User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive12

March - April 2015

Local museum of postcards, Mortagne-sur-Gironde, France. Archives 2013 • feb-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2014 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2015 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2016 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2017 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2018 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2019 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2020 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2021 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2022 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2023 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec 2024 • jan-feb • mar-apr • may-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • Current

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 13:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window shutters handle, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background a bit noisy but regarding the resolution it’s OK --Kreuzschnabel 09:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support.--Famberhorst 05:48, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Papilio machaon - Swallowtail 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Papilio machaon - Swallowtail 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 01 BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salins de Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very beautiful. Pity those shadows.--Famberhorst 05:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Building of the Salins de Frontignan 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Building of the Salins de Frontignan 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Pierre de Montpellier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead tree in the Domaine de Restinclières.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salins de Frontignan 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting lighting and good quality -- Spurzem 22:26, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viburnum tinus, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Background a bit noisy, but still QI for me. --C messier 17:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Pierre de Montpellier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quercus coccifera, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walkers in the Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walkers in the Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality , The second version File:Walkers in the Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 02.jpg is better to me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hi,how are you? I nominate another time this [1] with your suggestion,crop the sky. Can you give a look now? Thanks --LivioAndronico talk 09:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap d'agde depuis le Mont Saint-Loup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 07:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcophaga carnaria, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Photo challenge Black and White

Hello Christian Ferrer,
I just noticed that your picture File:Ruins of Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 01 BW.jpg from the Photo challenge Black and White was taken before March 2015. As that's an additional restriction for this challenge, I'll remove the picture and hope you still find the time to take and submit another one!
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 12:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
@Anna reg: Hi, oups sorry, I did not see that. This file too File:Dead tree in the Domaine de Restinclières bw.jpg is not taken in march. sorry again. :) -- Christian Ferrer 12:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

I found that one later on, too (your discussion page is still open in another tab ;->) - but you were faster. Thanks for pointing it out! Hope you can still use the remaining 11 days to take & chose pictures for the contest! Good luck, Anna reg (talk) 12:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcophaga carnaria, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lobularia maritima, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A wonderful plant. But unfortunately I cannot find the focus point. Sorry, it is not sharp enough for me. --Hockei 18:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC) Changed opinion after a closer look. Maybe you can denoise it a bit and a bit sharpen. --Hockei 18:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)  Done for both, thanks --Christian Ferrer 12:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)  Support There is more possible IMO. But good for me. I like it. --Hockei 17:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Bestiole

Salut à toi, Ô Christian Ferrer,
J'ai abattu l'insecte en vol. Tu peux jeter un oeil indulgent ? Merci à toi.--Jebulon (talk) 12:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

• @Jebulon: , merci, c'était biensur déjà une image de (très) bonne qualité meme avec la mouche, et elle aurait été promus de toutes façon peut-etre meme par moi. Elle est très réussie et fait partie de mes Favorites. -- Christian Ferrer 16:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments special.--Famberhorst 06:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du Mas Rousson, Sète 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Building of the Salins de Frontignan 14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Building of the Salins de Frontignan 14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating

Good morning Christian Ferrer, Thank you for nominating File: Solidago rugosa 001.JPG With regards, Dominicus Bergsma (Famberhorst).

Opinion

Hello! Your opinion: this picture is featurable for FPC? Why (if yes or not)? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

• Hi @ArionEstar: , painting and the colors are nice. However edges and corners are a bit noisy and not very sharp. So I would abstain from voting in such cases. I'm not sure these problems are really fixable without the RAW file and/or without a downsanpling. -- Christian Ferrer 05:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the comment. Perhaps the unsharpness of the corners and the edges exists because of the bad lighting. Have a good day! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcissus tazetta, Agde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcissus tazetta, Agde 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcissus tazetta, Agde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 12:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muscari neglectum, Agde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, I had reduced the green around the hyacinth much more to focus on the flower. --Cccefalon 07:38, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Done you're right, thanks --Christian Ferrer 13:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Midi, Vias 01 BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcissus tazetta, Agde 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eryphanis reevesii - Schmetterlingshaus Wien 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eryphanis reevesii - Schmetterlingshaus Wien 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaps mucronata on Lamium purpureum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 16:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outside stairs in Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 04:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outside stairs in Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète BW 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

It's good as FP?

