User talk:Julo/archive 1

Archive: Mar 2005 - Apr 2014

Image:Chicago_Downtown_Panorama.jpg

Just wanted to say that your picture Image:Chicago_Downtown_Panorama.jpg is just beautiful. It was just added to en:Chicago, Illinois. Nice job. 24.136.14.251 08:01, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) (en:User:Knowledge Seeker)

Missing license info in your images

Hi - some of the images you uploaded are missing license information. Please have a look at Commons:Untagged_images#Numbers_and_Symbols and add the missing info. Thanks! --EugeneZelenko 15:07, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

ESA images

Please don't uplaod ESA images as e.g. Image:Tytan_-_bryly_i_ich_rozmiary.png. Even if you have downloaded it from a NASA website it is no public domain. The credit line on NASA says: credit ESA/Univ. of Arizona/NASA. There is a reason that these images of Titan were deleted several times before in the Wikimedia Commons. Arnomane 20:00, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:HZwLazarecie1940.jpg

Done. /tsca

Image:Republic of China National Emblem.png

This image is redundant to Image:CoA Taiwan.png. Thuresson 12:30, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wikipedysta-Julo.jpg

Hi there - I think this image is probably OK, but just for the record: CC-by-sa and GFDL require the author to be named. As this images shows you, I was very likely created by someone else - your parents? Only they can put it under those licenses, and the licenses require them to be named... -- Duesentrieb 22:55, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Well, a reproduction like scanning, printing etc does not give you any rights to the image - the "creator" is the photographer. As this is your long-dead father, it's probably alright, though. You (and your siblings?) have inheritted the copyright, you can license it as you wish. I think GFDL and CC are quite OK, but it would be better if you would say "made by my father, as his hire I release it under..." or something like that.

It's all just nitpicking, really, as nobody is going to sue you anyway. But it's just strange to see a picture of a small boy and the description says "that's me, I made the image myself..." - it just doesn't make sense :) -- Duesentrieb 23:48, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Road sings of Poland images

Please put them into Category:Road signs of Poland. --EugeneZelenko 15:35, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wrocław

Jeśli wrzucasz nowe zdjęcia Wrocławia, np. Image:Wroclaw-Rynek-7.2005.jpg, zawsze umieszczaj je na stronie Wrocław. Ausir 5 July 2005 09:37 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Ceausescucourt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 15:30, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

You might be interest in!

I noticed the picture you upload at [[Category:Mopeds]]. You might be interest in perusing the article we started called w:motorized bicycle. --72.57.8.215 02:04, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bonhoeffer.jpg

Hi, you uploaded this pic last November and claimed it to be PD. PD in Germany is 70y pma, which is impossible for an image from 1945. I requested deletion at Template:Deletion_requests#February_28. --h-stt 17:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Visaginas coat of arms.png

Hi, I put this up for deletion because I have uploaded a better version. Hope you don't mind. Renata3 01:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it is bigger. But at least I cannot see individual pixels in the image. That was my major issue. Well, and also the second one is named consistently with other images. That's the two main reasons, really. If it is kept, could you upload it to the consistent naming? Thanks, Renata3 12:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wroclaw-NBP Kolejowa-Lelewela.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wroclaw-NBP Kolejowa-Lelewela.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE 21:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Spiegel-Cover 45-2004.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Spiegel-Cover 45-2004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

Rtc 18:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:Moved from PL - unsorted

Please use not categories in this way, there's no support to tag images by Wikis they are moved from (or used in), see Commons:Village_pump#Category:Moved_from_PL_-_unsorted. That'll open another can of worms we do really not need. Please add images to categories or articles they fit or leave them uncategorized so they show up in our special tools. --Denniss 01:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Przeniosłem tę listę do Commons:Bar/Do_posortowania - rozmawiałem z ludźmi na ircu, i ta kategoria rzeczywiście trochę psuje im pracę. tsca @ 11:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Category redirect

On 4^th of May 2006, you added the tag [[category:Coats of arms of Italian cities]] to the Image:Menaggio-Stemma.png. Please note that the category:Coats of arms of Italian cities is a category redirect and must be kept empty; you should use the Category:Coats of arms of Italian municipalities or the correct subcategory. Semolo75 12:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Moving images from de:Wikipedia to the Commons Image:Norwegermuster.jpg

Thank you for moving images from the German Wikipedia to Commons. Please remeber that there are some rules which have to be observed. If the needed information is not present on Commons the image can not be deleted in the German Wikipedia.
In general, be careful to preserve all of the information available about the image, always copy the image description and state who created the image.The Commons Helper will create a full summary that you can copy and paste into the Commons upload page. Please review the created summary and correct manually if necessary. Thanks --gildemax 17:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Henryk Zieliński

I am translating this article to en wiki and uploading pics to commons/en wiki. See my recent contribs (or just the pics in w:Henryk Zieliński for info on what I uploaded, you may want to correct some licenses/captions/etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

zdjęcia miejscowości

Witaj, nie wrzucaj "luzem" zdjęć do kategorii Cities and villages in Poland (zobacz: Commons:Bar#Polskie_kategorie). W ramach porządków utworzyłem Wysoka (powiat wrocławski), Kalinowa (powiat sieradzki) i przeniosłem tam zdjęcia. Pozdrawiam :) Meteor2017 12:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Cadiz-logo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cadiz-logo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Denniss 13:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Haida Totem pole.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Haida Totem pole.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

207.216.217.111 16:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC) .

Image:Epicycle et deferent.png

Thanks for the figure, but I think the direction of the movement(arrows) should be anti-clockwise when we see them from the north pole. Shinobar 17:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Znaki drogowe

Cześć Julo! Niektóre z dodanych przez Ciebie znaków drogowych przerobiłem na SVG. Stare PNG zgłaszam zatem do usunięcia. Na razie robimy porządek z: Image:Znak A-34.png, Image:Znak A-5.png, Image:Znak A-7.png, Image:Znak B-1.png, Image:Znak B-2.png, Image:Znak B-3.png, Image:Znak B-5.png.

Pozdrawiam! --MStankie 23:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Targets

Hello. I see you removed some images from Category:Target with the comment "wrong category". As some of these images, like Image:MidCityTargetPleaseLoot2.jpg seem to me to clearly depict targets and you did not add any "right" category instead, I do not understand this change and reverted this and similar examples. If there is a reason for removing such images please explain, thank you. -- Infrogmation 13:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ljubljana-square_near_stJacob_church.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 10:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Saddamcapture.jpg

I proposed the picture for deletion for the following reason. You can talk to me if needed on the french version of wikipedia only here : [1].

Copyvio of the right of the person. Not sure that the US gov had the authorisation from Saddam Hussein to take a picture and to broadcast it. The US government is so guilty of copyvio. I think the international treaties that protect humans and prisonners do apply. This is not a picture of Saddam as a public person in this case.

Gloran 21:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

Image:Chicago Millenium Park2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

JeremyA 00:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Grafika:KosciolMKolbego-Wroclaw-NaOstatnimGroszu.jpg

Jak w temacie. Kościoł ten mieści się na ulicy Horbaczewskiego - powinieneś zmienić nazwę swojego zdjęcia. Masur 08:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:W samo poludnie 4 6 89-Tomasz Sarnecki.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:W samo poludnie 4 6 89-Tomasz Sarnecki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

A.J. 11:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

• Gdzie można to sprawdzić? Niestety, nawet jeśli to jest prawda, to licencje na Commons muszą być weryfikowalne... Z radością wycofam zgłoszenie jak tylko będziemy mieli jakąś "podkładkę". Zgoda na powielanie nie jest wystarczająca, trzeba jeszcze mieć zgodę na modyfikację... A.J. 13:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Aha, a odpowiednia licencja to {{CopyrightedFreeUse}} lub {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat}}, tylko trzeba ustalić gdzie i w jakiej formie była wyrażona. A.J. 13:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Taka niestety moja parszywa robota... Byłbym wdzięczny, gdybyś skontaktował się ze swoimi znajomymi, czy któryś nie ma kontaktu do autora. A.J. 13:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • A tak BTW: z ręką na sercu byś poświadczył, że mogę sobie logo Solidarności w tle zastąpić np. przez logo SLD i zmienić datę wyborów? A.J. 13:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:MolotovRibbentropStalin.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:MolotovRibbentropStalin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

139.18.1.5 14:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:BiuletynDolnoslaski1981wrzesien.jpg

Did you really make this newspaper yourself? If you only scanned it, that is not enough, it has to be deleted then. The person who scans an image is not the copyright holder. If you don't add clear information, this images will be deleted after seven days.--Hannes2·wp 14:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Image page comment

Re:this edit - you're right. I was in a bad mood and my comment there was snotty. I apologize. Raul654 05:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Copyright status of several images

Is being disputed at en:Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/History of Solidarity. Your comments would be appreciated. Dzięki! PS. Także, pytanie: Image talk:W samo poludnie 4 6 89-Tomasz Sarnecki.jpg.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

W takich przypadkach najlepszy jest kontakt z autorem i uzyskanie potwierdzenia od niego. Ty sam mozesz napisac na swojej stronie ze ten program wypusciles pod PD i po sprawie.,--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Coz, twoja wola, choc jakbys chcial zaglosowac to by nie zaszkodzilo :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Mistake

Oh yes it was a mistake. But please write explicitly "i made this image", and a date you did it. Then there is less doubt. Anyways, it should be converted to SVG if you have the source files. --80.63.213.182 22:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

and if you uploaded it yourself, you can use {{pd-self}} --80.63.213.182 22:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Wien1858.jpg

Hi Julo, I just looked at the image Image:Wien1858.jpg uploaded by you and I think the date is incorrect. If you zoom the image up you will see that the last digit of the four-digit date does not look identical to the second digit, which is clearly an 8 (eight). So, assuming a constant typeset, the last digit must be something else. I would say it is a variation of a slashed zero. So the correct date would be 1850. What do you think? regards, --Contributor

The coins

Hi there, I checked the coins, and added my comments on the coins pages. --Tarawneh 00:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

prawa autorskie

Witam. Dziękuję za wiadomość i wskazówkę. Uważam jednak, że podana przeze mnie informacja 'photo taken by me (owner's permission granted)' jest wystarczająca i nie potrzeba dodatkowych wyjaśnień. Pozdrawiam i życzę miłego wieczoru. --Riva72 20:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Nie mógłbym wywalić, bo na commonsach nie jestem adminem :-) - zwróć się do WarXa Pibwl 21:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

You are now an admin

With 16 supporting votes for your adminship, I hereby grant you adminship. Congratulations!--Jusjih 14:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I have added your username to Commons:List of administrators (alphabetical right before me), Commons:List of administrators by language (based on your userpage, I have added you under Polish), and Commons:List of administrators by date (the last one since the most senior admin is on the top). Please check for accuracy.--Jusjih 14:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: cache?

You could look to Commons:Help desk#Getting rid of an old thumbnail.. I hope this will help. --EugeneZelenko 16:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Znak_D-26a.png

Witaj. Grafika, która załadowałeś niestety nie jest zgodna z zapisami ustawy (opona powinna być przedstawiona z innego profilu oraz cała opona wraz z tłem powinny być większe) (link).
Może podjąłby się Pan próby poprawienia grafiki (+zwektorowanie) ;) gdyż ja dopiero się uczę i wolę obecnie nie ryzykować ;) Pozdrawiam patrol110 21:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

W sumie masz rację :) PS> Ja dopiero od wczoraj bawię się w Inkscape i nawet mi się to podoba :D Pozdrawiam patrol110 15:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Dobra robota! Chyba wiem co powoduje tak dużą wagę ;) (za dużo zbędnych warstw). Sprawdzę jeszcze poprawność znaku z ustawą i podzielę się z Tobą ostatecznymi uwagami. Pozdrawiam. // Tak dla jasności, mowa o tym znaku: Image:Znak_D-26a.svg patrol110 16:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

I tak; niepotrzebnie użyłeś szarości w znaku (felga). Poza tym bieżnik na oponie nieco różni się od ustawowego, stąd ten duży rozmiar.
Jeśli miałbyś chęć, to proszę zastosuj się do wskazówek z tego dokumentu: link i popraw znak ;) patrol110 16:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Filizanki.spodki.jpg

There appears to be a problem with this image, it does funny things when placed in an article (see for instance [2], where it lands on top of the text). I suspect the . in the filename. Perhaps you could reupload it with yet another name, such as Filizanki_spodki.jpg (the underscore will become invisible on MediaWiki software) or Filizanki-spodki.jpg? --Ranveig 11:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pompeii0076.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pompeii0076.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. G.dallorto 14:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pompeii0075.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pompeii0075.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. G.dallorto 14:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Please don't take it personally. I just made a round check-up of licences dealing with Pompeii. Tha fact that you know, I appreciate, my question is another: since we are dealing with law, could you prove it, please? For instance mentioning a date book where it was published^? can you rule off the fact that the same image was published 10 year beofre o after, signed, by someone who died less than 70 years ago? This is the problem. --G.dallorto 19:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

In copyright laws, there is no such a thing as a "rough" date. Everything revolves around exact dates. We need either the exact, not "rough", date of publication, or the exact, and not "rough", date of death of the photographer. Hey, it was not me who made the rules in WikiCommons. They may be silly, but these are the rules. Sorry. --G.dallorto 20:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC) P.S: Deleting the taq wthout giving the information requested is an act of vandalism and can be sanctione as such.

