Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/11/05

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 5th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AD files

edit

Files for promoting Cordis hotel

Use for Cheng123xx sock puppets only, wall use to contact each other — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.250.52.218 (talk) 07:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: all, IP blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 10:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.250.52.218 (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 10:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.250.52.218 (talk) 08:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 10:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.250.52.218 (talk) 08:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 10:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 06:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be seen at her LinkedIN profile. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image you have for MOH Henry Hoffman is clearly incorrect for its uniform is that of a high ranking Army officer and not that of a Corporal that was the highest rank MOH Henry Hoffman achieved during the Civil War. Unfortunately this image is plastered all over the Internet and I am writing the different websites asking for it to be corrected.

I am a researcher for the Medal of Honor Historical Society. LastFullMeasure (talk) 11:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, though the description might have to be corrected. — Racconish💬 18:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gfchgffhhffghgf 172.58.172.206 19:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gfchgffhhffghgf 172.58.172.206 19:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Vandalism by a known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vgfghffgggffggfg 172.58.172.206 19:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vandalism & copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 20:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No cumple con los requisitos MonsineurNicolvon (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equivocaciòn derechos de autor MonsineurNicolvon (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just delete it for me bruv. I don't like my crop of it. Luna MacArthur (talk) 07:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content form commercial pornography here: http://www.xartbeauties.com/photos/lily-in-summertime-lunch-6423/17.html DraugTheWhopper (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 00:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

excede tamaño Heraldico bg (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

formato erróneo Heraldico bg (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

formato erróneo Heraldico bg (talk) 23:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete self portraits of non contributors. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Deletion nomination removed by an IP editor dauntless part of the sock farm. I have replaced it 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Not own work of uploader, as it is screenshot from a Lao TV interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHoKgfDr5hc&ab_channel=SIthNakarathZ1) 103.131.14.12 11:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bellydance.jpg Rubi2020 (talk) 15:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bellydance.jpg Rubi2020 (talk) 11:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader's nomination, likely another bad photoshop/copyvio combo. --Rosenzweig τ 09:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bellydence.jpg Rubi2020 (talk) 11:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader's nomination, likely another bad photoshop/copyvio combo. --Rosenzweig τ 09:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is useless since it cannot be inserted in "Prabhat Mishra" Wikipedia page. Gator-editor (talk) 15:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - Author Eric Zamora. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from https://ieee-ceda.org/committee/ceda-fellow-evaluation-committee and others Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Syced (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Syced (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably not own work Syced (talk) 12:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my own work, I found it from a website, https://dainikaabeshbhumi.in/?p=12957. Please change the Licence.


