Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/07/25

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 25th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalismo Geom (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created this and want to delete it Pfavorito123 (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Miljan Simonović as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation - User:БиблиотекаЈД recorded this photo from newspapers (explained in serbian) Yann (talk) 19:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as I said, I noticed that the photo doesn't have the appropriate license, so I asked the uploader (User:БиблиотекаЛКМБЈД) and he said: “...[this picture] was by my mistake uploaded as my work...and the black-and-white photo should not have been uploaded”. --Miljan Simonović (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:42, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook download, does not appear to be original work Ytoyoda (talk) 15:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:33, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope google image here Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 19:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:17, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it has the wrong name Pa7JA5 (talk) 22:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just rename it. --Yann (talk) 06:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I own this photo and would like to delete. Alencar.rossoni (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 06:55, 26 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from facebook "FBMD", a photo in full resolution with EXIFs should be provided, or a permission sent to OTRS Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission sent to OTRS. -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. According to this page, all editions are CC licensed. Wikipedia should be much more casual in regards to copyright infringement. Wikipedians should forget the concerns of copyright holders as trivial. - Shiftchange (talk) 07:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Shiftchange: You're not on Wikipedia anymore. This is Commons. You should have indicated the license of the original for derivative works. I looked it up: "The 2nd edition of "Mastering Bitcoin" is available under a CC-BY-NC-ND license, not a CC-BY-SA license". While it does not matter here, CC-BY-NC-ND is not acceptable for Commons. "Cover Designer: Randy Comer". Which also doesn't matter! Because "The cover image is from Insects Abroad". So this leafcutter ant should be somewhere in this book from 1874. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably copyrighted corporate logo, no evidence of permission being granted by the company. BethNaught (talk) 10:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es contenido no propio. Es de un medio de comunicación. Andrespedraza7 (talk) 21:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion of a talk page. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 05:18, 30 Juli 2018 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 12:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy issue Jane955 (talk) 02:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that Jane955 is in fact the person who uploaded this file, which has been tagged as a derivative work, for which the sources are not provided. I would be very surprised if this image was not uploaded in breach of copyright. For that reason, and because Commons is not a repository for ill-informed propaganda works, it should be deleted. And Jane955 should be told to use Commons for its intended purpose, and not as a soapbox. 86.147.197.31 04:51, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:51, 31 Juli 2018 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 18:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ENTRY WRONG ZANGFAI (talk) 13:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:43, 31 Juli 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 18:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anggisdevaki (talk · contribs)

edit

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload, see nonsense description and nonsense category. Ies (talk) 05:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, vandalism. --Jianhui67 TC 11:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nunujumro (talk · contribs)

edit

Low resolution, no metadata, exist elsewhere on the web. Unlikely to be own work.

~Cybularny Speak? 06:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:38, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small PNG file, probably screenshot, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 09:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Jianhui67 TC 11:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Brandon W. Prather was deleted, because the man was concidered non-notable. Probably his photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bích Liên 1571 (talk · contribs)

edit

Seemingly a copyvio, not "own work", see for instance https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/020c144b80f9e39bb37b670801f0d9fa?s=200&d=identicon&r=g

Ies (talk) 13:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Navidnavid90 (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:OOS: unused personal documents + promotional + copyright concerns

4nn1l2 (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aquibkhan ak (talk · contribs)

edit

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aquibkhan ak (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused personal COM:OOS pictures.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Canada for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file was uploaded by me wrongly.i want it to delete soon Jaanu1795 (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wrongly uploaded Jaanu1795 (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Yann. --Jianhui67 TC 11:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from political poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from non-trivial logo. Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improperly licensed upload as screenshots aren't free of copyright, contrary to what this file's description seems to suggest. SNUGGUMS (talk) 16:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by DMacks. --Jianhui67 TC 11:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vsoundoli (talk · contribs)

edit

Abusing Commons for self-promoting purposes, out of project scope. No contributions to any project.

Achim (talk) 16:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, no educational value, not used Avron (talk) 17:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from http://www.assumptiongreyhounds.com/facilities/index Ytoyoda (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Clive Barda in the EXIFs Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per title "Test image" Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope commons is not a social media. Not in used Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 19:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlgabaManuel (talk · contribs)

edit

unused/uncategorized images + grabbed from facebook "FBMD"

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jorge Costa Duarte (talk · contribs)

edit

small sizes without EXIFs : unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt image. Most likely some error occurred when transferring it over from en.wikipedia. Filelakeshoe (talk) 08:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:44, 4 August 2018 UTC: CSD F7 (file is empty, corrupt, or in a disallowed format) --Krdbot 18:44, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Segundo a Wikimedia o arquivo viola as leis. JoaoPLisboa88 (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file allready deleted. --JuTa 06:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No entiendo como agregar mi informacion y fotos no se hacerla y no hay una guia para hacer mi pagina Marta Guevara (talk) 15:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Simple enough? Yann (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file is a public domain file, as it is used by a politcal organization in Catalonia. If you reverse search the image up on Google Images, it can be seen that thousands of websites use the same loudspeaker icon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4th traveller (talk • contribs) 21:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 15:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly above TOO Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: I'll be blown away if it's not, w:South Park in the public domain? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, clearly a copyvio; a non-free version File:ButtersStotch.png is at en-wiki with FUR.  JGHowes  talk 02:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without much EXIF data 219.79.180.12 13:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. --B dash (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - scan of a postcard Ajpvalente (talk) 05:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:46, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/vitor107/6945044283 Ajpvalente (talk) 05:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - taken from http://amobarcelos.blogspot.com/2012/04/festa-das-cruzes-barcelos-2012.html Ajpvalente (talk) 05:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:46, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - taken from https://geofotografia.pt Ajpvalente (talk) 05:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:46, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - taken from https://www.baixaki.com.pt/papel-de-parede/14049-braga-portugal.htm Ajpvalente (talk) 05:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - taken from https://www.flickr.com/photos/carlos1952/5880007729 Ajpvalente (talk) 05:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:46, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - image taken from https://solagasta.com/caminhada-urbana-em-albufeira-albufeira/ Ajpvalente (talk) 07:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - image taken from http://cantinhodojorge.blogspot.com/2011/07/praia-fluvial-do-azibo-concelho-de_13.html Ajpvalente (talk) 07:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.flickr.com/photos/vitor107/7977989585 Ajpvalente (talk) 07:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://twitter.com/AncestralFood/status/982582904923525120/photo/1 Ajpvalente (talk) 07:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - http://terrasbouro.blogspot.com/2010/06/conservatoria-de-terras-de-bouro-dra.html Ajpvalente (talk) 08:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.trekearth.com/gallery/Europe/Portugal/South/Beja/Pomarao/photo1156576.htm Ajpvalente (talk) 08:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.flickr.com/photos/vitor107/5391520766 Ajpvalente (talk) 08:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - http://www.hoteltorresnovas.pt/galeria.php Ajpvalente (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 22:47, 11 August 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with juniordiviroydi --Krdbot 00:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

В сомнении авторство и лицензии: официальное промо фото; на фото персона и автор-одни и те же лица, отсутствуют метаданные. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора . Dogad75 (talk) 09:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:34, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1992. No Permission from the sculptor. FOP-related deletion requests require a full DR rather than a speedy deletion. Storkk (talk) 10:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:37, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark suggests this is a copyrighted image Ytoyoda (talk) 17:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: афиша сделана в 1975 году, разрешения автора или правообладателя неизвестны.  Delete Dogad75 (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: старое фото, сделана в 1975 году, автора, скорее всего, неизвестно.  Delete Dogad75 (talk) 17:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: старое фото, сделана в 1971 году, автора, скорее всего, неизвестно.  Delete Dogad75 (talk) 17:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1989. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not old enough for {{PD-old}}, author+permission unknown A.Savin 20:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Breeder and sportsman (1913) (20223402888).jpg|2=Though not an exact duplicate, but essentially the same image in a little bit lower quality. Guanaco (talk) 10:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Breeder and sportsman (1913) (20223402888).jpg|2=Though not an exact duplicate, but essentially the same image in a little bit lower quality. Guanaco (talk) 10:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:President, Vice President at Liberty Ball 01-20-17.jpg was tagged as a duplicate of this by User:B dash, but one should really think twice before marking anything uploaded by Gage as a duplicate. This file, uploaded by Fæ, is newer. The files are not identical though and the source requires an account so I can't check right now which is the "right" version. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as duplicate. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file name Antilovsky (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

