.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Exploding E match collage.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vltava river in Prague.jpg

The closing of the nomination was not a malfunction of the Bot but a human error. The nomination was created on 20 December 2018 but was denied {{FPD}} and removed. When renominating it Dmottl only "revived" the old nomination, which was a mistake and shouldn't have been done. That is why the Bot thought is was high time to close it. When you make a re-nomination you must always use the "/2" ending. Just like you, Lucas did on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Exploding E match collage.jpg/2. Btw, both of you should have disclosed that the photos were re-nominations. That would have explained things. --Cart (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

• Aha! Thanks Cart about the information regarding /2 ! I didn't know how to make that properly. Lucas, thanks for the assistance! --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 13:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
• Thanks for clarifying! I deleted my message to the bot maintainer. – Lucas^T 18:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

No problem. I'm sure the Bot guy didn't see the message anyway. We haven't heard from him in a long while and there are many things that are wrong with the Bot. We have to manage as well as we can until some new programmer steps up and take charge of the Bots here. --Cart (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EIZO Foris FG2421 VGA computer monitor displaying test pattern.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TESA CCMA-P 150 mm 0.02 mm dial caliper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC) Forgive me, but I don't know how to message a User. So. The caption of file TESA_CCMA-P_150_mm_0.02_mm_dial_caliper.jpg says "Dial caliper measuring 15.62 mm" but it looks to me like it reads 15.64 mm. Please delete this comment at your discretion. Delamaran (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wago 221-413 splicing connector with stranded wire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 23:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wago 221-413 splicing connector with stranded wire.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wago 221-413 splicing connector with stranded wire.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Help

Lucas,

I have seen your comment but I tired making it as 'set' but it did not work, would you be able to help me making it as set or merge it as set ? Mydreamsparrow (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Currently I reside with Colin's comment that your three images are not really suitable as a set nomination. Please also consider his other comment about having downscaled the images. – Lucas 15:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

• Could you rotate this image File:Reef knot.svg 180 degrees? Evrik (talk) 00:37, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кристаллы в высохшей капле Кока Колы.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IM3847 16:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Nachfrage zu Fotoqualität

