Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ileana n!

-- 22:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ileana n!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

My copyrights

edit

This is a photo of pope John Paul II i have since some time ago, i upload it to my computer, and i want to publish it. It is a casuallity that it is found on internet very easy! Either, religion should be free! Ok Msgr Camaldo's photo isn't mine, but the one of the Blessed John Paul II is mine, really mine. It is an OFFICIAL PORTRAIT that can be distributed around the globe. The photo of John Paul II, is one they distributed on 1979, for his visit to Mexico, i also have another one of 2005 when he died, i also have a photo of Paul VI, of a blessing he gave to my house in 1968.

Dear Ileana n, i need your help, i made the article on wikipedia spanish of Msgr. Francesco Camaldo, but i need a photo of him to put on the article, can you help me please?

Another question. If i upload another photo using copyright that says to a webpage? --JorgeE10 (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Si

edit

Me refiero a subir una foto citando la pagina de donde la baje. Mons. Camaldo no me ha respondido, y ahorita estan ocupados en Roma, pero seguire a la espera. P.D. haz una visita a la pagina de Wikipedia Barroco Novohispano, en español. Bueno, no se como averiguar si las fotos y su licencia, cuando las encuentro en ahoo o Google. Igual gracias por tu ayuda, y si quieres puedes seguir lo que estoy escribiendo en el articulo del Barroco novohispano. Saludos--JorgeE10 (talk) 03:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ileana: No se han borrado las fotos con copyright, lo dejo fluir solo, las quito, o ya las uso en wikipedia? --JorgeE10 (talk) 21:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Logo de Resident Evil 6

edit

La verdad no sé como manejar eso del copyright, me costó trabajo editar y quitarle cosas al logotipo para que sea eliminado, pero no entiendo porqué debe eliminarse si solamente tiene el número 6 y la palabra Biohazard, incluso en la Wikipedia en francés tienen el mismo logo sin problemas.

Nominaciones a borrado

edit

Te sugiero que cuando encuentres imágenes vandálicas en Commons, las mandes a borrar a través de Speedy deletion usando la plantilla {{Speedy}} en lugar de abrir un Deletion request, ya que claramente cumplen con los Criterios para el borrado rápido. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

Please be careful with uploading derivative works of copyrighted content. For example, files like File:Lepidodendron ophiurus.JPG could be an infringement of copyright of the Natural History Museum. -- RE rillke questions? 20:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Creative Commons

edit

Hola Ilieana n:

La web oficial de la escritora Maribel Álvarez ya cuenta con el sello de Creative Commons, por lo que entiendo que ya podemos usar las imágenes que aparecen en la web, ¿verdad?

Gracias

Hola, Ileana. El sitio claramente indica una licencia compatible, y lo vi desde un principio. Sin embargo, cuando se trata de libros, sus autores no siempren tienen todos los derechos de autor. Muchas veces, las portadas tienen un autor distinto o sus derechos pertenecen a la editorial. Otras veces, los derechos de autor de un libro le pertenecen a más de una persona (física o jurídica). Por esto es necesario demostrar por medio de OTRS tanto la propiedad plena de los derechos como la autorización. --Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 02:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Juan Manuel "Rifle" Varela.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Juan Manuel "Rifle" Varela.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 20:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio tagging

edit

Please be more careful when tagging images as copyvio, such as File:Bizarrap ftt.jpg. In general, you should only use the {{Copyvio}} tag if you find another image online that is both 1) older than the Wikimedia upload; and 2) of the same resolution or larger. Additionally, it is recommended that you supply a link to a specific external site rather than a page of Tineye or Google reverse search results, as different users might get different results and it can be hard to tell which site you are using as definitive proof of a copyvio. For mere suspicions of copyvio, you can use {{Delete}} instead.

In this case, the uploader has uploaded three images, all at full resolution with Canon EOS Rebel T7 in the EXIF, which is pretty strong evidence that it is own work. For a 2019 upload, it is not unusual that other people will download the image from Commons and use it online. Another photo by the same uploader, File:Trueno ftt.jpg, has been nominated for deletion and kept. -- King of ♥ 02:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply