User talk:Fabian Roudra Baroi/Archive 1

বাংলা বিবরণ যোগের অনুরোধ

ভাইয়া, ছবি আপলোডের জন্য আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ জানাচ্ছি। ছবি আপলোডের সময়, ছবির শিরোনাম আপনি বাংলাতে না দিলেও, অন্ততপক্ষে ছবিতে বাংলা বিবরণ যোগ করে দেওয়ার অনুরোধ করছি।

আপলোড উইজার্ডে আপলোডের তৃতীয় ধাপে (বিবরণ ট্যাবে) আপনি বাংলা ভাষায় বিবরণ যোগ করতে পারেন। ওখানে আপনি "আরেকটি ভাষায় একটি বিবরণ যোগ করুন" নামে একটি বোতাম পাবেন, তাতে ক্লিক করে যোগ বাংলা ঘর নির্বাচন করে বাংলা যোগ করতে পারেন। একসাথে একাধিক ছবি আপলোডের ক্ষেত্রে, "নিন্মলিখিত সমস্ত আপলোডে তথ্য অনুলিপি করুন..." বোতামে ক্লিক করে আপনি প্রথম বিবরণ তার নিচের সব ছবির জন্য অনুলিপি করতে পারেন। এই রকম (আপনার কমন্সের ইন্টারফেসের ভাষা ইংরেজি হলে স্ক্রিনশটে দেখানো লেখা ইংরেজিতে আসবে, তবে পদ্ধতি সব এক)। না বুঝলে আমাকে জানাবেন। ধন্যবাদ। আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

ছবি আপলোড করলে অনুগ্রহ করে ছবিতে বাংলা বিবরণ যোগ করুন। ধন্যবাদ। আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Added catagory

As your request in off-wiki, I have added "Project Korikath" Catagory in your images. You can find the images in the catagory now. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Fabian Roudra Baroi/Archive 1,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beck Taxi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute Swan at High Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Captivated Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monkeys of The Sundarbans 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Parliament of Canada, Ottawa 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Purple CA --Poco a poco 11:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Removed the purple tint from the picture, is it okay now ? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Wasiul Bahar 15:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The composition is OK (may be improved by cropping/cloning out the out-of-focus twig in the foreground but not a deal-breaker) but there are some overprocessing artefacts around the tail, can these be fixed? --BigDom 09:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks for the review BigDom, actually these are the sensor damages which occurred by laser lights during a party, I have tried to remove it as much as I could. Let me know if I can do anything else--Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 Support Looks much better for having the twig removed and the other bits aren't so noticeable, good to go. --BigDom 07:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Kingfisher in Sundarbans 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wasiul Bahar 19:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monkeys of The Sundarbans 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 04:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Subaru BRZ , Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and time control --PantheraLeo1359531 18:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feral Pigeon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! One of the last captivated Dolphins of Canada.3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Sunflower 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose I like your sunflower, and it could be a QI, but the image doesn't have the minimum requirement of 2 megapixels. I'm really sorry. --Terragio67 21:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
@Terragio67: Thanks for the review. I accidentally uploaded the short file, uploaded the main file now --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 Support It's a soft and nice crop/composition. I believe it is: Good quality. --Terragio67 04:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monkeys of The Sundarbans 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood Duck, Highpark 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monkeys of The Sundarbans 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute Swan at High Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose Burnt sky. Sorry. --Ermell 09:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
@Ermell: Thanks for the rreview. Tried to fix it is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood Duck, Highpark 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ship spotted in The Sundarban 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deers of Sundarbans 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archbishop Ganguli Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose Strange red spots all over the image. I´m not sure if this are hot pixels but that problem must be fixed before you upload more images. Sorry. --Ermell 09:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
@Ermell: Actually these pictures were taken almost 1 year ago also in JPEG format. I have tried a bit to improve it. How is it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Support Good work, thank you.--Ermell 23:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Parliament of Canada, Ottawa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose A lot of hot pixels, too noisy, the perspective should be corrected, the clone stamp error fixed and the CA removed. Sorry. --Ermell 09:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
@Ermell: Tried to fix it as per your instructions, is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Support Much better, thank you.--Ermell 23:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gus Harris Trail 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ship spotted in The Sundarban 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rottweiler in Sylhet 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water Buffal,Sylhet 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kajama, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enterprise 2000 and dash 8-400 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern Spirit 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enterprise 2000 and dash 8-400 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gus Harris Trail 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thousand Islands Pier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:10, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presto Card Reader.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very tight cut at the top but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thousand Islands Pier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too much denoising, too much sky (wrong orientation, in this case I suggest cropping some sky), too generic categories, please, remove "Ontario" and add something about boats and ports, the WB looks too cold and it is also a bit underexposed --Poco a poco 09:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)@Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, tried to edit it as you said (Sharp 50,Mask 25,Noise Red 10 and increased expo,highli,shadows,lights). Is it good enough? I added the port, not sure about the boats.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 Support Sharpness here is borderline, but definitely better --Poco a poco 11:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Probably not OK unless you have permission from the artist: see COM:FOP Canada in regard to flat art: "The freedom provided by the quoted section does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs. These cannot be uploaded to Commons without a license from the copyright holder even if they are permanently located in a public place, unless they are in the public domain." -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sharpness could be better (f/4.5 is too low for this kind of image, I expect f/8 or closer). The image is leaning in too. --XRay 08:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, appreciate it. Uploaded a new version how is it?
Sharpness isn't good, but may be acceptable. But - sorry - I found a lot of green CA. Please fix it. --XRay 09:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Fixed the ca. Actually, there was much grain in the raw so fixing it up took some details--Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 Support Acceptable. For the future: Please pay attention to the aperture. --XRay 09:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ENTERPRISE 2000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Image would benefit if the green buoy on the right edge was either all the way in or out of the picture. --GRDN711 04:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)@GRDN711: Removed, thanks for the suggestion. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 Comment The highlights are blown. Please dial them back. I'll wait a day or two, then move this to Consensual Review if necessary. -- Ikan Kekek 06:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, I tried my best. If it doesn't work, I'll cut out the right side. Also, what's your suggestion when I'm having a dark sub and bright bg> --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
I wouldn't be able to give you technical advice, but the contrast may have to be decreased in that situation. I'll look at the current version later today. -- Ikan Kekek 20:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Fabian_Roudra_Baroi

