Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Soft drink bottles

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some(!) files in Category:Soft_drink_bottles with drawings or photos

Similar to Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Almdudler2l033l.jpg: DWs of the copyrighted design (especially the drawings/photos) of the packaging. See Commons:Image_casebook#Product_packaging. I propose to delete those four files:

Saibo (Δ) 01:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC) clarified (only four) 16:48, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, Thank you for the message. Airplane, car, train or present to a mobile phone manufacturer. Images were noted, as a product, product manufacturers are manufacturing a product is much smaller than the listed cases. Therefore, the shape of the bottle and label designs with its competitors and identify the product stand out. My first illustrated products is a big product formed. These pictures are allowed, and why you think this picture is not permitted, please explain what logic do. If judged only if the difference in size, planes, cars, mobile phones, industrial products, including, trains, and I think should be removed.

Thanks for reading.

Mj-bird (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mj-bird, thanks for your comment. On all those four listed files are prominent photos or drawings. On your upload File:Photo - ITO EN, TEAS TEA new york , 4 types.jpg there are photos of fruits. Those photos were not made by you. Therefore I regard your photo of the bottles as derivative work of these fruit photos. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:48, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply comments. Now, I understand your point there. However, if trademark law is due, and believe that the laws of the Trademark Law in Japan or the Japanese design of this bottle is the country of origin. In Japanese law, there is no appeal can not respond from the right. Therefore, you report it to the right holders, and must receive an official request for deletion from the right.If you pointed out that many people get lost, you will also measure the image Coke and Pepsi Department believes the work should continue to take effective measures. In other words, if a person lost in a world manufacturer,unless their right to remove the original request, preferably a big problem keeping order and decision are probably not good. Could you withdraw a request for deletion.

Mj-bird 12:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Comment - the julmust label is based on drawings by Jenny Nyström (died 1946). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pieter! Article 43: "Copyright in a work shall subsist until the end of the seventieth year after the year in which the author deceased ..." (exceptions apply for some photos - but this is a drawing/artwork). So this image (File:Apotekarnes julmust.jpg) can be undeleted in 2017 ( Category:Undelete in 2017). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise Jenny Nyström's heirs will sue Wikimedia. So keeping this pic is very dangerous ;-) --Amga (talk) 08:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PRP. :-) --Saibo (Δ) 19:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know. But so what? I can live with it since it has wide acceptance among editors but it's plain stupid anyway. That's all I said (and, from my side, there's no need for any further discussion). --Amga (talk) 07:33, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear infringement of copyrighted artwork on bottles Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]