I wasn't rude and I did not ask for deletion, which is an extreme solution: I just asked for more information to be added. If you have it, you can provide it and the question is over. If you don't have it, then the image cannot stay on wikicommons. It's that simple. I had lots of images deleted myself before I learned the rules, so I figure everyone has to take some time before learning them.

I jave "threatened" nobody: in fact, I did not call the attention of any administrators on your behaviour. I just gave you a piece of information you seemed not to possess. I always assume good faith, when I start. I just informed you about the fact that deleting the template without solving the question first, on WikiCommons is considered vandalism. Now you know.

I am not an adm, I am just a user like you. It happens that I am Italian and I am trying to sort the images about Italy and Italian history. So I am calling attention from the uploaders on ALL images with a copyright notice needing further attention. That's all. Good work. --G.dallorto 13:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:WilhelmKolberg.png

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 15:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

oskard

żebym nie zapomniał:

Julo 16:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Pompeii

You don't have to give me the info: I do absolutely nothing with it. You have to write it in the relevant WikiCommons page and after doing it you should take away the template I added to ask for further information.

The link you give me, yesterday did not work (today it works), so I could not investigate anything at all. The point is: copyright statement should not depend upon a site that may or may not be online.

Furthermore, please stop competing. We are not running a competition about who is smarter, here. We are running an encyclopedia. Which I am afraid is a different thing. The point is: information must be complete. If you claim a picture is in the PD, then you have to explain why it is in the page, and not through a link to an external site that tomorrow could very well no longer exist. So please complete the information on the Wikicommons pages (not on my message page where it shall benefit no-one), and take away the templates.

Why you and not me? Because it is you who uploaded the images and therefore took the legal responsability of any false claim, if any. You may have not noticed it, but everytime you upload an image, you agree on a statement about legal responsability about its being in the PD. So I may not take such a responsability in your place: it is you who has to take charge of it. As you see, this is a serious matter, not a game about spoofing one another. Have a nice work. --G.dallorto 13:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Almost forgetting. If your claim is based upon the presence on the site of the Library of Congress please remember to add the {{LOC-image}} to any your pages in which you use such images. Thank you. --G.dallorto 13:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me, are you telling me you had me to waste my time for patiently explaing you the correct method of uploading pictures... you did NOT upload yourself? You must have a hole in your head. People are not here to demonstrate they are "smarter than thou", they are here to make a serious work. If you deign yourself to accept laws, then other people have no need to "act as policemen", as you accuse.

By the way, your claim on your pictures about Pompeii is and still remains wrong, but you took the responsability for the claim, so it is your business if it reveals itself to be false. I warned you, after that, do what you please. I am checking ALL of the licenses of ALL pictures about Italy. It is a long, BORING and time-consuming work. If you don't want to cooperate, it's ok with me, there are 7,000,000.000 human beings who are not, either. But please stop wasting my and your time. --G.dallorto 19:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Arabian-coin-1920's.jpg

I nominated most of the Turkish currency images for deletion here, I didn't nominate the above picture since I wanted to ask you first whether it is in the public domain due to its age. Thanks, Yonatanh 23:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion_requests/2007/03/03#March_3

Looknij sobie na to --WarX 00:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jeans.jpg

Hello,

It is quite sure that there is a possible copyright on this image. However the author could release it into the public domain, but "PD-ineligible" is the wrong tag anyway. Regards, Yann 02:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:MainzKastel.jpg

Hey, I just closed that discussion as keep based on your comment that 40 days from then it would be in the public domain, as it's been more than 40 days. I couldn't find the date of death of the copyright owner so I wanted to make sure with you that I made the right call. Thanks, Yonatanh 06:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PolishPresidentCopyright

Please do not close deletion requests as long as nobody really tested the deletion request argument for correctness, by sending an email to the organization asking for a comment on the objections. --Rtc 10:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Please also do not subvert the will of the community by overturning the closing of a deletion request.[3]   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The community did not agree to close this request and to delete images. I am the comunity, tsca is the community and plenty of people against deletion - they are the community, too. Aren't they? Julo 17:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[4][5]

The request was closed, the template was changed, and the images were deleted according to established procedure. Also, please reply to interactive messages at the location of the original topic to not scatter talk all around, fracturing the discussion. I do have nearly all pages I have posted to recently on my Watchlist. If I missed a comment of yours, please drop me a short reminder with a link.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Prezydent

W przypadku sejmu masz trochę racji: zmienię to. Co do prezydenta: nie sądzę, żeby udało mu się podważyć, tym niemniej dyskusja wciąż trwa. A.J. 15:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi Julo,

Yesterday (10 April) I requested deletion of some files about the "Siegbruecke der A59" from User:Stefan Knauf. I thought the procedure on Commons was to keep the discussion open for a week, or even 14 days, but you just closed the discussion after I added the requests. Why?

About the images: that are not bad images (except from the bike of the photographer to be in the picture), but the images show the same thing, each from a little different view. I know only really duplicate images can be requested for deletion, but I thought uploaded images on Wikimedia Commons had to be USEFUL. I don't see anything useful on 4 images of the same subject. One of these images is enough to use on the article of the A59. Also the files are not used in any Wikimedia project (except from 1 or 2 pages on Commons, and on the userpage of the uploader). Isn't it not more useful to preserve the diskspace for other, more useful images?

Best regards, Arafi 07:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Szkarłatny Kapitan

Przypadek podobny do Riva72: interesuje go wyłącznie skasowanie jego prac i jest mu obojętne, czy osiągnie to wykorzystując luki w copyright'cie czy cokolwiek innego (tak właśnie mi powiedział). Wcześniej twierdził, że nie mogą być na GFDL, bo wcześniej je opublikował jako "all rights reserved". Początek epidemii czy co? A.J. 09:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:W samo poludnie 4 6 89-Tomasz Sarnecki.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:W samo poludnie 4 6 89-Tomasz Sarnecki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--G.dallorto 13:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Apicofwtc.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Apicofwtc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--rtc 20:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Grafiki - własność rządowa III Rzeszy i zasady autorskich praw materialnych - na marginesie PD-Polish

Na marginesie dyskusji o Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Polish cały pakiet spraw dot.

1. Grafik, których prawnym właścicielem był rząd III Rzeszy (np. MSZ III Rzeszy),lub agencje państwowe ( jak Deutsches NAchrichten Buro) - A NIE OSOBY PRYWATNE- prawa wygasły w maju 1945 po likwidacji III Rzeszy jako państwa -podmiotu prawa cywilnego. Prosi się o stworzenie Template:PD-NaziGov.

2. Zauważyłem ,że niektórzy administratorzy (konkretnie-niemieccy) próbują wykorzystać dyrektywę harmonizującą EU dla generalnej blokady foto sprzed 1945 r.- niezależnie od proweniencji.

3.Tymczasem podstawową sprawą jest kwestia istnienia lub nie MATERIALNYCH praw majątkowych do dzieła, ktore są zbywalne i mogą ulec umorzeniu nawet przed datą śmierci autora.

4.Przykładowo - zdjęcie , do którego prawa zostały sprzedane np.Ilustrowanemu Kurierowi Codziennemu czy DNB,albo wykonane przez pracownika Ministerstwa Propagandy Rzeszy czy DNB , a osoba prawna uległa likwidacji bez następców prawnych prawa nabytego jest zdjęciem w domenie publicznej (prawo zbyte skutecznie nie wraca do zbywcy -autora)

5. Poza tym bardzo dużo starych zdjęć to zdjęcia legitymacyjne, paszportowe etc robione przez rzemieślnicze zakłady fotograficzne , które albo w ogóle nie są ( i nie powinny być )przedmiotem prawa autorskiego , albo jeśli traktować to restrykcyjnie - prawa do nich zostały zbyte przez wykonawcę (twórcę)- fotografa w chwili wyjścia klienta z zakładu fotograficznego po zapłaceniu za wykonanie zdjęcia, niezależnie od tego gdzie pozostał negatyw ( i nikt po wydarzeniach II wojny i komunizmu badać tego nie będzie)

6. Pozostaje kwestia zdjęć amatorskich - bez autorstwa. Jeśli już dziś niektórzy niemieccy admini chcą usuwać zdjęcia egzekucji dokonanych przez Wehrmacht w 1939 r vide : Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ciepielow.jpg

pod pretekstem dyrektywy harmonizacyjnej i poszukiwania autora ( gdyby się znalazł - to pierwszy do zawiadomienia - Prokurator IPN)...

a zdjęcia z powstania w getcie warszawskim zostały usunięte to aż się prosi o rozwinięcie tematu.

A prawna sytuacja jest taka,że w prawie europejskim ciężar dowodu faktu spoczywa na osobie,która z tego faktu chce wyciągnąć konsekwencje prawne. Dotyczy to zarówno prawa karnego ( domniemanie nieiwnności) jak i cywilnego , którego częścią jest prawo autorskie. Tzn. o ile nie ma dowodu na zastrzeżenie prawa o tyle ono nie istnieje . W polskim prawie autorskim przerzuca to ciężar dowodu na autora ,zaś wydawca ma jedynie OBOWIĄZEK ZACHOWANIA NALEŻYTEJ STARANNOŚCI - tzn. wiedzieć to co może uzyskać przy zachowaniu zwykłych wymogów staranności. Prawo zakłada domniemanie dobrej wiary użytkownika rzeczy czy prawa tzn. ewentualne naruszenie prawa materialnego może stwierdzić tylko właściciel tego prawa zwracając się z żądaniem do użytkownika o zaprzestanie naruszenia prawa ( i udowadniając swój interes prawny). Tzn. trzeba wykazać naruszenie prawa.

Ponieważ jest to powszechna zasada prawa rzymskiego ,obowiązująca zarówno w prawie polskim, jak i niemieckim inne postępowanie jest uzurpacją i po prostu robieniem ludziom wody z mózgu poprzez świadome mieszanie pojęcia autorskiego prawa osobistego, autorskiego prawa materialnego, zasady należytej staranności, domniemania legalności i zasady cięzaru dowodu po stronie tego, który zgłasza zarzut naruszenia prawa.

Generalnie: często słyszany argument,że każda grafika ma autora należy uzupełnić następująco: KAŻDA GRAFIKA MA AUTORA ALE WCALE NIE KAŻDA MA WŁAŚCICIELA i nie ma to nic wspólnego z datą śmierci autora.

To takie wstępne uwagi , które IMHO warto przemyśleć w długi weekend a potem przegadać z innymi adminami na Commons i na wikipl.

Serdecznie pozdrawiam: Andros64 08:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Cd. autorskich praw majątkowych

Witaj, Chciałbym Ci przesłać obszerne fragmenty tego:

BARTA Janusz, MATLAK Andrzej, MARKIEWICZ Ryszard (redakcja) Prawo mediów Warszawa 2005 Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis (wydanie I) ss. 752 ISBN 83-7334-442-X

które mam w wersji elektronicznej ( rozdział dot. autorskich praw majątkowych i ochrony praw z zaznaczeniem tych spraw, które nas interesują)

- tylko jak - i czy w *pdf czy *.doc

Niestety nie mam "pod ręką" "drukowanego' eksperta od prawa autorskiego dla ekspertyzy. Ale sam zobaczysz obowiązują tu ogólne zasady prawa cywilnego co do istnienia, przeniesienia, wygaśnięcia praw i czynnej legitymacji prawnej w sprawie.

