Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/14

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 14th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of presumably living male is outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom ALE! ¿…? 13:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a copyright violation. -Excolis (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom ALE! ¿…? 13:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidental duplicate of File:Lieutenant General of the Indian Army.svg Prez001 (talk) 02:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom ALE! ¿…? 13:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is obsolete and is not required. Dsroxx (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, speedy keep, free licenses are irrevocable. The file has been in Commons 1½ years, it has proper license and big resolution. It illustrates well writing on sand. It has no categories, but I try to add some. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a copyright violation. -Excolis (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have my doubts whether this actually exceeds the threshold of originality. --ALE! ¿…? 13:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation. Unquestionably above the threshold in the US, let alone in its home country of Vietnam. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: deleted as out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: deleted as out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque tiene un error en el punto cardinal donde marca el norte que ha sido subsanado en la siguiente imagen. Espeleologoa (talk) 23:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ??? thats a user talk page. JuTa 21:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Хочу удалить с заменой на тот же файл Melanholikkk (talk) 05:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, unused file. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Хочу удалить файл и заменить его на тот же Melanholikkk (talk) 05:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text in Russian: Photo by Ilya Molitvin. OTRS permission needed. Sealle (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, disparaging as well Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file uploaded was not my own one. It was a mistake by myself. Brunhuber (talk) 14:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 12:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philippe Gérard is a contemporary painter. Copyright violation. 83.204.244.60 20:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete author still living. Uploader must prove that he was granted authorization by the author. Kathisma (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With regret, this image is obviously not by the flickr uploader, but taken from Google Earth. It is the version from 21 October 2007 (all vehicles are precisely in the same position). ELEKHHT 01:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 01:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete agree. Kathisma (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a blog [1] written by a person with no apparent connection to "Rosa Amato", suggests this is not uploader's own work but a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment After nominating this I realized that the two images are not exactly the same, and I ask that the nomination be withdrawn, they are similar but not same. Apologies to the uploader! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Has been withdrawn. AFBorchert (talk) 10:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears here [2] marked copyright, all rights reserved Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted as copyvio. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject of a photo doesn't own copyright to the photo as stated in the Description, possible COM:COPYVIO, also article to which it was attached [3] was declined on 1 February, making it out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This needs to be processed through COM:OTRS to be kept. AFBorchert (talk) 11:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a scan of a photo, unlikely to be uploader's "own work" as stated, possible COM:COPYVIO. User's other images are a gallery of this same Mr. Mantellini with other famous people. This image is unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, image is unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is of poor quality (lack of proper baseline) and unused, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and lack of useful metadata suggest this image is a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License claim is nonsensical. This image is all over the web ex: [4], possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size shows that this image was likely sourced from [5] which attached to [6] and is possible COM:COPYVIO. User's other uploads have camera data, but are found online on other webpages. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and presence [7] here, marked copyright, make this a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and presence [8] here, suggest possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of low quality and also found [9] here, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment User's entire upload gallery may contain more of these. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite statement in license, this is not a Norwegian road sign and contains too much information about a presumably Living, non-notable subject and is outside of COM:SCOPE and may also be a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence that this is licensed creative commons. RadioFan (talk) 04:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and low quality plus lack of meta data and appearance [10] here, suggest a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the photograph of the sculpture may be own work of uploader, the sculpture itself is by a living French artist (see here), who would hold the copyright on this piece, making the photo a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source given "own work" is unlikely as the subject died in the early 20th Century about 90 years ago. However, without the name of the photographer or the original source of the photo, it is not possible to determine if this is COM:COPYVIO or not. The uploader's name implies connection between this image, the French Wikipedia page on "Institut Bergonié" and this gentleman's biography. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of non-notable presumably living subjects, unused on the project is outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photomontage, no camera data, unlikely to be user's own work. The uploader's name implies connection between this image, the French Wikipedia page on "Institut Bergonié" and its founders biography. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, small size photomontage outside of COM:SCOPE. The uploader's name implies connection between this image, the French Wikipedia page on "Institut Bergonié" and its founders biography. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is found on multiple websites [11] and may be a facebook or promotional photograph. The version uploaded here has no metadata from camera despite large size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata and not in use. Out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no useful metadata and presence of larger image [12] here & marked © Transboréal : tous droits réservés, 2006-2014, suggest COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from book as shown here [13] , marked "UN LIVRE // SUR LA ROUTE 66 – carnets de voyage. Enquête de Stéphane Dugast. Photographies de Christophe Géral. Introduction de Philippe Labro. Beau-Livre. 180 pages – 38 € (La Martinière éditions)'", possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given is correct, but a visit to that webpage shows its marked "© Verlagsgesellschaft Madsack GmbH & Co. KG" see [14] here. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Camera metadata reads: Camera model Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Author Michael Setzpfandt. *Source of upload is given as "own work" by user Stephan Buchheim. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image can be found [15] here, source given is claimed to be "own work" and author is stated to be "Simone Hartau". One of uploader's other images was credited to a different photographer, there is no possible way one uploader can be two photographers, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image without useful camera metadata also found in multiple websites, see here [16], possible band or musician promotional photo, unlikely to be "own work" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low quality image also found [17] here, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, small size image also found [18] here, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible COM:COPYVIO, while image is of large size, user's other two uploads were from other websites and this image has no camera meta data. It is presently in use in the project, but under the precautionary principle, I nominate it for deletion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size of image and that it is also found [19] here suggest a possible COM:COPYVIO. Also no camera metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Foto wird von uns (der Veranstalter) als Pressefoto für Bochum Total herausgegeben. Alle Rechte bei cooltour Bochum / Bochum Total 2010UG Cooltour2004 (talk) 10:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A license is required, see COM:OTRS .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that uploader "Cooltour" and those listed on the camera meta data are the same individual (Fotograf, Lutz Leitmann Copyright holder Stadt Bochum, Presseamt), possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Foto wird von uns (der Veranstalter) als Pressefoto für Bochum Total herausgegeben. Alle Rechte bei cooltour Bochum / Bochum Total 2010UG

