Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2023

File:Luzern asv2022-10 Kapellbrücke img1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2023 at 22:26:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Switzerland
Info Night view of the Kapellbrücke over the Reuss with the water tower in Lucerne. All by me --A.Savin 22:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 22:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite a striking night pic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The chosen aperture F/5.6 limited the depth of field. Almost everything is blurred / unsharp at full size. Please compare with similar pictures in the Category:Featured night shots, where most of them are of better quality in my opinion. This view point has potential, but the image would be more striking at blue hour. The outlines of the tower are hard to distinguish in that darkness. Also I don't see the need to include that much of black surface in the composition. At least the bottom should be cropped in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A bit too soft for me. The tower, the buildings... they're not very detailed.--Peulle (talk) 07:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that there could be more fine details on the building façades, but when we consider the file size and the excellent total effect, it’s still a striking image. It does not matter here why the façades are a bit soft, but technically it’s an interesting question. I doubt that the DoF was too low because we are at 14mm where ƒ/5.6 could be sufficient and we have seen photos with excellent detail resolution at ƒ/4 and ƒ/5.6 by the same photographer with the same lens. Maybe it’s a consequence of the long exposure time (30 sec), when the ground or setup was not perfectly quiet … And maybe noise reduction has eaten some fine details, too? The crop proposed by Basile is excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It might not be pixel perfect, but the composition and the overall impression moves me to a support --Kritzolina (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would guess, the blurry (not even to soft) outlines on the left really came from an exposure error, as mentioned by Aristeas. However it resulted, this should not happen to a FP. Beside from that, the composition is to overloaded to me. The reflections take a lot of space and distract from the main objects, which indeed are difficult to figure out by night.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Yes, the soft areas could be better. But I've never tried to shoot this sort of image myself, and I have forgiven such results in long nighttime exposures before. Daniel Case (talk) 17:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the current crop. The DoF is also function of the focus distance. If this point is too close, you may get part of the subject blurred, even with an ultra-wide angle like this one. For having taken long exposure night shots with my own camera (1, 2), I can testify that it is possible to get the buildings sharp in the darkness. Moreover, you can try again by going back to the same place. It's not as if the sky was special that day -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel Case -- IamMM (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Switzerland

File:Skindred - 2017153155639 2017-06-02 Rock am Ring - Sven - 1D X II - 0110 - B70I6029.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2023 at 07:01:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Benji Webbe of Skindred at Rock am Ring 2017

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info Benji Webbe of Skindred at Rock am Ring 2017; created by Sven Mandel - uploaded by Sven Mandel - nominated by Achim Raschka -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but Benji Webbe should be identified in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Done -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good quality for an ~~interior~~ shot taken at 400 mm -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for being pedantic, but this is definitely not an interior shot: Rock am Ring is open-air, you can see the crowd in the sunglasses. El Grafo (talk) 07:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@El Grafo: You are right: This is taken from the photographers pit in front of the main station at Rock am Ring at Nürburgring. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The background misled me. Thanks for the hint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. It’s an excellent lens, but one also needs to be able to handle it ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians and singers performing

File:Jahn-Wehr Bamberg Winter 2018-20180228-RM-114615.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2023 at 19:30:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jogger crossing the icy barrier gate of a weir in Bamberg, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Ice
Info Jogger crossing the icy barrier gate of a weir in Bamberg, Germany. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Artistic. Time seems frozen :-)

You could remove the very thin border at the right with the building, though, that does not add anything to the composition, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Basile. – @Ermell: I ask myself whether People#Others is the best gallery page. The person ist important, of course, as a kind of accent, but overall this is more a photo of the weir and the bridge. Wouldn’t Places/Industry#Germany (which contains photos of weirs) or Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany fit better? Or maybe Natural_phenomena#Ice if you consider the ice as the most important thing? Best, --Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for your comment. I didn't find the categorization so appropriate either. --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 09:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Basile Morin: @Tomer T: @Aristeas: Crop optimized.--Ermell (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Radomianin --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 10:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support very photogenic weir, got some nice semi-abstract shots there one summer :-) --El Grafo (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty cool Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Ice

File:Himalayas, Ama Dablam, Nepal.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2023 at 19:17:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Mount Ama Dablam from Chola Valley. Nepal, Himalayas.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info View of Mount Ama Dablam (6,800 metres (22,300 ft) a. s. l.) from Chola Valley. Khumbu Everest Zone, Nepal, Himalayas. All by --Argenberg (talk) 19:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 19:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great motif which works best in full screen mode. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great.--Famberhorst (talk) 10:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but can you please reduce the noise a bit? specially in the dark area in the middle Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Poco a poco, I personally like low to moderate amounts of luminance noise, namely fine grain random photon noise, in images as it helps keep fine detail and gives that austere, true to life look preserving features and traits of natural sensor photon breathing. But in this case of a large brightly lit scene your preference seems reasonable so I turned up the noise reduction a bit as per your request. --Argenberg (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nythar^T^.^C 01:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Nepal

File:Main facade (fragment) of Hospital de Santa Cruz. Toledo, Spain.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2023 at 21:48:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info created & uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 18:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detail/processing could have been much better, but Toledo and its rich architecture is one of my weaknesses Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 472961 07:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support per Poco, particularly regarding the columns next to the windows. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- - Comment Thanks to Poco a poco and Daniel Case for the comments. I changed the processing a bit and hope the image is better. Ввласенко (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes, it is better, thanks, Poco a poco (talk) 11:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I want to express my gratitude to Tomer T for his attention to two of my photos, which I did not consider suitable for FP. Ввласенко (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain

File:Breukvlak afgewaaide dode berk. 19-03-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2023 at 17:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
Info Fracture surface of blown dead body Birch (Betula) 5 days after the storm. Focus stack of 10 photos. beautiful fracture line sculpted by nature on a birch trunk. (wood sculpture)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sharp image but I miss the wow factor here. Ordinary light and busy background -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Maybe it doesn't come across well, But the photo (with the notes) tells a special story for me. I've never seen such a cool fracture of a blown tree after a storm. It looks like a work of art.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may think your picture is a piece of art, but compare with 1, 2, 3, 4, when the light and the composition are special. There's a huge difference in my view. Your background is distracting, and your subject seems very ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose that is indeed a strange way for a tree to break, but it's not really enough to make me go wow. Sometimes I wish we had a place like Reddit's /r/mildlyinteresting to honor this kind image. El Grafo (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ostorhinchus aureus - Wilhelma 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2023 at 12:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ring-tailed cardinalfish; Wilhelma, Stuttgart

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Apogonidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light in my view. Fishes in aquarium are not as exceptional as in the wild, and the level of detail here is rather low. Thus just a QI for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Contrasting background doesn't help, either. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: are you pointing out the parted-colored background? Indeed the contrast is separated in two parts, but isn't it an opposition argument? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. Thanks for pointing that out. Duly corrected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 13:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Fuentona, Muriel de la Fuente, Soria, España, 2021-08-28, DD 42.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2023 at 20:14:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La Fuentona, Muriel de la Fuente, Soria, Spain

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Spain
Info La Fuentona, Muriel de la Fuente, Soria, Spain. The natural spring is a natural monument since 1998. There are only 6 such monuments in the Community of Castile and León (the biggest in Spain by surface). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment First thought: huge! Second thought: Meh. I tried to figure out why, looking some time at the picture in detail and I think, the first attraction came from the great capture of the colourful clear water and the meadow behind it. But when you look around, you detect few grey hills, that aren't very interesting, which take a lot of space in the background. This could have led to the meh. I wonder if a tighter crop would lead to more powerful impression, and I wonder if the resolution is suffient, when the hills in the backgorund would be cropped out and I wonder if it's necessary or wanted overall. Maybe others like the first impression or the contrast beetween the void hills an the nice oasis thing in the valley or think it's a FP anyway.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 459265 07:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this is very good, but I would prefer more room on the upper right, so that those nice big evergreens are not cut off. I don't know what would be further up and to the right in this motif, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image could benefit from slight saturation boost. --Argenberg (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Argenberg. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Argenberg and Daniel Case: I've increased the saturation a bit, along with some cloning and highlights reduction.
@Der Angemeldete and Ikan Kekek: Obviously I cannot address your comments regarding tigther and wider crop in one version, but I can show you other version of the motif, maybe you like one of them better: tigther, wider. Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I do like the composition with the widest crop best. All three are good photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure, if I would support an almost wider crop, but what I do know, is that the more narrow one isn't that spectacular either. I think it might be good as it is.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support A fascinating place, especially with the contrast between the green paradisiacal spring and the arid slopes around it. --Aristeas (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Spain

File:Arve Falls.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2023 at 08:48:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arve Falls in Hartz Mountains National Park, Tasmania, Australia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support and dare I say, this photo is much better than the photo on the Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service website. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful image of a beautiful area and a very good photographer with small resolution and no wow for me.--Ermell (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like the diagonal; a bit different from the straight vertical characteristic of so many waterfall photos. Daniel Case (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 1,944 × 1,296 pixels. In 2023 that's a very low resolution for a landscape. There is no sun in this picture. It seems all in the shadow. Thus not special for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see why you are nominating this one – even without the sun this is a nice image for me. But the resolution … Of course the resolution is understandable because around 2009 (when this photo has been taken) some Commons photographers even advised others to downscale their photos in order to make them appear sharper … ugh! These were different times indeed, and this photo is a witness of that era, just as quite some of our older waterfall FPs which often feature rather low resolution, harsh contrasts and (IMHO) exagerrated long exposure. It’s a pity for this otherwise nice view, but I don’t feel that we should still promote photos of that kind today, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 19:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see it as an exceptional image --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 13:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keel-billed toucan (Ramphastos sulfuratus sulfuratus) in flight Peten.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2023 at 20:18:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting animal. I'm afraid the bottom is too dark and I don't understand the white spots on the wings --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Are they spaces between or within feathers? I don't think the black feathers on the underside of the bird are too dark, so I'm just awaiting Charles' explanation but am likely to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The feathers are black so that explains why they are dark. The "white spots" are tears in the wings. There are no FPs of the order Piciformes in flight. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support That's what I thought. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral For me there is too little detail in the lower part of the bird (too dark). The white border around the wings is a bit distracting to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)

File:Saslonch da Hartl Mont de Sëuc.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2023 at 11:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Langkofel and the Seiser Alm in South Tyrol

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info created and uploaded by Moroder - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 11:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and relaxing view. --Aristeas (talk) 06:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Relaxing in some ways, but with quite literally an awesome backdrop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Apparent stitching error near top of mountain (sudden shift from sharp to unsharp) and edge of mountain against cloud seems overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Pardon me but the comment, at least in my opinion, doesn't make sense. I can't see anything wrong, even at double maximum image size, nor in the area you marked nor in the clouds. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, it was the wrong area (someday we'll be able to draw in notes when looking at it at maximum zoom). I have redrawn it in the right area (I hope). Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel! Please, be more precise! And, what's wrong with the "mountain against cloud"?--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:ScotRail Class 170 Forth Bridge.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2023 at 16:05:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_Kingdom
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The view of the bridge from this angle is nice, and the train is of course a featured element of the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. As an aside, I always found "Firth of Forth" an amusing name, kind of like the fact that a great flutist is named Linda Toote, and I was told that she was once Principal Flutist in the Jacksonville Symphony (I believe it was) when the Second Flutist was Linda Threatt! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 22:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_Kingdom

File:Tip of the fjord-Abstract.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2023 at 11:07:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial photograph of a fjord in Nordland, Norway

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern Norway (Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info created and uploaded by MariusVa - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support very beautiful photo art … perfect for an album cover, for the frontispiece of some poetry from the far North or just for a thriller. --Aristeas (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. I see this as a figurative work, by the way. It's not abstract to me, just a great motif captured expertly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Ikan Kekek. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Norway#Northern Norway (Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)

File:FIZ BMW, Múnich, Alemania, 2022-10-23, DD 104-106 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2023 at 18:48:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info Night view of the main entrance of the BMW Group Forschungs- und Innovationszentrum, abbreviated as BMW FIZ, Munich, Germany. It's the main engineering and development campus of the BMW Group and the place where about 20,000 engineers and workers develop cars as well as motorcycles on a 500,000 m² area spread out across several areas and buildings. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally I prefer blue-hour shots, but in this case the night view is perfect, the extreme contrast emphasizes the austere beauty of the building. --Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting view of an interesting architecture --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wolfgang Moroder -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the sky is rather noisy, and there is a distracting bright artefact just above the building on the left. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think this is a great photo, and the noise level is very low for a night pic, but I do see the green "star" exactly where you state. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 09:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the evenly structured architectural forms. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support please fix the sky (note added). -- Ivar (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Cosmonaut, Ikan Kekek, and Iifar: Done, thank you, Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --PierreSelim (talk) 09:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support On the fine but exquisite line between realistic representation and abstract art. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Sao Paulo downtown - Ladeira Porto Geral.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2023 at 22:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow. At first sight, this looks like a boring version of "where's Waldo?" with not much going on at the individual level. It's only when you take a step back and re-adjust your perspective that it starts to shine. We've seen a few attempts to depict large-ish crowds here in the past (usually protests/demonstrations). Most of them filed miserably, usually because there was no composition to speak of. But this one ... it's almost like a landscape shot of a glacier meandering its way down a slope between two steep mountain peaks. Deserves more attention! --El Grafo (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid I don't quite see the appeal in the same way you do; while chaotic and colourful are positives, the scene also feels a little too ordinary for me to think of it as an FP. I'm also a bit bothered by the cut-off head in the foreground. --Peulle (talk) 07:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo. A river of humanity. It almost needs a cut-off head to underline the sense of crowding and movement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I totally agree with the supports that the crowd works. But I find the architecture at left distracting. An image like this can work but the crowd needs better framing. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support weighing up pro and contra statements. --Aristeas (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per El Grafo RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry to be this rude unsophisticated prole, who ignores the deep social aspects of this great (honestly great) composition but to me as a simple mind, the colours just look oversaturated. I nonetheless like to review big groups of people like this. I recently watched a video on a site called xhamsters, also featuring a lot of different people, but the quality wasn't sufficient and a lot of them were acting quite similar.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 01:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lagazuoi Torri del Falzarego Col dei Bos Tofana de Rozes Cinque Torri.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2023 at 22:41:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Dolomites - Unesco heritage in Ampezzo.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info All by by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Amazing! But I see four dust spots. Pan along the top of the photo from the left margin to the part of the sky above the second-highest peak (based on its nearby appearance) in the picture. One of the dust spots is in a cloud. It's OK if you get only the three relatively more visible ones, and I could still vote for the photo if you get only the two most visible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks @Ikan Kekek: for the note --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good enough for me. Thanks! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 10:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super detailed and plenty to look at.--Ermell (talk) 10:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 16:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 12:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:Hamburg, Elbphilharmonie -- 2023 -- 6610 (bw).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2023 at 08:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cranes at Elbphilharmonie, Hamburg, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 08:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the clear lines in black an white work very well for me. --Kritzolina (talk) 20:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 456167 07:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing interesting, nothing special. I do not see here any reason for FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 12:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems to be missing "1" but agree with Kritzolina that the rest of this image stands well on its own as a monochrome with a good range of gray tones. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the missing crane numbered 1. But there were only the cranes numbered 2 to 4. I've looked around and couldn't find the number 1. --XRay 💬 04:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Cat in Notre Dame college.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2023 at 11:28:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info all by --Wasiul Bahar (talk) 11:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 11:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Count my vote: yes. Worked out (you can see even hairs).

Displeased cat's face :), asking what do you need a photographer? But you can't see that this is Not Dame College. Носков А. С. (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not an outstanding image of a common subject. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Charles. Cute cat, but not an exceptional photo of a cat. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice subject, but the lighting is too dark --PierreSelim (talk) 09:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama vom Frauenberg.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2023 at 10:17:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Panoramic view from the Frauenberg in the near of Marburg in Hesse, Germany
Labeled panoramic view from the Frauenberg in the near of Marburg in Hesse, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info I like to show panoramic views from prominent vantage points. Wikimedia has not yet satisfactorily solved how to integrate optional informative labels in the formats required for this. I am now trying a set of two identical images, one with and one without labels. For that after photographing, it is also necessary to examine the geography. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A Perfect distant view. I find this kind of panoramas very informative. It would be good if the edges overlapped a bit, about 370 degrees. Je-str (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose these images do not qualify as a set, please read the rules. -- Ivar (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think Ivar is correct about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The ratio of lenght and the hight of each of these images is not acceptabe for me. -- Karelj (talk) 12:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question May I ask for constructive criticism? The format is the only way eplaining the subject. What better way to add the intended information content to it than with text in the image? This text necessarily obscures some image content. At the same time, how can it be offered to hide this text as well, other than with a label-free version? --Milseburg (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am happy to support either one and agree that the format is well-suited for such a panorama, I just fear that Ivar is right about the (rather rigid) set rules. --Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ivar and Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Then the rules should be expanded as long as it is here not technically possible to present such topics in an instructive way in another way. The easiest way would be to superimpose both images and display them optional with or without captions. Of course, then the two set more closely together than images of two frogs of different sexes. Now I really don't know which of the panoramas I should run individually or why both separately. Meanwhile the annotated version was significantly expanded in cooperation with the main author of de:Frauenberg (Hessen). --Milseburg (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, start a thread on the FPC talk page about expanding the rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Milseburg (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose :

1. The picture without annotations :

Extreme ratio panorama. Thin like a ruler, like this one or that one. My appreciation of landscapes is usually not compatible with such long formats, when the eyes are blocked vertically.
Number of pixels aside, the landscape itself is not really special in my view.

