Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/03

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 3rd, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Si

Jdjzgjsjzkzjxjxj 94.197.120.232 20:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video largely consists of clips from copyrighted movies and shows, particularly the first 20 seconds, as well as the short clip at 0:40. xplicit 01:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Vera (talk) 12:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Furgonetas Muchasj (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: vandalism – speedy closed. --jdx Re: 13:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright @ https://www.sportdiver.com/keywords/marine-conservation/shark-month-broadnose-sevengill Tiger (Talk) 03:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 14:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by Doug Perrine/naturepl.com. See here. Tiger (Talk) 03:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 14:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As much as I think that this page should exist I think that this should redirect to Commons:Categories, in its current state it isn't helpful. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Muchasj is indeffed on 2 projects and now locked globally. Content of this gallery page was "Gracias hermano por Mohamed alshehri" → Test page or no valid content. --Achim (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Achim (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request (Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Copie de 24992269 195157667700755 1621957105 n.jpg). --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.bustle.com/articles/73049-the-selfie-shoe-from-miz-mooz-is-the-footwear-version-of-the-selfie-stick-and-yes - Alexis Jazz 16:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 14:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You didn't really get it.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{archive|Not's delete [[:File:Fantastic Selfies.jpg]] resoult conferm file the site by Miz Mooz}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andefrur (talk • contribs)

I've just unwikified that.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio/reupload/LTA - category:Sockpuppets of Fritella. --Эlcobbola talk 23:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paperlink3 (talk · contribs)

edit

Promotional content. Clearly out of Commons:Project scope

Zaccarias (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paperlink3 (talk · contribs)

edit

Promotional content. As pure advertisment out of scope.

  • Note: I've notified this user that we don't accept advertising on Commons. He has just re-uploaded the same or a similar ad a week later.

Zaccarias (talk) 17:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily per nomination, obviously blatant spam. --Achim (talk) 19:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content. Pure advertisment clearly out of scope. Zaccarias (talk) 17:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: Blatant spam. --Achim (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional photograph to make advertisment for some spa & beauty salon. Out of scope. Zaccarias (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: Blatant spam. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

leere Datei --Dguendel 11:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: Empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 19:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OfficeNative (talk · contribs)

edit

Generally derivative works and/or out of scope because they are photoshopped. The user also admitted to be just looking for a webhost ("I was simply looking for a place where folks could easily discover and use them.") and not having actually meant to release any of these with a free license ("is there a way I can simply remove the images I have posted to WikiMedia Commons and regain my rights to them?").

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from https://www.facebook.com/haulb/photos/a.141614342541112.12444.141362065899673/884621281573744/?type=3&theater Outlookxp (talk) 06:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error of date. The exact cat is "Midsummer bonfire in Échavanne, 02 Jun 2018" ComputerHotline (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 19:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another photo like this is already available. I double uploaded it. LoafOne (talk) 13:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author-requested and duplicate. --whym (talk) 12:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anila chowdhury (talk · contribs)

edit

Very low quality image, out of focus

Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:36, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Topdesrhode (talk · contribs)

edit

Promotional content. Out of project scope.

Zaccarias (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 17:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and WP0 abuse elsewhere. --Green Giant (talk) 21:48, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Second nomination

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope promotional picture. Zaccarias (talk) 14:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF file, unused. No educational value. -- Geagea (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content. Pure advertisment and clearly out of scope. Zaccarias (talk) 17:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shanimaher112 (talk · contribs)

edit

Self-promotional uploads. Appears to be an architect working as a freelancer. Out of scope.

Zaccarias (talk) 17:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content. Pure advertisment clearly out of scope. Zaccarias (talk) 17:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Importexportdata (talk · contribs)

edit

Promotional content. Advertising image and a related unidentified logo image (firm presumably also is out of scope).