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photo with no exif, unlikely to be own work, PCP Gbawden (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A version of this found in 2020 https://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/tv-news/sidharth-shukla-shares-video-of-himself-late-pratyusha-banerjee-200515 - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deletd by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Анна Трепалова (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Trade (talk) 22:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence (such as a link to the web page where this image originated) that positively shows the license to be CC BY-SA 2.0 Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 22:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 12:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on this page: https://nfc.cambridgeschool.edu.in/about/founder-history/. Requires VRTS permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want it Mehwish Moviemis (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete In use at en:Krissann Barretto. But low resolution (239 × 255), with no camera metadata, and has metadata indicating that the author is Rasnoon Mehnaz. Appears to be copyright violation. Brianjd (talk) 10:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not Mehwish Moviemis (talk) 03:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as likely copyright violation. Not in use. Brianjd (talk) 10:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Appears to be a screenshot from a video (titled 'snapshot' and in PNG format). Potentially not own work as claimed. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 18:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Unused, lacks context info for any in-scope usefulness; questionable license claim-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1ihasan 1 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos and chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Mentxuwiki (talk) 14:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 05:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. See COM:FOP France. — Baidax 💬 15:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image of irrellevant people. 79.151.25.33 15:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In use on ca:Benidorm. --Achim55 (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which doesn't make it any better. Low res grainy lousy image --Zenwort (talk) 23:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Krd 05:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdoor advertising in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outdoor advertising in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 12:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded photos are not panoramic photos. It is a picture with HD resolution. It is also an important photographic material related to the opposition to conscription in South Korea. Koreayouthdraftliberat (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded photos are not panoramic photos. It is a picture with HD resolution. It is also an important photographic material related to the opposition to conscription in South Korea. Koreayouthdraftliberat (talk) 18:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcjuniorcaa (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Duplicates of country flags that are available in SVG for long time.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable people, No idea who they are or what they coach (the file has only ever been in Category:Coaches in the United Kingdom which is everything-buses!), –Davey2010Talk 21:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file depicting the flag of a fictional entity. 16052022m (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Trash to be thrown into the bin. Commons is not your personal free web host. --Achim55 (talk) 21:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 22:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 22:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims {{PD-old-70}}, but lacks author information and date of publication. Unclear if this image falls under a free license. plicit 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this image falls under a free license. Best regards. Foscolo (talk) 08:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, likely copy right violation - taken from subject's youtube profile Melcous (talk) 03:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. — Haseeb (talk) 03:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license: claimed as own work in 2022 but clearly available online as early as 2017 based on a tineye search Rosguill (talk) 05:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The photo has been taken a few years back by me. Unfortunately, the EXIF data has been lost after a slight retouch. It's of the highest quality — I own the original. The ones on the internet are small and use my owrk. Leila1717 (talk) 07:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 06:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution, poorly framed. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 05:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment an IP editor just removed the deletion notice from the file. I have reinstated it 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 04:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived from File:Fletcher Mckinnel School.jpg. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 05:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fletchermckinnel and global locks 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 10:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 05:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fletchermckinnel and global locks 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 10:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is unused, and the page is full of text that does not appear to be appropriate for Commons. At a minimum, the text should be reduced to a bare set of information about the image. Jonesey95 (talk) 05:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recently uploaded, redundant to File:Burma Star BAR.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too much post processingː too little contrast Traveller-chewy93 (talk) 06:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video is not a PD, copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait. Isn't there a YouTube license used on Wikipedia?Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No original creator, copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. — Haseeb (talk) 09:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. — Haseeb (talk) 09:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. — Haseeb (talk) 09:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete please, not in use anymore. Aman.kumar.goel (talk) 09:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ambarworld (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE.

Haseeb (talk) 09:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1984. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Іван Козлик. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptor is Per Ung (1933-2013). No freedom of panorama in Norway (except for buildings), the artwork is protected until 2084. 4ing (talk) 09:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission to "Can I use it in Wikipedia article?" not comply with cc-sa 4.0 license Drakosh (talk) 09:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. The file description claims that this file is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, but there is no evidence for this. Use in a Wikipedia article does not imply this. Brianjd (talk) 10:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded .svg version of this File:MESAM 1984-1996 logo.svg EmiliaITČA (talk) 11:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MIKAEELL (talk · contribs)

edit

Professional photos with no exif, one has watermark top right, another has FBMD.P PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marina bauer (talk · contribs)

edit

Professional photos. Sovsun is credited to the London Weekly. Others named PR Service- PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marina bauer (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just surname in russian without educational purpose Drakosh (talk) 13:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea

A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Logan olm (talk · contribs)

edit

Varying sizes and quality. Only 3 files with metadata. 2 files are sourced but no permission is available at the website. Doubtful own work.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DocSomeone (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope:Fictional national symbols.

Enyavar (talk) 16:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DocSomeone (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope: fictitious flags, coats of arms, and logos.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination, I also see no reason to keep File:Funny native dude.jpg by same uploader, it's unused and has no proper description either, so it's also out of scope. Enyavar (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked U+1F360 (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roxosex (talk · contribs)

edit

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Canular (Listenbourg) Rishāringânu 20:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Listenbourg is on Wikipedia in this list of fictional countries#L. -- Tukp (talk) 11:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak keep Oui, évidemment, c'est un canular. Mais à partir du moment où cette information est connue de tous et est répertoriée comme telle, à savoir qu'il s'agit d'un pays fictif et non un d'un pays réel, en quoi la demande de suppression de cette œuvre (carte géographique fictive) est-elle pertinente ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: is a screenshot of tv series not in cc4. Likely below COM:TOO] IMO. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, non-free cover Ignatus (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a TV series can't be a persnoal work: سردار جنگل Shkuru Afshar (talk) 02:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Shkuru Afshar (talk) 03:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Iran. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammedarrhioui (talk · contribs)

edit

Remaining uploads of this user, not already nominated for deletion. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammed Arrhioui.jpg, this uploader is generally suspicious, and there are issues with these files. The uploader is globally locked and these files are different resolutions and have no metadata. Also, no information is given as to where these photos were taken, but the obvious guess is France, which does not have FoP. So that might be a problem too.

