Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/30

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 30th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of Public Domain with pushy repetitious uploads against policy. The image has been deleted three times (!) already, as File:Szczepan Koruba obraz olejny.JPG and File:Szczepan Koruba.JPG by User:INeverCry, as well as File:Szczepan Koruba obraz olejny autor Robert Zwierzyniecki.jpg by User:Ellin Beltz. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Szczepan Koruba obraz olejny autor Robert Zwierzyniecki.jpg Poeticbent talk 05:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, watermark, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history. LX (talk, contribs) 15:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as unambiguous copyvio. --Эlcobbola talk 16:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hsujsbiownoon.jpg Nafio62346 (talk) 11:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: 1) COM:CHARACTER 2) extract from http://thebirdfromthemoon-art.tumblr.com/image/116911541502 then re-watermarked

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. I did not find this picture at abmc.gov. Picture taken in France, no indication that this would be a US government work. Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the original uploader (Roger Davies is), but I did transfer this file to commons.
You can find the same photo in an ABMC file :
from PDF file, page 14 : https://www.abmc.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Aisne-Marne_Booklet.pdf
on ABMC website : https://www.abmc.gov/cemeteries-memorials/europe/aisne-marne-american-cemetery
I don't know what's the copyright status of this brochure, and obviously the original uploader did not extract it from the PDF. I would think that either this photo was used to illustrate the page at one time (in 2005, maybe?), or that he scanned it from the brochure (you get it at the entrance of the cemetery, it's free).
--Zeugma fr (talk) 22:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Edit : in the wayback machine : http://web.archive.org/web/20050305223509/http://www.abmc.gov/am.htm
more specifically : http://web.archive.org/web/20050405022608/http://www.abmc.gov/images/am1w.jpg
--Zeugma fr (talk) 22:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! This will do. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyvio}}, alamy.com is copyrighted Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 21:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyvio}} Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 21:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, test uploading by the user (described in Burmese) NinjaStrikers «» 15:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in addition to being incredibly messed up, it is also a copyright violation, and thus a violation of policy. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not seeing a release under the license given at the source. OTRS filed? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - License confirmed.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake author and license. See metadata.
And there's no CC BY 4.0 license on Russian State Duma web site: Об использовании информации сайта - this is an incompatible license because there are nothing about, for example, commercial usage and derivative works. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 20:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither of the uploaders of this image are "Author Myr Muratet" who is listed in the metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Nomen ad hoc. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

always the same : picture coming from a delete photography (pas d'autorisation du photographe) - supprimer les deux photos Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 18:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Keep. Was already kept. No valid reason to delete. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]
    always the same funny "keep because already keep" :) :) :) --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 18:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, I'm laughing out 😂... because I wrote "already kept" and not "already keep". Nomen ad hoc (talk) 05:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  • "already kept" deleted

1) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Anne-Lise_Depoil.jpg

--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image extracted from a photo by "Author Myr Muratet" whose photos were uploaded by another account, see the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pro patria semper, as this image was created by Myr Muratet, neither Pro patria semper nor this uploader has rights to it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Nomen ad hoc. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extract from a delete - Nomen ad hoc (ex Pro Patria Semper) spoke a lot about "authorization" but nothing true exists -- see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:C%C3%A9r%C3%A9monie_de_remise_des_dipl%C3%B4mes_d%27archiviste_pal%C3%A9ographe_(2016).jpg Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image extracted from a photo by "Author Myr Muratet" whose photos were uploaded by another account, see the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pro patria semper, as this image was created by Myr Muratet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Nomen ad hoc. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extracted from a delete Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 05:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:C%C3%A9r%C3%A9monie_de_remise_des_dipl%C3%B4mes_d%27archiviste_pal%C3%A9ographe_(2016).jpg[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source image of this file has been deleted, thus this file cannot be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Nomen ad hoc. --Yann (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

part of a delete photo (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:C%C3%A9r%C3%A9monie_de_remise_des_dipl%C3%B4mes_2014_d%27archiviste_pal%C3%A9ographe.jpg) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 03:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

it's not true that the problem of authorization has been resolved. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 03:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
where is the authorization of the photograph (OTRS) ?
where is the certification that École des chartes is an official account (OTRS).
12 November 2016, Yann ask OTRS confirmation https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Inauguration_officielle_du_nouveau_b%C3%A2timent_de_l%27%C3%89cole_au_65,_rue_de_Richelieu,_par_Fran%C3%A7ois_Hollande,_pr%C3%A9sident_de_la_R%C3%A9publique.jpg
nothing OTRS, why ?
see the argumentation for another photo (École des chartes) by Jameslwoodward [here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Inauguration_officielle_du_nouveau_b%C3%A2timent_de_l%27%C3%89cole_au_65,_rue_de_Richelieu,_par_Fran%C3%A7ois_Hollande,_pr%C3%A9sident_de_la_R%C3%A9publique.jpg] Deleted: Requires a free license from the photographer or from École des chartes. In the latter case, the e-mail must include a copy of the written agreement with the photographer that allows École des chartes to freely license the image -- either of this via the procedure at OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
see also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rama#Compte_officiel_malheureusement_bloqu.C3.A9
the situation is not clean. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Jameslwoodward's prior close "Requires a free license from the photographer or from École des chartes. In the latter case, the e-mail must include a copy of the written agreement with the photographer that allows École des chartes to freely license the image -- either of this via the procedure at OTRS". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I lament this deletion. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement QazîKurd (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 22:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope lNeverCry 00:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naomiardella (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bonfimb5 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source says all rights reserved Victuallers (talk) 01:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope lNeverCry 01:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero

edit

Although claimed as "own work", all the logos uploaded are clear copyvios, above the TOO. Missing permissions in all cases.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 01:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)

edit

Dozens of logos from a serial copyright violator. None have proper sources, some are obvious copyvios. Some might be {{PD-textlogo}} in their home countries, many not.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I fixed description and licensing info for some of them.  Keep those.
Around 36 logos (grouped at the end of list) are very small, in icon resolution. For most of them probably exist a higher version; many of them (if not all) are unused. I didn't even tried to fix their details.  Delete --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete agree with XXN. Kathisma (talk) 01:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)

edit

Team group shots, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)

edit

files with incorrect licenses (like PD-Old with 50 years from publishing required for a file of 1976), bad or absent sources.

