User talk:1Veertje/Archive 6

Commons Conference project

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 20:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Rijksmuseum Twenthe

Hoi Vera, op de website van Rijksmuseum Twenthe zijn wel wat aardige schilderijen te vinden die in het publiek domein zijn, zie [1] en [2]. Ze gebruiken memorix, zie bijvoorbeeld https://collectie.rijksmuseumtwenthe.nl/zoeken-in-de-collectie/detail/id/66b193f1-f56d-5f86-94fa-c587e5b5670b . Kan jij zien of de download link hetzelfde geeft als jouw tooltje? Wellicht zin om deze afbeeldingen naar Commons te uploaden? Ik ga de schilderijen denk ik binnenkort aan Wikidata toevoegen. Multichill (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey, ja het RMT maakt ook gebruik van de Memorix Maior en dus met m'n scriptje in de max resolutie gedownload worden. Mijn scriptje gaat op zoek naar de link van de thumbnail.

Daarmee wordt er uit de API opgehaald wat de dimensies van de grootste versie kan worden opgehaald en de tegels van die versie aan elkaar kunnen worden geplakt:

for ($row=0; $row < $layer['rows']; $row++) { 
		for ($col=0; $col < $layer['cols']; $col++) { 
		 $url = 'http://images.memorix.nl/'.$institution.'/getpic/'.$id.'/';
			$url .= $layer['starttile']+$row*$layer['cols']+$col.'.jpg';
			$tile = imagecreatefromjpeg($url);
			imagecopy($image, $tile, $col * $tilewidth, $row * $tileheight, 0, 0, $tilewidth, $tileheight);
		}
	}

PHP is niet de handigste taal als je dit voor een hele groep afbeeldingen wil doen. In het verleden heb ik dit wel gedaan voor iMacros een macro te schrijven die het PHP scriptje voerde. Java zou beter zijn. Niet alleen voor dit, maar User:Hannolans heeft ook nog data op de plank liggen die ik van het nationaal fotomuseum waar hij de foto's die PD zijn uit zou gaan filteren.--Vera ^(talk) 13:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Gebeurt het trouwens wel eens dat we eerst een set in commons plaatsen voorzien van de kant-en-klare thumbnails en daarna een botje draaien op commons om de highres toe te voegen? --Hannolans (talk) 13:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Nee. Is ook niet direct makkelelijk automatisch te detecteren wanneer dat gebeurt.--Vera ^(talk) 14:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Edit-a-thon-Haagse-Monumenten-02-Motion-Blur-Effect.png

Beste Vera,

Leuk je weer eens tegen te komen. Je Dememorixer blijft vreselijk handig! Wilde je het volgende laten weten, als je het al niet wist. Een Peruaan, Jsmura van Wiki loves monuments geloof ik, vond het leuk om vervormde foto's van edit-a-thons op te laden, zoals deze van jou en dan de auteursvermelding niet aan te passen. Heb net om verwijdering gevraagd voor een soortgelijke foto "van mij". Vriendelijke groet, Hansmuller (talk) 07:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey, tja in principe kan je dit doen met werk dat een vrije licentie heeft, al kan men zich afvragen wat de het educatieve doeleind is van een afbeelding die een en al motion blur is. --Vera ^(talk) 13:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Foto's

Hallo Vera, ik zie een aantal monumenten foto's die nog niet in de WLM2017 categorie staan. Is dit een bewuste keuze, of zal ik deze toevoegen? groetjes, Rudolphous (talk) 18:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

De foto's van Texel moest ik nog taggen en categorizeren. Dat heb jij al gedaan, en nu heb ik ze ook voor WLM nog even getagged. --Vera ^(talk) 20:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Hierbij nog een lijstje foto's waarbij het monumentnummer mist. Ook kan het zijn dat het geen monumenten zijn. In dat geval staat de foto onterecht in de wlm categorie. [3] groeten, Rudolphous (talk) 13:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Ik heb het recht gezet. Wist je trouwens dat je de coördinaten uit een categorie of pagina kan projecteren op OSM of Google Maps? Met {{GeoGroup}} kan je de links daarvoor aan een pagina toevoegen. Zelf heb ik ook een simpel formulier een keer gemaakt om het ook los te kunnen gebruiken. Zie bijvoorbeeld mijn foto's van maart 2015. Met Google MyMaps kan je een geëxporteert KML besetand aan je Google Drive toevoegen. Kaarten die je daar maakt kan je op je smart phone weer naar boven halen zoals ik bij Wiki Takes Leiden deed. --Vera ^(talk) 20:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Hoi 1veertje, handig allemaal, dank daarvoor :-) Hierbij de map van WLM nederland 2017: [4]. Kennelijk heeft afgelopen jaar niemand de moeite genomen om foto's in zeeland te maken. Rudolphous (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Beschrijving bij category

Hallo 1Veertje, de beschrijving is nogal verwarrend. Kan je dit aanpassen en de respectievelijke links aanbrengen? :) Lotje (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Ik bedoel te zeggen wat er staat: Er is een plaatsje wat Stroe heeft met een straat Stroeërweg waar een boerderij aan nr 39 is in zowel Gelderland als Noord-Holland. Wat ik me kan herinneren had ik al RCE afbeeldingen van de ene Stroe naar de andere Stroe verplaatst dus die lijken ook niet te weten in welke provincie hun fotograaf bezig is geweest. --Vera ^(talk) 13:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

De beschrijving heb ik aangepast zoals ik bedoelde. :) Lotje (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Informateur zalm-hres.jpg

File:Informateur zalm-hres.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Informateur zalm-hres (cropped).jpg

File:Informateur zalm-hres (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Video en still Carola Schouten

Dag Vera. Ik heb zojuist in de beschrijvingen van File:Kamerlid Carola Schouten over het aanvragen van een Kamerdebat.webm en het daarvan afgeleide File:Carola Schouten 2016.jpg toegevoegd dat 2016 het jaar van uploaden is (op YouTube nl.). Het is zeker niet het jaar van de opname. Ik vermoed dat dat 2012 is, want sinds ergens in 2013 draagt ze geen bril meer. Zie ook de sterke gelijkenis met File:Carola Schouten 2012.jpg. In de categorieën van de video dient daarom denk ik ook nog iets aangepast worden alsmede in de bestandsnaam van de still. Groetjes, Apdency (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

de website die bij deze filmpjes hoorde heeft de mp4 bestanden gelinkt. In de metadata van die videos is een betere datum waarschijnlijk te vinden. Daar zal ik later ff naar kijken. Vera ^(talk) 17:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Ik heb in ieder geval bij het filmpje de categorie over video's uit 2016 weggehaald. De still kan een naam met het jaartal 2012 krijgen, of een naam zonder jaartal, als we het niet exact weten. Groet, Apdency (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

De mp4's op de website hadden geen metadata in de bestanden ingesloten. De persafdeling van de tweede kamer zal ik even mailen. Vera ^(talk) 20:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Uploadfilmpje