Category discussion warning

Fabian Roudra Baroi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Elizium23 (talk) 00:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fabian Roudra Baroi Portrait 2.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fabian Roudra Baroi Portrait 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

MdsShakil (talk) 07:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

@MdsShakil: Done. Can you check the mail?--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

✓ DoneMdsShakil (talk) 19:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water Buffal,Sylhet 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water Buffal,Sylhet 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clock Tower of old Post Office, Quebec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Parliament of Canada, Ottawa 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speed boat on Lake Ontario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto CN Tower 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HTO Park, Toronto 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rogers Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HTO Park, Toronto 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black Drongo, Sylhet 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose, Toronto 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 14:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HTO Park, Toronto 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image! But I'd suggest reducing the vignetting effect. --Augustgeyler 11:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)@Augustgeyler: Thanks for your review, is it better now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
 Support Great! Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please adjust the perspective. "Toronto" as location is not good enough. A smart crop would be nice, there is too much empty space. Geo location is missing. --XRay 04:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for your review, perspective fixed, location category fixed, cropped. I'm not sure how to add geo, is it already built-in camera? I couldn't find such settings. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Some cameras are able to add the geo location. Otherwise you can find tools here at Commons to do this. --XRay 12:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norvic 1 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please adjust the perspective. A category for the location is missing. Geo location is missing. It looks like a snapshot. --XRay 04:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for your review. Fixed the perspective and the category for the location, not sure about the geo location. I decreased the aperture from 1.8 to 4 to capture good details of white parts, also good enough shutter speed for a sharp image, I think the objects behind the boat are too close for a strong bokeh--Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --XRay 12:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HTO Park, Toronto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of St. Lawrence River 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Blue Heron, Highpark 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Blue Heron, Highpark 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norvic 1 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute Swan on Lake Ontario 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairmont Le Château Frontenac, Quebec 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose, Toronto 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clangula Hyemalis (Long Tailed Duck) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harbourfront Canoe and Kayak Centre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jack Layton memorial statue 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HTO Park, Toronto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harbourfront Canoe and Kayak Centre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harbourfront Canoe and Kayak Centre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jack Layton memorial statue 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

বিজয় দিবস?