Brianjd (talk) 07:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CaféBuzz @Brianjd I am the account holder
I ask you to delete my two available photos immediately.
and thank you for your valuable work to delete and block the account 196.117.111.233 13:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Most probably photographies of copyrighted and non identified artworks. The uploader was locked after crosswiki and sockpuppets abuses, I believe it is not safe nor useful to keep those files, not in use moreover. CaféBuzz (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please delete images because i have no access to my account which is blocked by you 196.117.111.233 13:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't blocked anything and I won't delete anything since I am not an sysop. However, you should know that once you uploaded something on Commons or wrote something on Wikipedia, it doesn't belong to you but to the community; the community will decide what must happen with it. You should also know that after your accounts being locked yesterday, it is obviously not a good idea to come here to comment anything and your IP could also be blocked for that. CaféBuzz (talk) 16:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Louisfhl

edit

Files uploaded by Louisfhl. The following photos have been lifted from an Instagram account dedicated to birthday cakes, instagram.com:


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 78.183.104.26 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio + Not free licensed.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this file is originally my work. Another user overwrite to my version. It hasn't any copyvio content. Kurmanbek (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. But which version is accepted/consented and should be restored? --Túrelio (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This file was created and constantly updated by Alikam1896, Kurmanbek, and me, which is completely original work and nothing on the map is copyright violated. Also, this file used all of the main article's language pages. This version is the original one but I want to see the other version, which is not added into delete request. --Emreoyun (talk) 14:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We can save current version. Kurmanbek (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is clearly a copyvio in that file. @Emreoyun @Kurmanbek You have no rights to give wrong information to anyone. --78.183.104.26 14:19, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We do not make any copyright violations. You can understand how sensitive I am here, how old I am. I'm the first to upload the file. So I am the first to draw. Another user has installed his own work on my file without knowing. Kurmanbek (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: 0 matches in tineye, no link provided. --Kadı Message 14:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably an Instagram photo per [1]. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Published without a free license at instagram.com on December 30, 2017. Thuresson (talk) 23:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lemonaka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.onestop.co.uk/terms-of-use/. COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On that page,

The content of the Site is protected by copyright, trade marks, database and other intellectual property rights. You may retrieve and display the content of the Site on a computer screen, store such content in electronic form on disk (but not any server or other storage device connected to a network) or print one copy of such content for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided you keep intact all and any copyright and proprietary notices. You may not otherwise reproduce, modify, copy or distribute or use for commercial purposes any of the materials or content on the Site without written permission from One Stop.

Lemonaka (talk) 23:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lemonaka The nominator Mdaniels5757 is suggesting that the file is too simple to be eligible for copyright. No terms of use can override that.
However, I am not so sure about this file being simple. The UK has a very low threshold of originality. Brianjd (talk) 01:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC) (edited Brianjd (talk) 01:43, 6 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Deleted: UK has low threshold of originality. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blank cover CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:The uplift, several blank images, delete all or keep all. --Krd 06:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: No encyclopedic value. --Kadı Message 17:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Actually not CC YouTube, it's my mistake Urang Kamang (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, no Creative Commons license on YouTube today. Uploader may have mistaken "CC" (closed captioning) with a CC license. Thuresson (talk) 15:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Downloaded from Instagram, according to this edit https://id.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istimewa:MobileDiff/17932606?diffmode=source Urang Kamang (talk) 04:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 15:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer Hanna Kunsch is still listed as living in Göttingen in the Göttingen address book / directory for 1960, so clearly she did not die over 70 years ago, and these photographs cannot be in the public domain.