Dag Vera. Deze week ben ik weer eens bezig om mensen die een foto naar Commons willen uploaden uit te leggen hoe dat gaat. Het is erg lastig om dit uit te leggen aan gebruikers die nooit eerder te maken hebben gehad met licenties en uploaden. Ten einde raad heb ik maar een YouTube link gestuurd https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbqmA2iR5kE. Het lijkt me handig als zo 'n soort filmpje (in het Nederlands) beschikbaar komt voor onervaren gebruikers. Of bestaat er al zoiets? 'k Leg de suggestie hier even neer, maar de vraag moet waarschijnlijk ergens anders neergelegd worden. Met vriendelijke groet, Tulp8 (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey, Ja Wikimedia Nederland heeft een aantal van dit soort films geproduceerd. Zie deze bijvoorbeeld Vera ^(talk) 18:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Dat had ik al gehoopt. Zelfs als behoorlijk ervaren gebruiker was ik niet van het bestaan van dit filmpje op de hoogte. Zou dit niet wat prominenter onder de aandacht van nieuwe gebruikers moeten worden gebracht? Tulp8 (talk) 12:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikimedia Nederland zit in de precaire situatie dat ze er voor zijn om de Wikimedia gemeenschap te ondersteunen, niet om zich met de inhoud van de Wikimedia projecten te bemoeien. Heb je zelf een voorstel waar nieuwe gebruikers deze filmpjes tegen zouden kunnen komen? Op Wikimedia Commons hier heb je ook nog het probleem dat het moeilijk te zien is welke nieuwe gebruiker uit Nederland komt. Vera ^(talk) 12:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

'k Dacht aan hier boven de gele balk met bijvoorbeeld de linktekst: "Nederlandstalig uploadfilmpje". Tulp8 (talk) 12:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Zoiets zou in de kroeg besloten moeten worden Vera ^(talk) 21:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Stephen Law voice en 160731 205357.ogg

File:Stephen Law voice en 160731 205357.ogg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Obvious copyvio. Recording a speech by another person does not give the person recording it any copyright or other authority to license it.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Categorie formatie 2017

De bestanden in Category:Dutch general elections 2017 coalition negotiations zijn toegevoegd aan Commons:Deletion requests/Dutch general elections 2017 coalition negotiations zodat de gemeenschap kan bespreken of die behouden moeten worden of niet. We zouden het op prijs stellen als u uw mening hierover daar uit. Als u het bestand heeft gemaakt, bedenk u dan dat een verwijderverzoek niet betekent dat het bestand wordt verwijderd of dat we als gemeenschap uw bijdragen niet waarderen. Het betekent dat een gebruiker denkt dat er een specifiek probleem mee is, zoals bijvoorbeeld met de auteursrechten. Als het bestand ter verwijdering is voorgedragen omdat er een beter bestand beschikbaar is, bedenk u dan dat hoewel het bestand verwijderd zou kunnen worden, uw harde werk (dat we echt enorm waarderen) voortleeft in een nieuw bestand. Vat het verwijderverzoek in alle gevallen niet persoonlijk op. Zo is het ook niet bedoeld. Dank u!

Wel jammer 1veertje, maar ik denk dat het niet in orde is, vandaar deze massa nominatie. Met overigens hartelijke groet, Elly (talk) 20:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

it's OK. Ken je visualFileChange.js? Daarmee kan je gemakkelijk alle afbeeldingen in een categorie nomineren / bewerken in een batch Vera ^(talk) 21:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Dank je, ja daar heb ik het inderdaad mee gedaan. Heel handig! Groet, Elly (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Ik heb een handjevol tips verzameld mocht je geïnteresseerd zijn. --Vera ^(talk) 15:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Winding towers in Nederlaand

Hallo, 1Veertje, vreemde benaming voor Nederland. De vraag is, maak ik een [[Category:Winding towers in the Netherlands]] aan. :) Lotje (talk) 07:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Ik heb het rechtgezet met Category:Winding towers in the Netherlands. --Vera ^(talk) 09:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Bedankt! Lotje (talk) 10:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Poetry slam

Hallo 1Veertje, er bestaat een Poetryslam pagina hier (dus het in het Nederlands), zou het niet eenvoudiger en minder verwarrend zijn deze leeg te halen en de link naar Poetry slam te maken in de Category:Poetry slam ? Lotje (talk) 10:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Met {{Move}} kan je dit soort naamswijzigingen aanvragen. --Vera ^(talk) 10:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Palmesel

Hallo 1Veertje, only me again! Kan dit worden opgelost in het Engels hier? :) Lotje (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:RN7 Logo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:RN7 Logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

MoiraMoira (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States – Results!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,400 people (the most of any nation this year) contribute over 8,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate pages on various Wikimedia projects.

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States! These photos are recognized for their photographic quality, artistic merit, and their encyclopedic value as illustrations of unique historical sites. We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret only being able to formally recognize the top 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other national contests, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 winners.

If you would like to view all the photos submitted for the U.S. this year, you may do so here.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all U.S. participants to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

A quick thank you to our national jury, as well as Commons editors who have helped categorize and place photos for the event. And finally, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments and helping to preserve our history through photography - we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events!

~Kevin Payravi & Nikikana, from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States (16:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC))

File:Ondernemer van het jaar 2017.webm

File:Ondernemer van het jaar 2017.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

1VeertjeBot

Hello, I blocked 1VeertjeBot because it is not approved. It is also causing a huge backlog of patrolled edits. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Steinsplitter would you be ok with me deblocking my bot account for a bit so I can correct the "Videos of YYYY by country" categories I created? As Auntof6 pointed out I forgot to add "country" to the {{Metacat}}. --Vera ^(talk) 12:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Nevermind, I see they already fixed it. --Vera ^(talk) 12:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Ok :-). I have seen you filed a "request or botflag" thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Metacategories created by 1VeertjeBot

Hi, 1Veertje. Your bot has been creating metacategories with incomplete {{Metacat}} template coding. That template needs a parameter to indicate the sorting criterion. For example, the template on Category:Videos of 1959 by country should be {{metacat|country}}. Please be sure to include the parameter when you or your bot create a metacategory. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Ah, sorry about that. Will try to keep that in mind in the future.--Vera ^(talk) 12:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

User:1VeertjeBot

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--Vera ^(talk) 14:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

deletion of image File:Patty pan from lalbagh 2285.JPG

Hi, You have notified me on the image deletion File:Patty pan from lalbagh 2285.JPG. I would like to know about the deletion request entry and discussion about this. --Rameshng (talk) 01:58, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your photograph was a photograph of a photograph of Pattypan. That makes it not entirely your work to license but a derivative work. At the time it was a speedy deletion request since it was an open and shot case.--Vera ^(talk) 11:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Dememorixer Category

Dear 1Veertje, I sometimes use your useful Dememorixer. There is a [[Category:Dememorixer]], but that Category is used to identify images that could be "upgraded" with the Dememorixer. Is there also a category that identifies images that have been upgraded by the Dememorixer? Vysotsky (talk) 14:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Recent VFC edits to make BBC Your Paintings fix

1Veertje, thanks for your recent use of the VFC tool to fix a bunch of BBC Your Paintings links. I happened to notice that one of these VFC edits (see this edit to File:Unknown painter - Brig 'Jane Williamson' Entering the Bay of Naples.jpg) produced a malformed result. You may wish to do a quick review of the other files you edited with VFC in the same edit run to see if any more need a similar fix. Thanks again. —RP88 (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

it seems that links that didn't work before now do, AND vice versa. That's not quite what I had expected. First need to get some sleep though. There doesn't seem to be a pattern to which links fall in either category 🙀 Vera ^(talk) 02:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

btw, I've made a bookmarklet for ArtUK.org that puts all the meta data on their site in an {{Artwork}} template. Vera ^(talk) 10:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Ahem

Hello. Just to let you know about this edit which removed a tag. I’ve fixed it. Green Giant (talk) 10:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

that's what you get when contributing to the Wikimedia projects: you do it right a hundred times and nobody remarks on your contributions. Do it wrong once and it gets noticed. Vera ^(talk) 13:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Elephant Parade 5023498418.jpg

And also:

• File:Elephant Parade Albert Memorial 4896940503.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade at the V&A 4897676872.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade in Selfridges 4897552683.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade in Selfridges 4897564007.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade in Selfridges 4898129598.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade in Selfridges 4898164320.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade Marble Arch 4897917694.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade Speakers' Corner 4897868004.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade V&A 4897122015.jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - City of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897591819).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - City of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897623233).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - City of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897630491).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Chordata - Mammalia - Animalia (4897363793).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897637765).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4898175734).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade - Marble Arch - Stripes (4897356531).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade - Marble Arch - Stripes (4897940988).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade - Oxford Street - Selfridges (4897387781).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade - Oxford Street - Selfridges (4898116108).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - Kensington Gardens - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897527172).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Hyde Park - Elephant Parade (4897306371).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Natural History Museum - Elephant - Kensington And Chelsea - Elephant Parade (4897096339).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Natural History Museum - Elephant - Kensington And Chelsea - Elephant Parade (4897703744).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Natural History Museum - Elephant Parade (4897056963).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Speakers' Corner - Elephant - Hyde Park - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897213571).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Speakers' Corner - Face of an Elephant statue - Hyde Park - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897284581).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Victoria And Albert Museum - Elephant - Kensington And Chelsea - Elephant Parade (4897725132).jpg
• File:Leophant 5022903247.jpg

Yours sincerely, bjh21 (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

contemporary sculptures etc. in the USA

Hi 1Veertje, regrettably the US has no FoP exception for non-buildings. Therefore, the following images probably violate copyright.

• File:Untitled modernist sculpture (Greg Moring), Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 (39137943524).jpg
• File:Untitled modernist sculpture (Greg Moring), Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 (39137947004).jpg
• File:Roger B. Taney Monument, Mount Vernon Place (23565220196).jpg
• File:Interior signage-decoration, Lexington Market, 400 W. Lexington Street, Baltimore, MD (35410170926).jpg
• File:Exterior mural, Closed North Pavilion, Broadway Market, S. Broadway, Baltimore, MD (26974532829).jpg
• File:Baltimore Maryland (35514091816).jpg
• File:Commercial building, Maryland Avenue, Baltimore, MD (38254190374).jpg
• File:Commercial building, Maryland Avenue, Baltimore, MD (38254191894).jpg
• File:The Forum Fountain (1975, Stafford Rolph), Paul Laurence Dunbar High School, 1400 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 (37971282891).jpg needs discussion whether a building or not.

--Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

The Greg Moring and The Forum Fountain were placed before 1978 so {{PD-US-no notice}} would apply. For the fountain we don't know for sure that the notice doesn't have a copyright notice, for the Greg Morning sculpture we do. The artist for the Roger B. Taney monument died in the 19th century. The signage at the Lexington Market might be old enough, but I can't find documentation about it. --Vera ^(talk) 22:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Categorized Baltimore churches

I identified all the churches in Category:1Veertje Baltimore and added them to the correct church categories. I didn't add date categories to most of them, mostly because I'm lazy tonight. Just so you know: Some of the photos have GPS coordinates that are off by several hundred meters; the Android probably was probably a little slow to catch up. I didn't change the coordinates. --Closeapple (talk) 05:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

HI, thank you! If it helps, this is the route on my main excursion Vera ^(talk) 08:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

meetup

Hi!

I would be interested in Meetup (normally).

However, I work even on weekends. Saturday would be option only in the morning. After all, I have to travel more than 100 km till Utrecht!

Tough task to achieve!  :(

--Quahadi Añtó 22:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

hi,

there is also a meetup for beginners every third Friday of the month in Amsterdam. But that's even further west. Vera ^(talk) 22:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

yeah. tight schedule. Especially if you're immigrant worker in Germany. :( --Quahadi Añtó 14:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Thank you for your photo's at IFFR2018 Michelle Boon (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Q1-nominaties

Hallo Vera, ik zie dat je gisteren vijf foto's voor Q1 heb genomineerd en alle vijf zijn gedeclined (waarvan één door mij). Hoe stel jij jouw camera in? Maak jij jouw foto's in RAW? RAW-foto's kan je met Lightroom veel beter verscherpen en de ruis is veel gemakkelijker te verminderen. Heb jij de foto's automatisch scherpgesteld? Bij automatisch scherpstellen wordt de schepte van de foto afgestemd op het midden en dit is bij de eerste vier foto's correct, maar bij de vijfde niet. Ik heb overigens geen ervaring met portret-fotografie, maar Granada wel (en ik vind dat zij het goed kan). --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Listening 4892916285.jpg

File:Listening 4892916285.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Editor-1 (talk) 12:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Flyer uit 's-Gravenhage

Hallo 1Veertje,

Ik zag dat jij best veel van auteursrechten en politieke partijen afwist en vroeg mij af of File:Islam Democraten flyer, The Hague (2018) 01.jpg en File:Islam Democraten flyer, The Hague (2018) 02.jpg een auteursrechtenschennis zijn? Ik hen ze geüpload omdat ik alleen maar simpele vormen zag zoals het logo van D66, als deze afbeeldingen niet mogen verwijder ze dan en laat een paar sjablonen op mijn overlegpagina achter zodat ik weet dat ze verwijderd zijn. Alvast bedankt. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey, ja ik vind deze poster ook te simpel om auteursrechtelijk bescherming te krijgen. --Vera ^(talk) 14:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Bedankt, ik wou het alleen zeker weten, dat heb ik nu ongeveer "een maatbeker" om mee te werken. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Kandidatenlijst

Ik heb de afbeelding Bestand:Kandidatenlijst gemeenteverkiezingen Oldambt (2018).jpg geüpload omdat het eruit ziet als eenvoudige zwarte tekst op een wit papier, kan ik deze hier uploaden? Anders deze dan z.s.m. verwijderen. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for making this work on Art UK!!! Jane023 (talk) 07:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Strong body language by Désirée Murk, conducting her workshop "Doing Business Richly" in New Delhi, India (9445104907).jpg

File:Strong body language by Désirée Murk, conducting her workshop "Doing Business Richly" in New Delhi, India (9445104907).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ikreis (talk) 19:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:05. Gijs van Dijk (31763202586).jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 23:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Promofilmpje Sleutelstad Radio 93.7 FM.webm

File:Promofilmpje Sleutelstad Radio 93.7 FM.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 21:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

File rename

Hallo 1Veertje, kan je eens zien of deze file kan hernoemd worden? Reden= #2. :) Lotje (talk) 12:35, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

File:A Million Ways to Die in the West - Uncensored.webm

File:A Million Ways to Die in the West - Uncensored.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Kurfürst Johann Georg I von Sachsen (1585-1656) und Gemahlin Magdalene Sibylle von Sachsen.jpg

hi 1Veertje, I am writing to ask you if it is possible to restore this painting executed between the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, by an unknown artist?--Manwe11 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.31.200.136 (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

 Done, in future: please ask at Commons:Undeletion requests Vera ^(talk) 06:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

unfortunately I'm not allowed to request them, because every time I request, my request is canceled without even being seen--95.245.76.61 20:36, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Followup: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems #Is A3cb1 pardoned?. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Breda in Beeld- Landmachtdag 2018.webm

File:Breda in Beeld- Landmachtdag 2018.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Take Mirrenberg (talk) 17:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

File:S.M. Re Vittorio Amedeo III di Savoia.png

hi 1Veertje,

I am writing to ask you whether it would be possible to restore these files concerning some of these portraits of an unknown artist executed between the seventeenth and eighteenth century, the artist since he died for 100 years, the most correct license included in the following files was PD-100 ,,

