Angelgreat

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Angelgreat!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

File:The Costa Romantica in Oslo, Norway.jpg

Hi, you can talk to me, you can request a second pair of eyes seeing over my descission (renaming is impossible, you don't give a valid cause). But never ever you are allowed simply to undo my adminstrative descission. Please don't do this again. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Flags map 2013.PNG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flags map 2013.PNG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Add ship photos please

Hi. Thank you for images of cruise ships, I like it. Can you please add some images of the 1982 Ocean Dream as the Tropicale, the Costa Tropicale, and the Pacific Star, and a image of the Federico C Please! Thanks.

Thanks, Angelgreat (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2016 (CST)

Hi,
I’m really sorry to answer you so late, i’d been very busy these last weeks. I’m not the owner of these photos of ships, i’ve upload them here with the authorization of their respective owners from an english website, Shipspotting.com. Maybe you could check there if you find some photos and send a mail to the photographs to know if they accept to let you upload some of their photos on Wikimedia Commons...
Sorry to can’t help you more.
Good evening. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 20:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Add sunken Ocean Dream image please

Hi. Can you please upload some images of the sunken 1972 Ocean Dream from shipspotting.com with the permission of the author Please! Thanks.

Thanks, Angelgreat (talk) 11:56, 27 March 2016 (CST)

Hi,
I’ll send a message to Geir Vinnes to know if he authorize me to upload one of his photos here, i’ll let you know when he will answer me.
Good evening. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelgreat (talk • contribs) 23:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@Lev. Anthony: Hi again, did you get the permission to use the picture? Let me know and thanks for reading this message.

Thanks, Angelgreat (talk) 8:26, 28 March 2016 (CST)

Hi,
I’ve got the permission from Geir Vinnes (i just waited for the OTRS permission now). The photos are here (before sinking) and here (after sinking). I hope it can help you.
Good day. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 11:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Koningsdam1 (cropped).png

File:Koningsdam1 (cropped).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

BrightRaven (talk) 13:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Harmony of the Seas may 2016.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Harmony of the Seas may 2016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Harmony of the Seas may 2016.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Elisfkc (talk) 02:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

@Elisfkc: How Come I'm Responsible for this? I Just Uploaded a bigger image, I'm Not the original Uploader.

Angelgreat (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2016 (CST)

File:Harmony of the Seas may 2016.jpg

File:Harmony of the Seas may 2016.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ahecht: How Come I'm Responsible for this? I Just Uploaded a bigger image, I'm Not the original Uploader.

Angelgreat (talk) 12:15, 16 May 2016 (CST)

@Ahecht: Please Reply to me!

Angelgreat (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2016 (CST)

Wikimedia Commons automatically notifies the last uploader when a file is nominated for deletion. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ahecht: Why?

Angelgreat (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2016 (CST)

Photoshopping

If you add parts to an image that were not there in the original file, please:

• upload your image as a new file, of course giving credit to the original author
• add Template:Retouched picture to your file. Regards,

--Sitacuisses (talk) 20:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

@Sitacuisses: I am sorry. I was just uploading bugger images because I thought uploading bigger images will make it more usable. I'll never do it again.

Sincerely, Angelgreat (talk) 16:13, 11 August 2016 (CST)

File:Tesla S P85 (14061719044) (cropped).jpg

File:Tesla S P85 (14061719044) (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 19:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Photo of the Hen in Alang

Hello,
I remember you’ve asked me a some photos in the past. If you need, i’ve just upload a pic of the Hen (former Henna) in Alang (here). Maybe it can help you.
Good evening. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Royal Iris.JPG

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 15:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

File:0923 - Nordkorea 2015 - Pjöngjang - Public Viewing am Bahnhofsplatz (22584887139) (display).jpg

File:0923 - Nordkorea 2015 - Pjöngjang - Public Viewing am Bahnhofsplatz (22584887139) (display).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BabelStone (talk) 08:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped).jpg

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Strahlenschmutz (talk) 18:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Strahlenschmutz (talk) 18:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Strahlenschmutz (talk) 18:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg

File:MS Costa Marina (5653986141) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Strahlenschmutz (talk) 18:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