2. The picture with annotations :

Language: German chosen. That makes the document quite unsuitable for Wikipedia in English and all other languages. Example: the first word is "Gladenbacher Bergland", while in English we say Gladenbach Uplands. The second word "Rothaargebirge", in English is "Rothaar Mountains, in Spanish Montañas Rothaar, in Japanese ロタール山地, in Russian Ротхаргебирге, in Arabic روتهار (سلسلة جبال), etc.
Units: meters and kilometers chosen. Miles and feet missing for the people who live in a country using a different unit system.
Font and text layout do not respect professional standards. Contrasted outlines missing, arbitrary / irregular punctuation spaces (example "Grosser Ahlertsberg 645 m,33 km"), etc.
Inappropriate font size. There are several different sizes of text, of different colors, and the smallest text (like "Hangelstein 305 m, 15 km", "Dannenrod" or "Wahlen") will not display well, given the giant width of the picture. I think even a poster will be hard to read. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you described the problems well but drew the wrong conclusions. I would like to link each label so that everyone reaches after a click the corresponding article in their own language. Can you technically realize this? Until then, the text is related to Germany because the vantage point is only described in detail in the German Wikipedia and is also located in Germany. Vertical limits? Be glad that there is no horizontal limit. A panorama board on site or virtually would have the same format. Rather, I considered a crop with an even more extreme aspect ratio. The geographically interesting content is all in the middle and not above or below, or even outside of the picture. One user on de:Diskussion:Frauenberg (Hessen)#Neues Panorama already complained that the volume was too large. A 360*180 panorama would be the wrong answer, but an even narrower section. The writing is different because it adapts to what is being described. Milseburg (talk) 10:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree If this panorama was printed on a 1-meter large poster, then the word "Hasenkopf" (for example) would measure only 2.3 millimeters large!😮 Totally unreadable without magnifying glass. You can verify the image is 42.483 pixels large, and the word "Hasenkopf" covers 97 pixels only. Many other names like this one would be simply not legible. Sorry but that's a major typographic error that no professional would ever make in such a layout.
Comparing the previous versions to the current one in the history, it appears that there were several (fixed) errors in the captions. Although German is not my mother tongue, it seems that these mistakes have also been pointed out by other users on the Wikipedia talk page. Here at FPC, we are photographers or image reviewers, but not specialists of this geography. How could we guarantee the text is accurate? This is not a picture coming from any professional administration -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's right, a 1 m printout of the panorama would be just as nonsensical as viewing the entire panorama in a strip adapted to the screen size. In order to set it up on site as a panorama board, it would be printed larger. It is correct that when attaching the label I took advice from the main author of the article de:Frauenberg (Hessen), who is familiar with the area, so that everything is correct and the educational benefit is high. I'm a bit disappointed that I have to fight a lot harder to get this effort recognized than in my previous FP candidatures, which are just beautiful images. I can also make it easy on myself and outsource the labeling like File:Panorama vom Schomberg.jpg or File:Panorama vom Schindlenbühl.jpg. For commons but poorer. Yes, I'm not a professional and I don't earn my money with photos. I'm participating here as an amateur and I think that's okay. Milseburg (talk) 13:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"nonsensical" => you seem not understand that the problem is the ratio. A text measuring 2.3 millimeters compared to a 1-meter image is ridiculously and excessively small. If you print 10 meters your pano, the same word measuring 2.3 cm will appear similarly tiny in comparison. That's why it's absurd: the font sizes are inadequate. Graphic designer is a profession that requires skills and sensibility to manage these aspects -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Anyone who sees a problem in the ratio has not understood this kind of photos. these panoramas are never meant to be viewed in their entirety. But you scroll from left to right and back. Just as you let your gaze wander in the landscape. In the full resolution, the caption can also be read well. What is the point of having a "normal" aspect ratio and then seeing billions of pixels of sky in return??? And the encyclopedic value is exactly the lettering for me.
I understand Milseburg's disappointment very well, because I made such panoramas myself and faced the same problems. On the one hand, you want to present a high resolution so that a lot can be seen. How can you reasonably include a font, which you can then hide again? Without lettering such panoramas are worthless. A caption in a language other than German is secondary, since the image is probably only used in the German wikipedia. Je-str (talk) 18:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This kind of very wide panoramas has a long tradition; just as they formed a special genre in the fine arts (mostly drawings and engravings, sometimes paintings), they form also a special genre of photography which has its own rules and merits. We cannot judge such a panorama using the composition rules from usual landscape photography; these are two related, but different things. Therefore IHMO it is not a good idea to reject panorama landscape photos because they do not offer a satisfying landscape composition. They just have their own kind of composition which is a bit more technical (if I may say so). Most other technical aspects of landscape photography apply also to such panoramas, e.g. sharpness, exposure, etc.; but regarding the overall balance of light and shadow one has to judge wide panoramas understandingly because in most cases it is probably unavoidable that large areas of such panoramas are in shadow. --Aristeas (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is not an interactive map like Google Map you can zoom in and then reveal details that were not shown at another scale. And this is not a map where you should put everything inside until pointing the doghouse of the village pharmacist :-) There's a prior work of selection that is necessary, in my opinion. Scale is important. One is writing "these panoramas are never meant to be viewed in their entirety" and the other "In order to set it up on site as a panorama board, it would be printed larger". Who knows?! Now it's too heavy, too busy, and overloaded with text of different font sizes. Compare with other compositions of the same kind, that at least respect a minimum size of text, that is decent for the viewer. I don't see the point of being lost, immersed in a panorama of this dimension, without any visual reference to the whole. For us, reviewers, it is also impossible to spot the spelling error of "Alberg", for example, that is in fact "Allberg". Or "Weimar (Lahn)" -> "Niederweima". But everyone can spot photographic issues on a picture without text. Not the same deal. Certainly there are norms and conventions for annotated panoramas, that would be fair to follow. That's currently a big mass of data extremely hard to use, I'm afraid. As if you were navigating in the universe, discovering a planet called "Omega", but where is Omega exactly, how far, how big? No idea. Because if you zoom out, then you lose the subject, written too small. And even the location is all green -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Подзорная труба (edited).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2023 at 07:05:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Telescope of an old design, after rain, on one of the floors of the Eiffel Tower

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical devices
Info Telescope of an old design, after rain, on one of the floors of the Eiffel Tower. Created, uploaded ~~and nominated~~ by Носков А. С. --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Носков А. С.: I guess you want to nominate this photo (you have added it at least twice to the list of FP nominations). But you missed the creation of the nomination page. As a little help I have done this for you. Please add your own support by adding *{{Support}} --~~~~ below and saving this page. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо! (Thank you! Danke Ihnen) :) Носков А. С. (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Носков А. С. (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tilted Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Spyglass. Носков А. С. (talk) 05:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Tilt fixed, cf. below. --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fascinating image made by an interesting camera. The demands regarding the image quality must therefore be reduced somewhat. The crooked buildings, however, I still find too disturbing. Perhaps the photographer can still improve that.--Ermell (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how to work in photoshop (and I don't like to edit photos, except how to crop foreign objects that got into the frame). It will also not work to re-photograph, because I live in another country and it is unlikely that I will come to Paris again. Носков А. С. (talk) 05:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And besides, using photo editors is not photography, but photomontage! Носков А. С. (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you do not understand the word photomontage. Correcting tilt is a basic edit which is more acceptable in competition than removing 'foreign objects'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tilt and perspective can be corrected, of course. Here is a version in which tilt and perspective have been improved. I have also reduced colour noise and chromatic aberrations. The question is whether we should also try to improve brightness and gradation (curves); I have done it a bit. I have not applied additional sharpening or reduced the overall noise level, of course. @Ermell: Would that version be better in your eyes? @Носков А. С.: If you like this version, I can upload it for you. Or, if you do not like that the photo is a bit brighter now etc., I can also undo that and correct the tilt and perspective only. --Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Very good Roman. I would support that version. The author has had a good eye for the moment which is the essence of photography. Perhaps he also finds a taste for improving his images. Who is the nominator? --Ermell (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like your version, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Thank you for your feedback, Ermell and Ikan Kekek! Because the original photo has alrady QI status and because some of the changes are a matter of taste, I cannot replace it by the new version (cf. COM:OVERWRITE). So I have uploaded the new version under a new filename (File:Подзорная труба (edited).jpg) and switched this nomination to the new file. Hope this is OK. --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I just wanted to nominate this on behalf of Носков А. С., as a little help ;–). But now we are discussing different versions of this photo, and things are getting complicated. To avoid reconciliation problems, it seems better that I take over the nomination and maintain it in my own name. I hope this is OK for everybody. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Носков А. С. (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --= Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As announced.--Ermell (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good. Very nice.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great improvement, clear support. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 455688 12:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Optical devices

File:Hamburg, Elbphilharmonie -- 2023 -- 6573.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2023 at 08:27:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elbphilharmonie (southeast corner) in Hamburg, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 08:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Did I ever mention, that I hate those perspectives? But the reason to oppose here is, that it's too simple to me. No great wow effect, sorry.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hate is a strong emotion that should be handled with care. --XRay 💬 19:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Just a small piece of some building, I do not see here a reason for FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 12:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Some good graphic elements but does not have enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support contrary to the three oppose !votes above this, I quite like this perspective – and even though I've seen plenty of these exteriors before, I never get tired of seeing them. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN711. Nothing exceptional there in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The detail makes the (IMHO aesthetically mediocre) building much more interesting than the usual total view. --Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Aristeas. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral When I look at the image starting at the bottom, I like it. The warm light on the brick/concrete make for a pleasing juxtaposition of triangles which rises to the top. If I start at the top, the perspective doesn't allow me to appreciate the geometry of the sides of the building, and I'm left with a giant wedge awkwardly occupying nearly the entire frame. By the time I get to the bottom, it feels secondary. I can't make up my mind which way to look at it, so I'm neutral. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manippuri dance of India by Shagil Kannur 3.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2023 at 12:24:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Manippuri dance is one of an Indian classical dance firms.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The picture is great but from this range the quality should be better.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Der Angemeldete. I like the picture, too, but no part of her looks sharp to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination-Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leptura quadrifasciata female - Keila.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2023 at 15:23:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Cerambycidae_(Longhorned_Beetles)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 18:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice background and very high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 07:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Cerambycidae_(Longhorned_Beetles)

File:Scarlet macaw (Ara macao cyanopterus) Copan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2023 at 15:43:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarlet macaw (Ara macao cyanopterus) Copan, Honduras

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 18:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous bird. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful, technically impeccable. --Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)

File:Pierreclos Château (3).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2023 at 20:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Château de Pierreclos with its church (12th century), in the département Saône-et-Loire, region Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info Château de Pierreclos with its church (12^th century), all by: Palauenc05 (talk) 20:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 20:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - OK for QI + VI but does not have enough FP wow for me. Also buildings at both sides seem to be leaning out. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak support~~ Support Nice and beautiful view of the castle. The verticals are leaning in different directions, so I guess the old walls are just not straight in reality. But at some places the edge of the roofs and the chimneys are unsharp; I guess that some mask (denoising the sky/sharpening the building) is a bit imprecise there. Could you try to optimize this a bit? Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @ Aristeas: Thanks for your advice. I'll try and find the raw file and see what I can do. But it will take until the weekend until I have time to do it. Regards --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Sorry for the extra work, but IHMO the photo is worth it. --Aristeas (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like the subject and the lighting but why is the cross over the tower on the right kind of faded away? the same applies to the top of the tree on the right. Furthermore it looks a bit overprocessed to me, the roofs for example look unrealistic Poco a poco (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Regarding the cross and the tree top: IMHO this is the same issue as noted above, i.e. probably some mask needs fine-tuning. --Aristeas (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Yup, I agree. The false detail on the roofs and walls, plus the sharpening mask inaccuracies are usually telltale signs of an AI algorithm going overboard. Could that be the case, Palauenc05? No EXIF to double-check, but I would venture to say that Topaz is the culprit :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As I said, I can't do anything until the weekend. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Poco and others. I do like the lighting though ... what would be harsh and flattening most of the day here actually works well with the walls' color at golden hour. Wish there was .EXIF data so we knew whether this was morning or evening, though. Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New version! Thanks for all your comments and hints. I've upladed a new version from the raw file and applied just small corrections. Some aspects should be explained:
- These walls are not straight at all, esp. if you look at the chimney in the middle or at the kink in the lower part of the wall of the main tower.
- @ Poco I didn't touch the roofs at all, they just look like that. I suppose, the appearance comes from centuries of weathering and the growth of fungi and mosses.
- @ Daniel The shot was taken on an October late afternoon.
- Thank you all for looking again. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Very nice, atmospheric photo, very good composition and technically flawless -- Spurzem (talk) 09:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Thank you very much for the improvements, Palauenc05! Changed my vote above to full support. --Aristeas (talk) 05:43, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aristeas I took out this vote, since you already had one above --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Julesvernex2. I hesitated a moment where I should add the new support vote; in the end I wanted to mark this one as a mere comment, but forgot to do so. --Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 479161 12:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looking better, the cross is not faded anymore and I like the tigther crop, too. Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France

File:Rural Leonforte.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2023 at 05:22:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Agriculture#Italy
Info: rural Leonforte, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Носков А. С. (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC) Rainbows are hard to catch.[reply]
Oppose -- I'm sorry, but I do not see what would make this picture sufficiently outstanding to qualify as a FP. MartinD (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very lovely instant, but the framing is not outstanding enought for FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour des anciens ponts couverts (Strasbourg).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2023 at 08:42:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good if simple composition, but I can't support it with a posterized sky. No guarantees if you fix it, but I'm not really sure it should be a QI, either, with all those posterization lines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The elongated composition does not work to me. Too much boring sky and boring water. The architecture itself is not exceptional. Technically, as mentionned above, it's posterized. From the file history, compared to the previous version, this one seems over-saturated -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Less posterized. Gzen92 (talk) 08:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Am I the only one thinking that this composition is basically a giant penis? However, it's already a big improvement in contrast to the the dull colours of the first verion, even though it doesn't have my instant support.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 18:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Not as obvious as the Ypsilanti Water Tower -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC))[reply]

ohohoho, you rascal!--Der Angemeldete (talk) 16:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(not really. I don't see phallic architecture here, on the contrary) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose I have to agree that the extreme vertical composition just doesn't work ... if it were just the tower, maybe. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As above, too much sky and water, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC))[reply]

File:Li Fu Lee at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's radio experiment station, 1925 (MIT Museum) - Restoration.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2023 at 21:46:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#People_at_work
Info created by Underwood & Underwood - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FunnyMath (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent restauration of a good photo of a very interesting and impressive person. It’s nice to compare it with the reproduction in the newspaper which is (for technical reasons) quite poor. --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work

File:C2022 E3 (ZTF)- Alessandro Bianconi.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2023 at 23:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Comets
Info The C/2022 E3 (ZTF) comet, created by Alessandro Bianconi of the Edu INAF - uploaded by Ras67 - nominated by Ras67 -- Ras67 (talk) 23:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic shot -- Ras67 (talk) 23:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 08:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Comets

File:Shahrestan Bridge.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2023 at 08:46:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Iran
Info Shahrestan Bridge All by me. -- Monfie (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Monfie (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The motif and reflection are nice, but detail is low, perspective correction missing and the composition not convincing. Furthermore I miss a better lighting here to make it FP. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 10:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just an explaination about the perspective correction. The bridge has been made like that (arc shaped). Look from this view. --Monfie (talk) 19:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wrong day and wrong lens unfortunately. Charlesjsharp (talk)
Oppose I'd rather find a picture without the brigde more outstanding. Object is too far away and the daylight isn't quite sufficient. However you made the best from what you had.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Color noise/posterization, low level of details. The white balance seems off, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Monfie (talk) 17:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scarlet macaw (Ara macao cyanopterus) head Copan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2023 at 07:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail, ~~but a bit dark (slightly underexposed in my view)~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done exposure adjusted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support An improvement Poco a poco (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 13:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ras67 (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)

File:Bursa lamarckii 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2023 at 08:02:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment very interesting subject, but imo top view's sharpness is not good (looks like camera wasn't steady enough). Any chances to fix it? -- Ivar (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Thanks, I try to correct it throughout the day --Llez (talk) 06:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done Top view replaced by a sharper version --Llez (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Support much obliged! -- Ivar (talk) 10:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells

File:Theyyam Of Kerala 2023 (107).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2023 at 17:22:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Theyyam is a ritual art form of Indaian state Kerala