 Comment Translation = "This photo is edited by us (the organizers) as a press photographer for Bochum Total. All rights reserved by cooltour Bochum / Bochum Tota" I don't really think that an organization can hold copyright, which belongs to the photographer. Perhaps an OTRS ?

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (fuzz on the pixels), lack of useful camera metadata and the user's other two uploads were also problemattic, leading to this nomination under the precautionary principle as possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Foto wird von uns (der Veranstalter) als Pressefoto für Bochum Total herausgegeben. Alle Rechte bei cooltour Bochum / Bochum Total 2010UG

 Comment Translation = "This photo is edited by us (the organizers) as a press photographer for Bochum Total. All rights reserved by cooltour Bochum / Bochum Tota" I don't really think that an organization can hold copyright, which belongs to the photographer. Perhaps an OTRS ? Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, small size of an advertising flyer, unlikely to be "own work" of uploader, and possible COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of useful description, unused on the project, and no categories put this photo outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of useful description, unused on the project, and no categories put this photo outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader's name "Karma Yogi Society" implies connection with subject and attempt to look official. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This newspaper from 1979 is outside of COM:SCOPE and a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This newspaper from 1984 is outside of COM:SCOPE and a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is listed as "Sebi Hennig", however this is not a selfie, unlikely to be "own work" as described. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is from source given, however it states clearly beneath the photo "© Cansel Kiziltepe/Mehmet Özaltan" see [ http://www.bundestag.de/bundestag/abgeordnete18/biografien/K/kiziltepe_cansel.html ] here. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a private photograph album; this individual is presumably living, has personality rights and is apparently non-notable. Image is not in use and Is in two non-existent categories. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low quality and presence on webpage marked "©2009 Association of Summer Theatres 'Round Ontario" here [20] make this a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is also found [21] here from November 2013, text source [22] here, marked ©Copyright 1997-2014. Image is to illustrate essentially an obituary of one of the figures in the image, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murat_K%C3%B6pr%C3%BCl%C3%BC Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: taken from (c) site. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, fuzzy edges, and lack of useful metadata suggest that this is not the "own work" of the uploader, but a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, strange aspect ratio, lacking camera meta data, no description, unused and hence outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image also found [23] here, marked "© Copyright CLBS All rights reserved." is possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, lacking metadata and unused on project, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, fuzzy edge pixels and being found all over the web, see [25] here, suggest this image is a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, poor quality and lacking metadata plus published [26] here, marked " American Public Media © 2014", make this unlikely to be uploader's own work. The subject of a photo does not own the rights, the photographer does. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size of image, lack of useful metadata, uploader's name is "S.M.U Ghana" implying close connection or attempt to create authority by use of Sikkim Manipal University, Ghana name. Possible COM:COPYVIO, similar and possibly Photoshopped images were found on Google search [27] here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is all over internet see [28] here for examples. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable, presumably living, recognizable subject, unused on the project, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and presence all over the internet [29] suggest this picture of a performer is a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears [30] credited to Фото: Виктор Савельев and marked © Липецкая и Елецкая епархия 2005-2012. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text information outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image of a non-notable presumably living and identifiable subject, unused in the project and outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reads like an advert, IMO this is out of scope. Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete agree. Kathisma (talk) 21:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from YouTube [31] possible COM:COPYVIO. Unused and in three nonexistent categories. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image also found here [32], possible COM:COPYVIO. Notice that user name implies close connection or authority with the University of the website from this image was lifted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller size, fuzzy edge pixels and being found [33] here and [34] here, suggest this image is a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacking information on the individual photographers of this photomontage, each image within which is unlikely to be uploader's own work and a possible COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep 'Cos any indiv. pic. is lower resolution, inferior quality, unsuitable as artwork on pirate versions or other uses that would compete with the commercial purpose of the original artwork. --Walkir29 (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I disagree. I think we need the license properly for each image. It is not possible to take copyright images, edit them and then claim them as new work, so I don't think it's possible to take images from a variety of sources, turn them into a montage and claim the copyright of the original creator vanished. They're still derivative; the licenses for the original images are still required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