• File:Ritratto di Ferdinando II d'Asburgo.jpg
• File:Ritratto di Raimondo Montecuccoli.jpg
• File:Comte Jean de Werth.png
• File:Ritratto di S.M. Re Vittorio Amedeo III di Savoia.png
• File:Josef Adam of Schwarzenberg.png
• File:Ritratto di Giovan Battista Giovio.jpg
• File:Ritratto di condottiero in armatura.png
• File:Fürst Karl von Isenburg.png
• File:Friedrich August I von Saschen.jpg
• File:Christiane Eberhardine 02.jpg
• File:Portrait of a gentleman01.jpg
• File:Kaiser Franz I von Hasburg.jpg
• File:Kaiser Franz I von Österreich im Ornat des Leopoldsordens.jpg
• File:Bartolomeo degli Oddi.png
• File:Portrait de Ludovico Gonzaga.jpg
• File:Eleonora Piossasco Occelli.png
• File:Giacomo Luigi Occelli.png
• File:Portrait of Vittorio Amedeo III.jpg
• File:Duke Charles emmanuel II of savoy.png
• File:Francesco III Caracciolo.jpg
• File:Giovanni Battista Caracciolo.png
• File:Carlo Caracciolo.png
• File:Petraccone I Caracciolo.png
• File:Ferdinando Giovanni Battista Caracciolo.png
• File:Giacomo I Caracciolo.png
• File:Sergianni Caracciolo di Avellino.png
• File:Petracone II Caracciolo.png
• File:Ritratto di Petraccone V Caracciolo.PNG
• File:Christiane Eberhardine 02.jpg
• File:Friedrich August I von Saschen.jpg
• File:Fürst Karl von Isenburg.png
• File:Ritratto di condottiero in armatura.png
• File:Ritratto di Vercellino Maria Visconti.jpg

--87.15.94.41 11:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Please make a request at Commons:undeletion request--Vera ^(talk) 12:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

unfortunately I'm not involved in doing so, I tried several times but my requests are always canceled without even being seen--87.8.55.29 14:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Have you tried creating an account? Vera ^(talk) 14:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

I would be blocked right away ,, please could you restore this list, only pr this time ?? ,, then I'll see to see the davare on my own ok ??? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.8.55.29 (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

No, please try and follow the instructions on starting an account. Please also sign comments on talk pages --Vera ^(talk) 14:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

ok, then I'll try to make a request on Commons: undeletion request, but I would like to mention you to have at least one vote in your favor, could you do me this favor during the request ?, otherwise the user will arrive Jeff who will cancel my request , (since I had asked him a thousand times to stop, but he went to call other administrators to spread the fact that I publish only copyviol, from the file that you restored so kindly, it is not so ,, I thank you fully for the restored file) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.8.55.29 (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Italian part - Citizens’ Corner debate- Brexit – Europe’s Big Bang theory. Where did it start? (26771605584).jpg

File:Italian part - Citizens’ Corner debate- Brexit – Europe’s Big Bang theory. Where did it start? (26771605584).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Uploaded and delted 11 May 2018 - well before flickr upload - flickrwashed Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Zeker zijn van onbezorgde oude dag PvdA 2018.webm

File:Zeker zijn van onbezorgde oude dag PvdA 2018.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ℯxplicit 01:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Dark Souls III Ringed City gameplay trailer

Hi, 1Veertje. I saw you tag this file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dark_Souls_III_The_Ringed_City_DLC_Gameplay_Video_.webm) for speedy deletion. I added a defense on the talk page, but I thought I'd notify you also. It's under Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed), as per the description of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69d-enwfDZ0 . Is that not allowed? Sorry if so, but I assumed it was; I saw this file under the same license, and it had been up for a while: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dark_Souls_II_-_Crown_of_the_Ivory_King_Trailer.webm CelestialWeevil (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

that trailer was published on YouTube by the creators of the game itself. The footage you uploaded was recorded by someone unrelated to the creators. It's a derivative work Vera ^(talk) 17:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry, you're right, this is OK! Bandai Namco is this game's publisher and this is their official channel. Hopefully they know what they're doing when they chose their license but that isn't necessarily our problem. They have also published Dragon Ball Z footage on their channel under a free license - something they are definitely not the only copyright holders to. :( Vera ^(talk) 18:03, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Nicole Brenez - The Image You Missed - IFFR 2018-1.jpg

File:Nicole Brenez - The Image You Missed - IFFR 2018-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regis Hebraud (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Heilig Landstichting blikt terug op Tweede Wereldoorlog.webm

File:Heilig Landstichting blikt terug op Tweede Wereldoorlog.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Standard YouTube License Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

ℯxplicit 05:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Brandweer op bezoek bij De Wereldboom.webm

File:Brandweer op bezoek bij De Wereldboom.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ℯxplicit 08:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Opening nieuwe basisschool De Uitdaging in Berg en Dal met 1 jaar uitgesteld.webm

File:Opening nieuwe basisschool De Uitdaging in Berg en Dal met 1 jaar uitgesteld.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ℯxplicit 11:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:05. Gijs van Dijk (31763202586).jpg

No idea why you consider it necessary to ping me here, anyway I don't understand why this photo has not been deleted, its status is still unclear to me from what is given in the description, the source link is to a different photo, its author is Lex Draijer whereas here according to the EXIF data Christiaan Krouwels. Maybe there is something to fix in the description, but otherwise I'll have to nominate this photo a second time. --A.Savin 16:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

The file was deleted and then out of procedure restored. 1Veertje, please do not wheelwar. You can either consult closing admin or go to COM:UDR instead. Jcb (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

File:VandenBrink photograph.jpg

File:VandenBrink photograph.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Was previously published as an larger image https://alchetron.com/Marcel-RM-van-den-Brink Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:10, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

File:VandenBrink photograph.jpg

File:VandenBrink photograph.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 12:06, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Fatal Flight Lockheed Hudson FK790 - Kornwerderzand (42995261684).jpg

File:Fatal Flight Lockheed Hudson FK790 - Kornwerderzand (42995261684).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Sherman Tank - Kornwerderzand (29840080218).jpg

File:Sherman Tank - Kornwerderzand (29840080218).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Breda in Beeld- Avondje NAC Loop.webm

File:Breda in Beeld- Avondje NAC Loop.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 16:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Breda in Beeld- Carnavaleske muziekmiddag.webm

File:Breda in Beeld- Carnavaleske muziekmiddag.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 16:31, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Bredanu Sport- Crossfit en Skateboarden.webm

File:Bredanu Sport- Crossfit en Skateboarden.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 05:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Carnavalsoptocht Knotsenburg 2018.webm

File:Carnavalsoptocht Knotsenburg 2018.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 18:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2018!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2018}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,400 people contributing over 8,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. The event runs similar to last year with some small but exciting changes: improved state guides, an interactive map, and a larger prize pool! Like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lehman Brothers offices in Manhattan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I agree that this is the best in scope, shows the subject well and is widely used. However, the description needs to be updated (geolocalisation + adress + mention that it belonged to Lehman Brothers until they went bankrupt). Skimel (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose A link to the category is needed. --Yann (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support OK now. Yann (talk) 18:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Re-publica 2010 (4534918546).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

 

B dash (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Re publica10 (4537529864).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

 

B dash (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Re-publica 2010 (4534928086).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

 

B dash (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mary Scherpe auf der re publica10 (4537519898).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

 

B dash (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Laber-Flashmob auf der re publica10 (4534784707).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

 

B dash (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Laber-Flashmob auf der re publica10 (4535407706).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

 