rubin16 (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ok, I went and found a slightly more correct source for the first one. However, I am unsure if this ia anonymous work or not. Reardless even if it is anonymous, then the template says 50 years, and only 42 years have passed. Most likely we should  Delete, but it would be nice to figure out when to undelete. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 17:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Menjerol (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bilalsaeedmusic (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

lNeverCry 01:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khalifa Alansari (talk · contribs)

edit

per COM:ADVERT

lNeverCry 01:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A low-quality photo of people standing around in a sports hall. Not in scope. This, that and the other (talk) 01:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE badly warped pdf format portrait lNeverCry 01:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/9f/99/fd/9f99fda131057e61f7846c06e48b4572.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken this photograph. This is a specimen of the scientific collection of Institute of Veterinary Anatomy of the Leipzig University where I have been teaching for 20 years --Uwe Gille (talk) 11:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks! Everything is fine then. Jcb (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - severely blurred lNeverCry 01:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - I'd do it myself but lack the powers Victuallers (talk) 13:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope lNeverCry 01:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 02:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope lNeverCry 02:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 02:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Anthere: Out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of commons?!? unused, but with e-mail address Hystrix (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho poor (Nokia C7) quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 panoramio streams of imho poor quality, imho randomly taken for personal use, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by bot – no educational value, unsharp and personality rights Albinfo (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image of trees(?) at night. No location, no description, generic file name, unused, uncategorized. Gauss (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completely blurry image of the interior a nondescript apartment. Gauss (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry picture without identifiable features, probably taken at night from inside a bus in an unknown city. No description, location or category. Gauss (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musician208 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to the mistake uploaded this file and privacy.Please delete this file or remove the image. Inderjeet kaushik (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Due to mistake upload or incomplete information please remove or delete the image and links thanks Inderjeet kaushik (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete As it is an unused image and requested by uploader, we can apply courtesy deletion here, IMO. Ankry (talk) 08:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirhassan568 (talk · contribs)

edit

personal images

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 00:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swsperves (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 20:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of doors of a metro train without discernible characteristics. No conceivable educational use. Gauss (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramazanpolat038 (talk · contribs)

edit

Non-free logos.

--XXN, 20:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adnanpjevic (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused personal photos - out of scope.

--XXN, 20:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XDeathMachinez (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused personal photos - out of scope.

--XXN, 20:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentifiable trees seen through an unremarkable window with unremarkable drapes. Out of scope, I'd say. Gauss (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentifiable trees seen through an unremarkable window with unremarkable drapes. Out of scope. Gauss (talk) 20:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olga ECP (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:ADVERT.

--XXN, 21:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lousy sharpness Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work by panoramio user. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 21:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure what this pretty small picture is supposed to show but I don't see how it should fit into Commons' scope. Gauss (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 22:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grégoire Lompo (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - personal images with no educational use.

Savhñ 23:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf file which appears to be an advertisement for some service complete with links. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiwole (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 18:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel.rubino19 (talk · contribs)

edit

Screenshots of Windows and Google Streetview, copyright issues.

Gauss (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Gauss (talk) 18:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I've uploaded a brightened and filtered version that makes things much clearer... but this just makes it more obvious that it's not showing anything of interest properly- we can only see bits of the seats, little of interest on the interior, and nothing clear on the platform outside. Ubcule (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Additional; this image is better anyway. Ubcule (talk) 22:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of uploader. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 19:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of uploader. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of uploader. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope poor quality selfie photograph. Acabashi (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rasep555 (talk · contribs)

edit

Files used for vandalism; out of scope.

Savhñ 19:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 02:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless someone wan'ts to repair the template it's out of scope with a one time use in 2015. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a video game, Microsoft Flight Simulator X. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 04:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low-resolution version of File:José Ferreiro (Filho).JPG, not useful for an educational purpose. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 04:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fiefiefiefie (talk · contribs)

edit

Logo out of scope (maybe a © issue as well), map doesn't seem to be free (GPS screenshot) Thoughts?

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saurabhtulu (talk · contribs)

edit

Non educational and out of scope

~AntanO4task (talk) 05:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's old photo so i don't need Mjanoos2693 (talk) 05:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image from a large Paid COI sock farm, no evidence of provenance for image. —SpacemanSpiff 07:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here. Given this and his other uploads, this user should be blocked. Acabashi (talk) 20:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scaled-down duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grundbegriffe_der_Psychologie_von_heute.pdf 178.197.234.235 21:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per [2]. --Rosenzweig τ 14:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher resolution duplicate File:Summa Iniuria.jpg 194.11.202.158 17:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: coloouration different, no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of another deleted files. Both uploaded within a few minutes of each. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work. Taking someone else's photo and applying a Photoshop filter to it doesn't make it yours to license. LX (talk, contribs) 16:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work. Taking someone else's photo and applying a Photoshop filter to it doesn't make it yours to license. LX (talk, contribs) 16:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio or incorrect license https://www.hw.ac.uk/about/profile/governance/richard-williams.htm Aloneinthewild (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Grabbed from the web, e.g. here http://www.hostelworld.com/hosteldetails.php/BellaVista-Hotel/Durres/81116 Albinfo (talk) 19:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Grabbed from the web: http://www.bodymindsoulspirit.com/how-to-use-brainwaves-to-expand-your-consciousness/ and many other places Albinfo (talk) 19:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web like all the other files of this user (e.g. here http://saglikhareketi.blogspot.ch/2013/02/bal-ve-tarcn-mucizesi.html ) Albinfo (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web like all the other files from this user: http://bilgifenerim.com/zika-virusu-hastaligi-nedirbelirtileri-nelerdir/ Albinfo (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Why is an uploader's college certificate significant to the world ? Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Why is an uploader's certificate significant to the world ? Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 19:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work by copyvio: see Acabashi (talk) 19:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Copyvio for light art. No Fop in France. Per Commons:Deletion requests/Fête des lumières. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:42, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No copyright for light. Yann (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork (projection mapping) TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I don't think there is a copyright on this. Yann (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It's artwork. There is a copyright on this... Like Tour Eiffel at night... --DocMuséo 14:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
    • There is no copyright on the Eiffel Tower at night. How many times do we have to repeat that? *sigh* There is only copyright on a show from the Eiffel Tower, with fireworks, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Désolé. Passer par l'anglais a simplifié un peu trop ce que je voulais dire. Alors, comme le français est votre langue maternelle, j'en profite ! Oui, nous sommes d'accord : ce n'est pas la Tour Eiffel en elle-même (ou tout autre monument du domaine public) qui est soumise au droit d'auteur la nuit, mais l'oeuvre qui y est (sur)ajouté (mise en lumière, feux d'artifice, etc.). En l'occurence, ici, il y a bien une oeuvre de l'esprit qui utilise la cathédrale Saint Jean comme support. Donc, malheureusement, cette photo ne me semble pas admissible sur Wiki. Mais si vous avez des éléments légaux allant dans le sens contraire, je suis preneur ! Cordialement--DocMuséo 20:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Keep With Yann.--Jebulon (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yann and Jebulon: How can you say such an artistic work is not copyrighted ?! Such a projection mapping (which is actually not a motionless picture) is like an animated movie. Look at the official 2016 program of the Fête des Lumières here : "the Festival of Lights brings together artists from over twenty-five different fields who transform the City of Lyon with light". Look at the 2016 project on St Jean cathedral here : "Artists Yann Nguema / Ez3kiel ".Yes, there are artists ! And it concerns any projection mapping of the official program of the Fête des Lumières of any year ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment A video of it in 2008. Not totally motionless as you can see. And far from being a simple light. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous closure. --Jcb (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lady-cat13 (talk · contribs)