Zaccarias (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain text, personal essay, unused. Achim (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope. Also with watermark. Category:Saiful Muluk Lake is filled with other pictures from the same viewpoint. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope. Also with watermark. Category:Saiful Muluk Lake is filled with other pictures from the same viewpoint. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the image contains the artwork of Sid Meier’s Civilization video game which is not free to use. Bsivko (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authors request, ugly photo, here is new and better: File:Lappajärvi library 20180524.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2018-05-30T11:02:10‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:6200:8863:b25d:b16a:8b2d:83fc:99e6 (talk • contribs) 2018-06-02T15:18:57‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is showing nothing usefull for Commons: a piece of sky with no particular feature. Pierre cb (talk) 02:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's art work I just share it for who want use it for any work. Meshari Alawfi (talk) 03:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Meshari Alawfi: Commons is not a web host. If it is not intended for use on a Wikimedia project, then it falls out of project scope. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 11:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@–LaundryPizza03 (d) Who told you i need web host ? I publish some of my works under Creative Commons and i guess that is right place for that --Meshari Alawfi (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not need it anymore and as i see some see it not benefit to be here {{Delete}} Meshari Alawfi (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: HR, reasonable quality. --Yann (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is showing nothing usefull for Commons: a piece of sky with no particular feature. Pierre cb (talk) 02:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's art work I just share it for who want use it for any work. Meshari Alawfi (talk) 03:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not need it anymore and as i see some see it not benefit to be here {{Delete}} Meshari Alawfi (talk) 14:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: HR, reasonable quality. --Yann (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is showing nothing usefull for Commons: a piece of sky with no particular feature. Pierre cb (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's art work I just share it for who want use it for any work. Meshari Alawfi (talk) 03:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not need it anymore and as i see some see it not benefit to be here {{Delete}} Meshari Alawfi (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: HR, reasonable quality. --Yann (talk) 10:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we really need categories for the GPW jubilee medals and other jubilee medals? These are very low-level/non-notable awards and just indicate they survived x amount of years long after the war, all of which can be calculated from the death date. It's a bit tedious to add these categories, and there's no importance to them.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: used, wrong place anyway. --Yann (talk) 10:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we really need categories for the GPW jubilee medals? These are very low-level and just indicate they survived so long after the war, all of which can be calculated from the death date. It's a bit tedious to add these categories, and there's no importance to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlanespotterA320 (talk • contribs) 2018-05-28T20:37:59‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: used, wrong place anyway. --Yann (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems screenshot because have borders. Also seems not own work. No metadata. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Also metadata from FB. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can be a selfie - RAllemand is the subjet of photo - manque nom du photographe et autorisation Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Keep it's clear the account RALLEMAND is the author of this photo, it is therefore a personal work as he says and that is allowed to put on commons. No reason to erase this picture. --Titou (talk) 07:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment - Hello, no it is not clear: anyone can create a RALLEMAND account, or a RMA, RMALLEMAND, IAmRAllemand, IAmTheRealRMAllemand, whatever "Roger-Michel Allemand" account. --ContributorQ (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Can be included in the passer-by picture. --Yann (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 05:27, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 05:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 6 Jan. 1958 and 5 Jan. 1959.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 13:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 9 April 1956 and 7 Oct 1957.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 6 Jan. 1958 and 5 Jan. 1959.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 13:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 5 Jan 1959 and 28 Nov. 1960.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 2 May and 6 Jun. 1955.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File copied from Facebook. Please import the original, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Jan. 1945 and 2 May 1955.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 9 April 1956 and 7 Oct. 1957.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 9 April 1956 and 7 Oct 1957.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 6 Jun. and 26 Dec. 1955.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jun. 1936 and 3 Jul. 1939.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 16 Aug. 1948 and 1 Jan. 1951.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jun. 1936 and 3 Jul. 1939.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free government seal. --Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Talk to me) 10:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 13:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 4 Sep. 1939 and 7 Jan. 1945.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 15:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ru:РусАйТиЭкспорт was deleted due to unencyclopedic content. Its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shivaay Inc. is not mentioned in en.wiki. Its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Out of scope. @Taivo: Just because a subject is not mentioned on en.wiki that doesn't mean it must be out of scope. We serve wikis in all languages and also if a subject is notable we should host media content about it even when a related article has not been created yet. Of course I agree in this case here. --Zaccarias (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --jdx Re: 18:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Slightly smaller duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harmen_de_Hoop_-_Speed_limit.jpg Spinster (talk) 07:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Slightly smaller duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harmen_de_Hoop_-_Sandbox.jpg Spinster (talk) 07:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright situation unclear, found same image at https://www.pinterest.de/pin/521643569317889534/ Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modification of picture of facebook https://www.facebook.com/taipeicathyyu/ Wolfch (talk) 08:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indcation that I can find on the source website that this file has been released under a "CC-by-4.0" license. In fact, the website content is listed as "HDPICS All Right Reserved" and the original image is listed shown here has a "Hey Day" watermark in the lower right which is not visible in this crop. This file is listed as reviewed and verified by Puramyun31 which is the only reason why I didn't tag this for speedy deleteion. Perhaps Puramyun31can clarify where they found the license for this photo.

