Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 19 2022
-
- Nomination Exterior of the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apse of the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wrought iron gate at the subconstruction of the staircase of the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Balustrade at the staircase to the parish church Saints Florian and Josef in Tanzenberg, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A person is writing on a truck during "Freedom Convoy" protest in Ottawa, Canada --Maksimsokolov 00:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 04:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christoph Kniezanrek, player of Floridsdorfer AC. --Steindy 00:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms of Prince-elector Clemens Wenceslaus of Saxony in Trier. --Palauenc05 21:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Giannaros mansion, Athens. --C messier 19:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Korai square, Athens. --C messier 19:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cat on Obozowa Street in Kraków --Jakubhal 18:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good cat portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 20:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Wildschweinjagd" von Friedrich Wilhelm Wolff. Der am Sockel angebrachte Name "Johannes Brix" aus Berlin bezieht sich auf den Eisengiesser. --Nightflyer 14:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mimosa pudica seeds in BhopalI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 11:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Only parts of the object are sharp- --Steindy 00:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Morus alba flowers in IndiaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 11:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 20:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kathak Solo PerformanceI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 11:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bharatnatyam different facial expressionsI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 11:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 12:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination GD Bakshi during a National Seminar at Bhopal January 2018I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Materialscientist --Suyash.dwivedi 11:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 12:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Swedish singer Myra Granberg, by FrankieF --Vivo 10:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. The focus is on the microphone and not at the singer. --Steindy 13:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Steindy. Also traces of upscaling are too obvious to see. --VileGecko 19:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for feedback. I withdraw my nomination --~~~~
-
- Nomination Football goal in the 2022 flood near Rattelsdorf --Ermell 10:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Train station at night, Ohio (by Cfeather54)--Mbrickn 10:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Right valve of a Peppery Furrow Shell, Scrobicularia plana --Llez 07:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality. --Kritzolina 07:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Support High quality coverage of scientific material. --Mbrickn 10:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kampen, upper part of the facade of 'the Gothic house' Oudestraat 158.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Kampen, upper part of the facade of 'the Gothic house' Oudestraat 158.
-
- Nomination Krn (2244 m) seen from Tonovcov Grad, Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Julian Alps in the Municipality of Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Julian Alps seen from Vršič Pass, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soča river in the Municipality of Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Karawanks from Lake Bled, Upper Carniola, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque commemorating founding of the Loma Prieta Chapter of the Sierra Club (by Schmiebel) --Adamant1 05:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry. The plaque should be in the center and horizontals and verticals should be adjusted. Resolution should be better for this kind of photographs. --XRay 05:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge to inner bailey of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Embrasure at the outer bailey of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stair tower of the inner bailey of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Georg chapel in front of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bay window of Vischering Castle, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Federal gymnasium in Tanzenberg #1, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Promotion in advance, please remove the dust spot at the top. --XRay 04:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 14:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial for the Munich main synagogue which was destroyed in 1938 - Detail of the inscriptions on the front --Kritzolina 20:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 07:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial for the Munich main synagogue which was destroyed in 1938 - side view --Kritzolina 20:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 07:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial for the Munich main synagogue which was destroyed in 1938 - detail of the inscription on the front, line from Psalm 74 in German --Kritzolina 20:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 07:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A dotted bee fly (Bombylius discolor) on a common cowslip (Primula veris) in the nature reserve Badstube Mimbach. --DavidJRasp 16:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp enough. Sorry. --Ermell 20:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A seven-spot ladybird (Coccinella septempunctata) on moss in the nature reserve Badstube Mimbach. --DavidJRasp 16:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glavni trg 1 in Celje, Styria, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soča river in the Municipality of Kobarid, Goriška, Slovenia. --Tournasol7 05:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape in Plöschenberg, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Please remove the dust spot on the right. --XRay 05:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 15:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape in Plöschenberg, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. IMO 16:9 would be better. --XRay 04:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