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Certainly striking, but I don't like the crop on the viewer's right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok now? -Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the crop is good now. I'll think about whether or how to vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Man in blue distracts. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose dramatic, but needs more separation of the subject and background. The composition draws additional attention to the left side. File:Theyyam of Kerala 3.jpg is comparable, but does a better job of composition and separation. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think I agree with this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 16:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad blue man! Go take your drum sticks and get out of there! But to me the level of detail here isn't quite as high as it could be.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Will nominate another version of this event--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babia Góra, zamieć śnieżna, 20230304 0704 3190.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2023 at 08:10:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ground blizzard in the light of the morning sun on the peak of Babia Góra

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Snow
Info Ground blizzard in the light of the morning sun on the peak of Babia Góra. All by me -- Jakubhal 08:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 08:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive shot, almost looks like a painting! --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is different Poco a poco (talk) 10:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit noisy ;-) but very good.--Ermell (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Palauenc05. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Palauenc05. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing mix, ~~but I think the crepuscular rays are the main subject of this picture and thus should be mentioned in the description~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Done -- Jakubhal 03:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow. --Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 17:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Snow

File:Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 148-150 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2023 at 13:20:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support was suggested here. -- Tomer T (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Diego: please remove one dust spot (note added). -- Ivar (talk) 13:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar: Done, thank you, Poco a poco (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support much nicer than the cropped version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, Tomer T! Poco a poco (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can say nothing against it. The cropped version didn't work. Some years ago I red, that the Atomium is under copyright and thus should be censored in some public shots. But I guess, Commons, once again, solved this problem on it's own?--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd rather say that the difference came from the fact that before July 15th 2016 there was no panorama freedom in Belgium Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Jakubhal 18:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking view of an original architecture. Thanks to Ivar for having pointing this image in the previous nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 14:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium

File:Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 184-186 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2023 at 16:09:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Buildings in Grand-Place, Brussels, Belgium

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info Night view of some of the buildings in Grand-Place, central square of Brussels, Belgium. From left to right: Maison du Mont Thabor (nr. 12, rebuilt in 1699 and restored in 1885), Maison de la Rose or "The Rose" (nr. 11, rebuilt in 1702 and restored in 1901), L'Arbre d'Or or "The Golden Tree" (nr. 10, built in 1696 and restored in 1901), Le Cygne or the "Swan House" (nr. 9, rebuilt in 1698 and restored between 1896 and 1904) and L'Étoile or "The Star" (nr. 8, rebuilt in 1695 and 1897). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks a bit squashed. The right side seems overcorrected to me.--Ermell (talk) 20:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great lighting ~~but the margins are very tight on both sides~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thank you for your feedback. Will update a new version this evening (CET) and try you adress your issues. Poco a poco (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermell, Basile Morin, and Iifar: I've reworked the image from scratch, it looks IMHO indeed better now. It doesn't feel "squashed" and there is more margin on both sides. Ivar: the 3 buildings on the laft are on a plane, but between the third (building nr. 10 here) and the fourth (building nr. 9) there is an angle, therefore you cannot expect horizontal to be horizontal from the POV of the camera. Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Now it looks good but I find the junk and the blurred people too disturbing to give a pro.--Ermell (talk) 19:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is fine in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral distortion too strong for my taste. -- Ivar (talk) 14:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not the easiest shot to make, and improvements helped. Still, could do something about that curlicue at the left of the roofline—it's got this weird halo. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. I see what Daniel is saying about a halo, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, Ikan Kekek: Done Poco a poco (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium

File:Sperlinga panorama.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2023 at 04:45:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
Info: panorama of Sperlinga, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be unsuitable if this nomination would be closed without a fair discussion. This is certainly an interesting view of a picturesque place. At the first glance it seems unlucky that the right part is in shadow, but on the other hand this emphasizes the sun spot on the village itself and gives some subtle drama to the photo. --Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't concur. The composition is ok but detail level is not the best and the ligthing really tricky, sorry, Poco a poco (talk

) 10:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose To me the mix of light and shadow makes it outstanding in first place, but not outstanding enough for a FP. Maybe there's a good version from this interesting rock alone to nominate?--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a Poco. -- Karelj (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 04:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-breasted nuthatch (26471).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2023 at 18:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sittidae_(Nuthatches)
Info Nuthatches (like this white-breasted nuthatch, Sitta carolinensis) are the only birds that can walk down a tree head-first (not to mention up and around). This pose where they lift their head up while facing downwards is the pose I most associate with them. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect.--Ermell (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sittidae_(Nuthatches)

File:Portrait of a young woman wearing a gray balaclava.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2023 at 11:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Portrait
Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good use of controlled DoF. --Aristeas (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 02:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Portrait

File:The Vela supernova remnant imaged by the VLT Survey Telescope (eso2214a).tiff

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 05:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This image shows a spectacular view of the orange and pink clouds that make up what remains after the explosive death of a massive star — the Vela supernova remnant.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by ESO - uploaded & nominated by Junior Jumper -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 05:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 05:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I Support the JPEG version. -- IamMM (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would also support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 10:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Ok, if some users are suggesting the JPG version, then I think this request should be replaced by a JPG version. Any admin please take a final decision.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 11:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is your nomiantion, so it is for you to decide. Yann (talk) 21:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: I agree to withdraw this nomination and instead of TIFF version JPG version is nominated at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vela supernova - VST - Eso2214a.jpg--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 04:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Jumper: please use template {{Withdraw}}, otherwise you have three active nominations, which is not allowed. -- Ivar (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 06:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:View towards Ryten and Middagstinden over Kåkersundet in Flakstad, Nordland, Norway, 2022 June.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 05:14:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view towards Ryten and Middagstinden mountains over Kåkersundet strait in Flakstad, Nordland, Norway

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow. Tomer T (talk) 07:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 08:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, great timing. P.S.: Norway is best country. :D --Peulle (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect reflection, gorgeous light, I think we have a winner :) - Benh (talk) 12:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 16:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top-level work by Ximonic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and crystal reflection -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support From my personal experience, Nordland in the summer is as impressive as it gets, and this photo proves my point. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I honestly got no time to review all of this pictures again and again, but shots like this one makes it worth to take a look in this list from time to time. Absolutely amazing.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 12:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I found a common word in Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, English and Norwegian to describe your image:
Sublime! --Gio Terra (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I always love a good midnight-sun picture, in the wake of my own visit to the Arctic. And wow ... the sharpness on this one (take a look at that house in the middle!). Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)

File:PalaciodoplanaltoFR.jpg, featured

{{FPVotingPeriodFlag nnotatorEnable">

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Dasfour2022 - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Difficult shot.--Peulle (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. I'm surprised no-one has complained about the perspective (which is fine to me), but I'm surprised neither the file description nor categories mention lightning. That is a whole lot of lightning, isn't it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
good suggestion! I re-wrote the caption to be more descriptive and added portuguese language too while I was at it. Dennis W. Asfour (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know by myself how difficult it is do get this lightning sharp, and of course I'm not complaining about the perspective (even though it looks a bit oblique). But finally someone who doesn't just hold the camera upwards to feel like a real artist.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Added an FoP tag to the page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil

File:Western Bowerbird 0A2A0436.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 11:47:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Ptilonorhynchidae_(Bowerbirds)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 11:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 11:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 16:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent natural framing -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 05:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support would be helpful to have location and scientific name in description. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Takes just a wind machine an some hairspray to to it better.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 12:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Ptilonorhynchidae_(Bowerbirds)

File:Auerbach Kirche Altar P8151442-2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 07:44:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Altar room of the church St. John the Baptist in Auerbach in the Upper Palatinate

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Junior Jumper -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 07:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 07:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful motif, well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you.--Ermell (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support But even better if you remove the purple CA and (this is nice-to-have) apply some selective denoising (e.g. big painting on the right) Poco a poco (talk) 21:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Daniel Case: @Poco a poco: @Llez: @Radomianin: @IamMM: @Moroder: @Aristeas: @SHB2000: @Agnes Monkelbaan: @Famberhorst: @Ikan Kekek: @Junior Jumper: New version where I tried to implement Poco's suggestions.--Ermell (talk) 21:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
LGTM; thanks for fixing this, Ermell! SHB2000 (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice improvement. Happy Easter! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the improvement, Ermell. Ein gesegnetes Osterfest! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Purple CA is still there, though. Happy Easter! Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:W. H. Kendal as Philamir and Madge Kendal as Zeolide in W. S. Gilbert's The Palace of Truth.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 06:22:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#People_at_work
Info created by London Stereoscopic and Photographic Company - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent restauration again. --Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work

File:Cinnamon hummingbird (Amazilia rutila) in flight Los Tarrales.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 19:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition. Wings well frozen in flight at 1/2000s -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous... --Terragio67 (talk) 07:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Guatemalan wildlife is so underrated! --SHB2000 (talk) 09:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background is distracting, but anyhow, you nailed it Poco a poco (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support So now there is an FP.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 463879 00:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing exposure time 1/2.000. I thought you would need much less for something like this.--Ermell (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One is supposed to need 1/4000 sec to freeze a hummingbird's wings, but can get away with less when the wing is changing direction. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)

File:Bregenz asv2022-10 img36 Pfarrkirche StGallus.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2023 at 12:44:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Baroque altar of the church of St. Gallus in Bregenz; all by me. --A.Savin 12:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not convinced by the processing, it looks overcooked (low detail, too), look at the scultptures (e.g. Jesus face). The left side is higher than the right side it needs a perspective correction. Is there a way to offer a bit more image at the top (to avoid the unfortunate crop of the stucco in the middle)? Poco a poco (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question I don’t see the quality problems, just the left and right crop (cutting parts of the side altars) seem a bit unlucky to me. Is there a chance to get some pixels more at the left and right? --Aristeas (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support for now. --Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 471244 00:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 06:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

File:Motorcyclist in Midtown Manhattan-L1002704.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 18:53:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A motorcyclist in motion on the corner of W 42nd St and 6th Ave in Midtown Manhattan, New York City

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Motorcycles
Info Austrian-American photographer Ernst Haas (1921–1986) was a pioneer of color photography who is also known for his blurred motion imagery. On my most recent trip to New York City, I explored this technique in Midtown Manhattan. I tried to provide context by including the yellow medallion taxis while aiming for a maximum in dynamic movement. The image currently illustrates Wikipedia’s article “Intentional camera movement”. – I find it extremely satisfying to be aware of the history of photography when taking pictures. Studying the works of other photographers inspires me to experiment with my own photography. (c/u/n) by me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (Leica M11? Nicht schlecht, Herr Specht...) ---Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too sharp for a Haas ;-) but very good.--Ermell (talk) 19:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dynamism. Original nomination. I can see this image illustrating an article about "speed" or "motorcycling" for example. Concerning the visual aspect, it's like abstract painting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different. --Aristeas (talk) 05:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Congratulations on capturing motion (in Manhattan) like this! --Kritzolina (talk) 06:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow. --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 478610 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Motorcycles

File:Passion fruits - whole and halved.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 06:24:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 06:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Weird coconut, maybe rotten.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support What a masterpiece!--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appetizing and very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 461020 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 22:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Knoppen van een gewone esdoorn (Acer pseudoplatanus). 03-04-2023 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 05:54:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Sapindaceae
Info Opposite knobs of a Acer. Focus stack of 18 photos. (Dark leaved seedling)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Especially impressive, considering the size of the buds. I was thinking of you this afternoon when I passed by a budding tree in my neighborhood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. When nature wakes up in the spring and the explosion of growth can no longer be stopped, I experience it as a fascinating miracle.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 05:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 477533 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 22:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Sapindaceae

File:150906-001 Wilpena Pound from Moralana Scenic Drive Pano 50pc.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2023 at 04:53:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wilpena Pound from Moralana Scenic Drive in Ikara–Flinders Ranges National Park, South Australia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by Faj2323 - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sides might be a bit dark, but I don't mind cropping them. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's an impressive view! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it is possibile to try some lateral crops, anyway the image is interesting as it is depicted. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 06:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't crop, please. It shows the wide open range as it is.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 470400 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 07:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia

File:Pier 25 New York January 2018 004.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2023 at 07:35:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info Hudson River frozen over in New York City - all by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Quality is good but neither the composition neither the ligthing are striking to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 10:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality isn't that good actually when looking at the focussed parts.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The quality of the parts of the photo that are not across the river in New Jersey looks high to me. The composition also works pretty well for me. I like the rounded shapes of the ice in the river. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Another image that captures an urban winter. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 450419 00:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dale Creek Bridge Union Pacific Railroad Company by Andrew J Russell.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2023 at 05:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States_of_America
Info created by Andrew J. Russell - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a really exceptional photo for the 1860s, I think! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Ikan. --Yann (talk) 09:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive structure -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 06:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magnificent contemporary document.--Ermell (talk) 19:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States_of_America

File:Vela supernova - VST - Eso2214a.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2023 at 04:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by ESO - uploaded by Fabian RRRR & nominated by Junior Jumper -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 04:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 04:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost too big to look at. And that's not a criticism! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 478957 00:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and added {{LargeImage}}. --RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very fascinating. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 06:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Basílica de San Pablo, Rabat, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 167.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2023 at 21:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basilica of St Paul, Rabat, Malta Island, Malta

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Malta
Info Basilica of St Paul, Rabat, Malta Island, Malta. The Roman Catholic Parish church is built on part of the site of the Roman city Melite, which included all of Mdina and a large part of present-day Rabat. The present church was built to replace a church which was completed in 1578. The new church was built with funds provided by the noble woman Guzmana Navarra on plans prepared by Francesco Buonamici. The church building commenced in 1653 was completed by Lorenzo Gafà in 1683. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 474725 00:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 06:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Malta

File:Palacio Pitti, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 163-165 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2023 at 21:06:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of Sala della Stufa, Galleria Palatina, Palazzo Pitti, Florence

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Painted_ceilings
Info Ceiling of Sala della Stufa, Galleria Palatina, Palazzo Pitti, Florence. The room, created between 1627 and 1641, was originally an open gallery, but it was closed off later in the 17th century and restructured as a “stove” room, a bathroom heated using the same techniques as the Roman baths and intended for private use by the Grand Duke, whose bedroom is believed to be next door. The decoration, specially the frescos and stuccos, commissioned by Grand Duke Ferdinand II de' Medici, are a work of Michelangelo Cinganelli (1558-1635) Matteo Rosselli (1578-1650) and Ottavio Vannini (1585–1643). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If it's intended as a square composition (which makes sense), this should be a square photo, simple as is. And when is finally understood that we on FP have a ceiling gallery FOR YEARS NOW? --A.Savin 01:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely an original reason to oppose this gorgeous picture Thank God I just commented and didn't oppose your church nom. Otherwise I'd have got the FPX template hier :D and I also hope you not to many newbies here come accross you. Poco a poco (talk) 06:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC) PD: Image is now square, my friend. Where is the gallery of non-religious ceilings? I cannot find it (sorry for wasting your time)?[reply]

My nom? How come? --A.Savin 13:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC) P.S. You don't just understand nothing. This is correct gallery, by the way. --A.Savin 13:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A.Savin: Yes, sure, nothing, comment expressing concerns about a nomination and right away this unfounded vote. Btw, cat fixed (maybe it makes sense to add this cat in other cats to make it more visible) and now the picture is perfectly square, what other reasons motivated your oppose that still need to be addressed? Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are convinced that I do revenge voting, why then are you expecting me to remove my vote as easily? --A.Savin 20:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be normal to remove an oppose vote if the sole reason is no longer valid. Of course, you can easily modify your comments and still oppose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 10:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support and I don't get A.Savin's concern. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, you are not the only one Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Everything in Florence is a epitome of beauty --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wolfgang. --Gio Terra (talk) 11:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 471340 00:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 06:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural_elements#Painted_ceilings

File:Coastline of Raftsundet at Digermulen in Vågan, Nordland, Norway, 2022 June.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2023 at 11:50:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coastline of Raftsundet at Digermulen in Vågan, Nordland, taken in June 2022.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern Norway (Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course. --Der Angemeldete (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exotic -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 479920 00:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support almost too perfectly Norwegian to be true ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Norway#Northern Norway (Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)

File:CA-84 Woodside April 2023 002.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 05:47:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Floods
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect, but given the difficulties of being an aerial shot, access, and figuring out what would make a good shot from ground level, this is excellent. Very high wow factor. Would suggest you also hit en:WP:FPC. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The dark/blackish region in bottommost area is creating disturbance.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 07:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high wow factor indeed, and carefully built composition for me. –Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and quality, important document (though, sadly, things will get worse and worse as global warming increases apace). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Documentary photography at its best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool aerial shot! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite impressive --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 461574 00:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Floods

File:Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (4).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 10:38:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway
Info A photo with a nice chilly mood from my icy fjord series; ice from the Drammens fjord impacting against the land during a very cold winter. Created, uploaded and nominated by yours truly. :) -- Peulle (talk) 10:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Peulle (talk) 10:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting view, and I'd like to give this photo a little love. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unobtrusive beauty. I like how the broken ice piles up at the coast. --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The harsh light doesn't impress me that much. Hazy background. These blocks of ice have the same aspect as clumps sometimes found on roadsides after snowplows have passed -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. A VI perhaps but no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 452781 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The ice looks quite good but towards the back the picture becomes quite uninteresting--Ermell (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Ivar (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile 20221115 (01).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 16:54:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile at night from the top of the Eiffel Tower