I just want to add that the uploader's user talk page seems to be one long list of notificationss/warning about improper file uploads. Maybe this uploader has difficulty understanding English, but they have continued with the questionable uploads despite being previously blocked multiple times for doing so which mean all of their uploads probably should be reassessed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:51, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Please see and click cc-by-4.0 icon (source page screenshot). Also, the copyright statement is produced by the layout itself, created by Studio 8, so that statement does not affect the Creative Commons-licensed status of the contents of the blog. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Explicit#Tistory_blog_consult) Puramyun31 (talk) 07:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying this. I am unable to clearly make out the license on the screenshot you attached. It might be better to add a direct link to the file’s page showing the license to make identification/verification easier. Moreover, even if the license is correct, I don’t think it was appropriate for the original file to be overwritten with a cropped version; the cropped version should’ve been uploaded separately under the same license. Perhaps you or someone else knows how to fix that. — Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Valid license supplied, guide, see also this link. — regards, Revi 15:42, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains BY-NC-ND watermark. Lojbanist (talk) 22:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works from eclipse maps are under CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0, not allowed in Commons

B dash (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - I checked a web archive and it was also NC/ND before the uploads here. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rodrigo.Argenton as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo under copyright: [1] ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete not a "clearly" lack of originality, is it a logo that you can produce simply typing with our keyboard, certainly not. So for me stills under copyright, is not because it's minimalist that lacks originality...
You should use more properly this card, trivializing is not good for us.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 14:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton: Keeping this logo or not is only a question of copyright law. Commons:Threshold of originality lists some court decisions on which logo images are protected by copyright law and which not because they are below Threshold of originality per court decision. Court decisions greatly differ between different countries. As for the Qualcomm logo a logo of a company based in the United States it should clearly not be protected by copyright law regarding the examples on Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_States. --Zaccarias (talk) 19:12, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Zaccarias, it is an American company, and that should be below ToO for USA. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer desired Dolphin2222 (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed or desired. Dolphin2222 (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders' request, recently uploaded unused file. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free file. Watermark on left bottom corner says it's from bike.baidu.com Tiger (Talk) 01:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there is a copyright watermark of "Baidu Baike" at the left bottom corner. This file is not free content. As per Wikimedia policy, it should be deleted on Commons. Celestial Phineas (talk) 01:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор плаката — Михаил Оскарович Длугач (1898—1988). Подпись есть на плакате (https://pp.userapi.com/c846017/v846017625/6902f/XC_es-TmYSg.jpg). Работа перейдёт в общественное достояние не ранее 1 января 2063 года (70 лет после смерти + 4 года работы во время Великой отечественной войны). До этого времени несогласованная с наследниками художника публикация является нарушением авторских прав. Стальной Детройт (talk) 08:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vohr (talk · contribs)

edit

Явное нарушение авторских прав. Файлы - либо кадры из фильмов, другие встречаются в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад.

Dogad75 (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Малое разрешение, отсутствие EXIF-информации, встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад. Необходимо подтверждение OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 12:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Явное нарушение авторских прав, некторые фото встречаются в официальных изданиях, например <https://www.kp.ru/daily/26801/3836549/>, где указан другой фотограф. кроме того отсутствуют матаданные

Dogad75 (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, Dogad75. Я готов поспорить с Вами, ведь почти все из вышеперечисленных фотографий либо сделаны, либо отредактированы мной. Владислав Симаков (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2018 (по Саратовскому времени)

Вы можете предоставить исходники? Вам в COM:OTRS/ru. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license and authorship. The man depicted in the photo died in 1971 GAndy (talk) 15:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license and authorship. The man depicted in the photo died in 1971 GAndy (talk) 15:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs)

edit

Files claimed as own work but without any compelling appearance thereof: small sizes, low resolutions, a collage, historical figures, blurry historical figures, modern hip hop artist, etc. Unlikely that anyone but a professional photographer would have this kind of access and produce such low quality images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 4

edit

Almost every upload by this user is copyvio, and it's hard to take any of the self-made claim seriously. Fortunately, none of these images are used on Wikipedia.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 5

edit

Please include these in the discussion above. Lack of sourcing, description or categories make these images useless for Wikipedia.

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 6

edit

Unused maps.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 7

edit

Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history and prior DRs above.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for building interiors in Germany. Architect Clemens Holzmeister died in 1983. We may not use this photo before the year 2054. See here (in German) for more information. Code (talk) 08:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nazarlvr (talk · contribs)

edit

For speedy deletion as (1) clearly uploaded for mystification vandalism, with fake description, authorship etc. (2) Two out of three images uploaded so far - commercial illustrations for glassware stores (the last one, "Крауз за життя" (described as "scientist Jean-Jacques Craus") is actually a portrait of the photography pioneer Louis Daguerre, meaning PD, but Commons can definitely live without it, getting a copy without mystification history and words about Windows activation over it). I've blocked the user indefinitely in Russian Wikipedia, recommend to do the same on Commons or globally (found the same mystification at least in Ukrainian WP)

Tatewaki (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 15:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image. Celestial Phineas (talk) 01:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 10:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own upload. I have requested author to upload once it get deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopala Krishna A (talk • contribs) 2018-05-30T10:51:38‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded own. I requested author to upload the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopala Krishna A (talk • contribs) 2018-05-30T11:05:03‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Firstac5 (talk · contribs)

edit

All files credit http://www.SurviveTravel.com. (Amazon referral site) (not anymore) File:Bahamaman.jpg can also be found on https://www.survivetravel.com/how-i-created-a-life-of-endless-travel-and-how-you-can-to/.

OTRS would be needed anyway, but I don't expect the user to send permission once they find out we don't like advertising. will be needed and the user has indicated they will send permission to OTRS.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunset on the Nullarbor.jpg is found on https://www.survivetravel.com/driving-across-nullarbor-plain/. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm the user that uploaded the files, and I own the rights to the pictures. I took them. I also own the website. I have some of these pictures on my website and thought I may as well share them with the public also. Bert Luxing 01:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
What's OTRS? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firstac5 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Firstac5: This is OTRS. But Commons isn't going to accept links to your Amazon referral site everywhere. If despite that you are willing to send permission for your photos to be used (you do know they can also be used for commercial purposes?), please do send your permission to OTRS. (use the release generator if you can) There are certainly some valueable photos in your collection, so we'd be happy to have them, but probably without the link. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: but if @Firstac5: doesn't mind having the links removed (I can do that in 2-3 minutes) and is willing to send permission to OTRS, it's an obvious keep right? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give permission and you can remove the links. And if all is good I'll keep uploading my back collection. Sorry for not following wikicommons guidelines. I'm still learning. @Alexis Jazz: @Jeff G.: Bert Luxing 01:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Firstac5: very good. I've removed the links. In your preferences you can configure your signature, which I suspect you did. Please change "Bert Luxing" in your signature preferences to [[User:Firstac5|Bert Luxing]]. It's another guideline: without a link it's much harder to find your talk page so you need to link your user page, talk page or both in your signature. If you prefer to actually change your username you can use m:Special:GlobalRenameRequest. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Alexis Jazz: - I just sent the username change request. I assume it will take a couple of days. I sent the OTRS release request a couple of days ago (still waiting for a reply) but I didn't want to do it for every single picture individually, so I asked if they could release all pictures from my website. Is that going to work? Or what would be better, if I could just automatically release whatever I upload to wikicommons, so that if I have pictures on my site that I do not want to be released it won't affect them. Is this possible? Basically I just don't want to have to send in a release form every time I upload a photo. Bert Luxing 00:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bert Luxing: that won't be a problem. OTRS basically just needs to verify you really are the site owner. Once that's verified you won't have to send individual releases for every new picture. If I'm not mistaken you should have (automatically) received a ticket ID from OTRS. An actual response will take much longer unfortunately, OTRS depends on volunteers and we don't have enough of them. The current backlog is 5 days. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: okay great. I'll wait for their response before uploading any more. Thanks for all your help. Bert Luxing 23:58, 6 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bert Luxing (talk • contribs) 23:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, File:Police in New York City.jpg appears on this website. NinjaStrikers «» 14:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ninjastrikers: I actually had noticed that, but both resolution and quality are lower than the file here, so marcotogni.it probably took it from Bert Luxing's website.
Can  I withdraw my nomination? I'm not pushing for deletion or anything, so if OTRS handles it I'm good. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was published in Memorial History of Louisville, published 1896. Publishing company no longer exists. Can be published under publish domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swerdkue (talk • contribs)