File:JoesphCorbettJr.jpg

File:JoesphCorbettJr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Warning

Your conduct on Yamla's talk page has reached the point of harassment ([1], [2], [3], [4], and especially undoing a user's edit to their own talk page and incivility). If you continue to import misbehaviour from a sister project and harass other users, you will be blocked here as well. Эlcobbola _talk 08:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

I quit Wikipedia

I am retiring from Wikipedia due to being blocked by User:Yamla, I have updated the talk page. From now on, I'll leave everyone else alone. I will still upload pictures here on Wikimedia commons. Angelgreat (talk) 17:21, 7 June 2018 (CST)

I miss Wikipedia

Man, It's been 3 months since I got blocked, and I still have to wait to be reviewed in 3 more months. I just want to go back. I will stay away from the cruise ship line, but not being able to edit my talk page is worse. Angelgreat (talk) 17:55, 1 July 2018 (CST)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

I don't know what part of this warning you found unclear, but you have continued to import en.wiki issues and harass Yamla. Эlcobbola _talk 19:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: How was that 'harassment'? I just said that I confessed to have evaded my Wikipedia blocking because the IP a dress was blocked as a result. Can you also revoke my talk page access if you're not going to unblock me here. Angelgreat (talk) 14:26, 2 July 2018 (CST)

Harassment is "a range of behavior from mild irritation and annoyances to serious abuses" and "it is characteristically repetitive." 1) That was at least your twelfth edit (!!!) to Yamla's talk page related to this issue, despite repeated requests for you to stop ([5], [6], [7], [8]), including "Do not contact me again. Anywhere. Ever." [9]; that you persist is harassment; 2) Yamla considers your messages to be harassing, and indeed filed an ANB report indicating he same; 3) Your phrasing of "You win, I quit" is bad faith, as it presupposes Yamla's goal was to make you quit (rather than, say, to improve the project/prevent disruption); that one can "win" implies you are working with an adversarial, battlegound mentality. If you had really "quit", you would have simply done so. We both know Yamla would have, and has, no interest in your proclamation. You are using the Commons to further a dispute on another project; that you were merely "confess[ing]" is disingenuous. I'll revoke your access per your request. Эlcobbola _talk 19:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

I've restored your ability to edit your talk page per this request. Fair warning: your constant changing of your mind and declarations of quiting/retiring are at the line of being disruptive--probably even beyond it. This is not a game, and we, too, require competence. Эlcobbola _talk 17:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

I want to be unblocked

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "I want to be unblocked because I want to apologize to the people that I have hurted here. I promise that I will leave those affected people alone. I would also like to be able to upload more pictures that are in the public domain to this project, as well as some maps, cropped images of places, and some buildings. I Would also avoid any problems with any users and leave affected users alone. I understand my edits have been disruptive/harassing because I threatened to not stop until he is unblocked or blocked from editing his talk page, harassed User:Yamla, and almost did the same thing to User:elcobbola. I understand that I may not get unblocked completely, but I will leave the Wikipedia incident alone." Decline reason: "Per Elcobbola. You have edited this unblock reason several times, and it is still contradictory and not especially convincing. We're willing to consider a new unblock request, but it must be consistent and credible. Guanaco (talk) 08:56, 18 July 2018 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

 Oppose. You have not indicated how you wish to contribute to this project in a productive manner. If you simply want to apologize, you may leave your apologies on this user talk page. Guanaco (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@Guanaco: I have since updated it to show how I wish to contribute to this project in a productive manner. Angelgreat (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2018 (CST)

You have a large number of deleted files, either copyvio or out of scope. Please elaborate about what you intend to upload. Also, if you are unblocked, it is crucial that you do not bother Yamla in any way, and you must not harass anyone else. Are you prepared to avoid Yamla, and more generally, respect other users so that you are not seen as a harasser or a nuisance? Guanaco (talk) 05:41, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

@Guanaco: I have since updated it to show how I intend to upload photos. I will also leave users alone, Angelgreat (talk) 11:59, 11 July 2018 (CST)