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by KTC - uploaded by KTC - nominated by KTC -- KTC (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Although it's a night shot, overall the picture is too dark in my opinion, and would benefit from an increase of the luminosity -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is fine and no need to correct, just like with my photo. Носков А. С. (talk) 05:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your photo had different issues that have been fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support I am supporting the nomination but the luminosity should be adjusted.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 05:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is fine and no need to correct, just like with my photo. Носков А. С. (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Носков А. С.: This is just my personal opinion. I think every user on Commons have the right to express his/her views freely on the platform. So, please don't take my comment in a wrong way. I just put my views. You may or may not agree with them. This is your personal choice. Regards -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, too dark. Most of the image is pure black. Night shots are made different. -- -donald- (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. -- Ivar (talk) 05:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 22:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Summit craters of Mount Etna.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2023 at 16:01:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: summit craters of Mount Etna during the 2022 eruptions; all by-- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark in my view, and I miss some special captivating feature here -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose would be a good QI/VI, but it's too dark for my liking. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin and SHB2000: Done: brightened. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting, and brightening it improved it. I haven't decided yet whether or how to vote, but I agree with SHB2000 that this might be a good VI, regardless of the outcome of this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; ridgeline also seems a bit oversharpened in some areas. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:SächsischeSchweiz KleinerWinterberg 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2023 at 13:06:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from Kleiner Winterberg into the centre of Saxon Switzerland

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Saxony
Info created by Philipp Konetschni - uploaded by Philipp Konetschni, improved by Poco a poco. View from Kleiner Winterberg into the centre of Saxon Switzerland. Refound on my watchlist. Forgot to suggest this for quite a while. - nominated by Der Angemeldete -- Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Der Angemeldete (talk) 13:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's a little noise in the upper reaches of the picture, but the vicarious pleasure and awe at being the man looking at this scene is paramount. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a description in English. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK Added, thanks for your hint.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Caspar David Friedrich variation. ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 13:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another in the occasional genre seen here of images that I imagine with some Bible verse in a calligraphic font running across the top. Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 22:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Saxony

File:Fountain in the Italian Park, Park Hyde.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2023 at 06:12:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#UK
Info created by Носков А. С. - uploaded by Носков А. С. - nominated by Носков А. С. -- Носков А. С. (talk) 06:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Носков А. С. (talk) 06:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fairly low resolution, not particularly impressive sharpness, the light and subject doesn't make the subject stand out... FPX, maybe?--Peulle (talk) 06:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image does not have a high enough quality to succeed.--Peulle (talk) 07:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Cinnamon-bellied flowerpiercer (Diglossa baritula) male on Indian shot (Canna indica) Finca El Pilar.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 08:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Thraupidae (Tanagers and Allies)
Info No flowerpiercer FPs. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but is it oversharpened near the head, or is there another thing that's causing the gray feathers to look much less sharp than the orange ones? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No idea I'm afraid! It has not been selectively sharpened. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. The bird is very small, though, I suppose? What's its approximate size? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11.5cm. I have applied a bit of sharpening to the blue-grey feathers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 451048 00:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Thraupidae (Tanagers and Allies)

File:Bremerhaven - Weser - Port 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2023 at 06:29:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the "Sail City" observation deck to the Weser and the port of Bremerhaven

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the contrast between the "emptiness" on the left and the busy city and harbor on the right. -- Llez (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (I hope you don't mind me slightly amending the gallery) --SHB2000 (talk) 08:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 458275 00:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support But the disturbing object in the left corner should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 19:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 06:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Llez. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

File:Photograph of Frederic Edwin Church by Napoleon Sarony.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2023 at 06:37:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Napoleon Sarony - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photograph and restoration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Fischburg in Gröden Südtirol.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 20:50:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The castle Fischburg in Gherdëina, South Tyrol.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy
Info All by- nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose due to the house on the right in shadow. Would be better photographed with the sun at the back left instead of back right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shadow does not disturb. Info There is a stitching error next to the (disturbing) wife. -- -donald- (talk) 04:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done @-donald-: Thanks for your support and note but how dare you say that my wife is "disturbing" ;-). I'd rather say that people on a photo enrich it because the landscape can be timeless while people with their dress and attitude on the long run are a time marker.

Support per Donald. I think the shadow is fine and gives the eyes some relief. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:24, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the “Castles and fortifications” gallery; after all the photo emphasizes the castle. --Aristeas (talk) 05:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 477729 00:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy

File:Kathakali Of Kerala (B) (6).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2023 at 19:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kathakali is a classical art form of Indian state Kerala

--Karelj (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Kathakali is a classical art form of Indian state Kerala.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. I don't like the vignetting in the bottom right. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified. Now please check.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 05:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the face is still unsharp, so I still stand by my oppose !vote. SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Very striking, but I want his face to be sharper. That is not a request, but the reason I probably won't vote for this, as much as I like it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that. I have tried my level best. -Shagil Kannur (talk) 05:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 09:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 12:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support To me the striking Wow outweighs the minor technical problems. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose lack of sharpness, sorry. -- Ivar (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not in focus. ~~Posed~~ picture with some of fabric backdrop showing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll Oppose, too. I don't think we should feature a photo of a man whose face is unsharp even at 50% of full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose} per others; doesn't just look unsharp in some areas but badly processed as well. Daniel Case (talk) 00:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patzmannsdorf - Kürbisfeld mit Pfarrkirche und Raiffeisen-Silo in Stronsdorf.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2023 at 16:21:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Austria
Info created & uploaded by Haeferl – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support So many Easter eggs :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Austria

File:Tetrahedrite - Black Pine mine, Granite Co., Montana, USA.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2023 at 14:54:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals
Info all by Ivar (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support more of that wonderful mineral pictures, please! :-) -- Ra'ike T C 18:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 22:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

File:Rime-ice-found-on-summit-cross.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2023 at 08:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rime ice found on the summit cross at the top of Fronalpstock (1,921 m), Morschach, Stoos, Switzerland

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice
Info Rime ice on the summit cross at the top of Fronalpstock (1,921 m), canton of Schwyz, Switzerland. Created and uploaded by Roy Egloff, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the most impressive photos of rime ice I have seen. Seems to lean to the left, but I guess the summit cross is just leaning in reality. --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --SHB2000 (talk) 10:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is impressive and nice (but seems a bit overprocessed) --PierreSelim (talk) 11:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- IamMM (talk) 16:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Impressive. Parts of the sky look a bit posterized, but not badly. Is that deep a blue on the snow in shadow how it might look on the top of a mountain in winter? I ask because I haven't been to a mountaintop in these conditions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment AFAICR it is, but I have only been on lower mountains in winter. Maybe somebody with high-mountain experience can explain this? --Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the foreground shadows have been lifted too much giving the slightly odd blue. In natural light the shadows would be very dark. But it looks OK, though does the foreground add to the image? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, I'd like to see it in more natural light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great find. --Peulle (talk) 06:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:31, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Ice

File:View of Rawnsley Bluff and Chace Range from Alison Saddle 20230211 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2023 at 07:51:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Rawnsley Bluff and Chace Range from Alison Saddle in the Flinders Ranges region of South Australia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support It's unfortunate that the foreground is in shadow, but overall this is a very nice view. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view, nicely framed by the hills and bushes. --Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:31, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination! --DXR (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, DXR! I hope you didn't get burned in the heat when you were here (I went a few summers back to this part of SA and let's just say that the temperature wasn't the best). SHB2000 (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia

File:Phnom Bakheng temple at Angkor, Cambodia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2023 at 12:33:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Cambodia
Info created and uploaded by Satdeep Gill - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 12:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some dust spots in the sky. I will try to fix them … --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Removed dustspots and major CAs. @Satdeep Gill: I hope it is OK that I have uploaded my version right over your one; I have done this just as a little help and because the changes are minor. --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish it could have been a little sharper. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educational -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Cambodia

File:St Stephen church in St-Etienne-de-Vicq (11).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2023 at 06:48:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of the Saint Stephen church in Saint-Étienne-de-Vicq, Allier, France

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 06:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 06:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The more I look at this, the more things I keep finding. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a good photo, but I find it a bit bland. Considering the high level of church ceiling FPs, I don't think this ranks among the finest.--Peulle (talk) 08:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. -- Karelj (talk) 09:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It looks a bit like a mattress from a holiday camp, which you didn't want to take a look on.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Peulle (and, frankly, per Der Angemeldete). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Área de Proteção Ambiental Taruma-Ponta Negra - Thais Shepard.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2023 at 15:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Bradypodidae_(Three-toed_Sloths)
Info created & uploaded by Issana.tas – nominated by Ivar (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overprocessed (twig and leaves above head) plus DOF issues (head partly out of focus) --Virtual-Pano (talk) 18:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination there are some postprocessing issues, I didn't see. -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:T9901C.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2023 at 20:23:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toshiba Direct Memory Access Controller, 1994

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded by Mister rf - nominated by Mister rf -- Mister rf (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remarkable, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could appear in an EE textbook. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 10:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am really a fan of images of computer hardware. The DOF for these kind of images is sometimes a huge problem, but here, it is solved in a very good way. Sharpness and lighting is fantastic! Support --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Killarnee (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:Nangyaar Kooth of Kerala.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2023 at 04:10:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info-- Nangyaar Kooth or Nangiar Kooth is a traditional dance form of Kerala.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You mean bottom crop? In this dance form, the dancer sits on a stool while performing. Thus the bottom part is unimportant. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but the fact that the bottom crop is poor doesn't suddenly vanish because the stool is unimportant. The image loses meaning due to stool's absence, IMO. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The stool can't be seen from the front when the performer sits on it. You can watch any video of this art to confirm this fact. Face expression and hand movements are the main attraction of this dance form. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, based on this and how striking her headdress, head makeup and the top of her torso are. It's OK that the focus decreases as the photo goes down. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That does not answer my query, but only further accentuates my point on why the location of the stool shouldn't be cropped.. SHB2000 (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Bottom crop is fine. Side crop is a bit tight. Yann (talk) 08:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~She is not performing. Posed~~picture with fabric backdrop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is taken from a great event Kerala School Kalolsavam 2023. How can you judge that it is not??? Kindly watch this category. And the background is not fabricated. It is a dark curtain. I felt very disappointed with your prejudice.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No prejudice - just a use of use of English misunderstanding. Fabric means material - in this case a curtain. Fabricated means something else. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Then the dark curtain is out of my control. It was a live performance. I just captured this image while performing. Your opinion on posed is prejudicial indeed.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp is fabric backdrop a demerit for FP?-Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is for me - as are man-made backgrounds that some photographers use for their images of plants and animals. The black background looks unnatural to me - does that really reflect how the performance looked? It was OK to remove the microphone. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Usually traditional dance forms of Kerala like this (Kathakali, Koodiyaattam etc.) are being performed in the nights. Nowadays all these kind of dances are being performed on stages. So by providing dark backdrop will brings an outdoor night ambience to audience. Kindly watch any videos of such dances. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Yann. --Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top crop could be a bit tighter for a better balance.--Ermell (talk) 19:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition and sharpness.--Peulle (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poor grounds.-Shagil Kannur (talk) 11:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

100% valid grounds for an oppose. The expression of the dancer looks odd - perhaps because it is a school performance, not a professional one. Even if is the perfect expression for the dance, a voter doesn't have to like it. And there have already been criticisms of the cropped stool, the top crop and the black fabric background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See this FP. Bottom cropped and have the same fabric backdrop. Fabric backdrops are common with stage performances. Hence these two issues may be ignored. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as having the same sharpness and processing issues (look at the bottom areas) that the other images in this series have had. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of this looks good, but the hands, instead of motion blur, have a lot of static-y artefacts. There's a lot to like about this, but I find that too distracting. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Town Hall, Yarmouth, England-LCCN2002708291 - Restoration.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2023 at 21:31:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
Info created by Detroit Publishing Company - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, but something should be done about the red-linked categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Took them from the TIFF, and thought they'd follow a standard format if you removed "(raw)". They don't. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meiræ 23:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom

File:Seattle from Space Needle June 2018 panorama.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2023 at 05:54:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good view and very well-taken photo, but this angle emphasizes some rather nondescript buildings nearby. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Would you prefer File:Seattle from Space Needle June 2018 003.jpg? It's not as high-res since it's a single shot as opposed to a panorama, but the angle is slightly different and I do like the seaplane at the left. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I like the light better, and the seaplane on the upper left is a nice bonus. I would vote for that photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File: Museo di Santa Giulia chiesa San Salvatore navata lato Ovest Brescia.jpg

File:Crëpes de Gherdëina da Secëda nëif d'agost.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2023 at 17:31:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

August snow over Val Gherdëina's Dolomites.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating details and interesting light.--Ermell (talk) 06:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell. --Aristeas (talk) 12:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealingly brooding. Please eliminate one dust spot at the left margin, slightly above the mountain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your support and note. It seems that when you come all my photos brood some dust spots ;-) Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meiræ 23:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive clouds and appealing viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:Kathakali Of Kerala (B) (5).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 09:32:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#event
Info Kathakali is a classical art form of Indian state Kerala. No fabric backdrop. Posed picture.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the dress is cut off on the bottom and on the bottom right. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bottom crop is correct to me. There are many FP having bottom cropped like this. -Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keywords: "to me". It may be fine for you, but it's not for others – arguing about criticisms isn't going to get you more !votes. SHB2000 (talk) 23:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Bottom, right and left crops are all too tight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But that doesn't effect the image IMO.-Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You insist on arguing with criticisms, don't you? Do you think your nominations are likely to get more votes that way? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination--Shagil Kannur (talk) 02:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bikini-Haus-Berlin-schwarz-weiss-2023.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2023 at 08:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shopping Mall Bikini-Berlin in black-white

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info all by me-- Tuxyso (talk) 08:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Concept shopping mall Bikini Berlin inside the Bikini Building. Originally built in die 1960th. The text on the outside means "Shoppen" - Shopping; "Schnabulieren" - eat with pleasure; "Flanieren" - strolling.
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, and if you were thinking that making it black & white emphasized the time the building was built, it works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

exactly that was the idea, Ikan Kekek plus the building itself has a bw look - so bw emphazizes the texture of the fassade and switches off distractions. -—Tuxyso (talk) 07:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Classic. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the way it evokes a lot of the pictures of mid-century, pre-Wall Berlin. There's almost nothing in this image (save the implied word "cyber" on the curtains in the windows) that would give it away that it's 2023. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The building on the left looks post-modern to me, though I could be wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The building at the very left is the „Upper West“ See de:WP: Upper West, built 2013-2017. —Tuxyso (talk) 06:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Ikan, reminds me the time in Berlin with the wall --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess 🍵 Rosalina 479538 11:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Kaula-Kotselvaara-Mine-037.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2023 at 07:46:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Volvo L60Gz loader at the Kaula-Kotselvaara Nickel Mine.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Other_land_vehicles
Info created by Alexander Novikov - uploaded by Alexander Novikov - nominated by Alexander Novikov -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 07:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 07:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It's a nice shot, and I went back and forth about weak support/weak oppose (perhaps someone could convince me), but I find myself wanting to see something happening with the loader or more context for its use. In other words, this is a very nice photo which certainly deserves QI and perhaps VI, but it feels too much like a vehicle placed in a landscape rather than documentation of the use of heavy equipment, if that makes sense. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022-07-13 Handball, Bundesliga Frauen, Thüringer HC Teamshooting 1DX 1820 by Stepro.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2023 at 20:06:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Handball, German Bundesliga Women, Teamphoto Thüringer HC