I nie mam zamiaru tego tak zostawić.

Tak na szybko - prosi się aż o

1. modyfikacja szablonu {{PD}}</nowiki> na plwiki poprzez polską wersję {{PD-because}}</nowiki>

2. modyfikacja szablonu {{PD-PRL}}</nowiki> poprzez uzupełnienie i fotografii anonimowych

Serdecznie pozdrawiam:

Andros64 09:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello Julo. We would like to publish this image of "Wroclaw, Poland: the memorial of 10th aniversary (1999) of Tian'anmen Sq. (Beijing, China) massacre, June 4th, 1989" in a Sociology textbook. Would you please contact me at [email protected] for details? I would like to obtain your permission to publish this photo. Thank you. -Jill

Image Tagging Image:Smile.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Smile.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 14:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Vince_Foster.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vince_Foster.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 14:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Milan-cathedral-door-fragment.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Milan-cathedral-door-fragment.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

User:G.dallorto 14:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Milan-cathedral-door.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Milan-cathedral-door.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

User:G.dallorto 14:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Korenov-widok.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Korenov-widok.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 23:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Orgelbrand Encyclopedia → Template:PD-Orgelbrand/Orgelbrand Encyclopedia

ok, usune to z glownej przestrzeni bo nie tam to powinno byc --Szczepan talk  12:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:S-Hertogenbosch.Orthenbrug.JPG

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Karl.von.Holtei-Wroclaw.ul.Rzeznicza.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 15:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Usually …

… administrators provide arguments while closing requests for deletion. --Polarlys 11:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Znak

Witam. Przypadkiem natknąłem się mna Twój wpis w dyskusji. Masz w tym rysunku bieżnika chyba 6 zbędnych odcieni szarości. Usuń je i zostaw tylko kolor czarny. Grafika nic na tym nie straci, a objętość pliku znacznie zmaleje. Pozdrawiam. Bastian 09:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Zrobione. Bardzo nie lubię poprawiać grafik wektoryzowanych poleceniem "Wektoryzuj bitmapę" ponieważ taka grafika zawiera olbrzymią liczbę punktów kontrolnych i warstw. Właśnie te warstwy i punkty zwiększają objętość plików. Usunąłem 7 warstw i trochę punktów więc plik zmalał do 20 kB. Byłby jeszcze mniejszy po zredukowaniu liczby punktów, ale na to nie mam siły. Tam gdzie jest 10 punktów mnie wystarczy 4, a czasem nawet 2. Czasem okrąg robię w oparciu o 2 punkty. Sprawdź tę grafikę, mam nadzieję, że nie zepsułem Twojej pracy, poza tym zawsze można przywrócić poprzednią wersję. Pozdrawiam. Bastian 19:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#The_Pabst_Plan

Regards, --Polarlys 18:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Admin tag

Hi Julo!

Could you please add an {{User admin}} tag to your user page? Thank you! --ALE! ¿…? 07:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Why wipe away the name of Marja Szczotkowska?

What's the purpose of erasing her name from Image:PaszportRzeczpospolitaPolska.1931.jpg? Assuming she is not a living person, she cannot be impersonated by a malefactor knowing her credentials. --87.224.129.16 22:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Kategorie

Witaj. Od jakiegoś czasu ładuję sporo zdjęć na commons. Czy zdjęciom mam przypisywać jakąś kategorię? Czy to nie jest zalecane? I jeśli trzeba, to gdzie się wpisuje kategorię? Pozdrawiam --Piotr967 12:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Jeszcze jedna prośba. Przeniosłem grafikę z enWiki na commons [[6]], ale bot czepia się licencji, co prawda mogę wpisać tj. na enWiki public domain, ale wtedy wyskakuje żądanie sprecyzowania rodzaju, a tego na enWiki nie ma. Czy coś z tym można zrobić by było OK? Jeśli nie to usuń proszę tę grfikę ze zbiorów commons. Pozdrawiam --Piotr967 18:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

---

Image Tagging Image:Franciscardinalarinze.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Franciscardinalarinze.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Dantadd✉ 00:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Hatzfeld

W takim razie umieszczę je ponownie, jeżeli otrzymam zgodę. Tylko jak ją uwiarygodnić? Tzn. w jaki sposób wprowadzić dowód, że zdjęcia skopiowano legalnie akurat z tej strony? --User:Bambosz

Image:Konigstein81.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Konigstein81.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lupo 12:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Hairw.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hairw.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Adambro 18:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Jumper_sweater.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jumper_sweater.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -N 00:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Jumper sweater.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Jumper sweater.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 12:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Common sense and mutual respect re:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Sophie Marceau2.jpg

Dear Julo,

I saw your vote, and I respect your rights to making your point. However, please consider my position based on the law, common sense and mutual respect.

My own original work is the image of Sophie Marceau with my father, Petr Shelokhonov.[7] I took the photo after the actors finished filming a scene for Anna Karenina and made themselves available for photographers. Sophie Marceau was very nice, graceous and generous, she projected a radiant ambience and made people around her very happy. My father brought me to the filming location and introduced me to Sophie Marceau, and I was impressed with the beauty, talent, and professionalism of this fine actress. My father, Petr Shelokhonov, died in 1999, and I decided to give his original images of my own work, including this one, to Wikipedia, and to public domain. However, the integrity of my own work remains under protection of international laws that are honored by Wikipedia policy.

I made the above image to document the meeting and work of two film actors, Sophie Marceau and my father, Petr Shelokhonov.

Article 6bis of the Berne Convention protects attribution and integrity, stating: Independently of the author's economic rights, and even after the transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation.

I donated my original image to Wikipedia with understanding that this community respects my objection to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to honor and reputation of my late father, Petr Shelokhonov.

My message to the Serbian Wikipedia users, regarding the distorted image, was treated with good understanding, and my request to return to using my original image was honored.

It is not only the legal issue of integrity and attribution, but also a matter of common sense, mutual respect and reputation regarding all parties involved.

Your cooperation is highly appreciated. Steveshelokhonov 09:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Interwencja

Jakim prawem usunąłeś te grafiki:

• Image:Silesia in Polish Voivodeships.png
• Image:Upper Silesia in Polish Voivodeships.png
• Image:Lower Silesia in Polish Voivodeships.png

Nie dość że nie został powiadomiony autor grafik to jeszcze usunąłeś to na swoje widzimisie. To czy grafiki mają jakieś wady i ewentualnie jak można je naprawić powinno się przedyskutować z innymi użytkownikami. Ty uznałeś że grafika ma wady i tak po prostu grafiki usunąłeś. Wszystko wskazuje na to że nadużyłeś uprawnień i dokonałeś wandalizmu. Proszę o natychmiastowe odtworzenie grafik. LUCPOL 11:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Odpowiedziałem też tutaj. Jeśli zamierzasz odpowiedzieć to proszę o wpis merytoryczny i oparty na faktach. Nie życzę sobie już więcej ataków osobistych od ciebie. Ja na pl.Wikipedii zostałem głównie zablokowany za wypowiedzi i wycieczki osobiste - nie zapominaj. U ciebie wycieczki osobiste do mnie to już recydywa, powinieneś tak jak ja również odbywać karę blokady. LUCPOL 14:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Wytłumacz mi zatem proszę co oznacza zdanie "Tymczasem skutek zamieszczenia tych grafik był taki, że w zagranicznych wikipediach w dobrej wierze obszar pięciu województw - od Międzyrecza po Tarnów, od Gorzowa po Zakopane - uznawano za obszar Śląska" - gdzie dokładnie i dlaczego uznano ten obszar za Śląsk? Proszę o dowód bo jak na razie to widzę tylko niedorzeczność w twoim poście. Napisałeś też coś co wiele wyjaśnia: "Za wszelką cenę usiłujesz wszędzie gdzie to tylko możliwe powiększyć znaczenie swojego regionu, w tym przez tworzenie sztucznego wrażenia, że jego granice sięgają dalej, niż kiedykolwiek sięgały" - a mianowicie: z góry uznajesz że "usiłuję" powiększyć znaczenie Śląska. To nie prawda. Chcę co prawda maksymalnie rozszerzyć artykuły o Śląsku ale ty chcesz maksymalnie rozszerzyć artykuły o Polsce. Czy jest w tym coś złego? Z góry zakładasz moją złą wolę. Wciąż!!! Widzisz że wprowadzam śląskie POV tam gdzie nie ma żadnego POV. Gdybym kiedyś poprawił liczbę ludności Zabrza z 120 000 (po IP-ku) na prawidłową 190 000 to jestem pewien że też byś powiedział że wciskam śląskocentryczne POV powiększając liczbę ludności w mieście na Śląsku. Czasami nie wiem czy mam płakać czy się śmiać. Wszystko co moje uważasz za śląskocentryczne POV. I mam cię brać na poważnie? Napisałeś na końcu "ja ciebie tu nie atakuję, ani nie popełniłem żadnego wandalizmu" - mylisz się. Co do wandalizmu i nadużycia uprawnień dałem ci niepodważalne argumenty: "Grafiki usunąłeś na swoje widzimisie (1)"bo tak sobie sądzisz", (2)bez żadnej dyskusji, (3)bez powiadomienia autora grafik, (4)bez żadnego głosowania, nawet (5)bez usunięcia ich z artykułów na Wikipedii". A co do wycieczek osobistych to tu masz choćby dwa cytaty: "LUCPOLa i jego nieopanowany tzw. "patriotyzm lokalny", który przybrał postać kliniczną...", "LUCPOL ma swoje sny o potędze, ale to trzeba leczyć". Ja dostawałem blokady za dużo mniejsze przewinienia. LUCPOL 14:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Te mapki stworzyłem aby ogólnie było wiadomo (pod względem graficznym) gdzie leży Śląsk. Po wejrzeniu na mapkę można od razu wiedzieć że Śląsk leży w obrębie województwa śląskiego, opolskiego, dolnośląskiego i lubuskiego. Taka mapka jest według mnie przydatna, a nie bez sensu jak ty twierdzisz. A jeśli chodzi o zarzut kłamstwa - dlaczego zatem pisałeś do WarXa nieprawdziwe informacje że zaznaczone było 5 województw - w tym małopolskie? Nie zaznaczałem małopolskiego na mapce. Jest jeszcze do wyjaśnienia niedorzeczność: "Tymczasem skutek zamieszczenia tych grafik był taki, że w zagranicznych wikipediach w dobrej wierze obszar pięciu województw - od Międzyrecza po Tarnów, od Gorzowa po Zakopane - uznawano za obszar Śląska" - co do której nie dostałem jeszcze odpowiedzi od ciebie. Jeśli chodzi o usunięcie map z przestrzeni Wikipedia to uważam to za najmniejszą szkodę jaką zrobiłeś w tej sprawie, więc się tu usprawiedliwiać nie trzeba. Chodzi przede wszystkim o to, że ty uznałeś coś za błędnego i/lub zbędnego i ot'tak usunąłeś. Nie wziąłeś pod uwagę że inni mają odmienne zdanie, że inni w tej mapce nie uważają za mylące lub nie uważają całej mapki za zbędnej. Nie oczekiwałem ani nie oczekuję abyś dyskutował o mapce z Anglikami, mogłeś sprawę mapki przedyskutować z Polakami i Ślązakami w dyskusji artykułu Śląsk bądź w dyskusji wikiprojektu Śląsk. LUCPOL 15:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:Wrocław Sukiennice

... powinna zostać skasowana lub wypełniona właściwymi zdjęciami. Wcześniej mieściła zdjęcia Nowego Ratusza, a nie Sukiennic! Shaqspeare 20:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Kosovo image

Hi Julo,

I see you protected a Kosovo political map until April 10th, with NPOV tag.

I would like to know why you chose the current version as NPOV, and not the other one?

Lakinekaki 21:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reply. I would like you to consider the political map of another Serbian province, Vojvodina [8]

Lakinekaki 00:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

unnesscairy deletion

Hello Julo, I saw you deleted this image: 7 mrt 2008 20:51 Julo (Overleg | bijdragen) verwijderde "Image:Ancilla Tilia Empurpled.jpg" ‎ (User:LexieMolotoff uploaded this picture few times under different names. Seems to be a profi photo, not own one) but did you ever bother to look up the photographer Lexi Molotoff on Google? you would have seen he actually is a professional photographer doing lot's of fetish photography...I'll ask him to upload this image again if you don't mind. But since I'm rather new to this, how can such deletion actions be prevented? HeadBangr 08:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanx for the info, but since I'm not a wikipedia commons expert, what should I do to get a nice photo of Miss Ancilla on wiki commons? I tried asking the photographer himself..any other options? 213.84.255.6 19:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

About Image:Feldman.png

it could be easy to do, but I'm not able to know how to do it. Please, check Image:Putna Vitov.png if it is enough stated, anything to add (or to be deleted if it has the same problem than other). Thank you in advance.--Shliahov 20:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

thank you --Shliahov 23:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Israeli money and stamps

Since PD-ineligible is for images that are PD "because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship" it's not suitable (i.e. it's wrong) for the Isreli money and stamp images. I'm not doubting that the image is PD (if you say so then who am I to argue) but a separate template (or an add-on to {{PD-Israel}}) for the case of Isreali stamps and money (linking to the relevant law) would be needed. Once such a template exists and the images are tagged with it the problem with repeated deletion requests for it being wrongly tagged would stop and everyone would be happy. Cheers /Lokal_Profil 00:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I changed PD-ineligible to {{PD-because|copy or scan of a banknote or stamp in Israel are in free use with no limitation. See: Category talk:Stamps of Israel}} which is a tad better. Also that way everything is linkt to from Category talk:Stamps of Israel if a proper license tag gets created. /Lokal_Profil 21:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

paszporty

Załadowałeś zdjęcia paszportów na licencji CC-BY-SA, rzecz w tym, że w ogóle nie posiadasz praw autorskich do tych zdjęć - z prostej przyczyny, reprodukcja w ogóle nie może być nimi objęta.
W USA: en:Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp.
W Polsce zaś artykuł pierwszy ustawy (Przedmiotem prawa autorskiego jest każdy przejaw działalności twórczej o indywidualnym charakterze). Wierna reprodukcja, zgodnie z orzecznictwem, nie jest takim przejawem (podobnie jak np. przetworzenie dzieła z JPG na GIF albo skan).

Inną sprawą jest to, że dla korzystającego z jakiegokolwiek dzieła liczy się tylko prawo autorskie miejsca korzystania. Paszport i wizy jakiegokolwiek państwa są bez wątpienia PD na podstawie prawa polskiego (art.4. ustawy, dokument/materiał urzędowy) i w Polsce można korzystać z tego zdjęcia bez niczyjego zezwolenia bez żadnych warunków prawa cywilnego (czyli także bez podania Jula czy publikacji dzieł zależnych na CC-BY-SA). No ale zawsze mogą być objęte prawem autorskim USA, USA generalnie nie wyłącza takiej ochrony. Adolf Warski 10:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:DeltaOkawango.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:DeltaOkawango.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

TheDJ 19:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

• {{PD-SeaWiFS}} used Julo 17:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

What do you think about...

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Belarus 1939 Greeting Soviets.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lviv 1939 Soviet Cavalry - no watermark.jpg?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Please see my user page ...

... concerning recent deletions. Doug youvan 22:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:K800i-Google-My.Location.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:K800i-Google-My.Location.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 19:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh.

'Kay. :) We're all entitled to mistakes, so whatever. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 21:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:8-course-tenor-renaissance-lute-04.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:8-course-tenor-renaissance-lute-04.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 08:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

• fixed Julo 13:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, friend. You know, everyone mistakes, I tried to find license on last versions of file, but I couldn't find license information. BTW, there are both one click ;). I'll try not to repeat that. Thanks for noting.--OsamaK 14:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Melb cbd.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Melb cbd.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

-Bidgee 08:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

• Sure.I've deleted it. Julo 08:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Wrocław

Nie wyszło zbyt dobrze [9] bo za dużo regularnych linii, ale na pewno jest lepiej niż z tym napisem Zureks (talk) 18:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Przedwojenne polskie znaczki pocztowe

Są-li OK? Znalazłem skan takiego z Ralphem Modjeskim. Picus viridis RSVP? 21:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chicago Millenium Park.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Chicago Millenium Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

KveD (talk) 03:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Konigstein81.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Konigstein81.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rama (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

see: This image was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2007, but was kept.

No new arguments for re-nomination or deletion. Julo ( ) 14:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Basteibrucke78.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Basteibrucke78.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rama (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, the problem with these images is no so much the of the image itself, than the author. "Anonymous" and "unknown" authors are not the same; a claim that an author is "anonymous" has to be backed by source. For instance "image scanned for book X, p.Y, anonymous author (op. cit., p.Z)". A work whose author is merely "unknown" is problematic and should be deleted if less than 170 years old (works older than 170 years cannot possibly fail to be in the public domain, no matter who the author was). Rama (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

See User_talk:Julo#Image_Tagging_Image:Konigstein81.jpg - the same case. Julo ( ) 14:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Troll.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Troll.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Sandstein (talk) 13:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

• I'm afraid you're right because of no FOP in Norway. Uploaded from en:wiki with wrong GFDL license, and should be deleted. Julo (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Konigstein81.jpg and Basteibrucke78.jpg‎

Do not remove "No source" tags unless the requirements are fulfilled. "Requests for deletions" and their results are irrelevant in matters of licencing. You cannot "vote" an image to be legal. Rama (talk) 08:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Dromedariesrange.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Dromedariesrange.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

(I added Australia and roughly converted to PNG; but a better image is still needed, some day! :-) --Tuvalkin (talk) 19:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Old postcards

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Konigstein81.jpg is very interesting, and it would be nice if we could extract from it some useful policy or at least guidance as to how old postcards should be handled. I have hundreds which I could upload, but many will raise the same issues as this, and I don't want to have to go through the same old arguments every time. Even better would be to work out some rules on anonymous images generally, but I suspect from past discussions that that will be much harder. I am thinking of working up a policy page on postcards, at least. If you have any thoughts on the general principles that should apply, could you leave me a note on my talk page? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Your Viaduc de Millau images

Image deletion warning

Your Viaduc de Millau images have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sadly Commons doesn't accept freedom of panorama in France. --Ikiwaner (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:ACMilan.ogg

Witaj. Czy tylko mi się zdaję czy Image:ACMilan.ogg został stworzony za pomocą http://www.ivo.pl/ivonaonline.html? Jak tak to to chyba nie jest free i nadaje się na delete. Pozdrawiam. Bandurr (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Europa1937-1939.gif

Hi Julo, thanks for participating in this deletion request. I guess we would like to move into the very same direction. All I am asking for is to follow our deletion policy which has some reservations in regard to deletions of images that are used on other projects. To move forward, I suggest to remove this inaccurate map from the Polish wikipedia here, here and here. As soon as this map is no longer referenced by any Wikipedia article in any project, I will happily concur with the deletion request. Cheers, AFBorchert (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kosovo-arrival-form-2008.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Kosovo-arrival-form-2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

195.171.95.4 14:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Israel_flag_crossed.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Israel_flag_crossed.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-Nard the Bard 18:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Hej, to znowu ja. Mógłbyś zobaczyć tą grafikę, bo mi się po korekcie poprzedniej wersji nie wyświetla?. Pozdrawiam! Bandurr (talk) 10:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Poland1939 physical.jpg

Witaj!

Czytając Twą dyskusję z Luckpolem, stwierdziłem że jesteś odpowiednią osobą. Usunąć trzeba tę mapę. Przedstawia nieprawdziwy podział polityczny w przededniu II wojny światowej. Zachodnia granica województwa pomorskiego jest taka sama jak po II pokoju toruńskim. Obejmuje m.in. Lębork. W tamtych czasach był częścią Niemiec na oko 25-30 km. od Polski. Nie potrafię poprawić mapy. Drugą przyczyną jest WMG. Widywałem poza Wikipedią Gdańsk w II RP. Interpretowane jako polski obszar celny lub pod polskim jarzmem. Ale przynależności Lęborka nikt wtedy nie kwestionował. Tak głośno jak Gdańska. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Jest bot, który raz dwa usunie wszystkie linki. Każdy dzień istnienia tej mapy zwiększa ilość ludzi z błędnym przekonaniem. Że traktat wersalski był dla nas łaskawszy. A to bardzo źle. Nie jest to wielka strata w porównaniu z usunięciem, nie oszukujmy się, mistyfikacji. Czy gdyby to było fair use, też patrzyłbyś na użycie? Ja nie potrafię takiej rzeczy poprawić. Jeśli ktoś umie, powinien skasować przed załadowaniem poprawionej. A Autor był tu ostatni raz 6 sierpnia... Mistyfikacja. Nalegam. 22 użycia tylko potwierdzają tezę o szkodliwości. Nikt od tego nie umrze, ale zastąpi prawidłową mapą. --Starscream (talk) 23:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

DW 401

Witaj, masz oczywistą rację i Twój revert był jak najbardziej słuszny. Pospieszyłem się niepotrzebnie. (A fotografie drukarki zrobiłem faktycznie wczoraj). Przepraszam i pozdrawiam Stako (talk) 06:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Image:Coat of Arms of Monaco.svg

Most likely it's an error in the reference picture. The official reference to use is the text of the blazon, but unfortunately, I have been unable to find that anywhere on the Web. -- Denelson83 (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

2 hours

I am considering your deadmin, because you have closed Delwtion Request: Image:Israel_flag_crossed as kept, although you were the uploader.

• After this admin mattbuck has restored another similiar flag with clear result. I give you 2 hours to delete your own work. PS: Admin mattbuck has got a similiar note on his disk. Mutter Erde (talk) 17:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Mutter Erde, stop threatening admins. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

family album

Julo, I have noticed that you have your own wee family picture up on Commons. As for the quality, remember, they did not have digital cameras back in the 1960s and 1970s. Another thing, the word them is not spelled 'em. Thanks--Jeanne boleyn (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Bonduelle.tin.cans.jpeg and File:Bonduelle.tin.cans.JPG

I marked these pictures for speed deletion because the images on the cans are copyrighted and in the middle of the picture. Yours --Jodo (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Licensing

Why not use Template:PD-self? Ottre 12:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Luck

Pojawił się żółty szablonik w tym zdjęciu [10] postulujący przejrzenie kategorii tej fotki. Ale wydaje mi się, że kategoria jest OK. Mylę się, czy te szablony są tylko apelem, typu: "na wszelki wypadek sprawdź"? Pozdrawiam i zgóry dzieki za odpowiedź --Piotr967 (talk) 17:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Vozrozhdeniya-topo.jpg

File:Vozrozhdeniya-topo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 00:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Fotka okładki Kroniki skasowana

Hej, możesz sprawdzić dlaczego usunięto moją fotkę - File:Kronika miasta Łodzi - nr 1-2008.JPG. Zdjęcie okładki czasopisma było zrobione przeze mnie, licencja podwójna GFDL|cc-by-sa-all, fotka była opisana, podałem że ja jestem autorem. Kronika miasta Łodzi jest czasopismem bezpłatnym, finansowanym ze środków budżetowych Urzędu miasta Łodzi, więc nie jest copyright. Czemu zatem skasowano? Za pomoc i wyjaśnienie z góry dziękuję. --Arewicz (talk) 12:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suwalki conference.png

Dzieki za reakcje, ja nawet nie dostalem notifikacji i zauwazylem to przypadkiem na watchliscie... wlasnie wrzucilem kilka dodatkowych zdjec z tej ksiazki, wszystkie z lat 1919-1920. Co za idiotyzm... w Ameryce nawet wszystko sprzed 1923 jest PD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 00:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Julo!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

• Image:1991Slottet.jpg is uncategorized since 21 March 2009.
• Image:EleonoraZiemiecka.png is uncategorized since 26 May 2009.
• Image:Elizabeth-isle.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Snails.on.the.bush.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Peipus-Ranna-Estonia.JPG was uncategorized on 17 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Bieżanów kościół 1939.JPG was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Kalendarz i zegar nawala.png was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:HerbWroclawia kMostuSikorskiego.jpg was uncategorized on 6 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Zaprzeg-krowi.jpg was uncategorized on 3 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

re: File:Greg5pope.jpg

Ja to przeniosłem z Włoskiej Wikipedii i wygląda na podobiznę umieszczoną w poczcie papieży. Nie analizowałem realizmu twórczości autora fresku. Może trzeba poszukać bardziej wiarygodnego wizerunku, ale to i tak nie są portrety. Pozdrawiam Klondek (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Nationalities in Second Polish Republic ca. 1931.png

Mysle, ze cie moze zainteresowac (update mapy H. Zielińskiego). Jest takze duza dyskusja na en wiki: [11]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 20:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Images of South Africa currency

Images of South Africa currency have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Anrie (talk) 07:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Solidarność Walcząca

Racja—przepraszam. Przeglądałem wszystkie te znaczki ponownie, żeby przywrócić część niepotrzebnie usuniętych, jednak jakoś (?!) nie zauważyłem szablonu OTRS. Kajam się. odder 10:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Bonduelle.tin.cans.JPG

You are prejudiced and cannot decide on this deletion request yourself (a restoration is also a decision...).