হ্যালো @Fabian Roudra Baroi, কমন্সে অনেকগুলো মানসম্মত চিত্র আপলোড করায় আপনাকে অসংখ্য ধন্যবাদ। আমি বাংলাদেশ থেকে আপলোড করা ছবিতে নিয়মিত টহল দেই। টহল দিতে গিয়ে লক্ষ্য করলাম আপনার ২১ তারিখের তোলা কিছু ছবিতে শিরোনাম হিসেবে ‘Victory day’ ব্যবহার করেছেন (উদাহরণ- File:Victory Day Celebration Dhaka, Bangladesh 21.jpg)। যেহেতু ছবিগুলো ২১ ফেব্রুয়ারির এবং ছবিতে শহীদ মিনার রয়েছে, তাই ধারণা করছি ছবিগুলো শহীদ দিবস/আন্তর্জাতিক মাতৃভাষা দিবস উদযাপনের ছবি। আপনি নিশ্চিত করলে আমি ছবিগুলোর নাম পরিবর্তন করতে পারি। নামের ক্ষেত্রে আপনার পরামর্শ থাকলে তাও জানাতে পারেন। শুভেচ্ছাসহ, Yahya (talk) 22:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

দুঃখিত। আমারই ভুল হয়েছে। ছবিগুলো ১৬ ডিসেম্বরেরই দেখতে পাচ্ছি। শহীদ মিনারের ছবি দেখে একটু কনফিউজড হয়েছিলাম। Yahya (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

@Yahya: ২০২১ সালের ডিসেম্বরে বিজয়ের ৫০ বছর উপলক্ষে মানিক মিয়া অ্যাভিনিউতে এই অস্থায়ী শহীদ মিনার প্রতীকী হিসেবে তৈরি করা হয়। --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

জ্বি, বুঝতে পেরেছি। আপলোডের তারিখ ২১ তারিখ হওয়ায় ভুল বুঝেছিলাম। ছবিগুলো আপলোডের জন্য ধন্যবাদ। Yahya (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Duck, Whitby 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Please add 'males' to the description. --Cayambe 21:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your support, added.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HTO Park, Toronto 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CN Tower at Toronto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norvic 1 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bicycle Lane, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto CN Tower 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Categories

Hi Fabian! Here is the missing answer for your questions about categorization. I've seen at your user page your language level in English is much better than mine, so it may be better you'll explain ... My answer is at your discussion page, because it's easier to create links.

First: We've an official policy about categorization. You'll find all important information at this policy. The tips are IMO the best point.

But before categorization you should know the difference of tags and categories. Wikimedia Commons has no tags. An example: Toronto, Park, Bench or Seasaw may be good as tag. As category you should have a closer look. Category:Toronto has a lot of subcategories. (Toronto is an awful example, because too much images are in the root category instead of good subcategories.). The same at Park, Bench or Seesaw. If the root categories fits to you image, look for one or more suitable subcategories. And please have a look for special categories. I've seen you've found already Dentonia Park. This category is much better than the more common category Parks in Toronto.

Second: Let's have a look to the questions in the policy. Some questions are important, other less important. You can't answer always all questions.

A closer look:

what?/whom?: Try to identify the subject, for example Seesaw. Then check for a better category (by location, by city, by material, by color, ...), for example Seesaws in Canada (red link, good idea, but the category does not exists). Does this category exists? Decide to create the category. Don't forget things like lawns, sky, trees, streets and all the other things around the subject.

where?: Choose a category which depends on the location, for example Dentonia Park or something else. If you take your location, in most of the cases Openstreetmap should find the location.

when?: A simple category for the time or date the photo was taken should be exist. It can be a month like Category:April 2022 in Canada or similar. It can be a season too. Or both. There are template categorizing automatically, like {{Taken on}}, but IMO it is not recommended categorizing on this way. You can't use tools like Hot Cat or Cat-a-lot with these kind of categorization.

There are some other questions for special cases, but not all of them are important for usual photographs.

Third: You do not know what you have photographed or you do not know the English word. In this cases I search at Commons for similar images with the known terms. Or I'm searching at Wikidata with my knowns terms and hope to find an entry. Or I'm looking at Wikipedia in my language and look for a link to the English Wikipedia at the article. Second last option: Search with Google with my photograph (instead of terms) and look for similar pictures. The option of searching with images instead of terms is not well known. Last chance: Ask at our Village Pump.

I know, these are only small tips. I'm categorizing my images and a lot of other images since years. I find new ideas of categorizing, good and bad ones.