Hallo Lucasbosch! Ich bin per Zufall über deine tollen Objektiv Bilder gestolpert (zb. File:Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM front angled.jpg oder File:Canon EF 100mm f2.8L Macro IS USM switches horizontal.jpg). Ich würde gerne wissen wie du den Hintergrund in dem Sinne gestaltest, als dass er rein weiß zu sein scheint. Schneidest du die Bilder extra nochmal aus, beleuchtest du den Hintergrund extra oder hellst du ihn bei der Nachbearbeitung auf? Ich frage, da ich selbst gern solche Bilder mache, mir aber immer wieder leichte Cyan und Magenta Schleier in den Hintergrund kommen (siehe zB. File:ASUS ROG Strix G15 (G513QY-HQ012T)-front oblique PNr°0884.jpg). Obwohl ich für alle Lampen die gleichen Lampentypen zur Ausleuchtung verwende, kommt es auch mal vor, dass auf der einen Seite des Objektes der Schatten Magenta und auf der anderen Seite Cyan ist. Ich habe schon versucht dem mit Weißabgleich und Farbtemperatur Herr zu werden, es ist mir aber leider nicht gelungen. Kannst du mir bitte sagen wie du den Hintergrund so toll hin bekommst. Danke, D-Kuru (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Hallo D-Kuru! Danke für das Lob zu meiner Fotografie. Wenn du auf meiner Benutzerseite schaust, sind alle Fotos mit homogenen Hintergrund, ob schwarz oder weiß oder grau, aufwendig nachbearbeitet dass dieser Hintergrund eine solide digitale Farbe ist. Du darfst dir da nicht vorstellen, dass ich den Hintergrund des Fotos, so wie aufgenommen, bearbeite bis er die gewünschte Farbe homogen erhält. Vielmehr schneide ich das Objekt rundherum digital aus und fülle den Hintergrund mit Pixeln. Dabei ist immer entscheidend, wie das Objekt an seiner Umrandung in den Hintergrund übergeht, und das hat viel damit zu tun, wie scharf dieser Rand abgebildet wurde (Stichwort Tiefenunschärfe bei offenen Blenden), wie der Randbereich beleuchtet ist (wie reflektiert das Objekt seine Umgebung?) und die lästigen Schatten. Im Grund versuche ich immer, das Objekt gleichmäßig zu beleuchten und bei der Aufnahme schon an die Nachbearbeitung zu denken. Objekte auf weiße diffuse Unterlagen zu legen, also auf Papier, bringt einen zwei Probleme rein: 1. das Papier schattet alle Lichtquellen der Umgebung viel ab und scheint nur minimal durch, dafür reflektiert es das Umgebungslicht ein bisschen zurück auf das Objekt. Folge: das Objekt wird nach unten zum Papier hin dunkler, Schatten auf dem Objekt selbst werden nicht ausreichend beleuchtet. 2. Das Objekt wirft Schatten auf die Unterlage (wie in deinem Foto) und dunkelt dann die Unterlage wieder ab, was dann das Freistellen in der Nachbearbeitung erschwert, weil man z.B. nicht schnell alle hellen Töne markieren kann. Ich hab gelernt Papierhintergründe bei hohen Ansprüchen zu vergessen, außer man achtet sehr genau auf die Ausleuchtung und stellt alles aufwendig manuell frei. Eine Zwischenstufe ist, das Objekt auf eine halbtransparente Oberfläche zu legen, Butterbrotpapier bis Foto-Aufnahmetische oder spezielle Lichtfilter-Diffusionsfolien (LEE 216 oder 250) und dann diese von hinten/unten extra zu beleuchten. Dann wird alles im Objekt zum Hintergrund viel heller, man kann es gut einstellen und der Hintergrund kann deutlich heller gemacht werden. ohne dass das Objekt überstrahlt. Nachteil ist aber, dass der Untergrund immernoch sehr nahe am Objekt ist. Das führt dazu, dass man eine diffuse Lichtquelle direkt im Kontakt mit dem Objekt hat, was einfach anders aussieht als ob dieser Diffusor weiter weg vom Objekt ist (was eine Softbox zur Hauptbeleuchtung ja wäre). Daher ist der nächste Schritt, die Unterlage entweder transparent zu machen (Plexiglasplatte) (Bsp von mir die WAGO-Klemmen oder das Fahrrad-Werkzeug) und ggf. zusätzlich mit Kreuzpolarisation Spiegelungen eliminieren. Oder gleich das Objekt frei im Raum aufhängen an Fäden, dann hat man volle Kontrolle über den Hintergrund und die Objekt-Beleuchtung ist ideal einstellbar. Zusätzlich sind sehr viele meiner Fotos Fokus-Stacks, bei denen viele EInzelaufnahmen mit unterschiedlichem Fokusabstand kombiniert wurden, sodass alles von vorn bis hinten scharf ist ohne Tiefenunschärfe. Und speziell die Fotos der Canon-Objektive haben schwarze Flächen im Raum platziert, sodass die Objektive hinten nicht den hellen Hintergrund reflektieren sondern eine passend dunklere Kontur haben. – Lucas 08:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung. Ich habe mir schon irgendwie gedacht, dass der Hintergrund zu homogen ist um natürlich zu sein. Das mit dem Papier und den Schatten nicht so gut funktioniert hatte ich auch schon gemerkt, wusste aber nicht wie ich ohne größeren Aufwand den Erfolg erzielen könnte. Deinem Text nach würde ich sagen, dass es eher gar nicht geht. Was mich so gestört hat waren nicht so sehr die Schatten (je weniger desto besser, aber man kann sie verkraften), sondern dass der Hintergrund so hässlich magenta oder cyan geworden ist (vielleicht ist das auch nur mein Monitor). Wenn der Hintergrund schlicht mit dem Fülltool reinweiß gemacht wird, ist das natürlich eine einfache Lösung. Das mit den Fokus-Stacks habe ich gesehen - so bin ich auf deine Bilder gekommen.

Ich habe schon versucht deine Arbeitsweise in meinen neuen Bildern zu verwenden. Die sind zwar alle samt nicht mit einem leichten Ausschneiden als Hintergedanke entstanden, aber aber ich bin trotzdem soweit ganz zufrieden. Und wenn ich eine Luminanzmaske anwende, dann hält sich das Ausschneiden auch in Grenzen. Nochmals danke für die Tipps!

--D-Kuru (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)