This image shows copyrighted material. Otherwise than in the examples given by you in the discussion (File:Softdrinks in supermarket.jpg, File:Libreria San Gines.jpg and File:SanDiegoCityCollegeLearingRecourceCity-bookshelf.jpg) in this case the copyrighted elements are the chief motive. So the image is a copyright violation. Chaddy (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Please use the relevant process in case you like to request undeletion: COM:UNDEL. Maybe you should wait till Commons:Deletion requests/File:AyranGetränk.jpg is resolved. --Martin H. (talk) 13:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I will not judge this, but in case of an UNDEL request this might be an argument. --Martin H. (talk) 23:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Thats the second time I deleted this image. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bonduelle.tin.cans.JPG was an individual decision related to this image, so you can not simply ignore it or argue against it with an not yet decided deletion request. Use COM:UNDEL instead! The rule, that derivative works are not allowed on Commons as long as the derivative part is not de minimis or covered by freedom of panorama also applies to administrators. Regards, --Martin H. (talk) 22:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:IndoChina1886.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:IndoChina1886.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Vinhtantran (talk) 05:57, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

File:SOFFA small.jpg

Hej, dzięki za info. Moja pomyłka w toku amoku najwyraźniej pomyliłem chłopaków. Już zmieniłem. Pozdr, Serdelll (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Łyżwiarz

Dzieki za info. Szczerze mowiac nie spodziewalem sie ze zgody nadejda. Ty tam wiesz najlepiej co jest w zgodzie, wiec po prostu tnij jak uwazasz, ze gosc nie za bardzo ma prawo nimi dysponowac. Ja na wszelki wypadek wlinkuje je do hasla. Masur (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC) ps. to serio ten łyżwiarz wyslal zgode? Az ciezko uwierzyc :)

• o kurde. Czyzby ona ładowała lokalnie po Wiki + na Commons? Bo ja 3 z plwiki (bez zgod) usunalem po tym, jak pojawily sie te z Commons. Polece po interwiki i sprawdze. Masur (talk) 17:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC) ps. ok, byly tylko na enwiki, bez licencji ani opisu, z takimi samymi nazwami jak z Comm. Mam andzieje, ze jakis admin u nich to wypatrzy, bo je otagowalem. Masur (talk) 17:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:GradDubrovnik.jpg

File:GradDubrovnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ed g2s • talk 08:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Polish translations needed

Hi! I contact you as you speak English and Polish.

Jastrow and I are working on autotranslating {{Meta information museum}}, the meta-template we use for many museums, like {{Information Louvre}}. Could you please help us find Polish translations for every tag name:

   * artist/maker
   * description
   * dimensions
   * credit line
   * accession number
   * location
   * source/photographer
   * references
   * other versions

"Credit line" is mainly about the mode of acquisition: what collection does it come from? Did it join the collections by gift, purchase, on loan, etc.?

Thanks for any help. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

I just created the appropriate subtemplate. The museum templates should now appear in Polish for Polish-speaking people. Thanks a lot! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 21:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Image:Swiditielstwo-1891.jpg

OMG, I just haven't logged in for a year... Sorry.

I'll add the transcription now. --My another account (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

File:GenBoleslawDuch.jpg

Julo, Musialem przegapic dyskusje COM:DR na temat File:GenBoleslawDuch.jpg i innych plikow Monte Cassino ktore skasowales. Czy mozesz podac link do DR? --Jarekt (talk) 13:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for taking care of the old copyvio version of File:Pikachu.png. It was recently discovered that Nintendo used images of six of their characters in a US patent without including any of the required notices to prevent releasing those six images into the public domain; I had uploaded the other 5 already, but was waiting on the deletion of the old copyvio version of File:Pikachu.png before uploading the last patent image to that name. Anomie (talk) 13:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Salvador.Dali-Profile.of.Time.JPG

File:Salvador.Dali-Profile.of.Time.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herr Kriss (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Skany gazet

Bundesarchiv nie ma do nich większych praw niż Ty, ale sprawdźmy jak je uzasadni podobnie jak wiele innych wątpliwości.

A co do harmonizacji unijnego prawa, zobacz np. jak różne byłyby losy zdjęcia przykładowo rzeźby Dalego w różnych krajach.

Wikipedia zaś nie jest niczyją agendą, tylko projektem bardzo restrykcyjnie podchodzącym do praw autorskich. Sposób na to widzę dwojaki: doprowadzić albo do złagodzenia praw autorskich, albo restrykcji stawianych w projekcie. Metodę przymykania oczu na naruszenia albo swobodnego odczytywania intencji autorów lub ustawodawców nie uważam za właściwą.

Co do uzasadnienia usunięcia: błędna licencja, było {tl|PD-user}}, zaś niewątpliwie nie jesteś autorem, gdyż kopiowanie nie jest działalnością twórczą.

Pozdrawiam, A.J. (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Co innego kiedy na ducha i intencje ustawy powołuje się w orzeczeniach sąd, który ma do tego gwarantowaną konstytucyjnie niezawisłość -- może się nawet pomylić lub palnąć głupstwo, to się często zdarza. My w praktyce musimy się poruszać z bezpiecznym marginesem. I tak np. wiele zdjęć nie jest utworami, bo nie ma znamion oryginalnej twórczości, żeby długo nie szukać to np. takie -- a mimo to gdybym nie określił jego licencji to by poleciało i nikt by nie próbował go ocalać argumentując, że sobie fotograf stanął i pstryknął i nie ma w nim grama indywidualności (chociaz to jest prawda). Z taką samą rezerwą muszę więc traktować Twoje zapewnienia, że układ typograficzny to wyłącznie rzemiosło, nie twórczość -- wielu typografów pewnie by tu zaczęło protestować.

Debata nad skanem z Bundesarchiv może być tutaj precedensowa; jestem przekonany że decycja powinna być za usunięciem, a jeśli przetrwa przy braku konkretnych argumentów prawnych uznam to za zwycięstwo głosu ludu nad bezduszną zasadą Commons:Licensing i wtedy Trybunę Ludu też przywrócę.

Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright status: Image:TrybunaLudu13.12.1981replica.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TrybunaLudu13.12.1981replica.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

A.J. (talk) 09:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Zgodnie z obietnicą, przywrócona Trybuna, na razie bez licencji (do uzupełnienia). Argument przez "BundesArchiv pewnie ma rację" można bez trudu transponować na "JuloArchiv pewnie też" ;) Ale proszę o obszerne uzasadnienie w opisie licencji. Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 09:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Republic of Kurdish Stable.jpg

Dobry wieczór, Julo. Widziałem że zdjęcie na stronie Commons:Deletion requests/File:Republic of Kurdish Stable.jpg jeszcze istnieje. Co się stało? Pozdrawiam --Tlustulimu (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

File:ParlamentBukareszt8148.jpg

File:ParlamentBukareszt8148.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jmabel ! talk 19:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

File:ParlamentBukareszt8160.jpg

File:ParlamentBukareszt8160.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jmabel ! talk 19:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

deletion of File:SwAP84.jpg

I saw that you deleted SwAP84.jpg. May you want to leave a comment on Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the male genitalia (2009-12-21) --D-Kuru (talk) 15:01, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

File:WiaduktStysia-popodpierany.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:KWZ, December 2009, Jordan & Israel

Hello!

What is the purpose of Category:KWZ, December 2009, Jordan & Israel that you have created? What's KWZ? --High Contrast (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Answered here: User_talk:High_Contrast#KWZ. --High Contrast (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Norfolk COA.gif

BotMultichillT 20:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

:File:Bay of Gibraltar from The Rock 12.jpg

Skasowałeś wcześniejszą (lustrzaną) zbędną wersję tego pliku, tylko przy okazji skasowałeś informacje o autorze. Teraz ja widnieję jako autor, a ja tylko to zdjęcie załadowałem w odpowiedniej orientacji. Aotearoa (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Update

Thanks. I indeed believe you found a good solution. I admit it is complicated. Could you also remove the first version from the history? That would be great. Thanks again. -- Mdd (talk) 16:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

And again, thank you. -- Mdd (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Laczowka.konektory.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 18:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana-klatka.na.rogu.ulicy.jpg

Hi. I fixed the description for your image. Please remove it from the polish article about Ljubljana, because this object has nothing to do with death penalty in Ljubljana (not even in the past) and people might get the wrong idea. Thank you, — Yerpo ^Eh? 14:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:1939-07-22-podchorazy.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 22:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vozrozhdeniya-topo.jpg

(1) You are interested party. So, I don't think you cann't close such discussion,

(2) You are mistaken. The works created by official agencies are not always official works by default. This map was created by official agency, but it is not official work, because this work hasn't got legislative, administrative and judicial character. Alex Spade (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Jezioro Paprocańskie.svg

Przykro mi że sie nie udało, nie wysilaj sie może ta grafika nie zasługuje na to by tu być :) --Muffi (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

ulica Cybulskiego we Wrocławiu

Witam. Ponieważ sporo robisz i zdjęć i tekstów o Wrocławiu, to mam pytanie - czy dysponujesz jakimiś źródłami (lub wiedzą o nich) nt w/w ulicy lub obiektów przy niej. Napisałem na razie na brudno hasło o Cybulskiego, chcę je dać na plwiki, a fotki na commons, ale wolałbym mieć jakieś źródła, bo mam szczątkowe. Podob nie zresztą pytanie o plac M. Borna (Dąbrowszczaków). I przy okazji pytanie o twą opinię - czy hasła te mają szansę utrzymać się na plwiki? Bo zasady ency są tam wyśrubowane. Jednak wydaje mi się, że dla Cybulskiego: dwa muzea, kilka inst. naukowych uniwerku, jeden krasnal wrocławski i archiwum państwowe czynią ją istotną. Dla M. Borna - KW PZPR, plus dwa instytuty naukowe UWr. Pozdrawiam serdecznie --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 11:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Old Polish passport

Hi. I'm Leong from Malaysia. Just a word of praise for your pictures of the contents of the old Polish passports which you have uploaded. I have had this sad self-appointed project to document images of passport stamps from various countries and your pictures have been very helpful. I ave been modifying them by cropping them closely and uploading them separately. For eaxmple, just search under Category:Passport stamps of Poland to have a look. Would you have any later stamps from those crossings, esp the period after the end of communism but before Poland joined the Schengen Zone? Would you consider uploading them? Thanks for your attention.slleong (talk) 17:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I will never be able to thank you enough for making the photos of the passport stamps available so immediately and without restrictions. I shall upload them within the next few days and I will inform you of the addresses. As for the other european stamps, I would be more than happy to have them too, especially if they are from eastern europe, but only if you have the time to scan them. Thank you so much once again. slleong (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

What can I say! You have done so much for me and so quickly!!! Dziękuję!! I have uploaded a few of your photos, and used them in these pages - Swiecko and Debeli Brijeg. Will do the rest in the coming days. Yes, I did notice the ultraviolet pictures of the polish passport stamps, as well as the Kosovo stamps. The're amazing. Just out of curiosity, what made you upload the photos of the old Polish passports? Thanks once again and I guess we have started an interesting correspondence here! slleong (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

You said: Did you mean ultraviolet, this JPG version of GIF? The author of original motion GIF version is user:Staszewski, not me. I just made two screenshoots of his GIF and sticked them together (using Irfan-view program), making my JPG version. If you did mean other pictures (stamps1.jpg ... stamps12.jpg), I scanned them using not expensive EPSON V200 desktop scanner.