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Other team sports
Info Handball, German Bundesliga Women, Teamphoto Thüringer HC; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
Support -- Stepro (talk) 20:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A bit too ordinary for my taste; it's "just" a team photo, not really taken in extraordinary circumstances.--Peulle (talk) 12:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality image is enough but I wouldn't feature it --Killarnee (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rally in support of Ukraine in Columbus, Ohio, United States, 26 February 2022 (51906586684) - edited.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2023 at 02:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Becker1999 - uploaded by A1Cafel - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 02:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral (Only due to watermark) -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 02:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionEstar: Watermarked removed. Would you consider changing your vote? --A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ until the watermark is cropped; strong message otherwise, though (if the watermark is removed, please ping me so I can voice my support !vote). --SHB2000 (talk) 03:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ The watermark makes it ineligible for FP in my opinion, very unfortunately --Kritzolina (talk) 08:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Version without watermark is now avaliable here. --Cart (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you very much, Cart, for the retouched version! Because everybody, including the nominator, dislikes the watermark, I have taken the liberty to switch this nomination to the version edited by Cart. Hope it helps, --Aristeas (talk) 13:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for removing the watermark, Cart, and thank you, Aristeas, for switching the nomination! Now I'll happily voice my support !vote: Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, SHB2000! --Aristeas (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question The original image was uploaded with a watermark, that was intentional. Is anyone permitted to remove it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Whatever the answer, I don't think FPC is the place for this sort of political statement, however sympathetic the community is to the message. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The original image was licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license which explicitly allows everybody to remix (adapt) the work. So I guess it is permitted to create a variant without the watermark, as long as the other conditions of the license are met. Regarding the question whether FPC is a place for this sort of political statements, I would like to note that I have voted for this photo because it is a good, exemplary photo. I would probably also vote for a similar photo showing some Putin fan holding up a poster with Putinesque propaganda – given that it is a good, exemplary photo. Photography has to document what’s going on in the world, whether we like it or not. My 50 cent, --Aristeas (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment All photos uploaded with a Commons-compatible license can be reworked; it's one of the criteria to upload an image here. In some cases the watermark can be removed and the original overwritten, but in this and many cases, it is better to upload the image without watermark as a new file and link it in a way that makes it perfectly clear that the original had a watermark. As for this being a political image, we have several political FPs already (including Nazi propaganda). Most may be older, but like Aristeas said, political images of all sorts are documentations that belongs on Commons to be used on encyclopedias like Wikipedia. Anybody wanting to keep the balance for articles, there is an entire category of Putinism to search for a really good image. --Cart (talk) 14:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It has to be noted that the slogan in the photo is not a simple obscenity, but refers to the famous statement made by a Ukraininan soldier during the Russian attack on Snake Island in 2022; please see the WP article for details. --Aristeas (talk) 08:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks to all that helped create this version of the nomination and making clear statements why it is eligible --Kritzolina (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I appreciate the slogan and the context behind it, but I'm not feeling overwhelmed by this photo as a composition. To me, this is more of a QI/VI photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not FP quality. --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We have so many more interesting photos of protests/protesters, but it's a meaningful photo and message. Presumably nobody is concerned about COM:WATERMARK? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not when the links make it perfectly clear that the original had a watermark and the file was uploaded under a license that permits alteration of the photo. The file also has a digital (=invisible) watermark (author in the Exif). --Cart (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Canberra From Black Mountain Tower.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2023 at 22:36:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canberra from Black Mountain Tower/Telstra Tower in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Australia
Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is one of my favourite panos out there, primarily due to its level of detail. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It might be helpful to indicate degrees of coverage in panos - here about 180 deg I'm guessing? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's 180° too, but I'm not 100 per cent sure. @JJ Harrison: ? SHB2000 (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't really recall since the photo is more than a decade old, but it's probably a little under 180 degrees looking at google maps. JJ Harrison (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Australia

File:Hamun Solmaz Daryani Hamoun 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2023 at 12:42:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
Info created and uploaded by Solmaz Daryani - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 12:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Featured film? --Yann (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Without the description, the picture can not be understood. It is not outstanding for me.--Ermell (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yeah. It's a good documentary photo, but it doesn't strike me as an outstanding composition. I respect the point it makes, so overall, I will abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A very interesting photo, however, in my opinion, I would choose a different crop. It's just a proposal (please see crop note). -- Radomianin (talk) 20:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I actually liked the original version more. But both are FP. Description just adding a further layer.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 17:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Crop suggested by Radomianin. -- ‍‍‍‍‍‍‍IamMM (talk) 05:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for your derivative, IamMM. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:42, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even better – thank you for the suggestion, Radomianin! --Aristeas (talk) 07:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Ermell's concern still remains, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also good. Yann (talk) 08:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support De persoon lijkt in gedachten verzonken.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another one with that National Geographic feel to it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LexKurochkin (talk) 10:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work

The chosen alternative is: File:Hamun by Solmaz Daryani 1 (Crop).jpg

File:Boeing-777-300ER A6-EGK.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2023 at 15:03:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A picture of a Boeing 777-300ER Emirates

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles#Air transport
Info created by Rich Flight22 - uploaded by Rich Flight22 - nominated by Rich Flight22 -- Rich Flight22 (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rich Flight22 (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cut off, PNG format, bad light. Please try quality images first. Yann (talk) 15:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann, and really a possible FPX candidate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. --Gyrostat (talk) 13:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:DHAB-BRIDGE OVER CANAL & GATE (DAY VIEW).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2023 at 16:32:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Other
Info created & uploaded by Dhabahawalpur - nominated by Q28 -- Q28 (talk) 16:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Q28 (talk) 16:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can we get a bit more of an explanation of what exactly we are seeing here and a few more appropriate categories, please? --Kritzolina (talk) 19:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, W.carter, for fixing those issues! Kritzolina (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, at least, because of the weird slant of the gate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 3rd rate computer design. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unnatural colours. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Contains at least one geometrically impossible overlapping (top right, see image note) – is this a tribute to M.C. Escher? ;–) And why would anybody want to build such a big road and bridge when the road ends abruptly at the wood (top left)? --Aristeas (talk) 05:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are several issues. The grass is simulated with some grass textures that sometimes don't fit in with the environment. The trees are sprites. This can work, but due to the perspective, it sometimes seems unrealistic. The physics are not rendered correctly. Sometimes shadows are missing, the car in the background is floating. On the car of the right, there are some weird areas (reflections?). The water seems quite unsharp compared to the environment, and also seems to have a low resolution. The backgrounds far away seem to be foggy, but there is not gradient where the fog seems to increase with a further distance. The arrows in the street are 3D dimensional. This could be problematic in reality :). Some transitions of plants are unrealistic (like used a stamp effect in photoshop). Some trees seem to have transparency issues. And the streets in the background seems to lead into the trees. There might be some other issues, but all in all, it seems not to meet the criteria to be promoted as FP, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose looks unnatural, i can't do anything with this picture --Killarnee (talk) 20:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frea pass Sella group Pisciadu Dolomites South Tyrol.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2023 at 22:19:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pisciadu, Sas dla Luesa, in the Sella group and the Frea Pass in the Dolomites - South Tyrol.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like these kind of pictures.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very beautiful scene, but areas of unsharpness in the middle. For a 96 MP image it is often hard to judge whether a problem that is obvious at 100% is actually significant in the grand scheme of things, so I've looked at a 19 MP version instead, and even there the issue is apparent. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed there is at least one slightly blurred frame in the center, but I would assess it differently: the unsharpness is not terrible in full resolution and almost gone in the scaled-down version. Overall the photo is still incredibly beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:William Brough's A Peculiar Family - Royal Gallery of Illustration.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2023 at 08:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for William Brough's A Peculiar Family

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Theater
Info created by Robert Jacob Hamerton - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something out of the ordinary.--Peulle (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. What makes them peculiar? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's some sort of farce. I know where to find the script of the play, but can't get to the British Library to read it. It's one of those things where it covers an early era of theatrical history - specifically the Royal Gallery of Illustration's early period - that's important, but is kind of treated with broad strokes as the lead in to more documented and much, much more revived works. (Cox and Box, Ages Ago! Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Theater

File:Golden-fronted (Velasquez's) woodpecker (Melanerpes aurifrons) male Copan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2023 at 21:13:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Picidae (Woodpeckers)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Everything is very sharp --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral To me the colours are dull and lacking vibrance. Otherwise good catch. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like this photo, but I keep thinking about how you have opposed photos in Consensual Review for lacking the tail, or part of it. This photo has part but not all of the tail. Talk to us about that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To me there's a big difference between a carelessly taken image that crops off the tail and one where part of the tail is hidden behind a branch. Check out the Commons FP galleries for dozens of examples. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's a pretty bird, and I don't mind the cutoff of the tail too much, though a photo of equivalent quality showing the whole tail would certainly be a better and more useful picture. When I look at your votes in CR, I will pay attention to whether you are objecting to the cutoff of the tail because of things blocking it or for other reasons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Very nice capture as always, but I don't like the centering of the bird's eye. The position of the branch and the direction of the beak both serve to put more visual weight on the right side, so it looks unbalanced to me and needs a crop on the left. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. The centering of the eye may be arguable, but I would not crop the photo at the left – it has some interesting balance which IMHO would be damaged by such a crop. --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tail is missing. It is essential for a woodpecker. It provides support when chopping. Also, the overall composition of the photo is not successful for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You'll remember voting on this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Very good pose and specimen and I'm ok with missing tail, but imo the noise level is disturbing, sorry. -- Ivar (talk) 14:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done New version uploaded Ivar. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment not much better, I'm afraid. Maybe ISO 3200 was too much for R6m2 in these light conditions. -- Ivar (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ivar. -- Karelj (talk) 13:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Picidae (Woodpeckers)

File:Zeltbräu Hof 20221012 HOF05741.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2023 at 12:29:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of a brick building of a former beer company. The image is dominated with blue and red. Beer is a high cultural good in Hof (Saale) and has a long tradition.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info View of a brick building of a former beer company. The image is dominated with blue and red. Beer is a high cultural good in Hof (Saale) and has a long tradition. Created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose High quality for sure, and perhaps QI+VI, but the subject does not have a lot of "wow" built in, meaning a photo would need to find that "wow" somewhere else. In this case, while it's a well captured photo, the light is harsh and the subject/perspective just are not visually interesting enough, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:114 once an iceberg now a Growler and a scupture V-P.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2023 at 10:41:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

floating chunk of glacier ice - sculpted by nature

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice
Info A floating chunk of glacier ice - sculpted by nature
|created by Virtual-Pano - uploaded by Virtual-Pano - nominated by Virtual-Pano -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 10:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 10:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Real work of art! I like the background too. Could you please add geolocation? Yann (talk) 11:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes indeed nature is a talented sculpture. I have taken hundreds of pictures on the western side of the Antarctic peninsular and I am not able to geolocte them properly, sorry Virtual-Pano Virtual-Pano (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At least, could you give an approximate location? "western side of the Antarctic peninsular" is better than nothing. Yann (talk) 12:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done EXIF metadata ammended accordingly - please keep in mind that this is an approximate position only --Virtual-Pano (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Indeed a high-class image. The subject is very special, and the image quality is ideal. A clear pro for me --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. --Aristeas (talk) 17:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, per others! What's the little thing glinting to the right of the curve on the right side of the iceberg, though? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A drop of water falling down - see the large number of them closer in the center close to the surface. Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 21:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The western coast of the Antarctic Peninsula deserves more media attention! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A striking blend of harmonious curves, color gradients and contrasting brightness -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Ice

File:Brackenheim - Stockheim - Schloss Stocksberg - Ansicht von SzO im Herbst (Panorama).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2023 at 18:42:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info the castle is already featured, but imho the wider beautiful autumn landscape around it deserves a star on it's own. Created & uploaded by Roman Eisele – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 20:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meiræ 23:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)--GRDN711 (talk) 01:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Ivar, for the nomination, and all of you for your support! --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harmonious bright colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Tuxyso (talk) 10:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a beautiful panoramic painting. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support May be one of the best of the year in my opinion. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm calling POTY finalist on this one! --El Grafo (talk) 07:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Schdogge rules... -- -donald- (talk) 08:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours. BigDom (talk) 11:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive piece of art. --August Geyler (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 29 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Germany

File:Daslook. Allium ursinum, zwellende bloemknop. 18-04-2022 (actm.) 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2023 at 04:34:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
Info Swelling flower bud of Allium ursinum. Focus stack of 20 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful and instructive, shows nicely how the single small flowers spread out from the bud. --Aristeas (talk) 07:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid this camera is not delivering enough detail. Also, I am not a fan of the black background. There are stacking errors - primarily the cobwebs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems pretty detailed to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The photo is OK, there are also small inherent errors due to the focus stacking process for a subject of this kind (info here for 20 pics or 60 pics as in the photo description?) and it may possibly to be improved by erasing the cobwebs-like traces (less visible in the first uploaded file) . --Mister rf (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 11:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae

File:Argiope spider female adult on her web dorsal view black background Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2023 at 01:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info Multi-coloured Saint Andrew's cross spider (Argiope versicolor) female adult on her web, dorsal view. The specimen measures 9 mm (0.35 in) (body only) and 49 mm (1.9 in) with the legs. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support love the detail in colour! --SHB2000 (talk) 02:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Easter egg :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The legs and web are super sharp, but the abdomen less so. Anything you can do? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Abdomen sharpened -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I'm not sure it's worked. Are those artefacts on the white spots? There appears to be an edge to the white area containing the two brown spots. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Blown highlights reduced. Note it is not focus stacked. There's only one picture taken at f/16. See at lower resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose great specimen, but abdomen is oof, sorry. -- Ivar (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish the belly were sharper, but even at 30% of full size, the picture is a lot bigger than actual size, and it's a good composition. I think it deserves a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ivar. Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)

File:Seattle from Space Needle June 2018 003.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 06:40:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States
Info A slightly different composition from Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seattle from Space Needle June 2018 panorama.jpg. All by me -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing light and colours. The seaplane (top left) is a nice extra. --Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this version much better. Impressive capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 12:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the airplane Killarnee (talk) 20:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seattle doesn't have the most impressive skyline – some may consider it drab, but this photo doesn't make it look anywhere near drab at all. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support IamMM (talk) 07:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support made me wow --RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely taken, very pleasant colors, and, of course, the airplane. Thank you! --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I think you could shave a little of the top where those clouds are awkwardly cropped (And, it was neat to see the second plane in flight, a distant jet in the right background!). Daniel Case (talk) 20:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States

File:Fallen leaf of Platanus x hispanica (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2023 at 06:47:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fallen leaf of Platanus × hispanica in Varennes-sur-Morge, Puy-de-Dôme, France

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Proteales
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 06:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 06:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support With some numbers, this could be the next Canadian dollar bill.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

not unless they scrap the maple for a plane. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A creative and refreshing reversal of the stereotypical autumn foliage over dull background. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the composition does nothing for me with such an everyday subject. 16:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs) 16:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles.--Ermell (talk) 21:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the contrast of the bright green against the earthiness of the dead leaves beneath. It emphasizes how ephemeral the leaf's beauty is, as off the tree it will soon die and fade to the dull neutral tones beneath. "Then leaf subsides to leaf / So Eden sank to grief / So dawn goes down to day. / Nothing gold can stay." Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Order_:_Proteales

File:Thymelicus lineola underside - Keila.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 06:28:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Hesperiidae_(Skippers)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 06:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, particularly in view of the size of the butterfly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golden light and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Hesperiidae_(Skippers)

File:Iglesia del Arcángel Miguel, Pedoulas, Chipre, 2021-12-13, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2023 at 04:55:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Archangel Michael, Pedhoulas, Cyprus

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info Church of Archangel Michael, Pedhoulas, Cyprus. Pedoulas, a small village with about 100 inhabitants, is known for its 12 churches, varying from a 15th-century chapel to a 1930s cathedral. The most important is the Archangelos Michael (Archangel Michael) church, which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site along with nine other Painted Churches in the Troödos Region. According to an inscription, the church was painted in 1474 at the expense of the priest Basil Chamados. In the image of the donor above the door, he is kneeling in priestly robes and presenting the archangel with a model of the church. Behind him are his wife and their two richly dressed daughters. To the left there are different saints and scenes of the New Testament and to the right Archangel Michael. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 04:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 04:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 06:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support From the outside, the small church looks so inconspicuous, the more magnificent is its interior. Great shot. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.--Peulle (talk) 07:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrescia (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What's happening in the upper right corner? Also, the chairs are chopped off at the bottom. – Now, I know how difficult it can be to get a shot like this right. In particular, when you don't have enough space as a photographer. However, this is not what I'd consider to be among the "finest images on Commons". Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Frank Schulenburg: I improved the bottom crop in the last version, the chairs are not cropped anymore. I don't see though a problem in the top right corner. Can you please elaborate your comment? --Poco a poco (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks so much for the fix! You're right, there's nothing wrong with the top right corner. My mistake. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I missed the cropped chair legs. Easy to crop by mistake, are they in the one of the RAW files Poco a poco? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp: I fixed the bottom crop in the last version, --Poco a poco (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The chairs may be disturbing, but it would better to see the whole chair legs. --XRay 💬 09:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

XRay: Crop fixed in the last version, --Poco a poco (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good. Thank you. --XRay 💬 16:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mister rf (talk) 22:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry for the late feedback. I was traveling with no Internet for 6 days. Will look into it tomorrow evening, latest on Friday. Poco a poco (talk) 16:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done now, Poco a poco (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support I agree it would be nice to see the whole chairs, but that isn't a dealbreaker for me. There's also a bit of ringing on the light under the door, but again that's such a small part of the overall image. It's busy, but redeemed by the grid pattern. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity

File:Covered board sidewalk in Tombstone, Arizona - May 1940.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 17:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States (I think?)
Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I won't support with this crop on the left and right. Yann (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a crop; that's the original photo borders. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a scan from a negative, right? Do we know how it was printed? To me that really looks like it was shot with the intention to apply a square crop to the final print: It would have been easy to avoid the car on the left and the frame on the right by moving forward just a bit. It seems the photographer was more concerned about getting more of the roof and boardwalk into the frame but didn't bother to shoot in portrait orientation - and there would have been no point in doing so if he was shooting for 1:1 anyway. I like this shot - to me as a European it looks like a still from a John Wayne movie. Probably would have supported a square crop, whether it was intended by the photographer or not. El Grafo (talk) 08:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would you offer a square crop as an alternative? Yann (talk) 11:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann probably a bit too late now, looking at the date. And in any case, I'd like to hear @Adam Cuerden's view on this first. Might be worth a try to wait a bit and then try again with new nomination? El Grafo (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how much this was intended to be cropped: This was from a survey programme, so it's hard to say how much it was intended to be adjusted, if any. Note that the buildings in the rear are significant, though: One of the usages actually depends on them being in frame as they're the only image we have of them before some structural changes. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe it's my relative photographic naivety showing, but regretfully I'm not really seeing a Featured Picture. The restoration is good and it's obviously high resolution, but as noted above the composition (in-camera "crop") is meh at best and it doesn't seem to portray an especially interesting covered walkway. It may have been taken by a respected photographer, but doesn't seem to me to be among his best work. Happy to be convinced otherwise if there's something I'm missing. BigDom (talk) 07:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I would support, maybe, with a crop in at both sides to focus on the walkway, but ... since it seems part of this nomination is that it's an image taken by a renowned photographer, imposing our own crop on it may be antithetical to our values. Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Серпантин в Гоначхирском ущелье.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 23:09:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hairpin bends on a road in Teberda Nature Reserve in the Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia, Russia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 23:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --John-Grégoire (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Russia

File:Floating Platform and illuminated East Coast Parkway seen from the sky observation deck of Marina Bay Sands Singapore.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2023 at 01:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Singapore
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great metropolitan atmosphere, amazing view. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin.--Ermell (talk) 06:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Singapore never fails to disappoint me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bottom crop trough the little boat isn't ideal. I'm not really overwhelmed by this partial view and the hazy setting. The horizontal barriers are bothering me. Modern architecture seems here to be like everywhere in metropole areas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Minor modification: Intrusive tiny boat cloned out at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm sympathetic to Milseburg's statement of not being overwhelmed. Important document, but not necessarily an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Milseburg/Ikan Kekek. The buildings in the centre also seem to be leaning slightly to my eye. BigDom (talk) 11:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is ok but neither the light nor the composition are convincing to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Singapore

File:Palacio Pitti, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2023 at 03:38:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling fresco "Ulysses' return to Ithaca" by Gaspare Martellini (1785-1857), Hall of Ulysses, Galleria Palatina, Palazzo Pitti, Florence, Italy

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info Ceiling fresco, Hall of Ulysses, Galleria Palatina, Palazzo Pitti, Florence, Italy. At the time of the Medici, this was the bedroom of the Grand Duke. From about 1775 the room was part of the apartment of Maria Theresa of Habsburg-Lorraine and after the restoration it was used, with the nearby rooms, as a gallery. In this period, after 1814, Ferdinand III commissioned Gaspare Martellini (1785-1857) to paint the fresco "Ulysses' return to Ithaca" on the ceiling (alluding to the return of the grand duke after his exile in the Napoleonic period), with a frieze decorated at the corners with allegories of Fidelity, Fortitude, Hercules and Apollo. c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressively beautiful, perfectly captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support nicely captured, Poco a poco! --SHB2000 (talk) 06:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm going to oppose to not let Poco go get away with these uncentered ceiling shots (he's got a few of them). Very striking when looking at it in portrait. - Benh (talk) 06:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late answer. I've been traveling with no Internet for 6 days. I'll look into the issue Thursday or latest Friday. Poco a poco (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Benh: I've uploaded a new version with several little changes to improve the symmetry. There was indeed some room for improvement. Thanks, Poco a poco (talk) 16:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait up, not all changes I made were improvements, I need to rework it again tomorrow, sorry. I reverted to the original version for now. Poco a poco (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that I got it now, Benh, what do you think? Poco a poco (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Poco, sorry for the delay. I definitely can tel it's not centered at a first glance. I don't think there a way you can fix it in post given that the camera wasn't centered to begin with. - Benh (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but there appears to be a bit of CA on the light in the upper right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings

File:Japanse esdoorn (Acer palmatum) 03-04-2023 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2023 at 04:54:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Sapindaceae
Info Sprouting leaves and flower buds of a Japanese Maple (Acer palmatum). Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid the buds and part of one leaf are not in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Some of the buds are not 100% in focus, but overall the photo is still very nice. --Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful very weak oppose I'm afraid I must agree with Charles ... it looks like the camera moved very slightly during the exposure. Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Sapindaceae

File:Aktie Cinématographique (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2023 at 08:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

100 francs bearer share certificate, issued in 1919 by Compagnie Universelle Cinématographique, Paris. Graphic design with theatrical masks at the top, flanking putti and the company's coat of arms with CUC ligature.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical
Info The Compagnie Universelle Cinématographique produced films and ran several cinemas in Paris. Reproduced from an original certificate of 1919, uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 08:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 08:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 05:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical

File:Blooming walnut (Juglans regia).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2023 at 10:29:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Juglandaceae
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 10:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Носков А. С. (talk) 06:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Весна идёт, весне дорогу![reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cannons and roses.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2023 at 06:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United Kingdom
Info created by Носков А. С. - uploaded by Носков А. С. - nominated by Носков А. С. -- Носков А. С. (talk) 06:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Носков А. С. (talk) 06:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uncategorized nomination; poor level of detail on the building; perspective issues.--Peulle (talk) 06:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
1. Помогите категоризировать. На русском вообще перевода этого ничего нет и вообще непонятно. (Категоризацию снимка я сделал). 2. Perspective issues? Здание на то момент требовало ремонта и кусты роз маленькие (Ракурс выбирал, чтобы убрать эти недостатки и выполнить саму суть снимка). 3. Вам и остальным (которые забраковали предидущую работу) по поводу разрешения снимка - на тот момент камера неплохая по цене и качеству.

1. Help categorize. There is no translation of this in Russian at all and it is generally incomprehensible. (I did the categorization of the picture). 2. Perspective issues? The building at that time was in need of repair and the rose bushes were small (the angle was chosen to remove these shortcomings and capture the very essence of the picture). 3. To you and the rest (who rejected the previous work) about the resolution of the picture - at that time the camera is not bad in terms of price and quality. Носков А. С. (talk) 07:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light, blown highlights, tilted -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
...tilted

кусты роз маленькие (Ракурс выбирал, чтобы убрать эти недостатки и выполнить саму суть снимка).

Я художник - я так вижу.

the rose bushes are small (the angle was chosen to remove these imperfections and fulfill the very essence of the picture).

I'm an artist - that's how I see it. Носков А. С. (talk) 13:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are many artists around this world, and this shot does not look like a piece of art in my subjective view -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a page for photographers - being an artist is not enough I'm afraid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Это фотография природы, архитекутры, художественная фотография (поэтому и художник), а не фото на документы (паспорт и т.д., где должно быть всё строго профиль и анфас).

This is a photograph of nature, architecture, art photography (and therefore an artist), and not a photo for documents (passport, etc., where everything should be strictly profile and full face). Носков А. С. (talk) 13:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Try nominate your photographs to Quality Images first and succesfull images place here. Chromatic aberrations need to be removed.

Попробуйте, сначала номинировать ваши фотографии как Качественные изображения, а лучшие из качественных можно попробовать разместить в данном разделе. Это поможет лучше понять технические требования к фотографиям, которые изложены в разделе Image guidelines. Выше указали на технические проблемы снимка такие как пересвеченное небо, искаженная перспектива (здание набок, розы тут не при чём), плохая детализация (это видно, если развернуть фото на весь экран). И ещё сильные хроматические аберрации на ветвях деревьев слева и справа, а также на верхнем куполе здания. Alexander Novikov (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these seemingly technical problems have a non-technical solution: just wait for better light. El Grafo (talk) 07:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose FPX to me, per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --August Geyler (talk) 19:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waddenzee achter de zeedijk bij Paesens-Moddergat. 04-04-2023. (d.j.b) 22.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2023 at 06:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Agriculture#Netherlands
Info View of the Kerktoren behind the dike of Paesens-Moddergat. Typical high skies above the Frisian coast.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light, bland colors, ordinary clouds and unremarkable landscape in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is not FP standard and the wow is missing.--Ermell (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per above. Yann (talk) 11:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahırkapı İskelesi, Fatih, 2016 02.jpg, not featured

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ahırkapı İskelesi, Fatih-İstanbul (2016)

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Turkey
Info created by Gargarapalvin - uploaded by Gargarapalvin - nominated by Gargarapalvin --Gargarapalvin (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gargarapalvin --Gargarapalvin (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment moving half a step to the left to properly align the gate with the pier behind it would have improved the composition quite a bit in my opinion. --El Grafo (talk) 07:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice decorations, so I understand why you took the photo and like it, but it's nothing amazing to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but agree with Ikan. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazon kingfisher (Chloroceryle amazona) female in flight Cayo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2023 at 10:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info Capturing a kingfisher at full speed is a target for many wildlife photographers. I have tried many times. This image does not have the highest technical quality but I submit it under the guideline that a 'good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph'. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a quick flyer too.--Peulle (talk) 12:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shooting a bird in flight is difficult, per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ra'ike T C 18:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I get what you're saying about how difficult it is. However, that doesn't make up for the bird not being in focus and the crop. Keep trying (I mean this in a positive, encouraging way)! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question What's problematic about the crops? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The weight is off. The same way as in the other picture below (see King of Hearts' comment). Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much difference between this one and this bird in flight photo you are exhibiting. Or this one? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The empty space on top of the bird makes the image look unbalanced. There's too much weight on the lower part of the photo. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we'll have to agree to differ. Looking at this photo would I be OK to say 'The empty space on below the bird makes the image look unbalanced'? There's too much sky on the lower part of the photo? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not bad but not good enough IMO. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 10:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, sorry. -- Ivar (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with the comments below, quality can be better and I'd expect that for FP, sorry Charles Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I like the captured motion here. But I have to oppose with Ermell and Poco a poco. --August Geyler (talk) 10:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean-Luc Lemoine Saverne 2023 (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2023 at 07:06:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Le Commissaire - uploaded by Le Commissaire - nominated by Le Commissaire -- Le Commissaire (talk) 07:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose excessive vignetting. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the photo is OK (maybe a little dark) but I would want more resolution for a portrait, especially an upper-body shot like this. Would make a good Valued Image though I think. BigDom (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose per BigDom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't mind a bit of a vignette in a portrait like this. ~~It's bit on the dark side and it has a milkiness to it that doesn't seem intentional.~~ Edit: actually not that bad, I think I let myself get fooled by the thumbnail. Compared to the first version, this one has had some heavy editing/retouching. Some might already call that "fake". I'd say, for a portrait, that can still be acceptable - but it should probably have a {{Retouched}}-template. Color correction maybe went a little bit too far towards the cool side. What really breaks it for me as a FP candidate is that bright spot right next to his neck. It's easy to miss that kind of thing while shooting when you're focused on your subject, but also easy to avoid if you're aware of your surroundings. --El Grafo (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, that bright spot could be retouched/cloned out, too. This would have to be mentioned using the {{Retouched}} template, of course. --Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would be entirely appropriate for this kind of image. Forgot to mention that I think this is a very interesting shot. There's something intriguing about his expression that makes me wonder what kind of person he is - or pretends to be. There's a potential for a FP here, imho, it just needs a little bit more careful editing. --El Grafo (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. I like this pose and the facial expression, but the background and vignetting just don't work. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museo di Santa Giulia chiesa San Salvatore navata lato Ovest Brescia.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2023 at 07:05:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Salvatore church in the Museo di Santa Giulia complex in Brescia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment would you be able to make the image more centred? --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment: the picture could not be taken from the center because of an obstacle Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's a pity. SHB2000 (talk) 01:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per my comment on Poco's uncentered ceiling nom. Here it's off by a mile. - Benh (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zweinaundorfer Straße mit Mehrfamilienhaus Nr. 61 (Leipzig).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2023 at 18:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Decay in a once industrial district of Leipzig

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info Street with abandoned railway bridge and apartment housed as cultural heritage monuments in a former industrial district of Leipzig – created, uploaded and nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August Geyler (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality image but I'm not seeing the exceptional level of "wow factor" required for an FP. -- Karelj (talk) 13:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Karelj. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe not quite an FP, per the above (though I haven't made a firm decision yet and definitely feel the sky helps argue for a feature), but either way, this could be a good VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you. --August Geyler (talk) 10:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spa Pool.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2023 at 07:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spa pool of Hamersley Gorge in Karijini National Park, Pilbara, Western Australia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
Info created and uploaded by Albertchetcuti - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know why, but there's something so mesmerising about this image. The pool is quite a difficult spot to access (50 mins from the nearest non-asbestos-contaminated town, 4 hours/350 km from the nearest town with good amenities). Also, I'm happy to crop off the bottom left, need it be. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would have expected the waterfall to be in focus.--Ermell (talk) 10:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh lights at the top spoils the composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination. I knew this photo had its issues; no harm trying, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Folkloric Tanoura dance performed by man.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2023 at 10:02:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photograph of a Tanoura dancer with intentional motion blur

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Photograph of a tanoura dancer with intentional motion blur. Created and uploaded by Mohamed Khalil90, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The depiction of movement and speed has always been a special challenge for photography, and this applies all the more to dancers with very fast motion, like the famous whirling Sufis. Here we see a dancer excercising the specific Egyptian form of that dance, the tanoura; it stands out for the use of a multicolored skirt which together with the motion blur creates impressive rainbow effects. Basically there are two ways to take a photo of dancers: You can try to freeze the motion by using a very fast shutter speed (like e.g. in this photo), or you can use intentional motion blur to make the movement visible. The latter has been done here, and I really like the result. Yes, you cannot see much, it’s an almost abstract photograph. ;–) But the motion blur with the mixing shades of colours and the strong contrast to the black background give a good impression of the dancer’s whirling and the colour effects. --Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image captures the essence of dance, thank you for nominating! --Kritzolina (talk) 10:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the motion blur really does give a dazzling vibe. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:09, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would add location information to image description, if available. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too bad we can't see how long an exposure this was, but the result is the photographic analog to futurist painting, in a way. After the nomination is over, the word "preformed" in the title needs to be corrected. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Oops – thank you for the hint! I should have seen that typo before nominating the photo ;–). Fixed. (Files can also be renamed during nomination, it’s just a bit more complicated.) --Aristeas (talk) 07:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support My favorite of the current nominations. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like Frank's motorbike nominated earlier, this picture is special in its kind. Nice vibes, with enough light to identify the main parts of the moving body. The only issues I see are the visible noise, and the distracting white spot at the right. But overall a striking and colorful image -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Houses of Reine by Gravdalsbukta, Moskenes, Nordland, Norway, 2022 June.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2023 at 13:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Norway
Info created & uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks very saturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I was thinking of nominating this image a while back, but had the same concerns as Charles. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 20. April 2023 (UTC)
Support Looks very satisfying.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 20:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree about the saturation, but after looking at the photo in full size most colours seem realistic and appropriate in my eyes. The only exception are some small orange buoys, but I guess they have really a very garish colour, so that orange is OK, too. --Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would be nice to hear from Ximonic about the saturation and colors, but not having been there, I feel like they are plausible, and it's certainly an amazing view, like many of Ximonic's pictures of Norway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for nomination! The main affecting thing is the warmer white balance compared to normal daylight pictures. This is due to basically everything in the picture being in the shadow, not in sunlight anymore, and being normally blue instead of neutralish. But in my opinion the blue tone picture wouldn't work in this subject very well. I think the Canon produces quite vivid colors to start with. For curiosity, the maximum vibrancy in Camera Raw I use is usually +10 or less from the raw file, I assume it's somewhere between 0–10 here as well. The saturation slider I like to keep somewhere at 0 though. In landscape shots I tend to like the Adobe landscape color profile quite often, then I often pull green a little bit down, because the green seems to get a little saturated sometimes... I think also in this case. I don't remember there being much anything else going on here colorwise. To my eye, it seems okay in "saturation", also in comparison to many quality pictures around, but feel free to disagree. The rest is trying to find balance in light contrasts and brightness. --Ximonic (talk) 13:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support From my own experience photographing in the direct and indirect light of the midnight sun (OK, tbh, not really any different technically from dusk or dawn light save for the direction it comes from and the surreality of reconciling the clock time and the sunlight), this is accurate. Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Norway

File:Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) female (IMGP1648r1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2023 at 09:35:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)
Info Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) female, all by me -- LexKurochkin (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LexKurochkin (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too bad about the cut-off tail feathers, but very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All the feathers are visible and thank you! --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC) 09:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Focus just missed the head- see definition on the existing FP of a different kestrel species (taken with 500mm vs this one's 210mm). Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC) Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but in this particular case I don't agree. My lens was zoom up to 300 mm, and 210 mm was used on purpose, to have better sharpness at the given distance, and, of course, the focus was on the eyes. Actually, this image has very slight DoF problem, but not on the head, it is on the long feathers on the tips of the wings. On the other hand analyzing your example image, despite it is already an FP, with all due respect to your amazing skills and knowledge in animalistic photography, I consider it not more detailed optically, but slightly oversharpened. It is visible at 1:1 scale on brown feathers on the bird's back of the head, where, due to lower microcontrast of the area, sharpening was less efficient. There are also two white low microconstrast areas on the belly with the same difference in level of detail. LexKurochkin (talk) 12:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I just have done it. File:Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) female (IMGP1648r2-DNA).jpg: The image made from the same raw file with the processing you prefer. LexKurochkin (talk) 13:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Much sharper version, let's see what others think. I am criticised for over-sharpening and for for under-sharpening! (ps. the tail feathers are not cut off as you say, but are slightly hidden, which may be what Ikan Kekek was trying to say). Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly cut off by the rock, I would say. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Ikan. But Charlesjsharp's photo is also beautiful.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question On which version do we vote now – on the original or on the sharpened one? Do you want to nominate the sharpened version as an alternative one? Just asking ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Info @Aristeas: I am not sure if it is possible to change the nomination to have both versions to compare. So, now the first version is nominated. If it does not violate the rules I would like to nominate both versions to compare opinions. Thank you. --LexKurochkin (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mister rf (talk) 22:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The other version is better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles Poco a poco (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Version