B dash (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Netherlands, Stompwijk, Grote Drooggemaakte Polder (3).JPG

Hi Vera, This is something from a long time ago. On 28 August 2015 you suggested to delete this file as it would be missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which would be needed to verify its copyright status. There is no missing information however. The image consists of two halves. It is clearly indicated at "Source" that the picture (i.e. the photo, the left half) is my own work, while the newspaper clipping (the right half of the image) comes from a source of which I gave the full web address. So I do not understand what the problem was. Luckily the file has been retained. Loranchet (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Netherlands, Den Haag, Ockenburgh, opgravingen, 1930s (1).jpg

Hi Vera, this is again an old one, but it irritated me much at the time as I put a lot of effort in the article in which this picture was posted. But I found no time to pick up this issue. You suggested on 28 August 2015 to delete the file in heading and a second file: File:Netherlands, Den Haag, Ockenburgh, opgravingen, 1930s (2).jpg In both cases your stated reason was that 1930 (or 1938) was too recent to be free from copyright. That is true in case the author is known, but in case of anonymous or pseudonymous works or works published by a legal entity the copyright expires 70 years after the first publication. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries%27_copyright_lengths And this is the case for both files. The authors/writers are unknown, and the works were published by a legal entity, in this case a private company, namely a newspaper publisher. So would it be possible for you to re-upload those files or else explain where my arument goes wrong? Many thanks! Loranchet (talk) 21:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

a newspaper article is not anonymous. The original author can be traced back in the newspaper's records and the newspaper holds the copyright as the author's employer. Works don't only have to be cleared for the country of publication, but also the US where it's 100 years. Vera ^(talk) 22:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Bad bot!

[5] I'm not sure why it thought that the video was from 1970. (Maybe the typo in the date, which I have now fixed?) But as much as I wish I had a time machine and could go back and change the result of the game, it was from 2018. ;) --B (talk) 12:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Hmm that's weird. Computers keep track of dates by counting the amount of seconds that have elapsed since January 1st 1970, so giberish/0/null gets interpreted as such. There are instructions for my bot to ignore January 1st 1970 for that reason. I have to check why it's ignoring its instructions. --Vera ^(talk) 12:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

What language are you using? Is there some equivalent of Nullable<DateTime> in your language? --B (talk) 12:53, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

PHP (don't judge, I know, it would be more reasonable to write in Python. it's what I'm used to). Just checked my code. I just checked, and I hadn't actually included logic to just ignore 1970. it should be fixed now. this line was suppose to catch bad interpretations, but I guess it didn't.--Vera ^(talk) 13:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:In the Hall of the Mountain King (Piano Version) - Edvard Grieg.opus

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:32, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Wiebke Loosen - re-publica 2014.jpg

Dear 1Veertje,

If you are uploading a youtube video which is very long--say 45 minutes or 1 hour in the above case--please consider typing in the time of the youtube clip since it can be hard to find the image. As in the case below.

• File:Hamed Nikpay.png

Like President Reagan says "trust but verify." I trust you but I don't know where the image is in this 1 hour+ video clip. I do my best but some people are terrible: they upload videos which are 2 hours and 30 minutes long with 1 single video clip and no time reference. At least, you are quite reasonable. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

I will try to keep this in mind. In this case: it's slightly after the 1:03:00 mark. --Vera ^(talk) 20:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment: It was (1:03:11) Thanks for the help. No wonder I could not find it. I did not scroll that close to the end and I had 1 hour of material to scroll through. The image is now marked. Best Regards Madam from Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

File:MOET IEDEREEN WEL KUNNEN STEMMEN- -- -WZHV 69.webm

File:MOET IEDEREEN WEL KUNNEN STEMMEN- -- -WZHV 69.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:33, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Dit is -WZHV.webm

File:Dit is -WZHV.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

File:VOORPOST actie STOP DE ASIEL-INVASIE - E40 Wetteren.webm

File:VOORPOST actie STOP DE ASIEL-INVASIE - E40 Wetteren.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Raphael Fellmer - 2016.jpg

The uploaded video clip does not appear to come from the given source....which names "Thomas Gottschalk". Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

ah, I'm sorry I messed up copying the incorrect cell from my spreadsheet. It's from this video in the same series around the 2 minute mark. Vera ^(talk) 09:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment: OK. Image marked. Goodnight from Vancouver, Canada where its 2:31 AM. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

good morning from Europe :) Vera ^(talk) 09:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:1Veertje/common.js

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:1Veertje/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 79 character 45: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 09:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC).

File:Volgende week herdenking bombardement Nijmegen in 1944.webm

File:Volgende week herdenking bombardement Nijmegen in 1944.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Dilemma donderdag- Nooit meer seks of nooit meer voetbal-.webm

File:Dilemma donderdag- Nooit meer seks of nooit meer voetbal-.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:'Refugees Welcome'-tag hangt nu door heel Nijmegen.webm

File:'Refugees Welcome'-tag hangt nu door heel Nijmegen.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Leroy Labylle voor drie jaar naar NEC.webm

File:Leroy Labylle voor drie jaar naar NEC.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:49, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:TV-KIJKEN IS OUDERWETS EN "GAAT UITSTERVEN" -- -WZHV -62.webm

File:TV-KIJKEN IS OUDERWETS EN "GAAT UITSTERVEN" -- -WZHV -62.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:HALLO ALLEMAAL!- CARNAVAL IN KNOTSENBURG -- -WZHV -66.webm

File:HALLO ALLEMAAL!- CARNAVAL IN KNOTSENBURG -- -WZHV -66.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:ROOKRUIMTE WORDT VERBODEN- "DIT IS DE HORECA OM ZEEP HELPEN" -- -WZHV 68.webm

File:ROOKRUIMTE WORDT VERBODEN- "DIT IS DE HORECA OM ZEEP HELPEN" -- -WZHV 68.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Gemeente dwarsboomt horecaplannen ondernemer Tweede Walstraat.webm

File:Gemeente dwarsboomt horecaplannen ondernemer Tweede Walstraat.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:TIDE POD CHALLENGE- BIZAR, BEZOPEN, EN EEN BEETJE STOM -- -WZHV -64.webm

File:TIDE POD CHALLENGE- BIZAR, BEZOPEN, EN EEN BEETJE STOM -- -WZHV -64.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Wijchense 'Liefdestunnel' beklad door vandalen.webm

File:Wijchense 'Liefdestunnel' beklad door vandalen.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Can

you please clarify your reasons behind your uploads at test-wiki.Thanks,Winged Blades ^Godric 13:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

I was testing out a little script that will crop and upload the thumbnail of videos published by the German association for the promotion of science. As you can see on their YouTube channel they feature a scientist on the left and a title card on the right. This will result in one upload to Wikimedia Commons every Wednesday. Vera ^(talk) 13:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks:-) Feel free to test your script at test.wiki. At any case, for further testing, please leave a minimal note at the user-page detailing the purpose of usage and more importantly, provide a minimal data, over the uploads, that can identify them as not violating copyright laws.FWIW, I have unblocked your alt and restored the deleted photos.Winged Blades ^Godric 05:20, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I've worked out the script so there's no need to keep the pictures around on test wiki. I had expected them to be deleted by now. Vera ^(talk) 08:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Creator:Jeroen Komen

Creator:Jeroen Komen has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this creator, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:1Veertje/common.css

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:1Veertje/common.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new prettyCss issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 21 char number 10 - Evidence: 10px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 12:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC).