edit

They are not own works by the uploader.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leo Newrules (talk · contribs)

edit

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IVickyChoudhary (talk · contribs)

edit

the article where the image is used is nominated for deletion in wikipedia, if it is delete when you close this then please delete the file too for being out of scope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzi_Khan

Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission either. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IVickyChoudhary (talk · contribs)

edit

The uploader does not hold rights, declares downloading from the internet COM:NETCOPYVIO

-- DaxServer (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:ManyArellanoOficial

edit

Personal images and artwork. None of the files are in use by the user, are of no interest to anyone else, have no educational value. Out of scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henrychan320 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: What is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://imagenes.canalrcn.com/ImgNoticias/styles/530xauto/s3/s3fs-public/noticias/obispo_0.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hassan baig (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope; Spam.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirrezamohammadiur (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Praashekh (talk · contribs)

edit

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pesell (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work. Old photos of polish people and propaganda.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP Krd 18:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pesell (talk · contribs)

edit

Doubtful claims of own work on these images: one is historic and obviously not own work, two are drawings by User_talk:R.Zwierzynieck, and two are photos of seals or emblems, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igor Kercsa (talk · contribs)

edit

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igor Kercsa (talk · contribs)

edit

No FoP in Ukraine.

Sealle (talk) 04:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Placing of memorial plaque is a public act of local administration and is realised only on the base of its official documents with the main and only purpose of informing the public about some event or a man of worth. The memorial plaque is not a sculpture (although the Ucrainian law does not quote the definition of a sculpture, the main object of a sculpture is artistic figure, of a memory plaque – plain information, mostly text ). It is not also a part of architecture, in spite that it can be mounted on the wall of building, because the architect did not planned it in his project. So, in my humble opinion, it is rather a kind of medium to inform the public on behalf of administration (article 10 в) — official information by administration) , which as such should be free.
More. A panorama, according to The Oxford Dictionary is «a picture or photograph containing a wide view». For that «Freedom of panorama» is about buildings or a large objects. One can not snap panorama from two meter.
At last, looking to the existing practice, there are hundreds of memorial plaques from Ukraine in Commons. Should they all be deleted? For example:
List
:File:Ukr Kharkiv Podolsky lane 2016 Memorial plaque.jpeg
File:Memorial plaque to Grigoriy Gnatenko, Ilyichyovsk.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Chrushov.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Surgay.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Ogloblin.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Zasyasdko.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Melnikov.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Korobchanski.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Maleev.jpg
File:Donets memorial plaque Alshits.jpg
File:Kotsiubynsky memorial plaque.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Boiko.jpg
File:Donetsk memorial plaque Geyer.jpg
File:Memorial plaque Ivanov Kazatin.jpg
File:Borysov memorial plaque Kharkov.jpg
File:Vasyl Lypkivskiy memorial plaque Kyiv.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка першій конференції українського краєзнавства.jpg
File:Ostrogski Castle in Starokostiantyniv. Memorial plaque. Замок Острозьких в Старокостянтинові. :Пам'ятна дошка.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка Ковалю Максиму Опанасовичу (с. Піщане).jpg
File:Дендрологічний парк 647.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка Паустовському.png
File:Пам'ятна дошка Яна Собеського.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка..JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка Ванжулів.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка...jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка педагогу.JPG
Wiki Loves Monuments - Полтавська область – 9 (in this galery are 100 snaps of mem. plaques & monuments)
File:Пам'ятна дошка у Парку.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка, Мотрин монастир.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка с. Малі Кусківці.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка Мізюну Григорію Михайловичу.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка Білявському Івану Сергійовичу.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка Федоруку Андрію.jpg
File:Пушкінська 66-1.jpg
File:Пам’ятна дошка Іванові Франку.jpg
File:Охрім Кравченко пам'ятна дошка.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка поруч з дубом.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка Костел Св.Мартина.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка на полудованих сходах.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка Ю.П. Василевичу-Славутич.jpg
File:Будинок творчості композиторів. Пам'ятна дошка.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка В. С. Висоцькому (Кременчук).jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка Є. Т. Добрик (Кременчук).jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка на честь Гришка.jpg
File:Пам’ятна дошка на честь воїнів.JPG
File:Духовне училище, пам'ятна дошка.JPG
File:Духовне училище, пам'ятна дошка.JPG
File:Біля музею пам'ятна дошка.jpg
File:Біля музею пам'ятна дошка.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка М. В. Чернову (Кременчук).jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка О. Й. Халаменюку (Кременчук).jpg
File:Пам’ятна дошка Левку Лук’яненку (м. Глиняни).jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка на стіні Успенської церкви.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка в честь Козицького П..jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка в честь Довженко О..jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка на честь М.Лисенко м.Рівне.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка на честь письменниці О.С.Ткачук.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка на стіні міського арсеналу.JPG
File:Пам’ятна дошка на честь воїнів-десантників.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка перейменуванню вулиці на честь І. М. Приходька (Кременчук).JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка в честь Пащенко О.С..jpg
File:Костел святої Варвари (Бердичів) - пам'ятна дошка.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка біля пам'ятнику по просп. Московський, 275.JPG
File:Житловий будинок, бердичів, вул. Садова 3-пам'ятна дошка.JPG
File:Пам’ятна дошка Василеві Атаманюку на будівлі середньої школи.jpg
File:Станція, на якій працював Горький О. М (пам'ятна дошка).JPG
File:Пам"ятна дошка.jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка. Будинок №5 вул.Степана Качали, у якому народився Василь Барвінський (м.Тернопіль).jpg
File:Пам'ятна дошка на стіні будинку "Слово", вул. Культури, 9, м.Харків.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка на честь М.П.Драгоманова м.Рівне.JPG
File:Пам'ятна дошка на честь М.Ф.Біляшівського м.Рівне.JPG