Sorry for not being clear. What I meant was what was the reason for you putting up photos of the old polish passports such as at File:PaszportRzeczpospolitaPolska.1931.jpg and File:Wkladka.paszportowa.29.jpg? Just that I cannot image that there are others who have this strange fascination for passport stamps like me. By the way, could you tell me how to identify which stamp is for entering Poland and which one is for leaving Poland, for both the communist era stamps as well as the post-communist ones (the blue and pink ones).slleong (talk) 06:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

What more can I say a big dziękuję again! You have been a great help for my crazy project. You lived through some of the most interesting and important events in history, so its great that you feel the need to document some of that moments. I just finished reading a book on the fall of communism in Eastern Europe after being inspired by the 20th anniversary of the breach of the Berlin Wall. Amazing.slleong (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi. The book I read about the end of communism in Eastern Europe certainly gave recognition to the free elections held in Poland, and the role of Solidarity in the collapse of the Iron Curtain. I could feel the excitement and anxiety when reading the events. Were you directly involved with Solidarity during the period? slleong (talk) 09:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Deepest condolences on what happened to your president and those who perished with him. Its shocking that something like this can happen. slleong (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks !

za informacje o Cybulskiego/Borna. To zdjęcie strony możesz już usunąć (o ile blokuje miejsce czy pamięć na wiki?) - już sobie wydrukowałem, będę informacje stamtąd obrabiać. Dzięki. Co do Cybulskiego, to jednak za parę dni zamieszczę hasło, mimo wszystko sądzę, że da się utrzymać - mam jako źródło jeden przewodnik z PRL (o tyle ważne, że w PRL nie było tak łatwo coś wydać jak dziś, to i chała taka jak czasem dziś przechodzi nie przechodziła) i jeszcze inne drobiazgi bibliograf. Słabe to wszystko, ale może się obroni. Zwłaszcza, że w czasie głosowania nad kryt. ency był w nagłówku tekst, iż to oznacza tylko kryteria ency z automatu, a nie przesądza o ency w całości. Jest tam fajna secesja na dwóch kamienicach, więc wolałbym by hasło o ulicy było. Oczywiście gdybyś gdzieś potknał się o dodatkowe źródło o tej ulicy, to będę wdzięczny za wskazanie. Kiedyś czytałem artykuł o Salzstrasse, ale niestety wtedy nie skopiowałem. Borna napiszę niezaleźnie - na bazie Twych informacji. Bardzo żałuję, że gdy czyściłem archiwum KW PZPR zanosząc do kotłowni tamtejsze teczki z donosami nie zachowałem kilku - to były takie malutkie, podlutkie donosiki jednego robotnika na drugiego, że ten drugi przed 13.00 pił piwo zamiast pracować. Nic wielkiego i historycznego, ale ich skany pięknie by ozdobiły hasło o KW:) "komunikacyjnie jest to uliczka zupełnie bez znaczenia" - no wiesz ! dla mnie ma ona dużo wieksze znaczenie komunikacyjne niż Krzywoustego, do Warszawy jeźdżę raz na rok, do pracy codziennie (OR, POV :)))) --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Tak zdjęcia oczywiście porobiłem, a jak ta obrzydliwa szaruga z gradem za oknem przeminie, dorobię kolejne, np. tablicy upamietniającej pobyt Kasprowicza. Przy obecnej aurze mój aparat robi fatalne zdjęcia, ale jak się rozjaśni ... I dzieki za linki - faktycznie można wycisnąc, a co więcej w jednym z nich jest spis literatury. --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:St. Maria Magdalena Gymnasium, Wrocław

To znowu ja. Nie to, żeby mi to robiło dużą różnicę, ale czy nie warto przekierować tej nazwy nieistniejącej już szkoły niemieckiej na polską? Na tej samej zasadzie, że nie mamy kategorii Akademia Jezuicka we Wrocławiu, mamy Uniwersytet Wrocławski? Nic jezuitom nie ujmując oczywiście :) Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Fajnie, pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 19:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Mapa Kurowa 2007 by Rudi.png

Piszesz, że nowa wersja nie powoduje usunięcia starej. Ale nie widzę sensu trzymania jej, skoro jest zastępująca ją, aktualniejsza. Piott (talk) 22:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

masz w 100% rację :) ale tu jest inna sytuacja. jest to ten sam plan co wcześniej, a różnice dotyczą tylko jego budowy graficznej, tylko kwestii planu jako pracy, nie jego treści. plan przedstawia to samo, zostały w nim wprowadzone tylko zmiany kosmetyczne. tak więc porównanie do dawnych planów sprzed lat jest nieadekwatne, ponieważ na mapie jest to samo co wcześniej, a jedynie z drobnymi zmianami autorskimi. i poprzednia wersja jest teraz niekonieczna, gdyż została zastąpiona poprawioną. ale jak tam uważasz, pozdrawiam - Piott (talk) 00:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Zdjecie protekcji

Moglbys zdjac protekcje z File:Polska 1039 - 1058.png i dodac Category:Maps of the Kingdom of Poland (Piasts)? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Teraz ok - dzięki! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 22:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

File:OldMaid234159.jpg

File:OldMaid234159.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

matanya • talk 07:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:LeszekWozniak-autokarykatura.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:LeszekWozniak-autokarykatura.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Plushy (talk) 14:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

• Tak, z tym plikiem się trochę pośpieszyłem bo najpierw wkleiłem szablon a potem zobaczyłem kto przysłał (jakoś tak nie od razu skojarzyłem nicka znaczy się) co nie zmienia faktu że zgody nie ma i zgodnie z podejściem służbisty szablon się należy :) Jest szablon OTRS pending który nie do końca się nadaje ale jest trochę lepszym rozwiązaniem niż brak niczego imho. Pozdrawiam i przepraszam za szybkie palce, Plushy (talk) 00:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Festung breslau.svg

poprawiłem rozmiar czcionki; co do braku opisu lotniska w legendzie, to nie wiem czemu się nie wyświetla, w tej kwestii i w kwestii źle wyświetlających się napisów jestem otwarty na propozycje i rady;

w razię czego mogę przesłać plik w formacie .png

Botero

Hi,

I was about to delete File:Museo Botero Bogotá by Turista Perene.png when I saw that you delete and then restaure it! Your comment was Colombian law accepts derivative works. First did you have a source about that. Then even though, I’m not sure that Colombian law accepts to apply CC license to this type of artwork. Could you explain me your point of view about this ? Cdlt, VIGNERON * ^discut. 15:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Brytyjski.znaczek.paszportowy.jpg

File:Brytyjski.znaczek.paszportowy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maidonian (talk) 00:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Image:IV MARSZ AUTONOMII ŚLĄSKA -0991.JPG

Mam do Ciebie prośbę czy mógłbyś skasować tę grafikę, ewentualnie przenieść pod inną nazwę. Przez pomyłkę nazwałam plik z cmentarzem: IV MARSZ AUTONOMII ŚLĄSKA. Śmiesznie to wygląda. Jak byś mógł to przenieść to można podać takie same dane jak w tym pliku: Image:Centralny Cmentarz Komunalny w Katowicach.jpg. Bo to jest budynek Centralnego Cmentarza Komunalny w Katowicach. Pozdrawiam. Ewkaa (talk) 17:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

• Dzięki serdeczne za przeniesienie :). Pozdrawiam. Ewkaa (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Your premature closure

Why did you close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Konferencja Wikimedia Polska 2010 mapa.png so soon? Why do you say that the author does not need to divulge sources for the map? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

• Non free derivative works are generally created by the uploader using "computer and mouse". Usually it could not prevent their deletion. And it wasn't a good idea to participate in discussion (with a quite questionable argument btw) and immediately close it. Trycatch (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hamulec_tarczowy.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hamulec_tarczowy.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 18:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Photo of Ignalina

Dear Julo,

My name is Anna Storm and I am a Swedish researcher of history, especially interested in industrial history. Now I am about to start at new project on nuclear power plants, with two case studies, one in Sweden and one in Lithuania, Ignalina. I saw your photo of Ignalina on Wikipedia and wonder if you have any special relation to the plant? Or if you live in the vincinity or so?

Thank you in advance!

Kind regards, Anna Storm

Postdoctoral researcher CBEES (www.sh.se/cbees) Södertörns högskola/Södertörn University SE-141 89 Huddinge/Stockholm Sweden

+46 (0)8 608 4953 [email protected]

File:Wroclaw1998AJurk020.jpg

File:Wroclaw1998AJurk020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Łukasz Łoziński (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Wroclaw latarnik na Ostrowie Tumskim.jpg

Rzuć, proszę, okiem na moją propozycję w historii pliku (przywróciłem zaraz oryginalną wersję) i zdecyduj, czy jest w porządku. Pozdrowienia --Łukasz Łoziński (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Z tego, co mi wiadomo, najlepiej zapytać autora o zdanie mimo licencji public domain, a zapomniałem tego zrobić, stąd powyższy wpis. Bardzo dziękuję za rzeczowe posty. Jak najbardziej popieram potrzebę gromadzenia szerokiej dokumentacji otaczającego nas świata. Różnimy się - wbrew pozorom nieznacznie - co do pomysłu na wykonanie.

Myślę, że tak bogate kategorie jak te poświęcone katedrom, aby pozostały użyteczne, powinny być źródłem przede wszystkim grafik wysokiej jakości, ponieważ gromadzeniem tak zwanego wszystkiego zajmują się takie instytucje jak Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe. Z drugiej strony nawet oni dokonują selekcji, bo nie wszystko, co stare, wydaje się interesujące. W naszych miastach również wyburza się stuletnie budownictwo robotnicze i jakoś nie wzbudza to sprzeciwu. Nie twierdzę jednak, że nie warto robić NACowi pewnej konkurencji.

Wyrażam tylko swoje zdanie i cieszę się, że decyduje społeczność, bo nigdy sam jeden nie wziąłbym odpowiedzialności za kształt Wikimedia Commons.

A co myślisz o pomyśle utworzenia rozdziałów według tematu w kategoriach dot. pol. katedr - wzorem Notre-Dame czy Koelner Dom?

Pozdrawiam --Łukasz Łoziński (talk) 09:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:HenrykZielinski okolo 1952.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:HenrykZielinski okolo 1952.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Babcia Hania confirmed the license Julo (talk) 21:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nashville Parthenon 005.JPG

You will see that I have reopened this discussion. Perhaps I should have asked you to reopen it -- but since FOP in the USA is a very complicated issue, it seemed clear to me that it should run the full seven days.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:WieczorWroclawia20marca1981.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:WieczorWroclawia20marca1981.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

shizhao (talk) 14:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Słusznie postąpiłeś

Witaj!

Czy długość dyskusji jest kryterium? Nasz przyjaciel zapomniał zapoznać się z licencją dotyczącą Unii, która dotyczy także Jego. Autor sam jest sobie winny, że nie chciał się ujawnić. Pewnie miał powody, by się tego bać. Ale tego nie dodałem do uzasadnienia głosu w nowej dyskusji. Ale dodałem "=== ===". Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Bombardowanie Warszawy

Witam. OK - wpisałem co myślę. Ale gdyby sytuacja się powtarzała to lepiej by było przenieść plik do pl-wiki i zrobić użytek z możliwości trzymania tam plików "problemowych" ale ważnych. Była na ten temat dyskusja z pół roku temu. Wiadomo, że zaraz kolega Masur by miał dużo do gadania... Ale może po prostu należy korzystać z tego co mamy pod ręką a nie oglądać się na cały świat, który ma czasami sprawy dla nas ważne i istotne w niezbyt wielkim poważaniu... Pozdrawiam Electron  ^<Talk?> 23:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Photographs by Lewis Carroll

Witam!