Rosenzweig τ 17:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding
by the same photographer to this deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, per nomination. Uploaders have been notified. Thuresson (talk) 16:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hanna Kunsch died in 1961, see the updated Wikidata entry. So these are not yet in the public domain in Germany and should be deleted. The files can be restored in 2032 if their US copyrights have also expired (which should then be the case for works published no later than 1936).

Rosenzweig τ 13:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" is not stated in the source Mateus2019 (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is stated in the source [2]. --RevengerTime (talk) 01:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done, file has been license reviewed now. Thuresson (talk) 16:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Aviram7 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request. In use and too old for G7, so starting DR. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --Strakhov (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work and date questionable when the image appeared in an article 8 years ago (Link); the corresponding redir can also go Isderion (talk) 00:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is indeed not my own work. Nevertheless I've been asking the creator if this image could be used for wikipedia which was accepted. 212.18.14.210 14:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide permission via COM:VRT. --Krd 06:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Afkomstig van https://www.kis.ac.jp. © 2022 Kyoto International School. Toestemming van de oorspronkelijke auteur moet gestuurd worden naar VRT. トトト (talk) 04:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, there is no person; therefore it makes not much sense to keep it. I was the photographer and uploader (Mattes) Mateus2019 (talk) 07:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As somebody living in Munich I must correct you. This very tiny homeless woman has seen crouching on the main station subway platform for years. It is one of the more depressing sights there. --Zenwort (talk) 23:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Has educational utility to illustrate homelessness in Munich. Despite the blurriness, it is an impactful image. The question about whether there is a person in this image is interesting. I trust the assertion from personal experience by Zenwort. And, even if incorrect, it certainly contains the belongings of a homeless person. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Author's request is valid for 7 days. The image may be useful. --Kadı Message 20:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Aviram7 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author's request. Too late for G7, and in use by the author, so starting DR. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: Thank you for letting me discuss the removal of the picture I uploaded on my talk, I do not understand, when the author itself wants to remove the image, then it should be kept with the consent of the commons community or no what's the use if this picture is removed cause i want to hide my identity please remove my file.kind regards → คⅴīгค๓ ([ʆεt'ς tαʆƘ🇮🇳])14:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Small file, poor quality, not used. --Yann (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Khinkali as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the logo belongs to the organization, not the person who uploaded it. COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Too complex for COM:TOO. --Kadı Message 20:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thanks to User:Alovsseb it has turned out that the original source is the South China Morning Post (I added a link). However, {{PD-HK}} appears to be no longer applicable as now the author is known. In addition the SCMP's terms read "You shall not use, edit, copy, publish, adapt, translate, make derivative works from, distribute or otherwise all or part of the SCMP Content [...] unless otherwise permitted in advance by SCMP in writing." Achim55 (talk) 14:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from https://verymobile.it/ not in cc4. COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate António F.123456 (talk) 18:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2806:101E:E:129B:9421:995E:B1A4:C6DB as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo. COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pipopo8 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio form Google Play Store. COM:TOO? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Здравствуйте. Я почти ничего не поняла, но я этот логотип копировала не из Google Play, а из App Store (потому что тогда обновлённый логотип не был опубликован в Google Play), но предварительно сделала прозрачный фон. Поэтому, если что, то это уже МОЯ РАБОТА. Юрина Татьяна (talk) 09:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is from 100 years ago. It can't be personal work. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and change license to {{PD-Iran}} --Zenwort (talk) 00:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Zenwort and Shkuru Afshar: Please add the date, source, and author. --Yann (talk) 20:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per [3], photographer Arno Stanke from Göttingen was active until 1960, so clearly he died not die over 70 years ago, and these photographs cannot be in the public domain.

Rosenzweig τ 18:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arno Stanke is listed as a retired photographer still living in Göttingen in the 1965/66 Göttingen directory. --Rosenzweig τ 18:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer Adalbert Blankhorn is still listed as living in Göttingen in the Göttingen address book / directory for 1960, so clearly he did not die over 70 years ago, and these photographs cannot be in the public domain.

Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" is not stated in the source Mateus2019 (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is stated in the source [4]. Auguel (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falscher Artname angegeben. Muss deshalb unter neuen Namen hochgelanden werden. Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why not simply rename ??? --Zenwort (talk) 00:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

confusions over file name, title, description led to this file not being named as others are. NickyMcLean (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NickyMcLean If the name is the only problem, just request a rename. No need to delete. Brianjd (talk) 11:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The intended file name was Geothermal.Electricity.NZ.NgaAwaPurua.png to correspond with the names for other stations and attempt to be globally organised, but I became confused in the late evening as to what fields were which, and couldn't see how to rename the file. Deleting, and then re-uploading the file (and not changing its file name) seems the only way ahead. As it happens, on viewing the image, I thought to make a slight adjustment to the annotation, so a new version is ready.NickyMcLean (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is now obsolete. It would have been replaced by an updated file (with a further decade's worth of data plotted), but the site now has two power stations, named A and B. Thus where there was a Geothermal.Electricity.NZ.Ngawha.png, there is now Geothermal.Electricity.NZ.Ngawha.A.png and Geothermal.Electricity.NZ.Ngawha.B.png with file Geothermal.Electricity.NZ.Ngawha.png no longer in use. NickyMcLean (talk) 08:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It has been determined several months back that Oliver Got is a photojournalist for the newspaper Midi Libre, and that this Flickr account was used to trick Commons users. This is copyvio washing. This user has been blocked on fr.wp for sockpuppettery and undisclosed paid editing. See User:Oliviergot..

Notwithstanding all this, this may still be below COM:TOO. Thoughts? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's a circle laid upon a triangle, probably below COM:TOO Spain. fr:Grupo Pefaco exists, and while the article may be biased because of paid writing, the company still seems to be notable, which means their logo is probably too. --Rosenzweig τ 23:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Flickrwashing. Newly created account with no followers, claims to be the person pictured so it’s not the photographer. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The artist has just added the information on her Flickr page that she holds the rights on the picture. Do you want me to have this confirmed by her with an original signature and send it over as a document? Actually I was following the instructions which say that pictures under a Creative Commons License published by an artist on Flickr are perfectly legitimate. But whatever you need in addition, I will make sure to provide. Thanks! Friedrich86 (talk) 15:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask you to countercheck the information under "Info" on Heike Hagen aka Velve's Flickr Page. She is a musician, but also a videoartist and thus obviously created the photo shootage herself. She's giving detailed information on being the label owner of Velve Music and holding the copyrights of all photos and artwork uploaded there. Do you have any further requests rsp. questions? If not, I'd be happy if you could close the discussion page. Thank you very much, Friedrich86 Friedrich86 (talk) 08:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. According to the Flickr account this is a selfie, no reason to disbelieve that statement. Therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:B. A. Honours - II Year - University of Mysore.png

The photos were previously published at https://www.srikanta-sastri.org/tnsrikantaiah and are unlikely to be own work as stated, as the subject died in 1966. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The website www.srikanta-sastri.org is managed by the family members of Dr. S. Srikanta Sastri (historian). The family members who are running this website are well known to me personally. We as a team have been collecting and collating these archival photographs of numerous personalities. Since your over-zealous and hasty deletions came forth, I have been in communication with the immediate family members. They were kind enough to share this link on their website where they state unequivocally that they are setting free all content on their site (unless otherwise specified) under the Creative Commons License. Furthermore, for every dispute that Wikipedia Editors may raise about content sourced from the above website, they are happy to send (by email) a letter under their letter head clarifying their position. I once more re-iterate there is no Copyright violation. You have further more taken the trouble to warn others to 'police' all of my other uploads! I must insist that I am not in the business of plagiarising content willy nilly. We are respectable people doing good respectable work (with zero anticipation of any remuneration or fame). Kindly see reason in our statement and re-instate the photograph(s).Bugs2beatles Bugs2beatles (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking further, I see that all his other images should be checked as well.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The website states "The site sets free in the public domain its content to the fullest extent covered under the creative commons license". This is rather confusing. The owner of the website does not give evidence why these old photos fall in PD, or wheter there is permission of the authors to publish with CCBYSA (which is impossible for old photos). There appears insufficient knowledge about copyright. Therefore, as publication dates and photographers are missing, the photos should be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]