Info Alternative version with more sharpening, as described in the discussion above. @LexKurochkin: You wrote above that you would like to nominate both versions to compare opinions. This is possible by using an “Alternative version” section in the nomination, as here. It makes counting the votes etc. more complicated, but it allows people to express their preferences for one (or both) of the versions. (I had to remove the small photo of the alternative from the discussion above and to change it to a mere link, the photo is now present here in larger size.) Hope it helps, --Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Thanks a lot! Yes, it is exactly what I wanted. --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support both versions. ----Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both are good; this version is better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Either version is good, but I find the alternative more harmonious. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this better, too. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Famberhorst, XRay, Agnes Monkelbaan, Mister rf, and Llez: Dear voters on the original version, right now we have a difficult voting situation with this image. Some people consider the alternative version as superior, but there are still more votes for the original version, and therefore at the moment the original would be promoted. Just to avoid any confusion I wanted to ask you if you could please have a look at the alternative version. Please check if you (a) like the alternative version, too (then please vote for it below of this comment), or (b) like the alternative version even better (then please vote for it and consider striking out your vote above for the original version), or (c) prefer the original version (then you got nothing to do, of course). Thank you very much! --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm not sure. This one is sharper, but it looks like oversharpened. --XRay 💬 10:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral In my opinion, this version has some problems. For a better comparison, the two images must be viewed in an editing program, as different layers. Although most of the noise on the background image and on the subject has been removed, the increase in detail is too strong, that's why there are disturbing transitions on the bird's feathers. This new processing was probably also for luminance levels, but the effect was much too oversized, so the intervention caused highlights blown out. The most visible areas are at the bird’s beak, at the bird’s feet, on the rocks, and even at the bird's eyes. The increase in sharpness create some areas with white pixels to be artificially introduced where they did not exist before, so apparently the level of chrominance decreases, so the natural effect of the photo disappears. For the best result the solution would be a photo obtained by editing with different parameters with several layers. Mister rf (talk) 15:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I choose the original photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The top photo is my favourite.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The version above is not sharp enough, I opposed it. This one has the required level of sharpness and is overall fine to me, even if the transition between motif and background looks a bit unnatural. Poco a poco (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info I would like to thank all the participants of this interesting and insightful discussion. Thank you very much. --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The original has 80% of the votes (8 out of 10), the alternative 100% (7 out of 7). Therefore, the alternative is promoted. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)

The chosen alternative is: File:Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) female (IMGP1648r2-DNA).jpg

File:Zwiefalter Aach 03.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 10:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zwiefalter Aach between "Wimsener Mühle" and Gossenzugen, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice image but this long vertical format just feels wrong. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Носков А. С. (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice image but I'm not seeing the exceptional level of "wow factor" required for FP. --Karelj (talk) 13:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama vom Schloss Auerbach.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 10:43:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info Panoramic view from Auerbach Castle over the Odenwald, the Bergstraße, the Upper Rhine Plain to the Palatinate Forest and the Taunus. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Milseburg (talk) 10:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though I wish more of the castle was visible. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cropped castle looks odd. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The cropped castle is a bit unlucky, but including more of the castle would have also meant to include much more (rather uninteresting) foliage at the bottom. So while a photo of the castle would have used a lower framing, for the panorama the framing is fine. --Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles, imo this image is not the finest on Commons, sorry. -- Ivar (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Ivar. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The castle is not really the point here but the view over the Odenwald, the Bergstraße, the Upper Rhine Plain to the Palatinate Forest and the Taunus. --Milseburg (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The cropped castle looks weird. Very central, it is the main subject of the picture, but we can't appreciate it because one half is cut off. Also the light is very harsh, not really charming -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Ivar. -- Karelj (talk) 13:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deforestation central Europe - Rodungen Mitteleuropa.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2023 at 20:35:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Spacecraft in orbit
Info created by A. Gerst - uploaded by Killarnee - nominated by Killarnee -- Killarnee (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Killarnee (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great capture which is definitely FP worthy, in my opinion. Unfortunately, in addition to a few hot pixels in the image, there are some dust spots on the left side (please see notes). If they are tolerable, then my comment will be obsolete. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix it but somehow it doesn't work. I think there is something wrong with the cache, I don't know what. Killarnee (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your efforts, Killarnee. I have removed the hotpixels as well as the dust spots and emailed you the image via WeTransfer link, so that you can upload that version. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay was really only the cache, no problems when emptying the browser cache. Killarnee (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sincerely for the comment and uploading the new version, Killarnee. I took the liberty of adding a retouch template to the file page. With the cache it's sometimes tricky, so it's recommended to use the command …?action=purge to force an update. Best wishes, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lower left corner is not optimal but the CA probably comes from the window of the carrier.--Ermell (talk) 21:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~needs a proper, neutral description that actually describes the contents of the image as well as the context. Quote from the author can (and probably should) stay, but should be marked as such.~~ --El Grafo (talk) 07:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Thanks for your helpful hint, El Grafo. As I just saw, the uploader has already added a more appropriate description in English and German on the file page. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Wanted to vote for this photo, but I have to Oppose for now, sorry.~~ It’s very good that a simple description has been added which mentions what is visible in the photo. But we should not delete the photographer’s motivation and interpretation of his own photo completely; that’s disrespectful. It may be OK if the description contained questionable claims and political stuff, but A. Gerst just refers to well-known facts. So please add the original description, marked as a quotation from A. Gerst, at the end of the new description and caption. --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Thank you very much for your helpful input, Aristeas. @Killarnee: I took the liberty of adding the author's original quotes in the descriptions, with references. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice, thanks! --El Grafo (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Radomianin! That’s the best solution. --Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration#Spacecraft in orbit

File:Bridge to Don Khon seen from Don Det with water reflection of stringy orange clouds at sunrise in Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 02:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 03:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive sunrise sky. Just a hint: The small part of the sky which is visible below the two trees behind of the bridge is noticeable brighter than the sky above them. If this is just real, fine. But if this is a side effect of some local contrast enhancement etc., I would suggest to dial down the highlights there a little bit. --Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Yes, you're right, there's a kind of halo behind these 2 trees, due to the contre-jour. The RAW picture was voluntarily underexposed (because of the sun coming in front) to avoid blown highlights. Then the bright parts reveal only when I adjust the light in post-process. But this is not a local adjustment. I met the same phenomenon on this picture. I assume this is due to the reflection of the sun behind the leaves. I've tried to fix it in a new version. Hope it's better now -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Now the photo is even more harmonious. --Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the improvement, Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You take such outstanding photos! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support those clouds, this reflecting water, the compo... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow - Very impressive clouds! Dinkum (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive image. Thank you! --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Clouds

File:Translation of St Martin church in St-Ignat (1).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2023 at 15:36:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Translation of Saint Martin church in Saint-Ignat, Puy-de-Dôme, France

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Part of a church and parts of trees. I don't get what would be great rather than generally pretty about this picture, but the composition doesn't work for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretfully oppose. The trees take the spotlight away. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finnish soldiers in NBC gear, 1961.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2023 at 07:26:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Finnish Defence Forces - uploaded and nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 07:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Resolution is only 1 MP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iifar (talk • contribs) 09:47, 17 April 2023‎ (UTC) -- Ivar (talk) 11:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I uploaded a higher resolution from the PNG. At least it is not FPX worth now. Yann (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I realise that this photo was created by the Finnish Defence Forces, but I'm not in love with the defence force logo on the bottom right. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SHB2000: I cropped out the watermark. -- ‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍IamMM (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay,

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I suggest to crop out the little white border at the lower left part. --August Geyler (talk) 10:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Augustgeyler: I'm sorry I didn't notice it at first, thanks for pointing it out. -- IamMM (talk) 03:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose cropped legs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The legs are cropped. But the image still tells a very strong mood. --August Geyler (talk) 07:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Surreal atmosphere. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per August and Frank. --Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it possible to clone out the fingerprint (see note)? --Llez (talk) 09:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this is a fingerprint. It might be a bad reflection when scanning the print. But there are white spots which should be removed. Yann (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Hate the fingerprint too, but love the mood ... "Yes, Lord Vader!" Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:La rive asiatique vue depuis le quartier de Beşiktaş à Istanbul.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2023 at 10:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view of the Asiatic side of Istanbul from the Beşiktaş district

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Turkey
Info created by John-Grégoire - uploaded by John-Grégoire - nominated by John-Grégoire -- John-Grégoire (talk) 10:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- It is a unusual view of Istanbul showing the Asiatic side and three high spots of the Erdogan "neo-Ottoman" presidency : the new Camlica mosque (the biggest one in Turkey), the recent mast with a a gigantic Turkish flag and the new television broadcasting tower. In the foreground, the Bosphorus and a typical "vapur" ferry remind of more usual Istanbul views. John-Grégoire (talk) 10:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's definitely a nice view, but I regret that I do not like the dull light, and I'm also not overwhelmed by the resolution or sharpness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Тусклый свет" может Вам и другим, которым тусклый свет добавить яркость на мониторе?

На фото переменная облачность и тень от облаков.

Резкость к сожалению - да.

"Dim Light" can you and others that dim light add brightness to your monitor?

The photo shows partly cloudy and cloudy shadows.

Sharpness unfortunately - yes. Носков А. С. (talk) 05:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretfully oppose per Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Носков А. С. (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light and low level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:TCDD DE 33 075 Konak - Murat.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 10:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

freight train to Tatvan at the Keban reservoir

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 10:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great view, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:California sea lion nap time in La Jolla (70474).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 13:54:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Otariidae_(Eared_Seals)
Info California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) napping in La Jolla, California. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question A lovely capture that I would like to support, Rhododendrites. Unfortunately, there are some oversharpening artifacts in the image. Can anything be done at these parts? Many thanks in advance, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Radomianin: Yes, I suppose it was a bit oversharpened. Redid it. If you still see an issue, could you add a note? Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you caught all of them. Once again, thank you :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely motif, nicely captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support lovely sea lions! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light and cute -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support So endearing, and the DoF is well handled. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dinkum (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Otariidae_(Eared_Seals)

File:Bladknop van een esdoorn (Acer). 13-04-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 16:54:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Sapindaceae

Info Leaf bud of a Acer. Focus stack of 15 photos. (seedling). Leaf bud of this maple is about to unfold the leaf.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 17:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! -- Ivar (talk) 18:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good compo, nice colors and nice detail Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco a poco. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco a Poco. --Aristeas (talk) 08:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail and natural background -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dinkum (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Sapindaceae

File:Tamarind fruits (Tamarindus indica 'Si Thong').jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 16:15:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed and educative. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mister rf (talk) 17:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail, educational -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dinkum (talk) 17:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Painted window (Boy and Bird). Funchal, Madeira.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2023 at 05:52:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 05:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Носков А. С. (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Реклама гейтсу?[reply]
Support Nice motif and good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support indeed. --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:48, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Could be a little sharper. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows

File:White leucistic squirrel with a peanut (85668).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 13:58:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White (leucistic) eastern gray squirrel with a peanut

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)
Info White (leucistic) eastern gray squirrel with a peanut. It's a quite rare variation and yes, this is the same individual from this other nomination. :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mister rf (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cute, as well as being unusual and a great shot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo, cute squirrel. --Aristeas (talk) 07:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and activity -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crop a bit tight at the top. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dinkum (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)

File:Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 21:15:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Our Lady of Grace, Cartagena, Spain

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Spain
Info Church of Our Lady of Grace (es), Cartagena, Spain. The church, built between 1716 and 1798, but consegrated already in 1179, is the center of the religious Easter events in the city. After severe damages in 1873 during the Cantonal rebellion it was restored in the current Baroque Revival style by Lorenzo Ros Costa in 1880, and again in 1943 after being target of attacks in 1936 during the Spanish Civil War. In fact, the demolision of the church was even approved by the Republicans but it didn't eventually occur. The high altar depicted in the picture hosts the Chapel of the Four Saints, Leander of Seville, Fulgentius of Cartagena, Saint Florentina and Isidore of Seville, along with the Virgen of the Rosell in the middle. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive and magnificent; very appealing colors. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Spain

File:Estación de metro Toledo, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-26, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2023 at 05:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toledo metro station, Naples, Italy

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations
Info Toledo metro station, Naples, Italy. The station, opened on 17 April 2012 and named after nearby Via Toledo, belongs to the Line 1 of the Naples Metro. It won the 2013 LEAF Award, an annual international architectural prize, as "Public building of the year". c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow – looks like a space station from some funky sci-fi movie. --Aristeas (talk) 08:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool effect on the escalator steps! Is it fair to assume that 0.25s the shutter speed for the underexposed HDR frame (i.e., the one that is capturing the highlights), and that the smoothened out steps are based on a longer exposure? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julesvernex2: Exactly, the exposure time of alle 3 frames were 1,3 - 0,25 - 6 sec. For whatever reason Lr takes over the exposure time of the underexposed frame in the EXIF date when creating the HDR. I had tried to change that to the longest frame, but didn't find a way to do so. Do you have any clue? Poco a poco (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I have the same issue. Lightroom seems to be rather clumsy in the way it sources the data for HDR composites (e.g., often taking the name of one of the files and the EXIF of another one), I'll let you know if I figure it out. In the meantime, if you're comfortable with command-line tools, you can use exiftool to manually copy the EXIF data (if memory serves me well, the command is exiftool -TagsFromFile FromImage ToImage ) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For those who are not so keen on using the command line - An open source graphic user interface for exiftools is available, which is easily locatable by punching 'GUI for exiftools' into your preferred search engine. It is no longer maintained, but gets the job done nevertheless --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great view and amazing architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my support – no FOP in Italy, this image will probably be deleted from Commons. -- Ivar (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing composition User:Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably the subject with the most "wow" of the current nominations IMO, and well captured. Where does this stand with FOP? I know that Italy has some of the most restrictive laws with this regard. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I don't know. We have tons of photos from all Naples metro stations. If this image is not allowed we'll have to process with a batch removal of images... Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From the Napoli Metro Website (www.anm.it - Regolamento metro/funicolari) -- 'Fotografie e/o riprese video sono consentite senza preventiva autorizzazione, a soli fini personali amatoriali' - Photography and video footage without prior authorization are for private amateur use only. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is amateur, but not private... Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for personal amateur purposes only. Commons is definitely not a place for personal purposes. This should be sorted out. -- Ivar (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It'll surely be sorted out by being deleted, like all other non-de minimis photos of copyrighted Italian architecture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, please, whoever creates the DR then all metro railway stations in Naples should be included in the DR. Not only this image/station. A pity. Poco a poco (talk) 06:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only those still under copyright. I won't create the deletion request, but you can expect someone to do so. A pity, yes. But it doesn't appear that Commons will ever consent to host non-commercial-only images, much as I wish it did. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A terrible situation. However, we should still promote this photo. I hope and demand that whoever deletes it determines first the date at which the copyright status of that metro station ends and takes care that this photo will be restored then (if Commons still exists then), just as we do with photographs of copyrighted paintings etc. Yes, that’s little consolation, but at least that must be done. --Aristeas (talk) 12:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel sure that always happens, but FPC regulars who are admins can tell us whether the process of undeletion when copyrights of buildings, sculptures, etc., run out is automatic or requires human intervention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FTR: I take no joy in being that guy, but it had to be done. For future undeletion, it would really help to have more (i.e.: some) information about the author(s). Then we could put the DR into a yet-to-be-created subcategory of Category:Copyright deletion requests by artist, which should help identifying files to undelete x years post mortem. --El Grafo (talk) 14:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, El Grafo, What about the other 19 stations of line 1 (not to mention line 6)? The copyright information on the webpage of the metro company does not apply to the Toledo station only. That DR doesn't look right to me. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco The situation for other stations may be different. This one is clearly a work of art above TOO, others may be too simple. So let's start with this one and see how the DR goes. If somebody comes up with a good reason to keep these, we can probably keep the others too. So, if you have any actual arguments other than "doesn't look right", please join the DR! El Grafo (talk) 08:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Skimming through the material we have for the other lines, there's really not much copyrightable stuff in there. Most of them are entirely utilitarian like File:Stazione Vanvitelli.jpg. Single files like File:NapoliUniversitaRashid.jpg need to be handled on a case-by-case basis. El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dinkum (talk) 17:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful shot! --El Grafo (talk) 07:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really special. Yann (talk) 17:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral over the FoP issues. Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations

File:Crete senesi (Monte Oliveto) Siena.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 May 2023 at 10:41:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The delightful panorama of the "crete senesi", hills in Asciano (Siena) Italy

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Tuscany
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 10:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

̈ I withdraw my nominationI WITHDRAW THE CANDIDATURE (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 20:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 20:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Era noite em Lisboa. Tranvía 575 de Lisboa, Portugal.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2023 at 15:55:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created, uploaded and nominated by CARLOS TEIXIDOR CADENAS -- Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 15:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 15:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp. I think there is a processing issue here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment*:No entiendo qué quieren decir. No incumple ninguna normativa. Es una imagen técnicamente difícil de obtener. Es un barrido, moviendo la cámara lateralmente, siguiendo el movimiento del tranvía. Por eso solamente está nítido y enfocado el tranvía. Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment*:I don't understand what they mean. It does not violate any regulations. It is a technically very difficult image to obtain. It's a sweep, moving the camera laterally, following the movement of the tram. That's why only the tram is sharp and in focus. I think they have not been able to interpret the photo. Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 21:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, heavy processing issues.--Peulle (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC):[reply]
Comment--- No entiendo qué quieren decir. No incumple ninguna normativa. Es una imagen técnicamente muy difícil de obtener. Es un barrido, moviendo la cámara lateralmente, siguiendo el movimiento del tranvía. Por eso solamente está nítido y enfocado el tranvía.
Comment---- I don't understand what they mean. It does not violate any regulations. It is a technically very difficult image to obtain. It's a sweep, moving the camera laterally, following the movement of the tram. That's why only the tram is sharp and in focus. I think they have not been able to interpret the photo.