--Igor Kercsa (talk) 19:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: These are clearly sculpture. I suggest you read COM:FOP. The word "panorama" is from the German and simply means that in some circumstances in about half of all countries it is permissible to publish photographs of copyrighted works that are in public. It does not matter whether the image is very broad -- a panorama -- or very narrow, as these are. FOP allows images. You argue that it does not apply, so you argue against yourself. As for your long list, if you believe any or all of them are problems, you should tag them for deletion. Commons has 40 million images My best guess is that at least 1% -- 400,000 images -- should probably be deleted, but we are only a small number of human volunteers. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pictogram is not CC licenced, is copyrighted by Stepan Kotrba, Zoo Prague. contact [email protected] 89.177.132.228 00:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CC licenced is the photo, not the pictogram. Thus, the question is whether the zoo exteriors can fall under so-called FOP as "veřejné prostranství" in sense of copyright law. With regard to specifics of Czech legal terms, legislation and its interpretation, I will analyse this problem in Czech. The problem is whether "publicly accesible without restriction" have to be interpreted as "publicly accesible without condition" even though the condition can be fulfilled easily by everybody and thus everybody have right to visit the zoo, i.e. the real traffic in the zoo is comparable with streets, squares, open parks and similar public places. Other relevant factors are that the zoo is managed by non-profit (contributory) city organization (not by any enterprise) on estates which were donated for public purposes.
Autorský zákon pro své potřeby "veřejné prostranství" nedefinuje ani neodkazuje některou z definic ve dvou jiných zákonech, které je pro své vlastní účely definují - zákon o obcích a zákon o místních poplatcích. Pokud bych z těchto definic měli vycházet, obě obsahují formulaci otevřeným výčtem: "zejména náměstí, tržiště, silnice, místní komunikace, parky a veřejná zeleň, jakož i další prostory přístupné každému bez omezení". Není zcela jasné, jestli podmínka stanovená pro "další prostory" se nutně vztahuje i na ty příklady, které jsou v definici jmenovány explicitně. V našem případě jde zejména o park. A druhou věcí je, zda podmínění vstupu například poplatkem je "omezením" ve smyslu této definice, protože splnit tuto podmínku (zaplatit poplatek) smí každý bez omezení, takže každý má právo do areálu vstoupit. "Každému bez omezení" vylučuje omezení okruhu osob, nikoliv např. časové omezení vstupu. V tomto smyslu má provoz uvnitř areálu stejně veřejnou povahu jako provoz na náměstích nebo v parcích s bezplatným vstupem. Typickým příkladem soukromého (neveřejného) prostranství by byl takový park, kde by veřejnost neměla na vstup právní nárok, tedy kde vstup či prohlídka nejsou nabízeny jako veřejná služba. Při posuzování veřejné či soukromé povahy prostranství areálu zoo lze rovněž přihlédnout k tomu, že provozovatel není podnikatelským subjektem, ale příspěvkovou (tedy neziskovou) organizací hlavního města Prahy, tedy právnickou osobou veřejného práva zřízenou k plnění úkolů ve veřejném zájmu. Využití ve prospěch veřejnosti bylo také jednou z hlavních podmínek donace Aloise Svobody, kterou město pozemky zoo získalo. --ŠJů (talk) 01:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
At the question page of the official web of the Prague Zoo, Romana Anděrová, which replied as an official speaker of the zoo there, answered to the question from 2006-04-22 18:58:44: "Zoo je veřejné prostranství, kde nelze kouření zakázat. Kouřit se nesmí v pavilonech a v restauracích. Ve venkovních prostorách naštěstí kouř ke zvířatům nepronikne, jinak by se jim to určitě nelíbilo." Similarly, to 2006-08-24 09:24:04 question: "Zoologická zahrada je veřejné prostranství podobně jako Stromovka nebo jiné parky. Nemůžeme proto v celém areálu kouření striktně zakázat, můžeme ho jen omezit v uzavřených pavilonech či v restauraci." Thus, management of the Prague Zoo declared officially and consistently the outdoors of the zoo as "veřejné prostranství" (public space). Thus, FOP can be applied undoubtedly. --ŠJů (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumed copyright violation; watermark on picture does not appear to be related to user, who gives a different name on his pt.wiki userpage Choess (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 01:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By mistake, Cyrillic symbol occurred in the word "cover" Adavyd (talk) 03:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from her Twitter page. Also, no EXIF data. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 04:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

last remaining upload of user, small size, no EXIF, likely copyvio Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr Monster 10 (talk · contribs)

edit

Remaining two uploads of this user. Other images were deleted as not own work, varying qualities. These two are at least very suspicious and also likely copyright violations.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded other images of this building, which were obviously not own work. This also looks like it's taken from somewhere else. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from this YouTube video, located here, does not have a license compatible with Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free packaging. LX (talk, contribs) 09:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - insufficiently described abstract collage ŠJů (talk) 09:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:Andre in the late '80s.jpg. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:United States Champion Dean Ambrose 2.jpg. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, bad name, out of focus. Not really usefull Ganímedes (talk) 12:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Boolacas