BTW: Please do not forget to recheck images at QIC, especially my image at March 6th. ;-) --XRay 💬 10:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

@XRay: I really appreciate your time and effort in helping me out with all these pieces of information. Even though my general communication language is English, as my mother language is not English, so I'm not aware of all the vocabulary related to playgrounds as I didn't grow up here from my birth. I'm pretty new to Wikimedia commons, as I started to contribute regularly to wikimedia commons since January. I'm trying my best here to learn with my maximum capability. Also, Thanks for all your help and I'm really sorry for being late to reply in your QI nomination as I was a bit busy yesterday. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 04:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm not a native English speaker too, so I can understand your problem. For special terms I'm looking at Wikipedia, Wikidata, Google, etc. Often I can find the term, but sometimes not. I this case I'm looking at Wikimedia Commons and searching in categories. I'm happy, if I find a similar image. And I'm disappointed when it's badly categorized. I need the category! As far as I can see, you're making good progress now. The categorizations are getting better. Reviews at QIC have helped me a lot to improve my images and gain a better understanding. Today my categorization may seem exaggerated, but many people have added something. I use my own bot for my pictures and it automatically adds the simpler categories to me. I also use tools like Hotcat, Cat-a-Lot and VisualFileChange. Some things (like regular expressions) may be easier for me, I come from Information technology. If you have questions, please ask. --XRay 💬 09:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

@XRay: Thats great. I'm also very interested in Information technology. Moreover, the subjects I applied for, in university are Information technology based. It would be a great privilege for me to learn from you. Actually, I don't know how to use most of the tools. That's why I do most of the things manually except QI nomination. Can you suggest me some helpful tools or bots that I might need? Cause I don't have much idea about them. In the past two months, I mainly learned about uploading files/ categorizing / QI,FP nominations only. Also, I'm excited to know more about how I can contribute here meanwhile learning new things.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 04:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

So, please have a look to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets (your preferences) and activate HotCat and Cat-a-lot. The tools will help add or remove categories. The link to VisualFileChange is above. --XRay 💬 13:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
I'm working with a bot for my images. That's more complicate. My bot is programmed in an old style using Perl. Today it should be much better to use Python. Many libraries exist for Python. If you like to have a look to the API, please try: Special:ApiSandbox. --XRay 💬 13:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