a new version is uploded Antilovsky (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file name Antilovsky (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

a new version is uploded Antilovsky (talk) 01:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader had requested deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vermont in United States (modern).svg) but messed up. Files were uploaded in 2017.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Since requested by the Uploader should have been speedily deleted. Worth noting that they did not upload all of the maps from this series and I wonder if they would like to delete them as well. They should be asked. --Forthrunner (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Forthrunner: no, speedy courtesy deletion is only for unused content that was uploaded <7 days ago. See also Commons:Courtesy deletions. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Either way, unused files that have better versions already in use on Wikipedia. Should still be deleted. Plus, uploader’s request. --Forthrunner (talk) 14:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Forthrunner: I think they shouldn't be deleted. External websites may be using them. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There are other, better quality, options for them to choose from. Plus, even if that’s the case then most likely the image is already there so it won’t matter if it stays on here on Commons. --Forthrunner (talk) 04:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Please delete, at the time the maps were created there was a discussion about changing the model of the maps, however, the maps that I created did not have an acceptable quality in the pages, because in smaller resolutions it is difficult to see the borders. There is no reason to continue to exist. Allice Hunter (talk) 00:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Allice Hunter: possibly, but there is no reason to delete them either, they are not hurting anyone. I've added {{Superseded|State in United States.svg}} to them, is that better? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want, this may be! But these images will only be good quality if they are added as large size. Allice Hunter (talk) 00:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Allice Hunter: oh dear, I hadn't noticed they used raster graphics.. That's bad, yeah. But I see you still do this! File:Queens County, PEI.svg is no real SVG either! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There may have been a problem saving the file, but I have not changed the file extension when editing it. I do not think this problem is so serious if the images are placed in the optimal resolution and it would be very laborious to have to upload all of them again. Allice Hunter (talk) 01:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not a real SVG, just a fake (wrapper); orphaned; uploader request. --Leyo 20:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free file Tiger (Talk) 07:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ciell at 10:29, 24 August 2018 UTC: No permission since 16 August 2018 --Krdbot 12:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://twitter.com/danesmith33/status/1021699717481287680, would need OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 18:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamza Slaoui (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 23:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagen con copyright Geom (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, out of focus, nothing to see. No educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی ربط است Edris rakhshani (talk) 09:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say File:Hizbollah flag.jpg falls under Commons:de minimis. FunkMonk (talk) 07:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@FunkMonk: "De minimis" basically requires that if the copyrighted part is blurred or blanked, the image is still useful. Will that image still be useful if I blur the logo? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"i stood in the middle of the street forever waiting for the damn wind to blow the flag so i could get a good photo of the fully-extended flag."
Oh, dear Flickr user upyernoz, you shouldn't have. Seriously. You shouldn't have. Like, you should not have waited. Could have probably kept this otherwise. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand, could you make any kind of useful image by cropping so it only shows the logo itself? Seems not. FunkMonk (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logos of Lebanese group Hezbollah

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, invalid DM tag. Category has plenty of photos from the same shoot, so no need to crop faces.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is described as "Official photo of Dr. John A. Kilpatrick", and appears to be a copy of an image from https://www.appraisalinstitute.org/about/ai-meetings-and-events/breakout-session-speakers/, yet is described as "Own work". That needs further explanation. RoySmith (talk) 03:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Greek debt

edit

Greek debt:

Other debts (also not updated):

Also not updated:

Also a combo of real data and projections:

Redundant files not updated for more than 2 years, based on a combination of real data and projections. These files present a mixture of real data by Eurostat and projections by Ernst and Young, which may or may not have been fulfilled. Contrary to the uploaders' stated intention they were not really kept up-to-date and distort reality. Therefore, they should either be deleted, updated or made to depict only real data. Currently, these files seem like they contain outdated predictions from oracles... --Heracletus (talk) 03:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep All files are in use on English Wikipedia, and on others as well. So long as files are in use on another Wikimedia project, they should not be deleted from Commons simply for being outdated. See COM:INUSE for details. --bjh21 (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per above. Why should they be deleted simply because they are out of date anyway? And did you try to fix it? --Philly boy92 (talk) 20:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At the very least the first part of the video needs to be deleted, it is simply a presentation that is a Derivative Work of all the photographs that were used in it. I believe there is little chance that all those photos were under a free licence or taken by Руслан Стародубов. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 03:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the website is rahter written that it is copyrighted instead that it is licneced freely. Sanandros (talk) 04:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as no source (No source since)
There is a source but the file was not aviable. Sanandros (talk) 04:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The site I got it from seems to have disappeared. I even included the UID that it had. My memory of it is that the image was copyright free. --One Salient Oversight (talk) 11:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The page says: "Rights Info: No usage fees. User must observe DNC guidelines. Contact LBJ Presidential Library for more information." It does not state what those guidelines are. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 04:43, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

published without notice in 1964. Would qualify for PD-US-no-notice licensing. SecretName101 (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No objection if clarified on the file page. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion PD-US-no-notice. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, plus personality issues Ymblanter (talk) 06:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image shows protected game illustrations. Gnom (talk) 06:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevanhogg (talk · contribs)

edit

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevanhogg (talk · contribs)

edit

per COM:WEBHOST.

A09090091 (talk) 19:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image of a Moldovan oligarch in an orphanage was uploaded in the context of a POV campaign. It violates the rights of the children depicted; besides legal considerations, it is ethically wrong; Commons shouldn't tolerate such content. Beware of sockpuppets. Mihai (talk) 09:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Like A LOT of other imports by J.C EVEN, copyvio from a newspaper published in 1953. A deritative file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pol_montjarret.jpg) should also be deleted. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 10:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" is doubtful, probable copyvio. Also not realistically useful for an educational purpose. The file has obviously been uploaded for just publishing promotional content or spam. Jotzet (talk) 10:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" is doubtful, probable copyvio. Also not realistically useful for an educational purpose. The file has obviously been uploaded for just publishing promotional content or spam (see user's previous uploads). Jotzet (talk) 10:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Media from TNN บันเทิง Official

edit

The TNN บันเทิง Official channel appears to be unassociated to TNN Thailand. The official website links to a different channel, where the video are released under the Standard YouTube License. This seems like a case of license laundering.

xplicit 10:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to understand that they have multiple youtube channels (here's another one). Looking at informations, amount of exclusives videos and number of subscribers, it seems difficult that it is not official. But it's a tricky one, I don't know if i am right.--Dancrpu (talk) 11:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that this channel's older uploads show various other watermarks. For example, this is watermarked by TV5 and this by MCOT. This further indicates that "TNN บันเทิง Official" is not operated by TNN. xplicit 07:17, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, can't make out anything in the image and it is beyond repair Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr images by Karel Fuentes

edit

Commons:Flickr washing. These images of Hugo Chavez are sourced from the Flickr user "Karel Fuentes", who chose a PD license. However, they are not original photographs by Fuentes and are not public domain because (1) their actual respective photographers are mentioned in image metadata, (2) they appear in an album [1] with 800 other images of Hugo Chavez from different time periods, locations and photographic styles, (3) other photos uploaded by the Flickr user are also blatantly belonging to other photographers or agencies (see [2]). seb26 (talk) 11:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I did not notice this when I uploaded the images. It seems that the "Hugo Chavez - Baby kissing.jpg" and "Hugo Chavez.jpg" do not have an artist or photographer according to the EXIF data or other sources. The other two which do mention the photographer or artist should be deleted immediately.--ZiaLater (talk) 07:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed those two photos do not, but their credibility as works by 'karel fuentes' are just as low. Note that the first photo by Jeffrey Noble also uses the same camera as "Hugo Chavez.jpg" despite not having his name itself marked. The perspective and camera angle of the baby kissing photo alone is doubtful. So all need to be deleted as COM:PCP. seb26 (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Seb26: Ok. Thank you for the good explanation.--ZiaLater (talk) 14:44, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While ReactOS is freely licensed software, it is questionable whether this also applies to the wallpaper seen here. As a derivative work, the screenshot would be unfree too. De728631 (talk) 12:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file name Antilovsky (talk) 12:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file name Antilovsky (talk) 12:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chefkunal (talk · contribs)

edit

All claimed as own work but at least one has author info in the exif (copyright Deepak Budhraja) and others taken off the net (https://blog.ketchupp.in/facts-chef-kunal-kapoor-dont-know/) likely copyvios