Kept: PD-1923. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not originating from Italy. — Racconish💬 19:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not originating from Italy — Racconish💬 19:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Montand came to France in the 20s and became French in 1929. This picture originates from France. The copyright is merely managed by an Italian company. — Racconish💬 19:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File source https://www.dobuss.es/ with Copyright Geom (talk) 21:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep – Added source and author information. As for copyright, it's public domain as work of Floridian government entity, as stated on the page's license. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 21:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The source website states: "All content © 2006-2018 Boca Raton, FL and its representatives. All rights reserved." - Jcb (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Anything the city says is overruled by state law. Whoever made that website doesn't know their own state laws. Also the seal predates 2006 and has been in use since 1991 at the earliest. Although there are some Floridian agencies permitted to claim copyright on their works, the City of Boca Raton is not one of them. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 21:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This depiction of the seal is not necessarily authored by the government and does not necessarily date from 1991 or before. Individual depictions of a seal have separate copyright. A reverse image search did not lead to any .gov website. And please don't use so many edits for one comment, the edit conflicts are starting to get annoying. Jcb (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I would generally agree regarding the license. Fry1989 eh? 00:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Look at that cheesy clipart! Definitively from the 1990s. —VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 21:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Israeli military police women stand in formation during an honor cordon ceremony for Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates in Tel Aviv.JPEG Et0048 (talk) 22:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by JarrahTree. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:LL. All images in the history of this file were from a Flickr stream that has been removed [2], the first image is from [3] and the others are watermarked. January (talk) 10:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. xplicit 11:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. xplicit 11:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear focus on the people -> personality right violation according to German law, also very middling quality with a few alternatives available. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I've missed this one during the clean-up! I've tagged it for SD. -- Meisam (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Jean-Pierre BONNOTTE / Gamma-Rapho. Unlikely to have been first (if even) published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep La photographie ayant été prise en Italie et en 1969, elle est acceptable sur Commons. Le copyright "Jean-Pierre BONNOTTE / Gamma-Rapho" est donc ici invalide, comme souvent avec Getty Images. @Patrick Rogel: la date de publication importe peu ici puisque c'est le seul fait qu'elle ait été crée en Italie qui compte, comme nous en avons discuté. - Groupir ! (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hormis le copyvio de https://www.gamma-rapho.com/fr/asset/fullTextSearch/search/Henri+Verneuil/page/2, de toutes manières la loi italienne n'a pas à s'appliquer puisque le photographe est français et l'agence aussi. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mais, @Patrick Rogel, du moment que la photo a été prise en Italie, ces lois s'appliquent indépendamment de la nationalité du photographe ou de l'agence, comme expliqué par @Ruthven ici ! - Groupir ! (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Après examen attentif des clauses et spécificités du droit italien en la matière, cette photo répond aux critères requis. Tisourcier (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On a second look I think my closure was wrong. This picture is taken by a French photographer, for a French photo agency, so that PD-Italy cannot be applied. The French copyright term is PMA+70, so that this picture needs permission. Jcb (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per nomination. — Racconish💬 12:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep If this photo is taken in Italy, Italian copyright law applies. The nationality of the photographer or the home address of the photo agency is of no importance. If I make a photograph in France, French copyright laws and French rules re FOP are applicable. Vysotsky (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • You are confusing two things. If e.g. a Dutch photographer takes a picture of a statue in France, indeed the French (lack of) FoP applies, because the statue was published in France. Regarding the picture, Dutch copyright will apply, unless the Dutch photographer first publishes the picture in France. Jcb (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete First of all, copyright for photographs rests with the photographer irrespectively where the photo was taken. This means that the copyright law of the photographer's home country is applicable. Additionals consideration need to be made if the photo is first published outside his home country, or if foreign artwork is the subject of the photo, but this does not seem to be the case here. So, as we need to apply French law, the image is not yet out of copyright. De728631 (talk) 12:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Italian copyright law applies independently of the nationality of the photographer or the agency. - Groupir ! (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file grabbed from facebook "FBMD", unclear if the uploader is also the copyright holder Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res duplicate of File:Gill - Jules Favre.jpg — Racconish💬 13:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer desired or needed. Dolphin2222 (talk) 13:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer desired or needed. Dolphin2222 (talk) 13:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed or desired Dolphin2222 (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Opinión Pública (talk · contribs)

edit

Wrong format : out of scope + unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:The Hitching Stone, Keighley Moor - geograph.org.uk - 127023.jpg Cosycoin (talk) 13:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD F8: exact duplicate. --bjh21 (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moon is disfigured and blurred, not a good one