And please remove the dust spot on the right. --XRay 05:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 14:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alpine hut in Piedmont, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 15:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Ferlacher Horn and Košuta from Plöschenberg, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Some dust spots to remove. --Steindy 15:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spots removed. —- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Support IMO OK. Hopefully Steindy will agree. --XRay 12:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Distribution substation in Plöschenberg, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
In the upper part some dust spots to remove. --Steindy 15:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spots removed. —- Johann Jaritz 07:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 07:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree stumps of apple trees in Wurdach, Köttmannsdorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
3 dust spots to remove --Steindy 15:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spots removed. —- Johann Jaritz 07:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Support IMO OK. Hopefully Steindy will agree. --XRay 12:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Rauschelesee from the Sattnitz ridge, the localities Reauz, Höflein and Pertitschach, Keutschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Great shot. Please remove the dust spot in the sky (right). --Steindy 15:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Done @Steindy: Thanks for your review. Dust spot removed. —- Johann Jaritz 08:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Alte Wache" (former police station), Hauptmarkt 3 in Trier. --Palauenc05 23:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Done --Palauenc05 09:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --VileGecko 19:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall tile from East Frisia --Kritzolina 21:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose IMHO, not sharp enough and NR artifacts. Also some more info would be welcomed, like the location of the tile. --C messier 19:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panel Mount POT (variable resistance) with KnobI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Bottom part of image is blurry --Adamant1 07:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yangmingshan National Park. By User:Hermesli --IamMM 03:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Some perspective distortion in the fogged city, but overall ok. --Tomer T 14:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 07:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tugboat Svitzer Glenrock performing towing operations in Newcastle --VileGecko 11:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Almost clipping the antenna at the top - is there any more space at the top of the image? Also, consider doing some tonal tuning - overall a little dark, especially in shadows. --GRDN711 20:44, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Done Recropped the photo so that there's more space above the mainmast and raised the blacks and shadows. --VileGecko 20:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, too small. --Nightflyer 12:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Question What is understood by too small? The photo is 12.5 MP. --VileGecko 14:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Answer Originaldatei (4.713 × 2.651 Pixel, Dateigröße: 1,27 MB, MIME-Typ: image/jpeg); Gruss --Nightflyer 15:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Adamant1 07:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Done Addressed the issues as mentioned by Nightflyer and GRDN711. --VileGecko 08:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. IMHO changes made (cropping, tone rendition, higher resolution) have improved raised image to QI level. --GRDN711 14:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Three stages of Lake Estancia --Guerillero 15:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption --Mike Peel 18:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Try to remove chromatic aberration and improve sharpness. --VileGecko 13:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
@VileGecko: I already tried to remove the CA (compare with the previous version), not sure that there's more I can do. Same with sharpness. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Support This is definitely better. Sharpness is still not perfect but the scene is great. --VileGecko 08:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2021 Cumbre Vieja volcanic eruption --Mike Peel 18:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Try to remove chromatic aberration and improve sharpness. --VileGecko 13:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
As per the previous image. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --VileGecko 08:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
editFile:Tamar_Getter_2019.jpg
edit- Nomination Israeli artist Tamar Getter. By User:Arielinson --Tomer T 12:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too unsharp. Sorry. --Imehling 11:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Imehling (talk • contribs • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • rights • rights changes) which area seems unsharp? --Tomer T 13:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I've taken another look. The picture is not unsharp but the colors look faded on my screen. It's certainly good enough to have a discussion about it. --Imehling 06:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Her face and neck are either unsharp and/or posterized to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 05:39, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's a pity. A beautiful picture with not so good technical quality. Perhaps a candidate for VI? --Imehling 08:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- A cropped version of this could definitely be a VI.--Peulle 12:11, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 07:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Serengeti_National_Park_2021-09_-_Polemaetus_bellicosus_-_martial_eagle.jpg
edit- Nomination Polemaetus bellicosus. By User:Snowmanstudios --IamMM 13:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --VileGecko 13:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I disagree. The feathers on the head are totally blurry. --Steindy 19:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support: I understand the argument about the head being the most important factor in whether a photo is a QI or not, but the overall impression is good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 21:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Steindy. --Fischer.H 07:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support good enough. Tomer T 13:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support --Palauenc05 08:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 07:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)