Gbawden (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS: low quality, small size 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, no educational value A1Cafel (talk) 16:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Movf (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ik heb geen behoefte meer om dit op internet te laten zien. Vos92 (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liverpoolpics (talk · contribs)

edit

Historical photos and drawings. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in error. Incorrect logo file. Dave Harig (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Used in vanity Wikidata items. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Out of Commons:Project scope: File in use on Commons only. An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons, nor solely because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace), but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed. Files relating to projects or events of the Wikimedia Foundation, such as user meetings, are also allowed. Dave Harig (talk) 16:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kanjuzi (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused music sscores of questionable notability. Should be in Score wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images by panoramio user Иван Бай overwritten by User Jarash

edit

I overwrote these files after having cropped the watermarks thinking that it is a good idea to have lesser files of the same subject. However after a talk with User:Túrelio I decided to revert my actions. Now I request the files to be reverted to original versions. --Jarash (talk) 15:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Reverted as req. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realised that this district is Ilimpiyskiy district and not Tungussko-Chunsky district. It is wrong and I have to upload it again with the right name Vova177rus (talk) 16:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - change the name. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realised that this is Tungussko-Chunsky district. Ilimpyskiy district is the large one in the north. I have to reupload the image with the right district name Vova177rus (talk) 16:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - change the name. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo with copyright. Not the right license. Must be imported in Wikipedia with logo, not Commons Léodras (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mpinedag (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:DW - photos of plaques/pictures/sculpture. No FoP for non-buildings in US.

Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted book covers. Probably suitable under en's fair use guidelines, but not appropriate here. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate to File:Allens Chemist, High Street, Mansfield Woodhouse (Now Lloyds Pharmacy).jpg, which is the one with higher resolution Tine (talk) 17:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - not a dup - verticals have been adjusted. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down version of image here: https://ekipa.mk/kochov-marin-prv-mi-dade-shansa-kako-igrach-no-ova-nema-da-e-trenerska-bitka/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Yahoo News https://www.gettyimages.fr/license/488067267 Per metadata: "Photo by Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Yahoo News" Freely licensed on Flickr by offical Yahoo News stream. Not clear that Getty is the copyright holder, thus not clear enough for speedy. Discussion needed. Эlcobbola talk 17:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Also applies to extracted images: File:Jesse Tyler Ferguson May 2014 (cropped).jpg and File:Justin Mikita May 2014 (cropped).jpg. Эlcobbola talk 17:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It should be kept, but will be deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"Andrew H. Walker" - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Jeez... do some research first folks. This image can be found on the Wireimage website at http://www.wireimage.com/celebrity-pictures/Actor-Jesse-Tyler-Ferguson-and-Justin-Mikita-attend-the-Yahoo-News/488084063 . There it clearly states "(Photo by Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Yahoo News)" (emphasis there mine). So we've verified the Getty part of the chain. The fact that it clearly states thet it's Getty for Yahoo means that Getty is taking the shots on behalf of Yahoo. Which means it's a work for hire situation. Which means Yahoo can do as they wish with the images. In this case, posting it to a Flickr account with a Wiki-friendly license statement. Tabercil (talk) 14:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-public artwork Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-public artwork Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know the copyright status of the newspaper. Thyj (talk) 18:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of a video so derivative works Avron (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used, additional with failure in photo Avron (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person used only on Commons user page of user who has only uploaded copyvios and has used a sockpuppet to recreate deleted copyvios. User is not a productive member of the community, so not in scope - see also Commons:Project_scope#File_in_use_on_Commons_only. Эlcobbola talk 18:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution of: File:Historic American Buildings Survey Richard Nickel Photographer, 1965 GENERAL VIEW of WEST (main) FACADE from SOUTHEAST - William H. Winslow House, Auvergne Place, River Forest, HABS ILL,16-RIVFO,1-4.tif Carl Ha (talk) 18:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of the Thai government. Yanjipy (talk) 19:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imgur page indicates this file was uploaded to imgur two years before was on Commons: https://imgur.com/6pGNqxPSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 19:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@76.81.204.26: @Mlazear: Since this image was uploaded elsewhere on the internet before it was on Commons, it is necessary to verify original publisher released it under a free license. See COM:OTRS for more details. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 19:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: spam Yann (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - @Fenikals: Spam is not a valid reason to delete. The image is used in a draft and I can't find it via a google image search so can't prove its a copyvio. Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: spam or copyvio Yann (talk) 19:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LexICon as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: suspected copyvio; Photo is taken from website:[3] and credited Trenkwalder there. Uploader now claims "own work, User:Media 765783". --LexICon (talk) 13:46, 24 July 2018 (UTC) Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 19:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: privacy violation not notable person Yann (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this is an own work, low resolution, no EXIF, uploaded after 11 years... Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tiffany I. Smith (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - I noticed this when this user's multiple VIs (which I nominated) and other in-use images were tagged for deletion (since removed from the nomination -- thanks). Those that are not in use are nonetheless in scope. They are images from an in-person Wikimedia event, which are typically considered to be in scope. Such events are typically also "upload notable people to Commons" events (they don't always actually meet the threshold of notability, but they are artists and others we typically consider to be in scope, as opposed to say, selfies or the uploader's family. This is why we have some of their images in use/VI). — Rhododendrites talk23:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, http://www.pualingo.com/ross-jeffries-paul-jeffrey-ross/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm new learning to edit and work with wikipedia so I may had made a mistake but I asked Ross Jeffries (who own the image) in a mail if I could use it and he said