This picture is good as FP? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

• @ArionEstar: The last version, much contrated is better IMO. The light on the island is a bit too harsh and the right side seems to leaning in a bit. As I said at the first nomination the museum is a bit too predominant in this image, in my opinion of course. It's not a bad image but it lacks a litthe magic touch. -- Christian Ferrer 04:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

  Oh yes! Thanks for comments! And other question: the problems of the picture mentioned here can be fixed with RAW file? If yes, you know someone who could help? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

• @ArionEstar: the bottom left and some of the boats seems unsharp and not in focus, that is not really fixable, however it is certainly possible to improve a bit the image with the RAW file. Me I could try, if you want. -- Christian Ferrer 06:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

  Yes, of course! Make yourself at home, take your time. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

  @ArionEstar: The RAW file is the file produced by the camera when the photographer is taking the picture, the photographer uploaded only an edited JPG version of this file. Unfortunately I do not have the RAW file, it is the author of the picture who have the RAW file on his computer. -- Christian Ferrer 14:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Question When I nominated this picture, users said the picture is very nice, but it has noise. I think certainly it is fixable. You know someone who can do this? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

  @ArionEstar: Unfortunately no, I have myself a lot of work late and I can not help you. But if I find the time maybe I'll try but I do promise anything. -- Christian Ferrer 04:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allée du Grand Pavois, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outside stairs in Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D612 Bridge, Frontignan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you | Merci beaucoup

Your camera equipment is partly the same, which I am using for shooting my images. These are the Nikon D810 and the two zoom lenses 1:2,8/14-24 mm and 1:2,8 G II/70-200 mm. You are performing an excellent job and I belong to the admirers of your superbe images. Many years ago I made a stop in Sète, when I was on my way from Austria to Andalusía. A marvellous place where you live. I love the light, the climate, the mood and the mediterranean sea. Southern France is almost like paradise. Thank you also for some promotions of my photographs. I wish you a fine work and go on shooting these fine landscapes of your region. Merci beaucoup et au revoir. --Johann Jaritz ^talk 05:26, 07 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Johann Jaritz: Thank you very much to you too! this equipment is very great, I specially like the wide angle 14-24mm. My latest lens is the Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG which is also very good. I began to discover my region when I started photography and I was pleasantly surprised by the beauty and diversity of the landscapes, my favorite topic, the only problem is that the area is very windy. Me too I noticed your photos and I like them hugely. -- Christian Ferrer 11:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building of the Salins de Frontignan 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salins de Frontignan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 21:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 06:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antirrhinum majus, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Oenothera biennis, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oenothera biennis, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carthamus lanatus, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC) bad light, overexposed area on stem which is not sharp. --Charlesjsharp 20:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halictus brachyceros dorsal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very useful, but it takes very strongly crop and possibly redress 90 ° the final image. As suggested --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Done -- Christian Ferrer 07:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not really sharp enough to be useful --Charles (talk) 21:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Charlesjsharp:  Comment It is not really unsharp and this is the most valuable image of this species. This is neither quality images candidates, nor FPC or nor Commons:Photography critiques. The only moot point is maybe that the animal is partially hidden by pollen. IMO of course. -- Christian Ferrer 11:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway bridge, Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centranthus ruber, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Rhône à Sète. Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footbridge, Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eristalinus aeneus, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Livioandronico2013 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Étang of Ingril, Frontignan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Still fine with File:Schloss-Oberhausen-Innenhof-Pano-2015.jpg?

Hi Christian! I made some further corrections on the photo you've recently reviewed on QI. Are you still fine with the photo? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Tuxyso: Hi, you lose some insignificant details in the shadows but the image and colors appear more striking in the latest more contrasted version. So I think it's an improvment and it's fine for me, but more contrast and the shadows will be blocked. -- Christian Ferrer 11:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

  I've applied some local NR techniques on the shadows and on the sky (Dfine2 is great for that) in the latest version. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera on Cistus albidus 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphaerophoria scripta, Sète 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Saint-Loup, Agde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gorgeous image.--Johann Jaritz 14:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap d'agde depuis le Mont Saint-Loup 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Saint-Loup, Agde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Très joli.--Johann Jaritz 13:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of Mount Saint-Loup, Agde 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera on Cistus albidus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Anglais. Agde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 06:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

FP gallery intermediate navigation boxes

Hi, quick question: you've been placing

{| class="messagebox small-talk"

| style="text-align: center;" | ''''' [[#top|↑ Top]]      [[#Featured pictures galleries|Galleries ↓]] '''''

|}

elements in the FP galleries to make navigation to the top/bottom of the pages easier (which is a good idea). Do you mind if I replace those with a {{FPGN}} template of identical content? Just in case someone wants to change anything in those elements in the future, even if it's only the background colour or something like that, that would make that much easier. — Julian H.^✈ 18:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Anglais. Agde 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 11:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Butterfly Knapweed Fritillary - Melitaea phoebe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Butterfly Knapweed Fritillary - Melitaea phoebe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Papillon e VI

J’ai mis en VI un très beau papillon, qui vaut surtout pour ses origines : une contrée lointaine et mystérieuse, qui jusqu’ici, était connu pour son pont et les déboires aquatiques des photographes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus: ...connu pour son pont... plutot ses ponts et en effet il est très beau et de belle taille, merci de me l'avoir notifié, je vais l'ajouter à mes favotites cele me servira peut etre pour une future potentielle identification!! -- Christian Ferrer 12:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)