B dash (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:44, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. The logo is in fr.wiki as fair use, which is prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FRONTAL VIEW OF NAKED MAN WITHOUT ENCYCLOPAEDIC INTEREST. 31.221.239.28 15:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


  1.  Keep Wikimedia does not ban nudity. The picture has been and is being used in several articles in Wikipedia, so someone has thought of it as encyclopedic. --Nichobond (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. --Yann (talk) 21:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person doesn’t authorise the publication of this picture. 193.152.127.63 10:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete According to wikimedia policy on images with identifiable people, picture may be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.113.186.57 (talk) 12:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted per courtesy; see also ticket:2021072510003219. --Ankry (talk) 08:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Youcefnezar (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eleazarofficial (talk · contribs)

edit

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurred, thus out of scope Amada44  talk to me 15:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, upload was only for check if ID possible NobbiP 18:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, very, very small size, thus out of scope Amada44  talk to me 15:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, from the facebook. Shared in F.B on 22 July 2014, and uploaded in commons on 2015 without any metadata --Alaa :)..! 15:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

faulty svg. JD {æ} 16:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:40, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This clay model that is a prototype of a sculpture is not in the public domain. This sculpture was created by Hongō Shin (本郷新) who died in 1980. see [4] and [5] Y.haruo (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:40, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook screenshot of some charity organization. Copyright status of the used photographs in these photocollage is unclear. Also unclear if in our project scope. Zaccarias (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is an image by Maurice Toussaint, made in 1935. Le Petit Chat (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible to be an image made in 1935 By M. TOUSSAINT as the Sapeurs-forestiers are in 1940 battlefield uniforms... Anyway that was scanned from the french National Forest Office newsletter on a subject about the Forest military corps during W.W.II. ̴̴̴̴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussie Oc (talk • contribs) 13:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too low quality, tiny, unsharp Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication the photo originates from Italy. — Racconish💬 19:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.pinkwap.me/download-video/reaction/2MhFxkbtuzQ.html Kattenkruid (talk) 20:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality photograph, seems out of scope Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. User with expertise on copyright law of Russia should check whether the depicted portion of text is copyrightable at all (originalty? COM:TOO) and, if yes, whether it's not PD-old or PD-gov due to its nature/source. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 15:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created by Hongō Shin (本郷新) who died in 1980. see here Y.haruo (talk) 11:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, These sculptures were erected in 2010. [6], [7] Y.haruo (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created by Hongō Shin (本郷新) who died in 1980. see here Y.haruo (talk) 16:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. This sculpture was created by Nakamura Shinya (中村晋也) who is still living. see here Y.haruo (talk) 17:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeat picture philmarin (talk) 09:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not an exact duplicate. --Amada44  talk to me 08:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work by uploader, given his upload-history. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 08:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing in it Hamim000000 (talk) 11:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 08:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eigentümer 93.219.103.113 17:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Amada44  talk to me 08:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to just be one guy's profile picture; out of scope. Also doesn't look much like the mayor it's categorised as. GKFXtalk 21:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 08:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kristian Lee (talk · contribs)

edit

Product photographs out of a sales brochure with unwanted advertising weblinks on the description page. As professional photographs we would need permission (Commons:OTRS) from the firm. But it's questionable if these images are in scope also because of the low resolution of these photographs.

Zaccarias (talk) 17:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Advertising. --Achim (talk) 20:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:6200:8863:b25d:b16a:8b2d:83fc:99e6 (talk • contribs) 2018-06-02T15:23:47‎ (UTC)