edit

The name of the photographer is given, and the metadata states the photos are copyrighted; there is no evidence of permission to license copyrighted images. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark in the only place in focus make it useless Ganímedes (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. This elaborate selfie, with the file and added cat named after the uploader Raihan rasiba, is a mask-out added on to a desktop wallpaper, possibly found here. Desktop wallpapers are usually free to download, usually royalty free, but typically licensed through a stock site. Most stock sites don't allow you to republish their images even if you buy a license. So not only a self-aggrandizing selfie, but probably copyvio too. Acabashi (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement QazîKurd (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan . Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan . Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan . Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan . Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan . Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan . Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan . Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Note the description as ' This is my photo, all welcome'. Acabashi (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph of the uploader Rasib Raihan. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Note the description: 'This is my picture. I am rasiba Raihan'. Acabashi (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution. Better quality here: File:Valérie Amarou 1 (cropped).jpg Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 15:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution. Better quality here: File:Valérie Amarou 1.jpg Caméléon Diaphane (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad files. Why? To illustrate what? Mykola Vasylechko 16:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free book cover. LX (talk, contribs) 16:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a 2D copyrighted work, not covered by the right of panorama in Canada or the US Hchc2009 (talk) 17:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity artwork of poor quality (oversaturated etc); unlikely to be in scope as superior images of the same locomotive are available Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity artwork of poor quality (oversaturated etc); unlikely to be in scope as superior images of the same locomotive are available Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful file, this uploader just uploads every single flickr file he finds. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This almost certainly has to be a photo of a copyrighted work. Jmabel ! talk 00:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think that the uploader is the copyright holder for the lyrics and the music. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless SVG encapsulation of a JPG image that is already available at File:AlAlcorn-Cropped.jpg KCAuXy4p (talk) 01:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to never have been used. User was blocked on the Turkish Wikipedia for having an inappropriate username, perhaps for being promotional. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 01:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo with non-geometric features. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 04:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samildemir (talk · contribs)

edit

inconsistent quality, sizes and EXIF data, copyright violations

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The book covers are likely copyrighted. The tone of the picture seems like spam. Out of scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hassan baig

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable movie. MCMLXXXIX 18:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 01:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused personal picture Kayser Ahmad (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zerep4411 (talk · contribs)

edit

Four unused, uncategorized personal images and one unused, uncategorized drawing without apparent purpose or enlightening description, all out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 20:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 20:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 20:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and maybe above TOO too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 20:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angeln444 (talk · contribs)

edit

Non-free logo.

--XXN, 20:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, logos above TOO, if there are free then the reason must be provided. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bmx20 (talk · contribs)

edit

Low resolution photos, unlikely to be uploaders work. See also the watermark on File:Lukas haraslin.png.jpg, which suggests this is a copyvio.

--XXN, 21:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 19:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Lgo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, maybe above TOO too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 19:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly framed, poor quality, blurred, and slanted. Doesn't do the project any favours. Acabashi (talk) 19:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio too http://vb.alsheher.com/showthread.php?t=45969. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by E Roc ond (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 19:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User page image of an inactive user. unused. GeorgHHtalk   19:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 18:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and unused anyway. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not useful for educational purposes. MCMLXXXIX 18:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, unused. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [6] MCMLXXXIX 18:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [7] MCMLXXXIX 19:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo exists in higher resolution elsewhere. Unlikely that is a Bollywood hugama created photo. See [8] Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo exists in higher resolution elsewhere. Unlikely that is a Bollywood hugama created photo. See [9] Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image of Ivanka Trump is sourced to a flickr account maintained by what seems to be a radio show. The image is, on Commons, attributed as "provided by [the show]", but at the same time the photograph is attributed to a photographer at Getty Images. I see no evidence that the radio show have the right to release this image. I can only believe that this is COM:Flickrwashing.

It is Getty Images ID #110388360 by Dimitrios Kambouris.

(tJosve05a (c) 07:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like a legitimate radio show that interviewed Ivanka Trump, so I assumed she gave permission for use of the picture.Anythingyouwant (talk) 13:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Use, not transfer of copyright, since the image is still listed on Getty, by a staff photographer. Media might buy rights to use images, but not rights to re-/sub-license. (tJosve05a (c) 14:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the subject of the photo does not own the copyright of the image, Dimitrios Kambouris at Getty Images does. (tJosve05a (c) 14:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, you may be correct that the radio station improperly uploaded this to Flickr with the wrong license. So, I do not object to deletion, although someone might want to get in touch with the radio station to give them a chance to clarify. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think what User:Josve05a suggested is probably correct, but instead of deleting the family tree could we just change the image of Ivanka please? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unless and until the image of Ivanka is changed, this cannot be kept. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Meta Data; small; maybe not his here own work; all the other photos of the user are copyvio Reda Kerbouche (talk) 08:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution and missing metadata. This is the user's only upload. LX (talk, contribs) 08:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution and missing metadata. This is the user's only upload. LX (talk, contribs) 08:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. schending van het portretrecht (geportretteerde geeft geen toestemming voor het gebruik van deze foto) 2. het is geen professioneel gemaakte foto en aldus niet representatief voor geportretteerde 3. geportretteerde houdt een artikel in zijn handen waarvoor hij niet via wikipedia als reclame-boegbeeld wil fungeren 5. geportretteerde ziet liever voorlopig geen profielfoto op de (niet door hem gemaakte) wikipedia-pagina over hem tot hij zelf een betere foto voorlegt. Audiocult (talk) 09:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Het portretrecht is in het geval van deze afbeelding niet aan de orde. Afgebeelde persoon wil de foto graag verwijderd hebben, omdat een door hem ingestuurde afbeelding niet op het artikel geplaatst kon worden. Mijn voorstel is om de door hem geplaatste afbeelding weer terug op het artikel te plaatsen, want die foto, die door sommigen als te artistiek werd gezien, heeft naar mijn mening geen problemen om op het artikel te worden gebruikt. Graag wijs ik dhr. Merkelbach er op dat de afbeelding ook onder een vrije CC-by-SA licentie beschikbaar blijft als deze op Commons wordt verwijderd, omdat het mogelijk is dat deze afbeelding elders onder deze licentie is gebruikt. Daarmee is ook het stuk Wikipedia-reclameboegbeeld ontkracht. Edoderoo (talk) 09:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • That a non-professional photo isn't representative for the portrayed person because it's a non-professional photo is pure nonsense. Amateurs photos can be just as good (or sometimes even better) than professional photos. That the portrayed rather doesn't want a picture if he doesn't like the picture is something he can't decide about. If the community of the Dutch Wikipedia accepts this picture as a valid picture, the portrayed has to accept that (since there's no problem with portrait right and no problem with copyright). The page about the portrayed is a page about the portrayed, not the page of the portrayed. Mbch331 (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We rarely delete images at the request of the subject and never at the request of a third party. Too many vandals make such requests to harm the subject. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This stained glass window is a work by Johannes Schreiter whose works are copyrighted as the artist is still alive. As this is an interior photograph the exceptions of freedom of panorma do not help us here. AFBorchert (talk) 10:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Copyvio (Copyvio)
No speedy delete: Cover may be PD-old. Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Cover may indeed be old, but someone will have to prove that. The drawing looks new to me. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1970th. Mykola Vasylechko 12:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 12:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion of redirects