if so, we need to eliminate thousands of current images from wiki. The En Wikipedia allows "Low resolution" images and states: "The copy is of sufficient resolution for commentary and identification but lower resolution than the original book cover. Copies made from it will be of inferior quality, unsuitable as artwork on pirate versions or other uses that would compete with the commercial purpose of the original artwork." Wikipedia should be consistent ... --Walkir29 (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We do not need to address the images in Commons other than this one in this nomination. This particular montage is claimed to be the "own work" of the uploader. I nominated this picture because it is fairly obvious that the uploader does not hold copyright to each of the nine subsidiary pictures and thus the montage is likely to be a COM:COPYVIO. You are quoting from "en:Wikipedia" rules; but this image was uploaded to Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Even if these are all Commons images, it is required that the source be named and the author listed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer of 2D art does not hold copyright to image painted by another, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster unlikely to be "own work" of uploader, and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of i.e. http://emol.org/film/archives/whitenoise/whitenoiseposter.jpg JuTa 07:56, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster unlikely to be "own work" of uploader as stated. Possible COM:COPYVIO, as it is image of poster from 2013. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer of 2D work does not own copyright to the painting in the photo, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader does not own rights to calendar pictured in photograph, it's derivative of copyrighted work, and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of uploader, image appears in multiple places on web, including [35] here, and is a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is highly unlikely uploader has copyright to all the images in this montage, under the precautionary principle, possible COM:COPYVIOs. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This is karosent, the uploaded of the file. Actually, I have taken all of these pictures myself. Therefore, I do own the copyright on each picture, and therefore on the entire montage. Please do not delete this file. Thank you.

 Comment I think that each picture then should be uploaded separately, as these images include an old faded farm picture, microphotography, air photos, 3D models and have very low quality (esp. on the cows in corner). As it is the quality of the images is so variable, the color balance and quality so different that it makes it seem unlikely to be the work of a single individual. Few people own the gear to make straight down, lack of parallax air-photos. Rephotographing stuff on the walls of the lab doesn't count to make it "own work," fyi. 50.38.42.138 00:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is the fifth version of this collection that you have uploaded. Don't do it again or you will be blocked from editing on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image here [36], no metadata on camera, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Box found on multiple websites including [37] here, unlikely to be "own work" of uploader and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is the subject's Twitter picture [38] and unlikely to be the work of the uploader, missing meta data, small size, etc. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is the subject's Twitter picture [39] and unlikely to be the work of the uploader, missing meta data, small size, etc. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Meta data reads "© 2013 by Vincenzo Menichella All Rights Reserved" Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image #3 of 9 in slideshow at [40] subject's website, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found here [41] on page two of gallery, marked © Copyright 2013, Bangladeshi Entertainers All Rights Reserved. , possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Picture is of upside down polar bear, by user "Sudpoleisbar"... (hoax or joke?) Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is useless for COM:SCOPE it appears to be a hoax or a joke image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, based on one (or two?) unfree files 24.134.38.14 08:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we keep partially uploaded images like this? ive never seen one here before. there are a lot at the gallery this is part of. should someone trim out the gray section and reupload as a smaller image? Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: .THe stated source has an explicit copyright notice, so aside from the quality problem, it's a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown photographer, OTRS Ticket needed Artmax (talk) 08:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should have consequently also filed the source image File:Michelides.jpg for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: Ticket#2014022010013276 --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The quality of this photo is very bad with a watermark barely legible. There is a lot of quality image to illustrate this athlet (see Category:Kevin Staut) -- Xfigpower (pssst) 09:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, no significant content Judithcomm (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; domain name watermark; taken from http://www.lesjoyauxdesherazade.com/2013/08/gateaux-algeirens-taj-el-moulouk-les-etapes-en-photos/Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi vouloir supprimer la photo ?