@XRay: Thanks for the suggestions, I started to use the tools and they are pretty easy. But can you tell me if there is any way to upload more than 50 pictures at a time? That's sometimes too time consuming. Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jack Layton memorial statue 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CIBC Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs PC (check the verticals), otherwise fine --FlocciNivis 10:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)@FlocciNivis: I couldn't focus on the perspective as I was in a hurry at the time of capture so it was pretty bad. I tried my best to correct it as much as possible. Please check the new version. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support That's good quality now, thank you! --FlocciNivis 10:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 01:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 01:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 01:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norvic 1 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Well done. --Augustgeyler 00:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Underexposed Fixable? --Augustgeyler 00:53, 9 March 2023 (UTC)@Augustgeyler: Definitely, it's improved. Let me know if more changes is needed.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support  Thank you. Good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress of Canada 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Parliament of Canada, Ottawa 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 13:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CN Tower at Toronto 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose, inukshuk park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress of Canada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 23:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you remove the CA of the branches of the tree in the middle? --Der Angemeldete 13:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)@Der Angemeldete: Definitely, Thanks for noticing. It's improved. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. I would still blurr the improved outlines a little bit. --Der Angemeldete 03:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sidewalk of Victoria Park Station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose, inukshuk park 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sidewalk of Victoria Park Station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque of Shahid Minar, Toronto 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto CN Tower 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empress of Canada 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Inukshuk Park 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inukshuk Park 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clangula Hyemalis (Long Tailed Duck) 68 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose, inukshuk park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023 Nikon Coolpix S6300 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inukshuk Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good image but the strings on the subject look slightly tilted CCW. --LexKurochkin 18:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
How is it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Very good now. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 20:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porter Airlines (Dash8-400) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 05:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street signs at Danforth and Victoria Park intersection 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sidewalk of Victoria Park Station 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check the verticals at the left side. --Ermell 06:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
@Ermell: It's a tricky picture, how's it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. That´s it. Thank you. --Ermell 19:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Canada Express (DASH 8-400) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Small halo around lower wing. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 21:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 21:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park Station 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Categorization must be better, category for location missing, geo location missing. --XRay 03:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Is it ok now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 04:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Please remove dust spot. --Rjcastillo 03:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)@Rjcastillo: Thanks for the review. I saw one and fixed it, if you see any more please mark it up.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
The buildings are leaning in too. --XRay 04:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the reviw. How is it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. IMO OK now. --XRay 16:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Please remove dust spot. --Rjcastillo 03:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)@Rjcastillo: Thanks for the review. I saw one and fixed it, if you see any more please mark it up.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
The buildings are leaning in too. --XRay 04:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the reviw. How is it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. IMO OK now. --XRay 16:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 18:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please fix the verticals. And there is a color spot on the right. --XRay 05:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review. Hows the new version? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 14:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Better and good enough for QI. Thank you. --XRay 07:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Turbines in Lakeshore, Toronto 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 06:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 Comment perspective distortion should be fixed here. --Augustgeyler 19:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
How's it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 Comment There was nothing new uploaded. --Augustgeyler 10:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
It's an honest mistake, I'm sorry. It's uploaded now. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 Support Well done! Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto City from Ontario Place 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto City from Ontario Place 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in ontario place 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto City from Ontario Place 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica of Shaheed Minar, Dhaka in Toronto 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left side leaning in --Poco a poco 06:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)@Poco a poco: Thanks for the review. How's it now ? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Definitely better --Poco a poco 19:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beanfield Centre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beanfield Centre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMO Field Closeups 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beanfield Centre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beanfield Centre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto City from Ontario Place 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Toronto City from BMO field 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{}}s Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Toronto City from BMO field 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMO Field Closeups 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Ontario Place 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beanfield Centre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beanfield Centre 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Toronto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It is rotated cw and might need a perspective correction. Additionally there is a halo at the sky around the edges of the building. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 05:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I did the best I could, how's it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support I think you manged too improve it a lot!  Thank you.. It is still not very sharp, the perspective is still not perfect, but I think it can be seen as QI. --Augustgeyler 17:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Billy Bishop Airport 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 04:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 Comment I suggest an improvement. The image is IMO too bright, please try to improve brightness and contrast. --XRay 04:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-winged blackbird, Highpark 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-winged blackbird, Highpark 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Same problems with the diaphragm to much wide open. Try to solve the CA problems that appear under the duck, in the shaded areas of the tree. --Mister rf 23:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)@Mister rf: Thanks for the review, CA removed. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support The new file is OK --Mister rf 09:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enercare Centre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The sign should be horizontal. --XRay 04:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, how's it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. IMO OK. Thank you. --XRay 13:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality and centred correctly IMO. --多多123 16:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Geo location and category for the skyline missing. --XRay 04:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, Geo added but I'm not sure which skyline to add it as. It's one of the end parts of Toronto, but not the main part. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support I've added a category. --XRay 13:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --多多123 16:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turkish Cargo 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turkish Cargo 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures at G Ross Lord Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:10, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 02:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhema Christian Ministries 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 02:57, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Downsview Park TTC Station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 02:57, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Canada in Toronto 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Downsview Park Merchant Market Farmers Market 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is a long white triangle after rotation in the bottom-left corner. Additionally it is still a little bit tilted to the left --Jakubhal 03:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)@Jakubhal: Thanks for noticing, how's it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 02:52, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