@Elcobbola: From what I see, I would support reducing this to a temporary block. Is there any sockpuppetry here? Guanaco (talk) 06:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Technically yes, but to my knowledge only for the purpose of requesting restoration of ability to edit their talk page, as linked above. I'm more concerned that Angelgreat 1) still seems to believe people "hur[t]" actually would want an apology from him/her rather than just to be left alone; 2) has not indicated that they understand the nature of harassment and how their conduct has been inappropriate ("I will leave people alone" is not the same as "I understand my edits have been disruptive/harassing because x,y,z", the latter being what COM:BLOCK requires); 3) expressed no interest in "upload[ing] more pictures that are in the public domain to this project" until they became blocked on this project and indeed has been adjusting the rational for your benefit, not, I believe, to reflect a genuine underlying engagement with the issue(s) (e.g., "I promise that I will leave people alone" is contradictory to "I want to be unblocked because I want to apologize to the people that I have hurted here"); and 4) is exhibiting here the identical behaviour as on en.wiki, which led to progressive removal of talk page access and then email access (indeed, he's been emailing me here inappropriately) - the unblock requests there (and decline rationales) are worth reading. In short, the understanding of the issue and credibility requirements of the blocking policy have not been met in the slightest. I don't see how changing this to a temporary block helps matters. If and when Angelgreat meets those requirements, unblock and we're done--or the rope has been handed them, as the case may be. Эlcobbola _talk 09:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I think that in many cases, giving them rope is the wrong approach, unless we actually want them to go through with it. I would prefer to see Angelgreat become a valued contributor, instead of an indefinitely blocked user with no chance of redemption. I definitely recognize that they're saying what they think we want to hear, but that's extremely common. Hell, I'd say that's the case with most unblock requests, and with appeals to authority, pleas for forgiveness, etc., in general. Clearly, Angelgreat's statement is tailored to my words and then yours. I do think the latest version shows nearly sufficient understanding of the problem. If they're committed to avoiding another bad outcome, and have the mental capacity to do so, they'll abide by it and be careful in general, knowing they're on thin ice.

Angelgreat has shown persistent, obsessive behavior, and I don't think the root cause on Commons is misunderstanding our policies and expectations. I see extreme frustration and of course desperation to be unblocked on English Wikipedia. Realistically, that unblock is not happening any time soon. My view is that if Angelgreat is blocked for some time, it may temper their emotional reaction and allow them to return in a more rational state, far less likely to cause further disruption. Guanaco (talk) 08:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

"I would prefer to see Angelgreat become a valued contributor, instead of an indefinitely blocked user with no chance of redemption"

Indefinite is not infinite. I've clearly said "If and when Angelgreat meets those requirements [set forth in COM:BLOCK], unblock."

"I definitely recognize that they're saying what they think we want to hear, but that's extremely common."

Yes, by definition, every successful unblock request says what we want to hear. The test is whether what they say is credible. Before he was blocked, Angelgreat was content to harass other users and engage in self-interested whining ([10][11]). Only after he was blocked did he decide he wanted to contribute substantively. That is one example that undermines credibility. Further, Angelgreat's own statement continues simultaneously to say he wants an unblock to apologize to editors and that he will leave other editors alone. These are mutually exclusive, and show excuses are merely being tacked on with no genuine thought. That is another example that undermines credibility. You may wish to re-read my previous comments, as I have unambiguously not advocated for "no chance of redemption" and have instead identified examples of failures to demonstrate credibility, the policy requirement. If a commitment is not credible, we don't unblock.

"My view is that if Angelgreat is blocked for some time, it may temper their emotional reaction"

This is explicitly calling for a cool-down block, which is not condoned. Эlcobbola _talk 14:44, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

It's ok if you don't want to unblock me, I understand. You can just deny the unblocking request if you can not unblock me. Angelgreat (talk) 12:21, 17 June 2018 (CST)

I meant that if Angelgreat is unblocked (given rope) and starts harassing someone again, the chance of another unblock is slim. By my interpretation a "cool-down block" is characteristically preemptive; an escalation, under the guise of preventing escalation. It's not necessary to ignore the reality that behavior often improves, given time. "As blocks are preventative rather than punitive, use a block duration that is proportional to the time likely needed for the user to familiarize themselves with relevant policies and adjust their behaviour." The policy could use some clarification, but that's a discussion for a different place. I'll concede the matter here and let this be indefinite.