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. Commons is not a photo album. Please keep patience until establishing their notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. Commons is not a photo album. Please keep patience until establishing their notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. Commons is not a photo album. Please keep patience until establishing their notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the post is labeled as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, it also states "Please Do Not Cut My Logo!​Please Do Not Use My Pics In Commercial Way !" This contradicts the Creative Commons license, and photos from this blog can not be hosted on Commons. xplicit 05:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:33, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another file needs tot be moved to this location (De Lijn icon 24munt antw.svg), but this redirect page needs to be deleted first. All pages linking to this redirect page have already been updated to bypass this redirect. Squizie3 (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality with many, many alternatives available Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG image with no photographic metadata, possible screenshot. January (talk) 12:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo. The company appears to be either defunct or unnotable. Corporate website is dead.
*description see https://www.easycounter.com/report/weimark.es
*dead website: http://weimark.es
Zaccarias (talk) 14:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo. No indication that this company meets our notability requirements.
*see http://www.visario.co.uk
Zaccarias (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional business card. Out of scope.
Zaccarias (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Это вовсе не самореклама, а всего лишь приятное в отношении дизайна оформление личной страницы!
Прошу не удалять этот крайне полезный файл.
Егоров Валерий

 Keep Sorry. I didn't see that this image is used on your userpage. Moved to Category:Personal files. --Zaccarias (talk) 19:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   17:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content: A closer look reveals that this is just an advertising. (look on the lower part of the image and you'll find a link to a website there) Out of scope. Zaccarias (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo possible above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   17:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a duplicate of a file uploaded at an early date (2007) by Stavros1 which contains more information than the one transfered from geograph.org.uk in 2011. It is an uneccessary duplicate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stavros1 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 3 June 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD F8: the file is a scaled-down duplicate of File:Upstream, River Mun at Sidestrand lane 5th October 2007.JPG. --bjh21 (talk) 23:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This image is the same as an existing file also located in Category:River Mun. Sobrassada (talk) 07:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The table says "Vol. 45, no. 2–5, 7 Jan 1945 — 29 Jan 1945" are in the public domain. Which issue is this? Yann (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No.6--Maher27777 (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 22 Jan. 1934 and 7 Jan. 1935.--Maher27777 (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 1 Jan. 1951 and 5 Jan. 1953.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 29 Jan. 1945 and 5 Jul. 1948.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the scope of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 13:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Time issues are copyrighted between 1 Jan. 1951 and 5 Jan. 1953.--Maher27777 (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This issue is outside the range of the public domain issues of Time; see wikisource:Time (magazine). — WFinch (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the source country and no evidence of the absence of US copyright at the back. — Racconish💬 19:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted in the source country and no evidence of the lack of copyright mention at the back. — Racconish💬 19:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 02:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

انتهاك للحقوق — Preceding unsigned comment added by KnightRIF (talk • contribs) 2018-05-29T01:54:47‎ (UTC)


Deleted: unclear authorship (small size, no exif...). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-old does not apply here: the map maybe from the 17th century, but this "golden" figure with the loupe is likely not from this time. The copyright status of this file (map with figure) remains unclear. High Contrast (talk) 06:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per above, PD-Old cannot apply. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete If an artist adds something to a PD work, the new resulting work is copyrighted. --Simonxag (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.Juliancolton | Talk 13:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор плаката — Израиль Давидович Боград] (1899—1938). Репрессирован, реабилитирован в 1957 году. Работа перейдёт в общественное достояние не ранее 1 января 2028 года (70 лет после реабилитации). До этого времени несогласованная с наследниками художника публикация является нарушением авторских прав. Стальной Детройт (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (author was rehabilitated post-mortem in 1957, so not in the PD in Russia before 2028). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор плаката — Израиль Давидович Боград] (1899—1938). Репрессирован, реабилитирован в 1957 году. Работа перейдёт в общественное достояние не ранее 1 января 2028 года (70 лет после реабилитации). До этого времени несогласованная с наследниками художника публикация является нарушением авторских прав. Стальной Детройт (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Support — According to COM:CRT § Russia and former Soviet Union:

In case the author was subjected to repression and rehabilitated posthumously, countdown of copyright protection began not from the death date, but from the rehabilitation date. If the work was first published posthumously, the copyright term is counted from the date of that first publication, unless the author was later rehabilitated, in which case it runs again from that later rehabilitation date.