Reviewing copyright of one image

Hi, As this photo needed special authorization, and also this user has also similar uploads, Please review this photo for copyright. I think this is not his own work. Thanks نیکات (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions

---

I noticed you've uploaded File:NMD 2018 FOLK (41168875934) (cropped).jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

 Senator2029 ➔ “Talk”  02:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:1Veertje/common.css

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:1Veertje/common.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:pt: line 21 char number 10 - Evidence: 10pt
2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 29 char number 8 - Evidence: 32px
3. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 30 char number 9 - Evidence: 32px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:1Veertje/common.css

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:1Veertje/common.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new prettyCss issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:pt: line 21 char number 10 - Evidence: 10pt
2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 29 char number 8 - Evidence: 25px
3. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 30 char number 9 - Evidence: 32px
4. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 31 char number 6 - Evidence: 3px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC).

File:US-CO - Denver - Sign - North America - Road Trip - Starbucks - The West (4892404818).jpg

File:US-CO - Denver - Sign - North America - Road Trip - Starbucks - The West (4892404818).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Can't find

a copy to commons template on NL-wiki. What's going on with you guys? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:36, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

you mean the Commonscat template? The Dutch Wikipedia does have that one. Vera ^(talk) 08:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

No, I mean the template that indicates that a file should be transferred to Commons. Many Wikis have one, like on EN: w:en:Template:Copy to Wikimedia Commons. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

the Dutch language Wikipedia doesn't have local files. There is no fair use material we allow on there and whatever free license material we had was transferred to Commons a decade ago. Vera ^(talk) 07:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Marten Toonder (1972) (cropped).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marten Toonder (1972) (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 12:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Juist voor dit doel had ik {{Extracted from deleted}} gemaakt. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Op http://proxy.handle.net/10648/abe1a5d8-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84 staat trouwens CC0.. hoe zit dat? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Ik zag het ook al. Geen idee eigenlijk. Een variatie op het Nationaal Archief sjabloon met cc-zero kon ik zo snel niet vinden. Vera ^(talk) 19:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:1Veertje/common.js

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:1Veertje/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 124 character 2: Unnecessary semicolon. - Evidence: };

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 12:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:1Veertje/categoryColor.js

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:1Veertje/categoryColor.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 32 character 12: Don't make functions within a loop. - Evidence: });

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC).

FYI FFA P-16

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PC-24_T-786.jpg --2003:E2:AF06:4F00:88AD:EF69:1B91:5511 17:28, 3 January 2019 (UTC) Missuse of commons Deletion request. from a long time hounding troll. Evidence that is a troll is also that he pop-up here on this talkpage and used "noping2 to try to hide his action FFA P-16 (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Why did I write you when I want to hide it? --2003:E2:AF06:4F00:88AD:EF69:1B91:5511 18:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Why you the use "NOPING"? Because you tryied to hide that you spit your lies here on 1Veertje'spage. STOP Trolling&Hounding me and your ill deleting tricks.FFA P-16 (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I basically cannot hide anything on any Wiki, because every edit gets saved. That you already messed up with other users is not my fault.--2003:E2:AF06:4F00:88AD:EF69:1B91:5511 18:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Another discussion about this user is running here.--2003:E2:AF06:4F00:88AD:EF69:1B91:5511 20:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

As of February 8, 2019, the user FFA P-16 has been blocked indefinitely on German Wikipedia for extended socketpuppetry, just as an additional information. For the checkuser administrator it was a clearly and considerable offense of user:FFA P-16 against German wikipedia rules with numerous accounts, just as he already did on Netherlands and English wikipedia. That being just added to his accuses against IP users of "hounding" and "socketpuppetry". All the best --2003:6:3E8:9747:994E:19CB:F9B1:C158 12:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in User:1Veertje/categoryColor.js

Hi 1Veertje, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:1Veertje/categoryColor.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 39 character 62: ['extmetadata'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: var t = document.createTextNode(data.imageinfo[0]['extmetadata']['DateTimeOriginal']['value']);
2. ISSUE: line 39 character 77: ['DateTimeOriginal'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: var t = document.createTextNode(data.imageinfo[0]['extmetadata']['DateTimeOriginal']['value']);
3. ISSUE: line 39 character 97: ['value'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: var t = document.createTextNode(data.imageinfo[0]['extmetadata']['DateTimeOriginal']['value']);

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 15:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC).

MOTD

Three of your nominations at MOTD/talk have been archived by a bot. I think, something went wrong? --C.Suthorn (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

I had proposed then for dates in 2019, but at the time the matrix of months wasn't yet expanded to include the months of this year. Nobody responded to the nominations and over time they were archived automatically. I don't mind them being turned down as nominations but I'd prefer it to have at least some response. Vera ^(talk) 08:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Elephant Parade Homeless Man 4897908972.jpg

And also:

• File:Elephant Parade Oxford Street 4897374679.jpg
• File:Elephant Parade Speakers' Corner 4897892540.jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - Albert Memorial - Kensington Gardens - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897530778).jpg
• File:GB-ENG - London - Elephant - City Of Westminster - Elephant Parade (4897585791).jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 21:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

File:-Kurz- Das Chinesische Zimmer und die Natur des Verstehens (Philosophie des Geistes).webm

File:-Kurz- Das Chinesische Zimmer und die Natur des Verstehens (Philosophie des Geistes).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roy17 (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

File:-Kurz- Die Duhem-Quine-These und wissenschaftlicher Holismus (Wissenschaftstheorie).webm

And also:

• File:-Kurz- Gottlob Frege über Sinn und Bedeutung (Sprachphilosophie).webm
• File:-Kurz- Transformative Erfahrungen (Entscheidungstheorie und Philosophie des Geistes).webm

Yours sincerely, Roy17 (talk) 20:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Orbanism Space auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2015 (21790426894).jpg

File:Orbanism Space auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2015 (21790426894).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.64.165.245 12:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Using CropTool on images with template "Crop for Wikidata"

Hi Veertje, just want to inform you, that your crop here[6] resulted in adding a picture of Burhan Sönmez (your crop File:Burhan_Sönmez_-_Foire_du_Livre_de_Francfort_2017_(37600767186)_(cropped).jpg) being added to the Wikidata Item of Aslı Erdoğan (Q468099)[7].
This automatically happens in your name on Wikidata.[8] This happened because the template "Crop for Wikidata"[Template:Crop for Wikidata] was attached to to original picture with the intent to get a crop for Asli Erdogan. If you're the first to make a crop of this picture, the crop will then be automatically added to Wikidata. Actually there is a small box/information after cropping (before uploading the crop), where you can choose if you want to add the crop to the respective (guessed) Wikidata-Item.
This just to let you know, in case there were more of this and you didn't know. I'll clean up the Wikidata-Item of Asli and (if needed) Burhan. Regards --Mirer (talk) 10:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Als betrokkene zijn toestemming geeft, hoe dan?