Angelgreat, please start over. Explain in a new request why you should be unblocked. In particular, I want you to answer these questions:

• Why were you blocked, and how will you avoid repeating this behavior?
• Your past edits here have almost all been closely tied to Wikipedia, mostly cropping photos for articles. Without evading your Wikipedia block, what do you intend to contribute here on Commons?

Try to make your request as complete and as credible as possible in one attempt. Feel free to take as much time as you need to consider these issues. Guanaco (talk) 08:56, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

I still want to be unblocked

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "I want to be unblocked because I want to leave the Wikipedia incident alone, in fact, thats how I got blocked. I also got blocked for insulting users, so I will not harass any users and I will try to make sure to not carry any problems from Wikipedia. I will try to upload and or crop photos that can be useful on this project. I can't promise a lot of photos to be uploaded, but I will promise to leave all affected users alone. I will also not evade any blocks." Decline reason: "Procedural decline: request implicitly withdrawn [12] Эlcobbola talk 16:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

•  Oppose See above discussion. User, yet again, appears to have learned nothing and continues not to engage with the questions asked. Not a single question posed has been answered. "I want to be unblocked because I want to leave the Wikipedia incident alone, thats how I got blocked" - You don't need to be unblocked to leave the incident alone. That reason is a complete non sequitur. "I will not try to harass any users and I will try to make sure to not carry any problems from Wikipedia. I will try to upload and or crop photos." You have to do far better than merely try, and there's no reason to believe you have the ability to actually succeed; again, you haven't even been successful (or even tried) in engaging with the queries above. Эlcobbola _talk 18:32, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

To reviewing admin: This edit just about says it all. This is not a user with the maturity or composure to edit on a collaborative project. Angelgreat, your talk page access will be removed if that happens again. Эlcobbola _talk 14:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: Do it then, I want you to revoke my talk page access right now! Angelgreat (talk) 11:35, 25 July 2018 (CST)

May 9, 2021

Unblock request granted This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request. Request reason: "Hello, this is Angelgreat. It's been 2 and a half years since I was first blocked. I know what I did to get blocked lot is messed up, but I have changed since then and have reflected on my actions. I was blocked here on Wikimedia Commons 2 and 1/2 years ago at 15 for harassing a admin who blocked me on Wikipedia, and I now regret that. I am not a kid anymore, I'm 18 and have matured. I am sorry to the people I hurt in the pass and will not import cross-wiki issues anymore. I know that not everyone is perfect, but I think another chance here will prove it. I was recently unblocked on Wikipedia after proving that I am ready to be committed to productive editing and I hope to also get unblocked here so I can upload images here again. I know it will take a while here and Wikipedia to regain everyone's trust, but I believe that I can redeem myself. To the reviewing admin, I'll give you time to review my request and if you accept or decline it, I'll understand your decision. Angelgreat (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "After reviewing the behavior that lead to the original block, I'm willing to give you another chance to edit productively. Please remember to assume good faith in others and remain civil. It should go without saying that behavior that's anyway close to what got you blocked previously will result in you being blocked again. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)" This template should be archived normally.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

I see that you've been unblocked on enwiki, and after this length of time, I'm willing to extend some ROPE. @Elcobbola: do you have any particular objections? --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: I generally find "it's been x amount of time" rationales uncompelling as our unblocking criteria relate to credibility and understanding, not mere passage of time (the earth's revolution about the sun does not impart knowledge.) Given, however, that the root of the block(s) could reasonably be understood to be immaturity, I'm also willing to accept it in this case and extend some ROPE. I would note, however, that "I was recently unblocked on Wikipedia after proving that I am ready to be committed to productive editing" is categorically untrue. Nothing was proven; Angelgreat was were merely unblocked there for the same reason as contemplated here. (Proof, for example, would be using the 2.5 years to contribute productively to simple.wiki, a project of which they are aware, or any other sister project. That was not done.) Further, that despite great eagerness and perennial en.wiki unblock requests, they've contributed nothing there since the unblock outside of archiving and self-indulgence is troubling. I've no objection to extending rope and unblocking, but do not get the impression the above is particularly genuine. I hope to be proven wrong. Эlcobbola _talk 23:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: Sorry for the late response, but to be clear, I archived my Wikipedia talk page as it was starting to get really crowded. Also, if you look at my Wikipedia talk page, I said on the top that I "may not respond swiftly to queries due to also being busy in real life" and that's because its true that I am busy with real life with school and work. I may not be as active as I was before, but I do intend to abide to the rules while being productive and I have some photos that I want to upload here as well. Angelgreat (talk) 00:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