I have total permission to get the image from his website and use it for wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmprendeMentes (talk • contribs) 21:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @EmprendeMentes: the copyright holder is almost always the photographer and not the person pictured. You should ask Ross Jeffries to ask his photographer to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew2602 (talk · contribs)

edit

Commons:Currency#Cayman_Islands

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://valet.ru/user/205243205/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scarlxrd in moskow 2018.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivonnejo04 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivonnejo04 (talk · contribs)

edit

Apparently a fan gallery, however several of these have over printing and sources that are obviously not "own work." The two from Flickr are questionable whether the Flickr uploader had the right to upload, due to one looking like an album cover and the other like a professional portrait - both are smaller than facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, http://www4.congreso.gob.pe/heraldo/index_fotoh1.asp?fecha=20141003 Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See the notice at the top of Category:Passports of Sweden and previous discussions at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Swedish Passport 2012.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Three passport covers, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Swedish passport.jpg etc. LX (talk, contribs) 22:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged - based on the previous discussions, I don't object to it's deletion. Sorry about that. Davekern (talk) 09:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the permission field, there is a licensing statement to be found at https://www.mountain-forecast.com/peaks/Erciyes. I see no license or any indication that the content is in the public domain there. On the contrary, there is a copyright notice at the bottom. It's there in the last archive.org snapshot before the upload and the first one after it. LX (talk, contribs) 23:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergey Korovkin 84 (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:SS

Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergey Korovkin 84 (talk · contribs)

edit

Images can be found at https://79161230044.com/, if the uploader owns the web site then we need OTRS verification.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to this file B dash (talk) 02:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source YouTube video is not posted under a CC license: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQUfUP4ytUs // sikander { talk } 13:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parto hoor (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parto hoor (talk · contribs)

edit

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 09:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: They are not claimed to be own work? None of them are.
@Leoboudv: you shouldn't have passed File:Taherehghayoumi008.jpg. Read Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Tasnim News Agency. I know virtually all the ins and outs of Tasnim, so if you have any questions just ask. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: It was JameslWoodward who told me that whether or not an image has a named author, the permission statement "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" applies...so long as it is clearly sourced to their website. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Leoboudv and Jameslwoodward: James would be wrong. I can write instructions to correctly identify Tasnim photos, but I thought there already was something like that. Will have to look for that later. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Read: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jesse Tyler Ferguson and Justin Mikita 2014.jpg: "This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Yahoo News https://www.gettyimages.fr/license/488067267 Per metadata: "Photo by Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Yahoo News". Freely licensed on Flickr by offical Yahoo News stream. Not clear that Getty is the copyright holder, thus not clear enough for speedy."