Na chłopski rozum, mamy tu sytuację w miarę podobną do zdjęcia bombardowanej Warszawy. Zakładając, że zgłaszający mówi prawdę, mamy sprzeczność między prawem Wuja Sama, a prawem Zjednoczonego Królestwa, które było ojczyzną Lewisa Carrola no i chyba miejscem wykonania zdjęć. Zatem, Wujcio, winien jest uznać wyższość brytyjskiego prawa, przypadkiem unijnego. Które mówi jasno: 70 lat po śmierci twórcy. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Zbanuj mnie, jeśli uznasz, że robię coś niemoralnego, w tej chwili. Ale dodaj tu swoje trzy grosze. Te zdjęcia są za ładne, aby je stracić. --19:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)~

kategoryzacja kościołów

Mam pytanie do Ciebie jako admina commons - czy istneije konsensus tłuamczenia nazw kościołów na angielski? W kategoriach? Bo ja mogę tłumaczyć, why not, ale dla wielu użytkowników wyszukanie kościoła wrocłąwskiego pod angielskim tłumaczeniem jest b. trudne. Bo kto wie co to jest Church of Blessed_Virgin_Mary_Mother_of_Consolation [12] W zasadzie już polskie nazwy są niełatwe - Najświętszej Maryi Panny Matki Pocieszenia, ale to przynajmniej jest oficjalna nazwa. Po kiego grzyba tłumaczyć na angielski nazwy własne, czyli robić OR i robić coś co tylko utrudnia korzystanie użytkownikom prawie wyłącznie polskojęzycznym (bo kto z Anglików szuka parafii na Dąbiu?). A jeśli mamy tłumaczyć parafie, to czemu nie miasta Green Mountain (Zielona Góra), Nearshore (Kołobrzeg).... :)? I jeszcze - czy nazwa kategorii nie może zawierać w nawiasie alternatywnej, bardziej komunikatywnej, np. "Category: kościół Najświętszej Maryi Panny Matki Pocieszenia (Wittiga)" albo Redemptorystów? Jaki jest konsensus w takich sprawach ? Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

P.S. A jeśli angielskie kategorie to czy kościół pw. św. Jacka ma być "church of St. Jacek" or "church of St. Hyacinth"? --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Słupy

Witam serdecznie i proszę o pomoc. Pamiętam, że napisałeś artykuł o słupach granicznych (czterech) we Wrocławiu - ale za chińskiego boga nie mogę znaleźć tego na plwiki. Mógłbyś podać namiar? Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Załadowałem kilka fotek dodatkowych do słupa stulecia:[13]. Zupełnie inna barwa niż na Twoim - jednak światło wszystko zmienia. Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 23:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Wrocław Schronisko PTSM Tumski-sala przod.jpg

Kolejno (jesli jestes zajety i/lub nie masz ochote na czytanie tego [dyskusji czy odpowiedzi nie oczekuje] to pomin prosze ponizsze pkty) :

1. Tak, faktycznie zle spojrzalem i dalem zla nazwe (co zabawne, bo nawet miałem w tej sali wyklady z hodowli tkankowych);
2. Ktora ty mogles bez problemow poprawic bez mojej interwencji i tylko wspomniec mi o moim karygodnym bledzie, bym nigdy wiecej nie odwazal sie "oczywiscie poprawiac" dobrych i precyzyjnych nazw, jak: "File:Sala od przodu-.jpg";
3. Niemniej jednak przenioslem pod: File:Wrocław Ogród Botaniczny-sala wykładowa.jpg, przyjmujac do wiadomosci, ze jestes zajety czyms innym (choc pewnie napisanie mi o tym zajelo wiecej czasu niz odkategoryzowanie i [zajeloby] przeniesienie pod inna nazwe. Ale ok, nie moj czas, nie wnikam. Tak sobie tylko marudze);
4. Co masz na mysli mowiac: kategoryzacja jest pochrzaniona, bo jak widze Category:Schronisko PTSM przy Hotelu Tumskim, Wrocław to chyba nie ma w niej nic "pochrzanionego"? Masur (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

• • Linkowalo w jednej dyskusji wikipedysty tylko, poprawilem oczywiscie. Masur (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:WandaDybalska.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:WandaDybalska.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

GeorgHH • talk   19:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Castanheirashopping.jpg

Please take care about other files mentioned in request. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Gryfice, autor: Jacko

Po tej akcji, zostawiam dodawanie biletów OTRS, odpowiednim osobom :) JDavid (talk) 09:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Pytanie

[14] - chciałem dodać kategorię, ale tam nie ma przycisku edytuj i nie da się nadać kategorii. Czemu? Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 22:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hm, dzięki, wydawało mi się, że byłem wtedy na Commons a nie na plwiki. A tu taka siurpriza, nic dziwnego, że nie dawało się edytować: Jakaś krótka awaria spostrzegania u mnie:). Przy okazji ,oże Cię zainteresuje ta nazistowska odmiana herbu Wrocławia (spójrz na literę W) a i na orła po liftingu

[15] i inne w tej serii. Ostatnio jest o niej głośno w prasie. Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 22:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of images of Polish money

Several images of Polish money have been listed for deletion so that the community can discuss if they should be kept or not. We would appreciate if you could contribute your opinion, seeing as you uploaded one or more of the images that is now up for deletion. The discussion is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of Poland. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:31, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of images of Hong Kong money

Multiple images of Hong Kong money have been listed for deletion so that the community can discuss if they should be kept or not. We would appreciate if you could contribute your opinion, seeing as you uploaded one or more of the images that is now up for deletion. The discussion is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of Hong Kong. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Stamps2005ofMontenegro.jpg

File:Stamps2005ofMontenegro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 16:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Licencje

Witam serdecznie. Mam pytanie do Ciebie jako admina na commons o niuanse między licencjami. Chodzi mi o to, by licencja zdjęcia wprost wymagała podania autora. Jednocześnie bardzo chciałbym uniknąć licencji GFDL, gdyż licencja ta to 10 stronicowy bełkot, w praktyce uniemożliwiający użycie przez kogokolwiek moich zdjęć bez dołączenia całej książeczki z warunkami licencji i wynajęcia sztabu prawników do sprawdzenia czy aby wszelkie wymogo GFDL spełniono. Jednym słowem - zdjęcie na GFDL nie jest, wbrew szumnym deklaracjom, na wolnej licencji.

A więc: kiedy ładuję własne zdjęcie to mam do wyboru różne licencje:

• podwójna licencja CC i GFDL "wymagane podanie autorstwa"
• licencja CC BY SA 3.0 "uznanie autorstwa Na tych samych warunkach"

Czym się różni ""wymagane podanie" od "uznanie autorstwa" ?

W dodatku po zastosowaniu samej licencji CC (np. tu [[16]]) mamy taki komunikat dla korzystających: "uznanie autorstwa – Utwór należy oznaczyć w sposób określony przez Twórcę lub Licencjodawcę. " i nic o uznaniu autorstwa tzn. podaniu autora.

Jaka więc licencja ma napisane w komunikacie dla czytelnika, że korzystając ze zdjęcia ma on obowiązek podać imię nazwisko autora?

Przy okazji: co oznacza BY i SA? O to samo zapytałem Łukasza, bo nie wiem, który z Was jest na linii:) Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 23:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Dziękuję za pojaśnienia. Będę więc stosował cc. Inna rzecz, że komunikat "Utwór należy oznaczyć w sposób określony przez Twórcę lub Licencjodawcę" nie jest dla przeciętnego uytkownika zdjęcia zrozumiały, tzn. nie pisze jasno, że mają być podane dane autora, raczej sugeruje poszukanie jakiejś oddzielnej sekcji pt. oznaczenie, której wszak nie ma. Ciekawe jakby to w sądzie wyglądało, czy ktoś kto podał zdjęcie bez autora mógłby skutecznie tłumaczyć, że licencja nic o tym nie wspomina. No, ale zawsze pozostaje liczyć na dobre obyczaje korzystających i nawyk podawania autora:). Jeszcze raz dzięki. --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 10:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Odbierz proszę maila, wysłałęm pytanie w/s nazewnictwa plików, a nie chcę go upubliczniać. Pozdrowienia --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 22:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:ALepper na stacji benzynowej.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ALepper na stacji benzynowej.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Cathy Richards (talk) 21:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Wuhazet

Would you please take a look at this? From my perspective, it's clear unwelcome sexual harassment and deserves the indefinite block I've given him. However, I do recognize that there may be cultural differences working here and that User:Wuhazet may not realize how bad his behavior looks to many of us. Thanks.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC) (I'm going to make the request of several Polish speaking Admins, as I know it's a difficult time of year.)

File:TrybunaLudu13.12.1981replica.jpg

File:TrybunaLudu13.12.1981replica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liliana-60 (talk) 22:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Detal, ale

w nazwie pliku http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drwniany_ko%C5%9Bci%C3%B3%C5%82ek_w_Kluczach.jpg warto poprawić literówkę (Drewniany). Chyba masz uprawnienia do takiej korekty? Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Dzięki za wyjaśnienia, w sumie faktycznie nie wiadomo czy warto. Pozdrawiam. --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 11:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Wkurzający mechanizm

Witaj. Czy możesz mi wyjaśnić dla czego mechanizm przesyłania plików ładuje mi wciąż tę samą grafikę, mimo że korygowałem i przesyłałem ją dwa pięć razy przy pomocy przycisku "Załaduj nowszą wersję tego pliku"? Dotyczy to obrazka File:Greek diphthongs.png. / Andrzej 22 (talk) 19:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

• A jednak było inaczej. Mechanizm pobierał nowy plik, ale Commons wciąż wyświetlało stary. Sytuacja zmieniła po około godzinie. Jeżeli możesz, zgłoś to gdzieś – szkoda nerwów i czasu. / Andrzej 22 (talk) 06:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Saibo (Δ) 01:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Julo/archive 1. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel (talk) 21:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

OTRS ticket from http://muzyczny.pl

Hi, could you check this ticket? I want to know if it grants for any image of musical instruments or musical accesories hosted there. Thank you very much for your time. Lobo (howl?) 15:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Rudolf.Modrzejewski.1931.jpg

File:Rudolf.Modrzejewski.1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Tadeusz Szymków

Odwiedzasz cmentarz osobowicki ? Sfotografujesz grób tego aktora ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Na filmpolski.pl są podane takie współrzędne: 79/854 Czy jest to dla Ciebie cenna wskazówka ? Dasz radę ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Usunięcie loga

Usuwam loga stacji o które potwierdziłeś od użytkownika Nikbot. Miałem obawy, że tak będzie. Na razie i pozdrawiam LukaszM600 P.S. Użytkownik Ciacho5 z Wikipedii też prosił o usunięcie logów stacji. LukaszM600 discussion 13:58, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Zeitschrift des Vereins fuer Volkskunde 19 A 002.png

(Deletion requet) Please see User talk:Fastily/Archive 1#File:Zeitschrift des Vereins fuer Volkskunde 19 A 002.png and undelete the file. --enomil 13:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

It's a scanned copy of a blank page, there is no need for it, nor is it being linked to any article. Gsingh (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't write again why it is in WS-scope and so in Commons-scope, it is all said at Fastily's disc. --enomil 17:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

 :::Than it should be deleted on the DE wikisource project also, there is no need for a blank scanned page. Gsingh (talk) 03:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Could you provide a translation for the de Wikisource page? It doesn't work with Google Translate. But it doesn't appear that the image is linked to any page, don't you think that it would be better to delete the last page on de Wikisource? There's no use for an blank page. Gsingh (talk) 03:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Jachiajew6V1945.jpg

File:Jachiajew6V1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikiźródła

Nie wiem, czy cię wikiźródła powiadamiają: s:pl:Dyskusja wikiskryby:Julo#Historia Polski a fotografie

Image:Ulica w Ejszyszkach.JPG

Copied from w:ru:Википедия:Сообщения об ошибках#Ulica_w_Ejszyszkach.JPG = Wikipedia:Zgłoś błąd w artykule

• toz nie Ejszyszki- a Soleczniki :)

Автор сообщения: Alicja 94.232.224.1 20:16, 31 мая 2012 (UTC)

--Shruggy (talk) 00:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:2003-10-11-Bauchnabel.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2003-10-11-Bauchnabel.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hindustanilanguage (talk) 05:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Flaga Ljubljany.jpg

Yours sincerely Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Tk100n1o.jpg

This appears to be the same as http://www.bangladesh-bank.org/images/currmuse/tk100n1o.gif. You say on the file that it was released into the Public Domain by Ron Wise, but is he the true author or is the Bangladesh bank? --Bequw (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Tk100n1o.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— T. 08:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified pictures of "Pisa"

Hi Julo. I identified this file File:Pisa004 crop fl.jpg, it's the Camposanto of Pisa. But this other picture File:Pisa002 crop fl.jpg I don't think that's in Italy (i'm quite sure...!). It is possible that it is in a big city of Germany or Austria or of East Europe? (Prag, Budapest, Varsaw, ....?). And then I think that the picture is more elder than 1930. This kind of skirts are more characteristic of the early twentieth century (1890-1915). What do you think? Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Wonderfull !!!! Thank you! --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified locations in Italy

Hi Julo. I looked at this unidentified stereo photographs of your grandfather (group Sh). They are (I think) all monuments in Category:Como. I will be very greatful to you if you can give at each photo the category of his monument, and then the category of the historical images of Como too. Thank you very much. For the other pictures of Switzerland, sure there are photos of Bern, but not all. I will see better these photos soon. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Post Scriptum: the numbers that you give to the files, are they written on the glass or are they numbers that you give? It's important, specially the number (x). If they are numbers written on the glass, some unidentified pictures we can localizate it in the same place, e.g. if (1) and (3) is Como, and (2) is unidentified, we can assign Como to the (2). Tell me about it, please. Thank you!