File:RMS Olympic & RMS Mauretania.jpg

File:RMS Olympic & RMS Mauretania.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Invalid PD claim - 1935 is not before 1926 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Whpq (talk) 12:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons media repository

Based on this comment by you, it seems you have a misapprehension about what Commons is. Commons is a media repository, but as stated in Commons:Project scope, the content must be "public domain and freely-licensed educational media content". You stated "Unless there's more public domain equivalent images of the America here, some of the images needs to be kept for now." This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the licensing that is required of any content uploaded to Commons. Commons only accepts freely licensed media. See Commons:Licensing for the details. I can see from your talk page that you were unblocked recently after a very long block. Committing copyright violations or advocating for keeping copyright violations on Commons is likely to get you into hot water. -- Whpq (talk) 18:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@Whpq: Sorry for the late response, but to be clear, the "some of the images needs to be kept for now" refers to the images used on the Wikipedia Page of America. I was saying that some of the images used are the only photos here of her in the livery like the Venture Cruises and Second Chandris livery. There's also the color images of her under the US line. Sorry if it offended you. I'm not defending copyright violations, I'm saying that it may be needed unless a public domain equivalent is avalible. Angelgreat (talk) 19:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons does not accept non-free content. Period. Full stop. Regardless of what you may wish to use it for or how important you may believe they might be, unless the images are properly under a free license, they cannot be stored on Commons. -- Whpq (talk) 19:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Pearl Jemima.jpg

File:Pearl Jemima.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

68.193.211.254 20:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Closing discussions

This closure is totally inappropriate. Let an administrator review the deletion discussion and they will take the appropriate action. -- Whpq (talk) 01:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Olympic scrap Jarrow.jpg

File:Olympic scrap Jarrow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.151.30.172 21:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Completely inappropriate close AGAIN

I have undone your close of a discussion for a file which you uploaded. It is completely inappropriate. Did it not occur to you that it would be a bad idea given the note above closing deletion discussions? As well, altering another editor's comment as you did here is not appropriate. And IP editors are allowed to edit on Commons. There is no requirement to create an account and the lack of one is not a reason to close a deletion discussion as you announced here. -- Whpq (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Whpq: This user have done the same procedure a few time ago: see here. 193.146.182.91 09:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

193.146.182.91: That was because no-one responded to it in a few months, and no admin closed it, so I did it. I even asked the person who made the request that they can open a new one if they want. Hopefully this time, someone responds to it. I'm not sure if you're 79.151.31.9 , but if you are, welcome back. Regardmess, I'm taking a wikibreak. Angelgreat (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Olympic scrap Jarrow.jpg

File:Olympic scrap Jarrow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Aquitania scrap Faslane.jpg

File:Aquitania scrap Faslane.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pppery (talk) 03:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

File:RMS Mauretania (II).jpg

File:RMS Mauretania (II).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No evidence for public domain, image extracted from Pinterest Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 79.151.31.9.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop modifying my comments!

Good morning Angelgreat, I clearly ask that you please stop modifying my comments when I open a request to delete images that you have uploaded that may be possible copyright violations or license discrepancies, like you did here.

As @Whpq has already indicated, that is completely inappropriate.

Also, that you sabotage my comments to give a false opinion to others about me makes me feel very bad, because my only goal is to help Commons and Wikipedia as much as I can.