QIC Photos of Christian Ministries, Downsview

A more precise Summary/Description of your photo would be "Entrance of the Rhema Christian Ministries building, ...". For Categories, explore Category:Churches in Canada or Category:Christianity in Canada. These have sub-categories such as "Churches in Toronto" and "Christian buildings in Canada". One or more of these may be appropriate for your photo. Looking in Category:Entrances in Canada one finds Category:Doors in Toronto which is also appropriate. Tagooty (talk) 02:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me out, I'm not sure which denomination they are. So, I'll just add churches in Toronto and Doors in Toronto. Also, I'll change the description. Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Downsview Park TTC Station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turkish Cargo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-winged blackbird, Highpark 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
should be cropped and shadows lifted --Charlesjsharp 08:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Done --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turkish Cargo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turkish Cargo 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhema Christian Ministries 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turkish Cargo 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Eglintion Station (TTC) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Downsview Park Merchant Market Farmers Market 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
White triangles after rotation, top-left corner and bottom-left corner --Jakubhal 03:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)@Jakubhal: Thanks for noticing, how's it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 Comment There is still one in bottom-left corner --Jakubhal 02:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
@Fabian Roudra Baroi: --Jakubhal 03:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)@Jakubhal: I'm sorry I missed that one, it's fixed now. Thank you. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhema Christian Ministries 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
QI needs a descriptive file name and summary. Categories should reflect the subject -- presumably this building is only incidental to the Downstown Park. --Tagooty 03:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)@Tagooty: I'm not sure what categories to add, also for the description it's a christian ministry --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
See your Talk page User_talk:Fabian_Roudra_Baroi#QIC_Photos_of_Christian_Ministries,_Downsview --Tagooty 02:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)@Tagooty: It's updated. Thanks for the help. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:05, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Canada in Toronto 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CAT:Air Canada and Toronto need to be more specific. Add Category:C-FRAM (aircraft). A bit hazy, improve clarity? --Tagooty 03:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)@Tagooty: Done as you suggested, is it ok now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Eglintion Station (TTC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Toronto City from BMO field 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beanfield Centre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMO Field Closeups 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto Skyline March 2023 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 Comment I believe that is a raccoon, not a raccoon dog. Raccoon dogs, which are not at all closely related to raccoons, are native to East Asia. Raccoons are native to the Americas. -- Ikan Kekek 04:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for letting me know, I'll keep it in mind. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhema Christian Ministries 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhema Christian Ministries 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Toronto City from BMO field 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMO Field Closeups 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Toronto City from BMO field 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures at G Ross Lord Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image but currently improperly categorized (overcategorized and undercategorized) --MB-one 17:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
How's it now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Park and Toronto are overcat -- see COM:Overcat. Structural systems is too general -- see Commons:Categories#Find_an_appropriate_category --Tagooty 04:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
How about now? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now --MB-one 09:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Your file names could be more helpful. Charlesjsharp 09:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMO Field Closeups 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Toronto City from BMO field 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures at G Ross Lord Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMO Field Closeups 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Function in Dhaka University 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Eglintion Station (TTC) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks in High Park 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagulls at Downsview Park 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
poor file name --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Status set to "Promotion" again. Please oppose and send to CR if you wish to do so (or just have the image renamed), but the image should not be reverted to "Nomination" for such a long time. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but would be better with shadows lifted --Charlesjsharp 15:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but would be better with shadows lifted --Charlesjsharp 15:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 23:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall Arts in Downsview Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Tagooty 02:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge between Ontario place and Toronto 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheppard West Station (TTC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TTC Subway Train 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CAT is too broad. Make it more specific either "Toronto subway rolling stock‎‎" or one of its sub-categories --Tagooty 02:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)@Tagooty: Thanks for the review, it's updated. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 02:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Subaru BRZ (ZC6) - In motion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Function in Dhaka University 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dam at G Ross Lord Park 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry Blossom in High Park 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Gacard 16:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Empty category

Hello @Fabian Roudra Baroi: ,

while looking through the Category:Quality images by user, I noticed the empty category Quality pictures by User:Fabian Roudra Baroi. If this is no longer used, it should be deleted.
I also noticed that the category Quality images by User:Fabian Roudra Baroi is sorted under Q in the Category:Quality images by user. If you want to sort it e.g. under B, you can use the sortkey [[Category:Quality images by user|Baroi]].

Greetings F. Riedelio • 💬 13:18, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks F. Riedelio for noticing and reminding me, I did as you suggested. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 02:23, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden Chair at Downsview Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Parliament of Canada, Ottawa 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Parliament of Canada, Ottawa 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Captivated Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soccer Field at G Ross Lord Park 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiji Banded Iguana at Toronto Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon in High Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon in High Park 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
How can you tell that this is a common racoon dog and not a common racoon? If this is a common racoon dog, it probably should be categorized as “Nyctereutes procyonoides” instead of “Procyon lotor”? --GRDN711 00:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)@GRDN711: Thanks for the comment, the file name is corrected. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 Info Reset to "Promotion". If anyone wishes to dispute this, please set to "Discuss". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 of Porter Airlines- On flight, from below.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West Eglintion Station (TTC) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I'm not too pleased with the glare – is there anything that can be done about it? --SHB2000 11:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 Info Please do not send anything to CR without a supporting or an opposing vote, which you wish to challenge. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) :@SHB2000: Thanks for the review, that's the best I could do. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 11:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Please fix the COM:Overcat -- change "CAT:Branta canadensis" to "CAT:Branta canadensis in Toronto‎" --Tagooty 02:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard Ducks at Downsview Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 03:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jack Layton Memorial Statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too dark. Otherwise it is good quality --Jakubhal 05:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose No reaction after more than a week --Jakubhal 11:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Im sorry , I was too busy this week. Ill fix soon. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)@Jakubhal: How's it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support I personally don't like the cropping so much, but still QI. --Аныл Озташ 12:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support Now is good enough. Thanks --Jakubhal 16:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People playing cricket in Toronto 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People playing cricket in Toronto 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People playing cricket in Toronto 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Flock in Huntsville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Flock in Huntsville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 03:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Family in Huntsville 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Family in Huntsville 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Piediluco 09:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