Oppose First of all, you are not going to persuade anyone by claiming they weren't able to interpret the photo. But the main point is that the tram is not sharp and looks awful at even 50% of full size. Your cellphone is not a good enough piece of equipment for you to take a technically very good photo, such that it could pass COM:QIC or here. Featured picture candidates is not a place for photos that "do not violate any regulations"; it is for the best of the best photos on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan Kekek. If a photo does violate any regulations, that's where it goes. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Carlos, just an attempt to explain this, because “sharp” means so many things. Your photo is indeed sharp in so far as you have captured the tram nicely, without motion blur, by moving the camera laterally with the right speed and angle. Congrats! That is the correct technique to capture a moving vehicle and you have mastered it. But the photo is unsharp in another way, and this is what the people mean when they say “not sharp”. As Ikan already pointed out, the cellphone used to take this photo is not able to capture such a scene, especially at night, with the necessary resolution and fine details. Looking at the tram this means that it is sharp, yes, but there are no structures and almost no fine details. The cellphones tries to hide this (as cellphones use to do) by heavy sharpening, but it can sharpen only the coarse contours and edges, there are no fine details, the whole photo seems to consist of blobs of several pixels. I know this is hard to see this if one is used to smartphone photos, but when comparing them with the photos from better cameras one can see the difference – and it is a huge one. Compare this photo e.g. to the existing photos in the Rail vehicles gallery, e.g. to this Cable Car photo, also of a vehicle moving sidewards. The Cable Car photo is of smaller resolution than your photo, i.e. the tram uses less pixels than in your photo, but nevertheless the Cable Car photo shows much more fine details, because every pixel is used well – e.g. you can see all the faces. What does this mean? Your photo is nice, well-done and useful, but due to the limited capabilities of the cellphone it is not on the high level we would expect here. You could try to repeat this kind of photo with a better cellphone (I have been told that the newest phones really do excellent photos even in night situations) or, probably better, with some camera. Once you have learned how to use the camera well, you could make good use of your ability to capture the tram by moving the camera sidewards – and thus create a photo which is sharp in every respect. No offence, I just tried to explain this. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the complete explanation. Thank you very much.

OK. Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to present another photo taken with a photographic camera, of a steam locomotive. I hope that the new photo meets the high level of quality required. Thank you very much, and greetings to all. Carlos Teixidor Cadenas (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ankara in black and white 04.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2023 at 19:08:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close-up black and white photograph of a padlock

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Black and white#Other
Info created by Omer Unlu - uploaded by Gargarapalvin - nominated by Gargarapalvin -- Gargarapalvin (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gargarapalvin (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't do anything for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Носков А. С. (talk) 06:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Хорошо прорисована текстура дерева. Глядя на замок возникает вопрос: "А что за дверью?"[reply]

The texture of the wood is well drawn. Looking at the castle, the question arises: "What is behind the door?"

Oppose per Ikan Kekek. -- Karelj (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The resolution is rather low for this kind of static subject and the wow factor limited -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Level of detail is too low and perspective distortion is visible. --August Geyler (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Andrew church in Cloppenburg (16).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2023 at 15:34:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baptismal font in the Saint Andrew church in Cloppenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support good Ezarateesteban 18:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered asymmetrical composition in my view, with the organ cut off, the candle interfering in front of the benches, and the tight crop at the right. Also I find this architectural element quite ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stone gate with columns and Buddhist reliefs leading to a clothed statue of the Buddha seated, Wat Phou temple, Champasak, Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 02:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 07:48, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful sculptures, nice framing effect. --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos

File:Artistas protestam contra a Ditadura Militar - Tônia Carreiro, Eva Wilma, Odete Lara, Norma Bengell e Cacilda Becker - Restoration.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 19:32:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Cultura contra Censura" protest in Brazil

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1960-1970
Info Unknown photographer, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, but could you please get rid of the yellow tint? Yann (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tints tell information about photographic techniques, especially printing. Best not to get into the habit of changing everything. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tint is due to aging. This is a black and white print. I rather like something like File:Artistas protestam contra a Ditadura Militar - Tônia Carreiro, Eva Wilma, Odete Lara, Norma Bengell e Cacilda Becker.jpg or File:Artistas protestam contra a Ditadura Militar - Tônia Carreiro, Eva Wilma, Odete Lara, Norma Bengell e Cacilda Becker, grayscale.jpg. Yann (talk) 11:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Historically important and well-taken photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 06:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrescia (talk) 12:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1960-1970

File:Open-air Museum Vysočina (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2023 at 13:38:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice window with history and character. I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link: we have a special section with photos of windows, so this photo would fit nicely into that section. --Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think if it was an open-air museum, they would clean the glass... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special to me in its simplicity.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral and tending to oppose. The compo is fine but the detail is very low (6 MPx) for an easy shot. Poco a poco (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I find this photo of only moderate interest. Nice plant, simple shutters, uninteresting whitewashed wall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support Like Ikan I think it would be better with less wall, and is the tilt natural to the window? If not it could be corrected easily. Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion is natural --Pudelek (talk) 20:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good work. I like the clear and well balanced composition. But the wall shows so little texture and the dark contrasted window also gives very little content, that I think it can't catch me. --August Geyler (talk) 19:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows

File:Razorback Lookout, Ikara-Flinders Ranges NP 20230212 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2023 at 09:08:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Razorback Lookout on Bunyeroo Rd, Ikara-Flinders Ranges National Park, South Australia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I recently stumbled upon this beauty taken by DXR – the image quality explains for itself, really. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Thank you, I also quite like this one. --DXR (talk) 05:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A splendid view, the road leads the view nicely into the image. I just wonder if all colours are really so subdued there – but probably they are, because it is a very dusty place? --Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed a very dusty place, speaking from experience a few years back (though I suppose you could say the same for the entirety of Outback South Australia). SHB2000 (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 07:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good detail, nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco and others. This one is working for me, partly because of the tree in front on the right, the declivity, and the differences between the right and left sides. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high resolution, appealing road -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice image but I'm not seeing the exceptional level of "wow factor" required for an FP. -- Karelj (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the feel of an arid landscape on a pitiless summer midday with almost no shade available (I almost feel compelled to make sure I have plenty of water on me just looking at this). The road draws the viewer into the landscape. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well composed scene. --August Geyler (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia

File:Fork-tailed flycatcher (Tyrannus savana monachus) in flight Cayo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 14:25:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Tyrannidae (Tyrant Flycatchers)
Info At someone's suggestion I try again for a bird in flight at speed despite my kingfisher failing to make the grade. We have almost 400 FPs of Passeriformes (songbirds) but only a couple of FPs of these little birds at speed. As we all know they don't fly in a straight line. Here is the fork-tailed flycatcher in flight, but the nominated image shows the fork tail which in use as it twists and turns to catch its prey. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this may be one of your best-ever bird photos! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 06:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 06:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 09:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Tyrannidae (Tyrant Flycatchers)

File:Rapa incurva 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2023 at 09:18:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rapa incurva (Dunker, 1852); length 4.2 cm; Originating from Masbate, Philippines

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Muricidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not a very unusual-looking shell, but great details and a fairly small shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment bottom view has double lines, because camera wasn't steady enough (note added). Please fix it, if possible. -- Ivar (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Bottom view replaced. Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Muricidae

File:VR-Yhtymä Dr16 night train near Kolari.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2023 at 11:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Night train from Helsinki, Finland just outside Kolari

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 11:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 11:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not one of his finest. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the nomination! While the night train to Kolari is an interesting and unique service, I have to agree with Charlesjsharp that this is not a particularly good photo and shouldn't be an FP. Sadly I don't have any better photos of this service, but I've uploaded a bunch of other random photos from Finland instead ;) --Kabelleger (talk) 21:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When the Author agrees, I think it's pretty clear.--Peulle (talk) 10:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination —Bruce1ee^talk 12:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crete senesi - Asciano (Siena).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2023 at 08:03:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Tuscany
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by PROPOLI87 -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info The delightful panorama of the "crete senesi", hills in Asciano (Siena) Italy — Preceding unsigned comment added by PROPOLI87 (talk • contribs)
Oppose ⚠️ No embedded color profile. Oversaturated fluorescent grass. Please read Commons:Image guidelines#Color space and upload a new version. Same issue as this previous nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded the original version, I hadn't saturated the image but slightly increased the exposure. The grass is so green because it's "grain" (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87[reply]

It's a smartphone picture. Sometimes automatic filters and post-treatments are integrated. Exposure doesn't appear in the new metadata. Tones seem unnatural to me, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely not used filters, you may not even believe it and I assure you that in Asciano Siena the hills really have this colour. And it is precisely for this characteristic that I nominated in FP.151.40.164.243 10:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87151.40.164.243 10:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not you, but the telephone. This smartphone Galaxy A52 integrates pre-selected programs that transform the scene in function of the aspect you want to give to the picture (high dynamic range, ultra-bight colors, etc.) -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the same company that automatically fakes moon photos (this Youtuber also does a few tests to confirm this), so like Basile Morin, the colours also look a bit unnatural. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha! Funny. Yes, I also have the impression that these tools are designed to save users from tedious post-treatment. So the inner processing may handle the work automatically, depending on the kind of scenes they analyse. The goal is probably to produce an instant result that one can share immediately on the social networks. Despite the risk that it looks a bit fictional -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per my comment above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nominationok, I withdraw the application and I see to post a photo of the same places made with a canon. Thank you all.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arboreal stingless bee nest (Trigona sp.) Flores.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2023 at 08:19:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arboreal stingless bee nest (Trigona sp.) in Guatemala

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Носков А. С. (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really interesting sight and worth dealing with the leaves and so forth that are out of focus for being too close. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive nest. --Aristeas (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)

File:Oberschloss Kranichfeld – Eingang.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2023 at 19:19:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Main entrance (gatehouse) to Oberschloss Kranichfeld in Thuringia, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
Info Main entrance (gatehouse) to Oberschloss Kranichfeld – created, uploaded and nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August Geyler (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice image but I'm not seeing the exceptional level of "wow factor" required for an FP.--Peulle (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The photo could have been a bit sharper. But it is still special to me in its simplicity.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this as the arriving knight's view. I can just imagine the sentry saying "Who goes there?" And it's a good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Very interesting story you imagined. August Geyler (talk) 13:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of Hollywood films. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle, good QI, but not suitable for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Little bit of CA on the planks, but that's easily forgiven here. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Have hesitated because of the CAs (also on the wall), but as Daniel says this is a minor issue. --Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Reduced the CAs. Thank you for mentioning this! --August Geyler (talk) 10:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany

File:Panoramic view of Cape Spencer and The Gap, Dhilba Guuranda-Innes NP 20230208.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2023 at 00:03:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A panoramic view of Cape Spencer in Dhilba Guuranda–Innes National Park, Yorke Peninsula, South Australia.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stumbled upon this nice sunset image. Composition works nicely for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sun is too bright for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think having the sun be that bright in one small area of the photo is OK, but DXR, would you like to smooth out or otherwise decrease the posterization in the sky? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A stunning panorama! Because the black sun was not shining that day, just the ordinary one, it seems reasonable that the sun is bright. (You could try a big soft oval mask over the whole area around the sun to dial the exposure a little bit further down – but only a little bit, else we just get unrealistic grey instead of white.) There is one serious issue: a stitching error (see image note; it has already been annotated by Milseburg on the file description page). At the top left is a dust spot (see image note) – insignificant, but easy to fix. Sorry for mentioning issues, but it’s such a great photo that it really deserves some work. --Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per comments. Daniel Case (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 10:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gottfried-Hulsius Inventarium Sveciae (1632) Trier.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2023 at 06:53:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Copper print: view of Trier with a short description of the history of Trier in Roman times, in: Johann Ludwig Gottfried and Friedrich Hulsius: Inventarivm Sveciæ (Franckfurt am Mayn, 1632).

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Book_illustrations_in_black_and_white
Info Published in 1632 by Johann Ludwig Gottfried (1584-1633) and Friedrich Hulsius (1580-1660),
reproduced from an original print of 1632, uploaded and nominated by --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 06:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful print in very good condition, and it's nice to have the accompanying text. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Printed#Book_illustrations_in_black_and_white

File:Lenovo Ideapad 100-15IBY - cristaux liquides (5 dioptries).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 07:15:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info Light passing through liquid crystals (each red/green/blue group measures approximately 0.25 mm x 0.25 mm) of a Lenovo Ideapad 100-15IBY laptop computer (5 diopters). -- Gzen92 (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose where's the wow factor? --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This photo is straining the eyes.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorry, but I just came by here, and I must say this is wow. Imagine this is in all of your digital devices with an lcd display, and this photographed in such a resolution, just zoom in and there you have your wow. Killarnee (talk) 20:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 08:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A technichally excellent photo with high educational value. As we provide pictures for an encyclopedia I think this is more important than lots of wow. --imehling̣̻ (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is it, or is that for en.wikipedia's FPC? As for me, I react like Junior Jumper, but I don't know whether it's justifiable to vote against a feature just because it strains my eyes, because Kilarnee is right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support With Imehling̣̻. It is perfectly made, has a high educational value and gives a very unique and unexpected impression of the (photo-electronic) world. --August Geyler (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though it doesn't appear to be showing an image, which might've added value. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snowy walking path Holmestrand feb.23 (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2023 at 07:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway
Info: created and uploaded by me. --Peulle (talk) 07:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Peulle (talk) 07:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, front and centre. I like how the path just fades in. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 13:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry to dissent, but this gray snow in the shadow doesn't make anything to me. Very ordinary trees. Limited depth of field. I appreciate the idea of a contre-jour, but the sky is just white. Technically there are blown highlights with parts of the sky burnt at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's nice, but the composition as a whole is not dynamic enough to wow me, although I find it really good as a series of details at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I get the atmospheric feel to this photo but unfortunately the trees are nothing special and the composition does not work in my opinion. Dinkum (talk) 17:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-winged dragonlet (Erythrodiplax funerea) female Belize.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2023 at 15:47:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)
Info The are more than 50 species in this genus, but no FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very high level of detail and good light, but posterized background. Logically the branch behind the transparent wing should have been in focus, but I understand it's technically difficult. To avoid a weird transition, maybe make the outer part of the branch as blurry as it is behind the animal, by selecting the right frame among all those used during the focus stacking process? The white spot at the bottom is a bit distracting too -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, posterized background very difficult to sort! And focus-stacking dragonflies is a horrible compromise... Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Might rework some time... Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palacio Pitti, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 146.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2023 at 17:16:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling fresco "Wedding of Hercules and Ebe" by Pietro Benvenuti (1769-1844), hall of Hercules, Galleria Palatina, Palazzo Pitti, Florence, Italy

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info Ceiling fresco "Wedding of Hercules and Ebe" by Pietro Benvenuti (1769-1844), hall of Hercules, Palatine Gallery, Palazzo Pitti, Florence, Italy. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice too, except a bit soft on the right hand side (e.g. the lion). Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visible shadows in the frame and the painting. The corners are bright and the center dark -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Ok, thank you for your feedback, I take it back. Poco a poco (talk) 13:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 13:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) female Palopo.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2023 at 18:39:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's that background posterisation issue again, Charles. Is it fair to assume that it's not present in the original Raw? If so, I would check if somewhere in your workflow you're reducing the working bit-depth from 16-bit to 8-bit (e.g., when sending the image to Topaz). Happy to help figuring it out. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks will check and ask for help if I cannot work it out. Not something I'm aware of. Not in RAW. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]