We should  Keep them, but they will be deleted.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Interestingly, we have OTRS permission for File:Benn Northover.jpg. (not nominated, Photo by Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Chanel) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Jesus, just because images are from getty doesn't automatically make them not free, getty photographers are paid by companies/organisations to take pictures, the Benn Northover image is moot cause that image clearly says "Getty Images for Chanel" thus an OTRS permission was sought cause that image was not paid for by Chanel for its free use whereas all the images i added were from the OFFICIAL Yahoo news Flickr feed so they paid for the rights to those images and thus can freely release it under any licences they choose cause even the photographer has specifically stated that theses images were taken for "yahoo news". Can people who don't understand copyright laws please avoid trying to tag everything they see, there are other ways to becoming admins. this was discussed before, i'm technically retired so i don't like coming here to teach kids how to play..--Stemoc 15:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The set can be found on the Wireimage website at http://www.wireimage.com/search/#events?q=[488128989]&ep=2/60/1&s=3 where it learly states for every image "(Photo by Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images for Yahoo News)" (emphasis there mine). So we've verified the Getty part of the chain. The fact that it clearly states thet it's Getty for Yahoo means that Getty is taking the shots on behalf of Yahoo. Which means it's a work for hire situation. Which means Yahoo can do as they wish with the images. In this case, posting it to a Flickr account with a Wiki-friendly license statement. Tabercil (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tabercil: I agree (the exact details may differ but that makes no difference in practice) but this is pretty much the same as TechCrunch, and those files were (incorrectly in my opinion) deleted. I would be very happy if this was kept and TechCrunch undeleted, but I doubt it'll happen. And keeping this while leaving TechCrunch deleted simply makes no sense. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:38, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tabercil: I don't see what the Wired image link has to do with the discussion (it states Copyright © 2018 Getty Images. All Rights Reserved.) ; the same pictures are available at the Getty website and are copyrighted as well. If it was only stated "Photo by Andrew H. Walker for Yahoo News" it would have been no questionning about the copyright status; the problem is the mention "/Getty Images". In short it appears an OTRS permission has been received for another Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images picture. May someone verify if it's a valid permission and if it originate from Andrew H. Walker or another third party ? Has someone contacted Andrew H. Walker ? That's the only question, I guess, we must respond. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: contacting Andrew H. Walker is absolutely pointless, I guarantee you Andrew does not hold the copyright. On paper, the copyright holder will most likely be Getty but whoever the photos were made for (Chanel, TechCrunch, Yahoo) has been granted an unlimited non-exclusive, sub-licensable worldwide license. (it's virtually impossible this is not the case, Getty rights experts have looked at this) Alternatively it's the other way around: Chanel, TechCrunch and Yahoo are the copyright holders and have granted Getty an unlimited non-exclusive, sub-licensable worldwide license. I suspect it's the former, but besides attribution it shouldn't make any difference for us. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The TechCrunch deletion was actually a big mess-up by the deleting admin, you have to realise, a few of our admins actually have no idea about some of the copyright rules, they didn't become admins because they know those laws, they did it by the "other" reason..and the deleting admin in that DR is always in hotwater, not sure why no other admins did anything about this (oh yeah now i remember, they give their balls in exchange for admin rights on wikiMedia), that said, again Getty is NOT the copyright holder, they are an agent, whatever the photographer does with their images is none of their concern, their job is to "sell" their images, the photographer makes the rules, not the agent. If someone wants to "pay" for the use of those images, they are more than welcome to but as it stands, the rights to those images belongs to Andrew and the people who paid him for those images, which in this case is Yahoo News, the former explicitly stated he was taking images for that event which means he has explicitly given Yahoo News his permission and the latter who owns the images are free to release them whichever way they want. Its a shame most of the admins who knew all this are long gone but alas we have to deal with n00bile editors and admins who might as well end up deleting everything if they so choose because people who question them are either shut down or ignored...--Stemoc 13:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Stemoc: Chanel/Techcrunch/Yahoo calls Getty to take pictures of their event, they deal with Getty, not photographers. Photographers who work for Getty would have to sign a contract. That contract includes clauses to make sure the photographer won't be the copyright holder. This doesn't mean the photos are not acceptable for us, but some of your reasoning isn't completely accurate. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:36, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Josve05a: While you're at it, could you also ask them about TechCrunch as it's a very similar case? I would greatly appreciate it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
