Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 25 2022

Consensual review

edit

File:Friedelsheim_Kirchgasse_6_8_027_2022_09_11.jpg

edit

 

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fondry_des_Chiens_during_civil_twilight_(DSC07718).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Fondry des Chiens during civil twilight; natural sinkhole in Nismes (Viroinval, Belgium) --Trougnouf 18:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Looks decent at the preview size, but when you zoom in it's very overprocessed IMO, sorry. --BigDom 16:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
    I reduced sharpening (which I guess is refered to as overprocessing), I can hardly see a difference but I think it looks fine in the first place. --Trougnouf 23:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Doesn't look great at full size on my 23.5-inch (or 22.5-inch, I forget which and don't have the tape measure at my side) monitor, but it looks OK on my 13-inch, and I think that's good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 17:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per BigDom. The problem is visible at full size. But the compo is good, it's a shame, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 23:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Isn't full size a bit excessive for QI review? --Trougnouf 11:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. I see the problems on my laptop.--Peulle 14:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough up to A4 size print. --Smial 15:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)