Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 02 2015

Consensual review

edit

File:Duiker Island Les otaries du Cap (3).JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Duiker Island--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Distinct detail quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)It need a rotation, the sea is tilted and if possible a correction of the barrel distortion (the sea is a bit curved) --Christian Ferrer 21:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
      Done Reduction of noise, corrected in sky, and add more a little blue-saturation.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC))
  •   Support --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Ramu-Keval_Devi,_folk_art,_Bharatiya_Lok_Kala_Museum,_Udaipur,_India.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Ramu-Keval Devi, folk art, Bharatiya Lok Kala Museum, Udaipur, India. --Yann 10:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Harsh flash shadow. --Mattbuck 16:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
      Question Can it be corrected? I don't know how to do this myself. --Yann 09:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I uploaded corrected version.--Hubertl 09:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --LivioAndronico 08:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Kuala_Lumpur_Methodist-1-2-Brickfields-Girl-Primary-School-02.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Sentral Vista building. In the foreground the Methodist 1 & 2 Brickfields Girl Primary School --Cccefalon 08:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion   SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
      Oppose The sky is very overexposed for me. --Steindy 13:52, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    Have a look at the histogram and you will see at the first glimpse, that there is nothing overexposed. --Cccefalon 15:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
    I am aware that your photos are always perfect. Only my photos are ░▒▓█▓▒░ in your eyes. --Steindy 22:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
      Support QI to me --DKrieger 15:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support a white sky but with no details lost --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support There may be a slight technical deficiency in the sky, but it's not overexposed and it's so minor that I only notice if looking for it. The rest of the image is fine, so good for me! Ram-Man 03:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support as Ram-Man -- DerFussi 08:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 14:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Gagra,_Plaża_(11).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The beach. Gagra, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 01:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Picture is unsharp --Jacek Halicki 20:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. How sharp do you want it? Look at the stones. Its getting a little unsharp in the upper third part, but the rest is really ok. If you want more sharpness, you need a tilt/shift-lens from this position. --Hubertl 21:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment   Done Sharpness added. But this is maximum I can add. More would create artifacts. --Halavar 23:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support I would rather have more depth of field (shot at f/11 and risk a little diffraction softness) than maximal sharpness in those areas that are in focus at f/8, but it's still enough for a QI. Ram-Man 03:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --LivioAndronico 08:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)