While I didn't get a clear answer from anyone (merely pointed to their ticket system - I could send a message from [email protected], but...), but from what I could desipher (do not quote me on this, or decide based on my comment) the photographer is the copyright holder, and Getty is the copyright holder's authorized seller of licenses. In cases such as this, a client does hire a photographer (a stringer or freelancer) via Getty (who contacts the photographer), and allows the client to use the image in perpetuity, while the photographer retains the copyright. I was then pointed to https://www.gettyimages.com/eula and https://wonderfulmachine.com/images/blog/2014/02/14_getty_global_assignment_contract.pdf --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the most likely situation is that Andrew H. Walker is the copyright holder and that Yahoo has a usage right. This is consistent with what Jonatan wrote and also with ticket:2014120410004011, from which we do know that Andrew H. Walker has been prepared in the past to release one of their pictures into CC-BY-SA 4.0. It may be worth trying to contact him to ask for permission (and to send this permission to OTRS). If he would be prepared to do so, we may be able to undelete these files in the future. --Jcb (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to take the liberty of appending to this closed discussion. Per Jcb's suggestion, I wrote Andrew H. Walker at his web site to ask:
Hi, I'm a volunteer editor for Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia. We noticed a lot of your excellent images for Getty Images and Yahoo News online at Flickr, for example https://www.flickr.com/photos/yodelanecdotal/14090779276/ Could you say who owns the copyright for these images: Getty Images, or Yahoo News? Does Yahoo News have the right to license them as Creative Commons Attribution? Thank you!
He responded (within an hour!):
I believe that Getty Images pens the copyright, but Yahoo has a usage agreement, the specifics of which, I wouldn’t know.
Andrew H. Walker
So (unfortunately!) it seems that this was decided correctly. --GRuban (talk) 17:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@GRuban: not completely. The closing rationale was "the most likely situation is that Andrew H. Walker is the copyright holder and that Yahoo has a usage right". As we see here, and I have said this before in similar cases, the photographer doesn't hold (or doesn't manage) the copyright and we're asking someone who knows about as little as we do. Getty is, probably, legally the copyright holder. Getty also knows a lot about copyright infringement and a part of their services is "Offering uncapped indemnification, our team of legal pros make sure your imagery won't cause unnecessary rights and clearance headaches." These guys don't fuck around. So we can go two ways from here:
  1. Assume those Getty legal pros are a bunch of completely retarded idiots who don't know what Flickr or Creative Commons is, and Wikimedia Commons users are way better than them
  2. Assume Getty, Yahoo and TechCrunch are grown-ups who understand contracts
Somehow, we are insulting Getty. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:49, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Olivier LPB as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COPYVIO : logo, not too simple, and the website indicate copyright https://www.ejco.com/em/fr/terms-of-use PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 20:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also not used, may be SCOPE issue. --Эlcobbola talk 17:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Denniss as no source (No source since):... Reading the history, I see this passed a review by Stemoc but no review tag was placed on the image. I am changing this from a deletion (no source) to a nomination for consensus on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have already mentioned the source on the image which is this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/narendramodiofficial/12231220583/ --MohitSingh (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Great! I withdraw this nomination. Please take a few minutes to review all your other images and if any have "no source" on them, please provide source? We are working through a 50,000 image backlog of non-sourced images and all the help you can give will be most graciously appreciated! Ellin Beltz (talk)

Kept: withdrawn FASTILY 09:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if this is OK. See previous discussion on VPC. The older DR didn't address this issue. Yann (talk) 15:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: there is reasonable doubt to believe that the Flickr account is operated by government employees, and may be operated by personal staff who do not have authority to release this picture under a free license. xplicit 03:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]