Hi 1Veertje,

Je hebt de foto van mobiliteitsdeskundige Kris Peeters toegevoegd aan zijn wp-pagina, vanuit wikicommons via flickr. Nu wou ik een wp-pagina maken over die andere mobiliteitsdeskundige Dirk Lauwers. Lauwers laat weten wel een privé-foto (van zichzelf) te willen afstaan, maar heeft zelf geen wp of commons account. Vraag: hoe krijg ik vanuit mijn account die foto op commons (en wp)? Moet ik zelf een flickr account aanmaken, of kan Lauwers mij via mail toelating geven? Geen enkele mogelijkheid in de commons-uploadwizard lijkt toepasselijk. Bedankt voor tips, of verwijzing naar juiste helppagina. Robberd77 (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hey, Wikimedia Nederland heeft een handige website voor dit proces opgezet: wikiportret.nl Vera ^(talk) 11:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Bedankt, Vera, dat gaan we uitproberen! Robberd77 (talk) 10:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Art - Nikolajplads Copenhagen (46411791014).jpg

File:Art - Nikolajplads Copenhagen (46411791014).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pugilist (talk) 08:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Julia de Boer

Dear 1Veertje, This photograph names as the photographer: Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten. Today you added a category to this file, Category:Photographs by Julia de Boer. Could you give a source that confirms your addition? Vysotsky (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

on flickr, you can see the photo is in the album for the 2008 edition of The Next Web conference, with the album description stating photos should be credited to Julia de Boer. Boris Veldhuizen van Zanten is the director of The Next Web and used to use this Flickr account as his personal account. Vera ^(talk) 20:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Dan Taylor

Hello.I have created "Category:Photographs by Dan Taylor" but is Dan Taylor a user here or a photographer on Flickr (Some photos are personal work)? ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

they're the photographer hired by the NEXT conferenceVera ^(talk) 09:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nyan tomcat.gif

Hey, how is that a copyright violation? I did it myself, completely from scratch, no reused parts or anything. (It was a hell lot of work.) Just reusing the concepts in your own art shouldn't make it a copyright violation, otherwise paraphrasing some text would do so as well.--Pink kitty111 (talk) 13:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Have you even watched them side by side?.. :-( --Pink kitty111 (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

You didn't make it from scratch, you copied it from the original. The way you copied it doesn't matter. What you're referring to with "paraphrasing" is the fair use principle, we don't allow fair use material on Wikimedia Commons. --Vera ^(talk) 12:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Damn sure i made it from scratch. I used nothing more than my memory. Why do you claim i didn't? - It cost me hours to do this one.--Pink kitty111 (talk) 12:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

If there's a all-rights-reserved copyrighted photo of something, and somebody goes there and takes basically the exact same shot again and releases it under some free license, we have no problem with that one here on Commons. Why should this be different?--Pink kitty111 (talk) 12:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

You didn't even wait for a proper deletion discussion to finish!.. :-( --Pink kitty111 (talk) 12:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

And paraphrasing is not fair use. It is completely okay on Wikipedia and anywhere else.--Pink kitty111 (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

File:American International School of Rotterdam (3).JPG

File:American International School of Rotterdam (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.97.19.205 10:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Voorzitter Khadija Arib te gast in het Lagerhuis.webm

Template:Copyvionote/layout Roy17 (talk) 00:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

File:DN Asks- Do you know the UNL concealed carry policy-.webm

File:DN Asks- Do you know the UNL concealed carry policy-.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Template:Idw/lang

Sanandros (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Problem en VI

Hi, Can you give your opinion about this image?Reykjavík - tree of the year 2016.jpeg. If the proposed correction does not have your agrement you can remove it without problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Soviet censorship with Stalin2.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Hunter9502 (talk) 07:09, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

File:Flying next to Hans (19551915503).jpg

Hallo Template:U ik zag deze afbeelding en vroeg me af of deze afbeelding met links onderaan de verwijzing naar "ik kan vliegen" een verwijzing zou kunnen zijn naar {{Creator:Jeroen Komen}}. Thanks. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

hey, Ja dat "ikreis" is de gebruikersnaam van Jeroen Komen op diverse platformen. Vera ^(talk) 12:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Wat leuk dat je dit kon uitvissen. Misschien een Category:Jeroen Komen aanmaken? Thanks. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

is niet zo zeer uitvinden als dat ik hem geholpen heb bij het aanmaken van het flickr account. Iedereen kan een categorie aanmaken, daar heb je mij niet bij nodig. Ik heb zijn foto's ook in Category:Photographs by User:Ikreis weggezet. Vera ^(talk) 22:10, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

User:1Veertje/common.js

Hi, your page is located within Category:Non-media deletion requests. Cozuld you pls manage to get it out. Thx. --JuTa 20:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

✅ Vera ^(talk) 20:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

1VeertjeBot

Hi! Your bot did not add a video cat to File:東日本実業団駅伝 2018 1区 スタート直後.webm.--Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:57, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Pastries with a Purpose- Goldenrod Pastries.webm

Template:Autotranslate TILRs ([[User talk:TILRs|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Matthias Maurer

hi 1Veertje, sorry for asking, but is the man on this photo (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Matthias_Maurer?uselang=de#/media/File:NEXT_BERLIN_May_8_Creative_(7158310852).jpg) really the same man as here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Maurer? Your Matthias Maurer is the founder of LA RED - and not the astronaut. I think so. both are in the same https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Matthias_Maurer

ah, yes, my mistake, fixed it. Vera ^(talk) 09:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:How the Chamber Works (UK).webm

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

File:The House of Commons Chamber.webm

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:03, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:ArtZuid 2011 Amsterdam.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Internetdagarna 2015 (23244620945).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Videos by year

I realized I undid one of your bots edits and started to wonder. Should all videos really have for example Videos of 2019 if they already have a category lower down in the hierarchy, like Videos of 2019 from Sweden? I thought that was over-categorizing, but perhaps it is good to easily get a count per year.. Ainali ([[User talk:Ainali|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

My script is supposed to not add "videos of 2017" if "videos of 2017 from Norway" is a category. I'll have to check why it's not doing that. Vera ^(talk) 19:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

To help you search, here is the diff, and the category it had was one subcategory below national level: Category:Wikimania 2019 videos. Ainali ([[User talk:Ainali|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Similar problem special:diff/362049331.--Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

should be fixed --Vera ^(talk) 16:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with SITENAME and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Le deuxième sexe.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Droit de retrait 03 ([[User talk:Droit de retrait 03|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:34, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Nominations for deletion of misogynist not-educationally-useful content

I saw that you were ganged up on during deletion discussions for some of the exey panteleev photos that use women's bodies to make degrading puns about code without actually demonstrating what the code is or does. I've renominated a bunch again, if you have time to back them up it would be much appreciated. I have left some of the images alone, but nominated the most egregious.

Previously, the admin had decided that consent was assumed, and as a result no one should care about objectification. What is very concerning to me is that none of these images actually shows what the described technologies are or do. Another thing to note is that all of these images are hosted at the artist's Flickr, so I'm not sure why WikiCommons has to serve as a backup.

Particularly concerning is that some of these images are the top result when the technology is searched (eg. "full stack")

• File:Full_Stack_(Exey_Panteleev).jpg
• File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg
• File:Body painting - display.jpg
• File:Body painting - z-index.jpg
• File:Body painting - Proxy.jpg
• File:Body painting - MongoDB's "WHERE".jpg
• File:Clover (40670426730).jpg
• File:Body painting - float left right.jpg
• File:Body painting - QR code.jpg
• File:RSS feed icons painted on a naked woman (by Exey Panteleev).jpg
• File:HTML output - Exey Panteleev.jpg

Thank you!