edit

Nominating this and the other redirect for deletion, after my speedy deletion requests were rejected. In my opinion these two redirects should be deleted so that the previously occupied files of the same name deleted by both Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ternopil, Ternopil's'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (1).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ternopil, Ternopil's'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (12).jpg can be easily undeleted in the future should the assumed works (buildings) fall public domain. I have already changed the instance of use at w:uk:Вікіпедія:Wiki Loves Earth/Тернопільська область/Тернопіль to point to the current file name. However, I do not believe the uses must be changed at w:uk:Вікіпедія:Wiki Loves Monuments/Тернопільська область/Тернопіль, as I assume the instance of uses refer to the old deleted files, not the current files that do not show something monumental. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sieht nach einer URV aus (Miltos Manetas; * 6. Oktober 1964 in Athen) Jbergner (talk) 12:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If this is by Miltos Manetas it is a copyvio; if not, it is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 12:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Syktyvkar Academic theater.jpg (formerly under file name "File:Драмтеатр - panoramio (1).jpg")

edit

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Building after 1950. Mykola Vasylechko 11:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Keep According the description it is drama theatre in Syktyvkar. Syktyvkar is Russian city, and Russia has freedom of panorama.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{FoP-Russia}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 12:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of derivate h-stt !? 14:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is being used for creating auto-biographies in English Wikipedia and promotional user page. Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 14:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom -- user is a vandalism account. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. File is called 'Yin Fu'; desciption is: 'Yin Fu lovely photo'. This one purports to come from notoriously unreliable Facebook. Acabashi (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Reverted vandal removal of notice by uploader. Acabashi (talk) 07:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update note: The uploader has today decided to remove the Facebook link and change source and author... the original uploaded link can be found in the file history. I've found the picture on the Facebook page, so one of two things: a. possible copyvio as Facebook pics are nororiously unreliable, or b. If it is kosher on Facebook it is obviously a personal selfie image of a nonentity and out of scope. Acabashi (talk) 04:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 15:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.winstonchurchill.org/images/National_Churchill_Library_and_Center.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be from http://charlievillanueva.sportsblog.com/posts/2789346/i-m-returning-to-dallas.html. The uploader on en-wiki hasn't provided much verifiable source information and the only other image uploads from the account were all deleted as possibly unfree and were of the same basketball player. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be surprising if the photo came from a page that hadn't been created by the time the file was uploaded, but other than that, I agree. Given the lack of metadata and in light of en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 18#File:Cv31-image3.jpg, this should be  deleted. LX (talk, contribs) 16:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ainestar (talk · contribs)

edit

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information for both the object and the picture of it. On one hand this could be a chinese fake creation instead of a real bagde, on the other hand somebody has taken this picture of this 3D object and there is no evidence of permission from that photographer. Jcb (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990th. Mykola Vasylechko 15:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990th. Mykola Vasylechko 15:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonsoir, Le presbytère est notre maison, la photo ne me dérange pas, mais les panneaux sur le portail oui. Je peux vous fournir la même sans les panneaux. Cordialement Bruchier V. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16:01, 30 December 2016‎ (talk • contribs) 86.249.129.46 (UTC)

Bonsoir, je peux tout aussi bien effacer les inscriptions sur les panneaux si vous voulez. Sachez toutefois qu'aucun des critères de suppression n'est remplie en l'occurrence. Cordialement, --P.poschadel (talk) 16:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: modified version -- deleted original. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 16:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 16:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 16:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Ukraine. Building in 1953-1957. Mykola Vasylechko 16:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding between 1950th—1990th. Mykola Vasylechko 16:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created between 1950th—1990th. Mykola Vasylechko 16:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern painting (English inscription), OTRS required. Achim (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in Albania. Building was build in 1963. According to that and Wikimedia Commons policy, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in Albania. Building was build in 1963. According to that and Wikimedia Commons policy, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [11]. Yann (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in Albania. Building was build in 1963. According to that and Wikimedia Commons policy, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in Albania. Building was build in 1963. According to that and Wikimedia Commons policy, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [13]. Yann (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FoP in Albania. Building was build in 1963. According to that and Wikimedia Commons policy, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [14]. Yann (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 18:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 18:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 19:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 19:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 19:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990-2000th. Mykola Vasylechko 15:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990-2000th. Mykola Vasylechko 16:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990-2000th. Mykola Vasylechko 16:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990-2000th. Mykola Vasylechko 16:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be Crown copyright. The UK has the PMA+70 rule. No inidication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990th. Mykola Vasylechko 16:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad files. Why? To illustrate what? Mykola Vasylechko 16:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1995. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1995. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 2004. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 2001. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 2001. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not useful for educational purposes. MCMLXXXIX 19:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to File:Anna university 1.jpg and File:Anna university 4.jpg; I think two similar (but slightly different) examples are enough.