Also, that you say that I have to create an account to edit when (also reproached by Whpq) there is no policy that prevents anonymous users from editing. In addition, I'm not dedicated to sabotaging and vandalizing files as other IPs can, so I think that, instead of helping Commons, you are showing others an attitude that does not assume good faith and questions that of others.

Honestly, don't think that I like to mess with you and that I like to request the deletion of your contributions because, rather more, the files that you upload seem quite impressive for me, but I think that the project's policies are quite clear and, although unfortunately they are cool photos, some may not be valid here.

Please, I beg you to understand the situation.

Yours sincerely, 79.151.31.9 10:55, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@79.151.31.9: I'm sorry about that. It's just that I had bad experiences with some IP users and I didn't want that to happen again. I'll stop modifying your comments. Angelgreat (talk) 13:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much, don't worry because I understand perfectly your perspective.

Thanks again and greetings. 79.151.31.9 13:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Mauretania in drydock 1928 autochrome process port side.jpg

File:Mauretania in drydock 1928 autochrome process port side.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Image by © Clifton R. Adams/National Geographic Society/Corbis/All Rights Reserved Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 193.146.182.91.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:William Bradford Bishop, Jr (colorized).jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50802449793).jpg

And also:

• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50802453913).jpg
• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50802454673).jpg
• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50803196526).jpg
• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50803312842).jpg
• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50803313757).jpg
• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50803321527).jpg
• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50803324132).jpg
• File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium (50803326352).jpg
• File:Municipal Stadium (50894892048).jpg
• File:Municipal Stadium (50895606546).jpg
• File:Municipal Stadium (50895610271).jpg
• File:Municipal Stadium (50895611351).jpg
• File:Municipal Stadium (50895612891).jpg
• File:Municipal Stadium (50895724657).jpg
• File:Municipal Stadium (50895827967).jpg

Yours sincerely, Eureka Lott 01:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium demolition December 14, 1996.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium demolition December 14, 1996.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cleveland Municipal Stadium demolition December 14, 1996.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

File:WTC Building Arrangement and Site Plan.svg

Why did you had a problem with File:WTC Building Arrangement and Site Plan.svg and reverted it without discussing anything?

It was improved, closer to original and better than any other available SVG map of the area. YitzhakNat (talk) 23:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

@YitzhakNat: First, you changed the color scheme. Secondly, you didn't touch it's sister diagram File:WTC Building Arrangement in preliminary site plan.svg at all. Therefore, I reverted the diagram to match the two diagram. So if you want to have the post-9/11 diagram edited to match the colors and details of the pre-9/11 diagram, go ahead. Angelgreat (talk) 00:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Man, we have a high-visibility image and you are edit warring to restore an incorrect version. You didn't even bother to read the reason you got reverted the first time.

You've had how many warnings about unconstructive editing? Enjoy the month long ban! Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Frartn (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg

File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:E11:5010:4650:F541:B95:6F8:8E59 11:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Apple-eMac-FL (transparent).jpg

File:Apple-eMac-FL (transparent).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David Fuchs (talk) 13:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Frartn (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:E11:5010:4650:DCA5:AB19:9258:9AD3 14:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Frartn (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Frartn (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Dā də bātorāno kor.wav

File:Dā də bātorāno kor.wav has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://lyricstranslate.com/es/national-anthems-patriotic-songs-d%C4%81-d%C9%99-b%C4%81tor%C4%81no-kor-lyrics.html Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

25stargeneral (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

181.43.7.29 18:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Pandas (4376382730).jpg

File:Pandas (4376382730).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Credit says: AP Photo/Xinhua, Chen Xie Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MyOtkryty.svg

Copyright status: File:MyOtkryty.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:MyOtkryty.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Mak.by.svg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:R.M.S Majestic.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:R.M.S Majestic.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:R.M.S Majestic.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

81.41.175.237 17:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Ukraine disputed regions as a Russian puppet state.svg

File:Ukraine disputed regions as a Russian puppet state.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Susmuffin (talk) 07:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Two Busch Stadiums (142491763).jpg

File:Two Busch Stadiums (142491763).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Costa Diadema (40) (15689719264).jpg

And also:

• File:Costa Diadema (41) (15692251123).jpg
• File:Costa Diadema (42) (16124736890).jpg
• File:Costa Diadema (43) (16124728620).jpg
• File:Costa Diadema (54) (16124465228).jpg

Yours sincerely, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Эlcobbola _talk 18:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Pacific Princess, 2008 (cropped).jpg

File:Pacific Princess, 2008 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The source file was deleted. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Komarof (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2, 2024

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Hello, this is Angelgreat. I did not intend to get blocked again when I left a talk page message to a English Wikipedia admin here on Commons. I don't know how the blocking admin justified it "importing xwiki issues" if I wasn't harassing anyone like 5 years ago. I do not intend on importing issues from other wikis and I don't want to stir any more drama with the minions of Yamla. I just want to upload my colorizations and svgs and nothing else. To the reviewing admin, I'll give you time to review my request and if you accept or decline it, I'll understand your decision. Happy New Year. Angelgreat (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)" Decline reason: "per Эlcobbola. Importing problems from other projects into Commons is obvious, just like your refusal to acknowledge that. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

•  Oppose - Angelgreat's successful unblock request included "I [...] will not import cross-wiki issues anymore". Verily, that was part and parcel of the original block--badgering a user on Commons related to issues on a sister project. Despite this promise, Angelgreat contacted @Deepfriedokra: about their eighth (!!!) denied UTRS appeal on en.wiki--a project which has had the sense not to unblock this user. That message included, for example, "you hint that you have evidence against me, yet you refuse to share it, as if you're saving it to use against me", which suggests a battleground mentality and indeed is a failure of good faith. Deepfriedokra's response of "I will be thrilled to have no further contact with or from you" is also indicative of the unwelcome nature of Angelgreat's contact. That Angelgreat appears not to understand this ("I don't know how the blocking admin justified it "'importing xwiki issues'") is astonishing lack of clue and self-awareness, but par for the course. Эlcobbola _talk 00:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
  • I was just asking Deepfriedokra, not threatening them. It's 2 different things. Plus, I onlybrung that up to the user once, plus an edit to add more info. I wasn't spamming their page like with Yamla's. Also, how am I being "unwelcoming"? Please explain that. Angelgreat (talk) 00:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Donald Trump NYMA (colorized).jpg

File:Donald Trump NYMA (colorized).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mr. James Dimsey (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

February 3, 2024

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Hello, this is Angelgreat. I honestly messed up in this case. I'm sorry for import cross-wiki issues when I talked to Deepfriedokra. I'm sorry for my wording, and i'm sorry for trying to excuse my actions. Please unblock me and I'll stop importing import cross-wiki issues and i'll promise to leave Deepfriedokra, Elcobbola, Canteberry, Ferret, Yamla, and their minions alone both here and on Wikipedia. I don't want any more drama, I just want to upload my images, diagrams and colorizations here again. Angelgreat (talk) 14:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)" Decline reason: "minions" — Racconish 💬 14:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

•  Oppose - A user blocked for, among others, AGF reasons using the phrasing "and their minions" is either a troll, incompentent, or both. How much longer are we expected to entertain these obtuse and unresponsive requests? Эlcobbola _talk 14:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

sorry for trying to excuse my actions

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Protest Flags of Belarus and Russia.svg

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

File:1976 Hertz Rent-a-car ad with O. J. Simpson (43240461854).jpg

File:1976 Hertz Rent-a-car ad with O. J. Simpson (43240461854).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—Bagumba (talk) 04:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

File:1978 Hertz Rent a car ad with O. J. Simpson (43240459714).jpg

File:1978 Hertz Rent a car ad with O. J. Simpson (43240459714).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Renerpho (talk) 00:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:1969 Chevrolet Caprice Coupe with O. J. Simpson (27713891264).jpg

And also:

• File:O.J. and Marguerite Simpson 1969.jpg
• File:1976 Hertz Rent-a-car ad with O. J. Simpson (43240461854) (cropped).jpg
• File:1969 Chevrolet Caprice Coupe with O. J. Simpson (27713891264) (cropped) (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Ruja Ignatova FBI (leftpic).jpg

File:Ruja Ignatova FBI (leftpic).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hariboneagle927 (talk) 10:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)