Ok. But you have forgotten:

• to delete in each picture the "Category:Unidentified locations in Italy":
• to assign at each picture the category of the monument (church, tower, building) in Como, if it is possible. It's not difficult: it's suffisant that you look into the different cats of the buildings in Como, and you will ricognize very well the building.
  

Thank you very much! Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Okragly Stol 1989.jpg

File:Okragly Stol 1989.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.24.244.224 09:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:10&50tolar.jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 22:51, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Gonars Memorial.jpg

File:Gonars Memorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 7b65115be18279b9c4b10c039fd597d4

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

A guide to Polish copyright

Following some recent discussions, I have attempted to compile a guide to Polish copyright. It's available at User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright. I'd like to invite you to comment on it, and of course you are more then welcome to improve it. I am contacting you and several other commons editors who I know work with Polish Copyrights, as I am not aware of any centralized noticeboard to reach them, feel free to pass this message to such a place if it exists, and to whoever else you think could be interested in such a topic. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Tadeusz Szymków

Odwiedzasz obecnie Cmentarz Osobowicki ? Czy dasz radę sfotografować grób tego aktora jeśli leży on na polu 79 , a drugi parametr usytuowania (nie wiem kwatera, rząd albo grób ?) wynosi 854. Jest szansa na fotkę ? Pleonazm9084 (talk) 12:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

• No więc proszę o Twój adres e-mail Pleonazm9084 (talk) 09:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Copyright status: File:KWK Janina 1938-39 zza płota2.JPG

Julo, wstawiłeś mi pytanie o licencję, a przecież to plik załadowany pierwotnie przez Ciebie z Twojego archiwum. Niezaleznie od tego widzę, że plik ma w opisie przez Ciebie dodaną licencję cc-by-sa-3.0.

Pozdrawiam PawełMM (talk) 06:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana-square near stJacob church.jpg

File:Ljubljana-square near stJacob church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Us_flag_crossed.png

Is this the logo of a Puerto Rican anti-statehood movement by any chance (given that the crossed-out US flag is a 51-state flag)?

• No. See here. Julo (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nordkapp Globus 2005.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Europa (moon)

Witaj. Ktoś w tej kategorii nieźle namieszał. Może to jakiś błąd któregś bota. Kategoria powinna grupować fotki księżyca Jowisza, a jest tam cała kolekcja chrząszczy i gruowe fotki ludzi. 89.78.160.39 10:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For finding the source of File:Wanda Wasilewska 2.JPG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 11:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Requset

Hi Julo, could you please take a look at User_talk:Shanmugamp7#File:Benzynowa_lampa_gornicza_Davy.27ego.jpg, Thanks--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 17:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File:HalaTargowa2-rzuty.png - forgotten template:PD-old-100

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

"Speedy" Deletion requests

Hi Julo,

I noticed you closed a DR just 40 minutes after it started. The guidelines expect to wait for seven days until closing, if it's not an obvious copvio. I think we should give uploaders and the community this time to answer in the DR. Tx --Funfood ␌ 13:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Kłopoty z licencją

Cześć Julo

Mam kłopot z licencjami zdjęć na stronie Portowej Straży Pożarnej "FLORIAN". Zdjęcia są z mojej galerii. Język angielski nie jest mocną stroną i nie wiem jak to wszystko mam pozaznaczać aby wszystko było ok. Generalnie zdjęcia można przyjąć, że są PSP FLORIAN. Można przyjąć dlatego, że są robione przez pracowników z polecenia dyrekcji PSP FLORIAN, ew. jedno (nazwisko podane) to zdjęcie z serii za które PSP zapłaciło. Jestem we władzach PSP, więc wiem jak to wygląda z punktu formalnego.

Mam też pytanie odnośnie logo PSP FLORIAN. Zostało ono usunięte bez wiadomego powodu. Coś musiałem naknocić.

Można prosić o pomoc? --Jbork (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Pan Tadeusz

Czy podczas wizyty we Wroclawiu ktos zadal sobie trud wskanowania/sfotografowania rekopisu calego Pana Tadeusza? Dziwi mnie fakt, ze w takim USA jest wszystko traktowane jako pozycja obowiazkowa, praktycznie w sieci. Chocby oryginal konstytucji i poprawek do niej. A na polskiej wiki jak nie ma tak nie ma...

File:Bonduelle.frozen.JPG

File:Bonduelle.frozen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 16:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Order

Witaj, pomyliłem się w nazwie strony i byłbym wdzięczny, gdybyś mógł zmienić jej nazwę na prawidłową.

Obecna nazwa: File:- ribbon bar v.1979.gif [17]

Powinno być: File:Order of Carlos Manuel de Céspedes (Cuba) - ribbon bar v.1979.gif

Z góry dziękuję za pomoc. Pozdrawiam - McOleo (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

• Dzięki. McOleo (talk) 07:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Julu, mam kolejną prośbę o korektę w nazwie strony.

Jest: File:Order of Merit (Liechtenstein) - ribbon bar.gif [18]

Powinno być: File:Commemorative Medal of the 70th Birthday of Franz Josef II (Liechtenstein) - ribbon bar.gif

Dziękuję awansem i ściskam dłoń - McOleo (talk) 07:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Wrocław, Ślady wojny - fotopolska.eu (300372).jpg

Wikipedyści są wszędzie! :) W kategorii Category:Images from Fotopolska needing categories jest kilka Twoich zdjęć z Fotopolski. Gdybyś miał ochotę to możesz skategoryzować i zobaczyć czy nie ma duplikatów (na przykład File:Władysławowo, Karwinka - fotopolska.eu (179616).jpg i File:Ujscie-KarwienskieBlota.jpg). Zwiadowca ²¹ 10:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Plitvickie-bilety.jpg

File:Plitvickie-bilety.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Zdjęcia z NAC (kwestia licencji)

Witam. Mam takie pytanie odnośnie zdjęć pochodzących z NAC. Czy mogę wrzucić do Commons następujące zdjęcia: [19], [20], [21] na takich samych zasadach (licencja PD-Poland) na jakich zostało wrzucone poniższe zdjęcie:

[22].

Pozdrawiam. --MAx 92 (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Dziękuje za odpowiedź. Wg. informacji podanej przy tych zdjęciach z NAC pochodzą one najprawdopodobniej z Ilustrowanego Kuriera Codziennego, ale nie podano konkretnego numeru. Trudno, poszukam w starych wydaniach gazet. Pozdrawiam. --MAx 92 (talk) 08:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Zatoka Pucka mapa mini.png

Cześć!

Widziałem, że edytowałeś tę mapę. Czy potrafiłbyś dodać do niej dalsze rezerwaty w Parku?

Pozdrawiam,

Gżdacz (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Przejmowanie materiałów z NAC

Nawiązując do rozmowy o zdjęciach z NAC chwilę wcześniej, jeśli ustawa mówi opublikowane bez wyraźnego zastrzeżenia praw autorskich przed uchwaleniem ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1994 r., to czym jest tu to "wyraźne zastrzeżenie"? Czy podanie nazwiska fotografa już stanowi takie zastrzeżenie? Czy jeśli w broszurce z 1974 mam reprodukowane przedwojenne zdjęcie podpisane "Ze zbiorów CAW" (CAW=Centralne Archiwum Wojskowe), to ono wskutek tej publikacji staje się PD, czy nie?

W tej chwili mogę uściślić kwestię:

Tutaj jest zdjęcie z NAC: http://www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/92808/6d0ccd5dd780fbc3d15d66a7b956235e/

Znalazłem je, opublikowane zostało bez podpisu autora zdjęcia (nie ma go także w stopce redakcyjnej) w Ilustrowanym Kuryerze Codziennym, 1932, nr 174 (25 VI), str. 2: http://mbc.malopolska.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=66726

Pytanie: czy w tej sytuacji mogę to zdjęcie ściągnąć ze strony NAC i umieścić w commons? Usuwać logo NAC czy nie?

Gżdacz (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Kolejny taki przypadek, tylko inne szczegóły:

http://www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/92805/5443973fca4d954d84085599967d1081/

opublikowane (po lekkim wykadrowaniu) w broszurze

Mieczysław Kuligiewicz, Kuter pościgowy Batory, Wydawnictwo MON, 1974, Typy Broni i Uzbrojenia 28

z podpisem "z Archiwum Dokumentacji Mechanicznej".

Skądinąd wiem, że wyszło też w Ilustrowanym Kuryerze Codziennym 1934, nr 116 (28 IV) str. 4, tam akurat z podpisem autora, który zmarł w 1968.

Można załadować na commons?

Gżdacz (talk) 06:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Dzień dobry,  chcielibyśmy poinformować Pana, że zdjęcie (Wiki-Commons)  przedstawiające Ratusz w Nowym Miasteczku  – oczywiście po podaniu informacji dot. praw autorskich – zostało umieszczone na stronie naszego niekomercyjnego projektu << Kalendarza FVKS "W Podróży" 2013 >>. Motywem przewodnim są "wieże". Nie wykluczone, że pojawią się tam kolejne zdjęcia Pana autorstwa. http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/ http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/2013/11/24/wieza-ratuszowa-nowe-miasteczko-pl/ Mamy nadzieję, że wszystko się zgadza. Pozdrawiamy  FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. (Stowarzyszenie Promocji Miasta Kultury Görlitz-Zgorzelec t.z.) [email protected], Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File:HongKong10dolar.jpg

File:HongKong10dolar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Znaczki GG 001.jpg

And also:

• File:Znaczki GG 002.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 003.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 004.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 005.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 006.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 007.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 008.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 009.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 010.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 011.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 012.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 013.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 014.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 015.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 016.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 017.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 018.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 019.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 020.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 021.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 022.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 023.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 024.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 025.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 026.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 027.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 028.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 029.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 030.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 031.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 032.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 033.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 034.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 035.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 036.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 037.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 039.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 040.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 041.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 042.jpg
• File:Znaczki GG 043.jpg

Yours sincerely, JuTa 14:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Illustrations from "Historia Polski 1914-1939"

Julo, Właśnie zauważyłem Category:Illustrations from "Historia Polski 1914-1939". Licencja CC nie jest poprawna ponieważ Henryk Zieliński jako autor książki nie miał praw autorskich do zdjęć w niej wydanych, tylko do tekstu, wiec nie mogłeś tych praw odziediczyć. Na szczęście wszystkie zdjęcia są objęte {{PD-Polish}}. Planuje to poprawić ale chciałem najpierw sprawdzić z tobą. Pozdrowienia. --Jarekt (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Kaliumcyanid.jpg

File:Kaliumcyanid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.145.180 13:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Okragly Stol 1989.jpg

File:Okragly Stol 1989.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polimerek (talk) 15:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:ApfelBirneQuitte I in Brockhaus.jpg

File:ApfelBirneQuitte I in Brockhaus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CaS2000 (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Walschaerts motion.gif

File:Walschaerts motion.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 10:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)