Ubcule (talk) 19:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: they are redundant files rather than duplicates. Can be kept. Ruthven (msg) 14:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This extremely clever poster, is most likely not the own work of the photographer who snapped its image during Occupy Boston. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I am the photographer. You are quite correct, of course, and I should have been more mindful of this when posting the picture here. It still feels like an important bit of documentation for the Occupy Boston article, but as it can only be supplied under fair use, I will re-upload to Wikipedia. Tim Pierce (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work, unlikely date (baseball without snow in background), and odd coloring leads to the suggestion this is an older image rephotographed by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1959. No Permission. Mykola Vasylechko 16:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence that uploader is creator of this image, no useful meta, small size, user's other uploads were all copyvios. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF, looks like a crop, previous uploads by this user were also copyright violations Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is the better version of same image — File:KG-2016-Ag-10som-Yusuf-b.png Vahe (talk) 18:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is the better version of same image — File:KG-2016-Ag-10som-Yusuf-a.png Vahe (talk) 18:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small picture without apparent educational purpose. Last remaining image of a user whose only global contribution has been a sandbox page (which uses this image without clear relation) older than a year. Gauss (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor quality, imho randomly taken for rather personal use, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of poor (Nokia C7) quality, imho randomly taken for rather personal use, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License release on source says "Creative Commons By License" and isn't hot linked to a version number. Declaration is incomplete and isn't valid. We need to know what version of CC they are releasing it under. Majora (talk) 19:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It is true that there are subtle differences between the versions of CC-BY, but they all accomplish our purpose and, given that 2016 date on the source page, I think it is fair to assume that v4.0 is intended. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from boat, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two major issues bad SVG to PNG render, and incompatible with free/libre vector graphics editor Inkscape. HarvettFox96 (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Uploaded better version available. HarvettFox96 (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se trata de la reproducción de una obra pictórica de la que desconozco a quién pertenecen los derechos. El pintor, Alfonso Grosso Sánchez, falleció en 1983. el archivo lo subí yo mismo y ahora me he dado cuenta que puede haber problemas en cuanto a la reproducción. Pido disculpas Alberto Bravo (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality and no good for the project, and given this user's other uploads, most likely copyvio. Acabashi (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing OTRS 178.197.225.64 20:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cited legal case does not say the images are PD, it says they were fair use. Additionally, there is no way to verify the claim this was a government work. Reguyla (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Obtained via an FOIA request" just means that the government had a copy, not that they own the copyright. No evidence, so PRP applies. Reventtalk 21:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that this was either artistic work created by the UK government, or that it is in the public domain The Bounder (talk) 13:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No real doubt about UK government source. --Yann (talk) 11:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extensive searches have been undertaken to find licence information: no free use or evidence of government origin has been established. No government origin has been found on searches at the Imperial War Museum, UK National Archives or National Portrait Gallery. In the book from which this image has been taken (Ben Macintyre: Operation Mincemeat, 2010), the image is acknowledged as being sourced from the family, not from free or government sources. The previous deletion was closed with the statement "No real doubt about UK government source": not only is there significant doubt, such an argument goes entirely against the precautionary principle. If you wish to keep this image, please provide proof that this is from a UK government source. The Bounder (talk) 21:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that this was either artistic work created by the UK government, or that it is in the public domain The Bounder (talk) 13:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No real doubt about UK government source. --Yann (talk) 11:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extensive searches have been undertaken to find licence information: no free use or evidence of government origin has been established. No government origin has been found on searches at the Imperial War Museum, UK National Archives or National Portrait Gallery. In the book from which this image has been taken (Ben Macintyre: Operation Mincemeat, 2010), the image is acknowledged as being sourced from the family, not from free or government sources. The previous deletion was closed with the statement "No real doubt about UK government source": not only is there significant doubt, such an argument goes entirely against the precautionary principle. If you wish to keep this image, please provide proof that this is from a UK government source. The Bounder (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non permanent advertisement. Not simple enough to consider it as copyright inelegible Discasto talk 21:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voy a pedir la autorización para reproducir esta imagen al Ayuntamiento de Alcalá de Henares. Pero no creo que tenga la respuesta antes de Reyes (06/01/2017). Un cordial saludo:--Raimundo Pastor (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Note that the city may have the right to use the image for this purpose only -- it is likely that the photographer must provide the license for the image of the candles. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third-party upload, claims Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, but I see no evidence of that license at the cited source. Jmabel ! talk 21:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding in 1990-2000. Mykola Vasylechko 22:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding after 1950. Mykola Vasylechko 22:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding after 1967. Mykola Vasylechko 22:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding after 1950. Mykola Vasylechko 22:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Biulding after 1998. Mykola Vasylechko 22:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Type at lower left reads "Copyright 1947 Warner Bros." The lobby card was indeed printed with copyright markings. WFinch (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The copyright was not renewed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Type at lower left reads "Copyright 1944 Paramount Pictures"; the lobby card does indeed bear copyright marks. WFinch (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The copyright was not renewed. User:WFinch, let me suggest that you check this before making any more similar nominations -- I can't remember a single case of a movie poster's copyright being renewed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#Germany for Nazi graffiti. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Germany for Nazi graffiti. 84.61.140.85 22:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep First of all, the threshold for originality is quite high in Germany so this likely fails to meet it. Even if it were copyrightable, COM:FOP#Germany states that "ephemeral works whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ... graffiti on exterior walls ... are typically considered permanent." As for being Nazi imagery, per COM:NCR there is no requirement that an image be legal in its source country (as long as it is legal in the US), only that it be Free. -- King of 20:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Has this file to be tagged with {{Nazi symbol}}? --84.61.140.85 12:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Even the user, who uploaded this file, is actually from Germany: de:Benutzer:Matthias.Gruber. --84.61.143.206 08:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 21:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It probably is own work, but I see not reason to keep a watermarked image with no useful description file name or categories. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uscg.mil is the only source information??? Some evidence for this, please! I guess, this image comes from some commercial of Dessault 188.104.101.99 22:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Comes from a USCG page without a credit, so it is almost certainly a USCG image -- if it were a Dassault image it would be credited. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is absolutely identical with the older File:Sinnbild Mofa.svg. And the older file had the correct name "Mofa"! Mediatus (talk) 23:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: both files are in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am the source of the Witness Statement. It is MY WITNESS STATEMENT and I created the document. Please read and see for yourself. Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Documents from the courts are usually in the public domain. I am not sure what the license should be. Yann (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 12:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored as per ticket 2014022410017096. Yann (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Regardless of the OTRS permission, this pdf file is out of scope as its not in use and of no apparent educational utility being a personal testimony. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for requesting my input on this document. I had originally added it as a reference tool because this was the testimony that was a key underpinning of the Supreme Court of Pakistan's decision to form the Judicial Commission and launch inquiry into the Memorandum's authenticity, origins, etc. The document is also apparently available on a web portal: https://www.scribd.com/document/82418771/Mansoor-Ijaz-s-witness-statement-to-the-Memogate-Commission, so perhaps if you feel the need to delete the document (I certainly can add it with appropriate permission authority, which I thought I had done in the first instance), then we can replace the pointer to this document on Wikimedia Commons with a pointer to the web page above.
I personally don't care one way or the other. I simply wanted to make sure the primary document information that was critical to the final conclusions developed by the Commission's justices was available to the general public. I still feel this document has important historical significance -- it is much more than a simply personal testimony with no educational utility, as you have stated. Happy to debate it further if needed. Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 20:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope -- we do not keep PDF's unless they are in use on another project. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since the current version of this is online (as stated on the first page of the pdf), why should this copy be separately uploaded and claimed as 'own work'? Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, which may not be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Model release, "In general, when the shutter is released, the photographer who pressed the button owns the copyright. An exception is when the image falls into the “work-made-for-hire”(also known as “work for hire”) category. A work-made-for-hire relationship is created in two situations: (1) the photographer is an employee hired to take photographs for the employer—an example would be a photojournalist who is an employee of a newspaper but not a wedding or portrait photographer who is hired for one event; or (2) the photographer is hired to provide photographs for collective works or compilations and signs a written agreement that specifically states that the work is to be considered a work made for hire. Therefore, freelance photographers are subjected to work-for-hire status only when they agree to it contractually." http://blog.kenkaminesky.com/photography-copyright-and-the-law/