Seazzy ([[User talk:Seazzy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Fokke Jacobs de Zee - 1921.jpg

And also:

• File:Fokke Jacobs de Zee - De Telegraaf 1921-08-16 (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 08:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Mr. V. H. Rutgers 1913.jpg

Hi, I am wondering about this photo. You write, you made it yourself - but as you did not live in 1913, there must be a source like a book, which should be mentioned. And it seems strange to me, that there should be only 7 years between the photo of 1913 und 1920. I feel that they are at least 20 years between the two photos. --Nicola ([[User talk:Nicola|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

hi, sorry, forgot to edit the wikitext after uploading. The photo was first published, anonymously, in the Nieuwe Tilburgsche Courant of 13 July 1913. I included the link. The photo itself could well be a bit older than that. Vera ^(talk) 19:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Microsoft's how-old.net has him at 38 (was 36) in the 1913 photo and 44 in the other :o. The AI might be biased against mustaches though. Vera ^(talk) 19:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

I think he looks like in the middle of 20 on the photo of 1913. So it might be published in 1913, but the photo might be older. --Nicola ([[User talk:Nicola|int:Talkpagelinktext]])

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Willem Maria van Lanschot.jpg

And also:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Alexander van Sasse van Ysselt.jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Willem Hendrik Bogaardt.jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Theodorus Johannes Antonius Duynstee.jpg

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 14:50, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Gustaaf van der Feltz.jpg

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 15:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Egbertus Johannes Beumer.jpg

And also:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Jan van Leeuwen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 15:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Henri Marchant.jpg

And also:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Dirk Jan de Geer.jpg

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 15:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Dirk Bos.jpg

And also:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Eduard Ellis van Raalte.jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Gerrit Jannink.jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Hendrik Goeman Borgesius.jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Jan Gerrit Scheurer.jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Johan Willem Herman Meyert van Idsinga.jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Willem Hovy.jpg

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 16:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Duynstee

Dear 1Veertje, Could you tell me where you found the name of the photographer of this photo of Theo Duynstee? Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

the source in its description. Vera ^(talk) 21:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. The name must have been added to the source after I uploaded the file, I guess. Thanks also for adding undelete in 2027. Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

you added it as text when you uploaded it last April. We're quite fortunate that we have an institution that keeps track of these dates. The photo was also published in the book Category:Onze Afgevaardigden (1913) and with OpenRefine I was able to match all but 7 of the ~80 credited photos. Vera ^(talk) 21:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Licentie van {{PD-old}} naar {{Anonymous-EU}}

Dag Vera, ik zag dat je bij Postzegel 1936 zomer.jpg de licentie hebt veranderd. Ik heb nog heel veel andere postzegelscans geupload met PD-old. Voordat je die allemaal gaat veranderen een vraag. Bij de licentie staat: "... en de auteur anoniem is. Dit heeft betrekking op de Europese Unie en die landen die een auteursrechtentermijn hebben van 70 jaar nadat het werk openbaar werd gemaakt en de auteur diens identiteit nooit geopenbaard heeft."
Bij Category:Stamps of the Netherlands staat in een NOTE "For the license see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#The Netherlands. There is mentioned: "Prior to 1 January 1989, the government-owned corporation PTT made the stamps as being created by the company and as such was considered their author." So for example all stamps of 2016-70=1945 or earlier are copyright free and {{PD-old}} can be used.". Als auteur wordt dus de PTT beschouwd. De auteur is dus niet anoniem. Volgens mij is het gebruik van Anonymous-EU daarom niet juist. Wat zijn jouw gedachten hierover? Groeten, Wouter ([[User talk:Wouterhagens|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

ja, ik zit er aan te denken dat een template moet worden aangemaakt voor Nederlandse postzegels. Pd-old is niet van toepassing want de auteur is nog niet zo lang dood. Template:Tl is een voorbeeld voor een ander land waar een template voor bestaat. Vera ^(talk) 19:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate — Racconish ^💬 16:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

User:1Veertje/Tips/CatPerson.js

Vera:
The subject page shows up as the only page in Category:People by name. I'm sure you didn't intend to have that happen. Regards, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, fixed it. Vera ^(talk) 17:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Code issues in User:1Veertje/Tips/CatPerson.js

Template:Autolang Your CommonsMaintenanceBot ([[User talk:CommonsMaintenanceBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) at 17:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC).

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Dionysius Adrianus Petrus Norbertus Koolen.jpg

And also:

• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Henricus Paulus Cornelis Bosch van Drakestein (cropped).jpg
• File:Onze afgevaardigden (1913) - Henricus Paulus Cornelis Bosch van Drakestein.jpg

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 22:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Francis Kramer

Dear 1Veertje, You deleted some of the photographs shot by Francis Kramer. It might well be possible that's not necessary. Apparently the copyright holder, R. Kramer, gave permission to the Utrecht Archives to bring some photographs by Francis Kramer under CC-BY-SA-4.0. The RKD also has well over 100 of his photographs openly available on the RKD website, and RKD is normally quite strict. Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

the rkd could have thousands of images licened for publication on their site, that would still not take away the author's copyright. A photo is not OK for Commons unless it has explicitly been given a free license or is in the public domain. Vera ^(talk) 07:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

That's exactly what I am trying to make clear: it is highly likely that the copyright holder (R. Kramer) gave a free license for the photographs of Francis Kramer. But if you don't want to check that out, that's fine with me. Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

I checked, the Drakestein photo was listed. Of the people that I've shown the overview of "Onze Afgevaardigden" IRL more than one picked him as their favourite beard so that's nice. --Vera ^(talk) 11:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Lawrence Mishel addresses the Democratic platform drafting committee.webm

And also:

• File:What options do workers have- Testimony before the Democratic platform committee.webm

Yours sincerely --- Coffeeandcrumbs 09:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Legends - Nashville TN (31289032457).jpg

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:Hip Hop Evolution on the Red Carpet (cropped).jpg

And also:

• File:Mark Villarreal - NBC (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle ([[User talk:Sealle|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Leidsepoort - 2.jpg

Hallo 1Veertje, ik vroeg me af of een rename aangewezen is (vanwege #2). Thanks. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

ik snap de vraag niet? Als het jouw inziens een goed idee is de foto te hernoemen (geen slecht idee) kan je er zelf een rename-sjabloon aan toevoegen. Vera ^(talk) 08:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Zomerexcursie - Noordwaard .webm

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 04:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Re publica 19 - Day 3 (47014476434).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Olia lialina ([[User talk:Olia lialina|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Dememorixer

Beste 1Veertje, Klopt het dat de Dememorixer niet werkt op deze afbeelding (= deze afbeelding )? Of moet ik een andere URL gebruiken? Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:33, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

hey, dit ziet er niet uit als een Memorix Maore fotogalerij Vera ^(talk) 21:39, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:-SaveYourInternet - -DeleteArt13- Big Businesses Fighting Each Other to the Detriment of Freedom.webm

Template:Autotranslate Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

author (P50)

Hoi Vera, Template:P is alleen voor geschreven werken, niet voor foto's en dat werk dus zou je deze niet meer willen toevoegen? Daarnaast gaan we niet voor iedereen die een foto heeft gemaakt een apart item aanmaken. Multichill (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

File:SocialPoint logo 2017.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Lordtobi (✉) 20:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Zeker zijn van de beste zorg.webm

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Feather hair extensions 2011.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:26, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

• File:US-CA - San Francisco - 2007-07-28 (4889300377).jpg

Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

These 2 videos

Dear Madam Admin,

• File:Kaj van der Ree 2019.jpg & File:Jurre Geluk 2019.jpg are private videos which I cannot view in Canada. Please ask someone who can view and review them to do so. I did sign in to YT but was denied access to them. I managed to find the time to view your other videos.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

it's also not listed anymore in the Netherlands. Probably because the guy on the right turned out to be a pedo. the wayback machine can still show you that the video description says these two people were in it and that it was published under a CC-license. Other videos on the channel have the same set. Vera ^(talk) 08:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

• Template:Comm: OK, I reviewed them based on the wayback machine data. Best Regards, --Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Stoppt das Sterben im Mittelmeer!.webm

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Station Breda-periferie vv.webm

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 04:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Komborden gestolen in gemeente Altena - Altena TV.webm

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Bart Logchies coacht voor één keer AFC 7 en ze winnen eindelijk weer eens!.webm

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 10:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)