VI

Hello, VI is not an easy contest, but... it is the most useful and you will always find help there. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks for the support, as I have been active in QI and FP, I'm using the experience to find the best image. Recently I also started to nominate pictures for VI. But sometimes I struggle with the scope. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon Dog in High Park 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Language Monument, Toronto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Useful descriptions of images

Recently, you've uploaded close to 100 images each showing one Canada goose, and you've nominated many for QI. All these image files are "Canada goose at Downsview Park nn.jpg", the Description is "Canada Goose at Downsview Park, Toronto, Ca" and the CAT is "Branta canadensis in Toronto". If I'm looking for an image to illustrate a Wikipedia article, I may search for "Canada goose sitting" or "Canada goose head eating flower" and so on. Your images will not show up in these searches, although several of them are suitable.

A requirement for QI is that "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description." See for e.g. these 7 images each showing one yellow-billed stork: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven. Each has a specific file name, description and set of CATs.

Adding specific file names, descriptions and CATs to each image is a little extra effort during upload. However, it will result in more of your images being used in Wikimedia projects and elsewhere. Tagooty (talk) 04:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

@Tagooty: Thanks for taking the time to explain to me. I'll keep this in mind when I'll be uploading next time. So, for the description I'll explain the picture and for the title I'll just use the keywords? --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 19:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Yes, perfect! Also, add CATs such as "Birds facing left", "Birds perched", and so on. Note that you could improve the description and CATs of some of your good images already uploaded to make them more useful. Useful gadgets are "Hot Cat" and "Cat-a-lot". Enable these in Preferences > Gadgets. They are useful for changing the CATs for a bunch of images. Tagooty (talk) 00:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

@Tagooty: Okayy, thanks for the suggestions. Is there any tool to edit the title or add a geo of more than one picture together?--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 05:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

"Perform batch task" tool in the left-side menu is quite powerful. You can select a bunch of images and repeat the same edits on all of them. Tagooty (talk) 06:12, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Flock in Huntsville 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G Ross Lord Park 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Ontario Place 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People playing cricket in Toronto 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Geo location missing and categorization must be better. --XRay 04:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Please read COM:QIC, COM:CAT and COM:PEOPLE. --XRay 04:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, it's added.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support OK. But what's about personality rights? --XRay 15:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Flock in Huntsville 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Geo location? Category for the lake etc.? --XRay 04:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)@XRay: Thanks for the review, it's added.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support OK. IMO acceptable now. But I think there may be other opinions. --XRay 15:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Family in Huntsville 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 10:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Family in Huntsville 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:28, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Branta canadensis (Canada goose, feral) - eating flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
WindShare ExPlace turbine viewed from Ontario Place.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People playing cricket in Toronto 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:34, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People playing cricket in Toronto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon in High Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dentonia Park 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Need some help with the subject category. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:22, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks in G Ross Lord Park 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. geo location? --XRay 04:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)@XRay: I don't really remember the exact geo for this spot on map, but I know the park. Should I add geo of the park? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People playing cricket in Toronto 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Language Monument, Toronto- From back.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enterprise 2000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
TC-LJR (aircraft) - From below.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaque of Language Monument Toronto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bangladesh Police Otokar Cobra - Left side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Structures in Downsview Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
"Structure" is very general. Please give a more precise description and CAT. --Tagooty 03:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC)@Tagooty: It's added. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 07:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The propeller blades are blurred. Why? --Tagooty 13:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
The propeller are not fixed, they spin because of the wind. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good enough. --多多123 12:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-Billed Gull at Toronto 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Family in Huntsville 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Flock in Huntsville 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose at Downsview Park 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canada Goose Family in Huntsville 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you

Dear fellow Commons photographer,

I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.

At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!

Hello Fabian Roudra Baroi !,

Camera1 mgx
Camera1 mgx
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.

All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 16.jpg

File:Buildings and Roads of Old Quebec City 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Asclepias (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Fabian Roudra Baroi/Archive 1".