OwenBlacker (talk) 09:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
За многие годы я так и не понял, почему одни файлы в Вики спокойно висят годами на том основании, что они ИЛЛЮСТРИРУЮТ нечто - человека, произведение, событие, а другие - удаляются. Разве нет правила по этому поводу? // Когда я загружал файл, понятия не имел о его правовом статусе. И теперь заниматься доказательством его необходимости мне просто недосуг. Конечно, если его удалят, статья обеднеет. С другой стороны, удалено уже столько, и гораздо более ценного... Что при голосовании я воздерживаюсь. Александр Васильев (talk) 12:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
На викискладе хранятся только свободные файлы. Этот файл в категорию свободных на подпадает. Согласие от наследников Бограда не получено. Плакат охраняется исключительным правом автора до 31 декабря 2027 включительно. 1 января 2028 плакат перейдёт в общественное достояние и его можно будет свободно использовать, но сейчас — нет. К фильму были другие плакаты, например вот этот плакат неизвестного художника. Можно использовать его, а можно загрузить в русскую википедию плакат Бограда в небольшом размере как несвободный файл и обосновать добросовестное использование специальным шаблоном. — Стальной Детройт (talk) 13:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (author was rehabilitated post-mortem in 1957, so not in the PD in Russia before 2028). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On the version uploaded to en.wiki, the photo is credited to Benjamin McMahon. Here the same uploader states it's their own work. Also, the photo was previously published here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 09:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two images in history of this file. Copyright ED Jahelka/wwwjahelka.com in metadata on first upload, source of second upload unclear. January (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship for both files). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. The artist fr:Théo Hanssen died in 1957 and the file can be restored after copyright expiring in 2028 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 11:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

samll size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (unclear authorship). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 statue [8]. Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover such statues. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 statue [9]. Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover such statues. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Japottie (talk · contribs)

edit

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)  Delete The last one is on en-wiki as non-free - with source The artist, Tom Sherman, provided this video still for use in this wiki article; it also appears as an illustration to an article by Tom Sherman: http://www.kunstradio.at/TEXTS/nerve.html Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in Marocco allow this? Will be good idea to update Commons:Freedom of panorama. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission: the authors are different than the author of the uploaded image, judging by the different names (Hájek, Hájek, Horský vs. Newoserre Czeva (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. — Racconish💬 20:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists elsewhere on the web [10]. ~Cybularny Speak? 17:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 09:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appear to have been previously published at https://www.danddsilver.co.uk/commissions/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 09:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: source = own work based on author = Syryatsu who uploaded many other similar files as own work. No reason to doubt this one. --Guanaco (talk) 09:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that image is uploaders own work ... Thanks,   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  23:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sama than Photo_isabelle.jpg and problem of permision Salsero35 (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like a screenshot to me. --Guanaco (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright from 遠見. Outlookxp (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Afifa Afrin as no permission (No permission since) Aftabuzzaman (talk) 22:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to vote for Keep because this photo was uploaded in 2008 and there is no internet hit earlier than 2011. Probelly the author gave verbal consent to the uploader to upload this. After 10 years, it is also quite impossible for the uploader to find the author & send a written permission. excuse my english. --Aftabuzzaman (talk) 22:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Работа братьев Стенбергов: Владимира Августовича Стенберга (1899—1982), Георгия Августовича Стенберга (1900—1933). Произведение перейдёт в общественное достояние не ранее 2057 года (70 после смерти последнего жившего соавтора + 4 года работы во время Великой отечественной войны). До этого времени несогласованная с наследниками художника публикация является нарушением авторских прав. Стальной Детройт (talk) 09:38, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Работа братьев Стенбергов: Владимира Августовича Стенберга (1899—1982), Георгия Августовича Стенберга (1900—1933). Произведение перейдёт в общественное достояние не ранее 1 января 2057 года (70 после смерти последнего жившего соавтора + 4 года работы во время Великой отечественной войны). До этого времени несогласованная с наследниками художника публикация является нарушением авторских прав. Стальной Детройт (talk) 09:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, малое разрешение. Файл встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад <http://bloknot.ru/kul-tura/rossijskie-rokery-vy-pustili-pesnyu-v-chest-stoletiya-revolyutsii-568046.html> Dogad75 (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 15:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While published on a NASA website, there is no evidence that this image of a Soviet-era spacecraft was produced by NASA. Huntster (t @ c) 04:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not at all. Images are published in books, in reports, etc etc all the time. This doesn't mean any copyright is suddenly released. We have no evidence that this was the case, and such works were and are copyrighted upon creation in the Soviet Union/Russia. These don't fall under the exemptions in PD-RU-exempt. Huntster (t @ c) 06:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, photos are not PD-RU-exempt. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Старое фото оцифрованное участником в 2011 году. Настоящий автор, скорее всего неизвестен Dogad75 (talk) 12:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, own work is under doubt, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. кадр из фильма 1954 года Dogad75 (talk) 12:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, screenshot from 1954 film isn't own work. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]