These photographs are work-for-hire portfolio shots that belong to the model. The only release of rights to these photographs has been made to Wiki Commons.

Joe1w (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All of which is irrelevant as it is out of scope, and a poor photo to boot. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work, very small, odd pixelation or coloring around face and shoulders, looks like its from an unacknowledged source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Model release, "In general, when the shutter is released, the photographer who pressed the button owns the copyright. An exception is when the image falls into the “work-made-for-hire”(also known as “work for hire”) category. A work-made-for-hire relationship is created in two situations: (1) the photographer is an employee hired to take photographs for the employer—an example would be a photojournalist who is an employee of a newspaper but not a wedding or portrait photographer who is hired for one event; or (2) the photographer is hired to provide photographs for collective works or compilations and signs a written agreement that specifically states that the work is to be considered a work made for hire. Therefore, freelance photographers are subjected to work-for-hire status only when they agree to it contractually." http://blog.kenkaminesky.com/photography-copyright-and-the-law/

These photographs are work-for-hire portfolio shots that belong to the model. The only release of rights to these photographs has been made to Wiki Commons.

Joe1w (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make any of them free. IF you own the copyright, you need to provide proof. See OTRS on the how-to. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: poor photo, out of scope, probable copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image of Lake Constantia, depicting nothing specific at all Braveheart (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, quite good quality image in fact. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 18:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, sure. If you wanna keep all the crap imported from Panoramio, you go ahead and deal with it. Braveheart (talk) 20:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality duplicate of File:Rembrandt 61029.jpg. Much lower resolution and badly reproduced colour/tone. PatHadley (talk) 15:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use the duplicate template, not DR. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La pagina era una prueba, se autoguardo. Cenepred (talk) 15:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Requested by uploader. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was extracted from a photo by "Author Myr Muratet" whose photos were uploaded by another account, see the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pro patria semper, as this image was created by Myr Muratet, neither Pro patria semper nor this uploader has rights to it. I would point out that formerly "Didier Plowy" was considered to be the real name of the École nationale des chartes; I do not see anything from Myr Muratet granting permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, Yann resolved it as Kept. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Aside from the issues raised above, there is the more fundamental fact that the source of this image is given as:

"Extracted from File:Cérémonie de remise des diplômes d'archiviste paléographe (2016).jpg"

Unfortunately, that is not true -- this man does not appear in the cited image, so we have no source for this image.

We also have no confirmation of the identity of User:École des chartes, so much of the discussion above is making an unwarranted assumption that File:Cérémonie de remise des diplômes d'archiviste paléographe (2016).jpg is OK. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source, author likely not uploader. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find the image anywhere else, I doubt this image represents ASUNM. MCMLXXXIX 19:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 19:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete TOO in France is pretty low. Probably not ok to keep the file. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 20:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 20:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 20:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication of 'reasonable inquiry' on the identity of the photographer and no indication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am confused by this nomination. The source of the picture was clearly stated at the time of upload in 1 June 2007, as "Description=Airspeed Oxford advanced trainer. Photograph published in: Aircraft of the Fighting Powers Vol I Ed: H J Cooper, O G Thetford and D A. Russell Harborough Publishing Co, Leicester, England 1940. Photographer not identi..." That information was still in the template. So I have moved it over to source, the book was published in 1940 but the image came from the Aircraft Spotting Guide put out by the UK Government and the photo appears around the web from that source (http://www.wwiivehicles.com/great-britain/aircraft/trainer/airspeed-oxford-trainer.asp) and also this 1940 book. Notice that the picture in that book and the picture here are the same but for contrast and sharpening. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In the UK, the PMA+70 rule applies. It's not clear on what base the uploader stated that the photographer was not identified, but that does not necessarily mean that there was any 'reasonable inquiry'. Uploaders happen to state random things. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Ellin, I don't think that "put out by the UK Government" is correct -- the book was published by Harborough Publishing Co, Leicester, so PMA 70 would apply, not the UK government 50 year rule. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per discussion, COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]