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reliable online source confirms that the city of Pensacola has any such flag, which is possibly a hoax. The city's own official website (www.cityofpensacola.com) makes no mention of a city flag. See the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Flag_of_Pensacola,_Florida, which ended with the wikiarticle being deleted on 31 January 2014. The uploader of this flag to Commons has had many other uploaded images deleted as well, including a PNG version of the supposed "flag of Pensacola", which the uploader provides no source for: see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stepo114. I request that this image and any other unsourced, unverified "flag of Pensacola" images like it be permanently deleted. Textorus (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We have File:Flag of Pensacola.svg which is the same flag as this which is widely in use, including at Pensacola, Florida. It has been in use on that article for more than two years, so our nom has not done very much research here. We do not generally delete existing raster versions of files after the svg is created and the nom gives no valid reason to delete this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the original creator of this image. It seems that people think this is the actual flag of Pensacola, which it is not. I made this image to illustrate Pensacola rather than be the flag of Pensacola, therefore I want to nominate it for deletion. Stepo114 (talk) 00:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That appears to be correct. Pensacola is known as The City of Five Flags, see http://www.pensapedia.com/wiki/City_of_Five_Flags, and apparently flies all five where most cities would have one.

It follows that File:Flag of Pensacola.svg should be deleted also. I have tagged that file and notified the creator. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: I can't see a tag in File:Flag of Pensacola.svg, nor a note on the talk page of the creator. Did you mean another file by any chance? Well, while you're pinged anyway, could you please close this DR as well? Clin --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted My comment with respect to the SVG version appears to be incorrect. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Tbitech01/sandbox). MER-C 10:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is only one 3dz2 orbital (one of five in the canonical set of d atomic orbitals). This image displays two different ones with this same label. This image is unused, and we have many options for replacements in Category:Atomic orbitals (and subcats thereof). DMacks (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown photographer, OTRS Ticket from creator needed Artmax (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: Ticket#2014022010013276 --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 17 results for this name, including a facebook, no article on any wiki. The uploader seem to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 17 results for this name, including a facebook (a kid), no article on any wiki. The uploader seem to use commons to create arms for his relatives. 195.220.213.10 12:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 12 results for this name, no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his relatives. 195.220.213.10 12:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 22 results for this name (mostly commons and social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his relatives. 195.220.213.10 12:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 28 results for this name (mostly commons and social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his relatives. 195.220.213.10 12:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of a file deleted for being out of scope. See the previous deletion request. Commons is still not a depository for creative drawings. 86.195.75.219 12:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 35 results for this name (almost only social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : arms of a not very known heraldist with no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : arms of a minor heraldist, google gives only 25 results for this name (almost only social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploaded hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 31 results for this name (mostly commons and social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. And in addition, the uploaded hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 31 results for this name (mostly commons and social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. And in addition, the uploaded hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 18 results for this name, no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 29 results for this name (mostly social networks and commons), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends. 195.220.213.10 12:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Being borne by a notable individual is not the only reason why coats of arm images are allowed here. Coats of arms of users, coats of arms which are distinctive in some way, in some cases coats of arms of micronations, etc. are also allowed... AnonMoos (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
: Delete. Clearly out of scope. These are not the arms of a micronation, of a user, and they are perfectly common. In addition, the original uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 29 results for this name (mostly social networks and commons), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends 195.220.213.10 12:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 11 results for this name (mostly social networks and commons), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends 195.220.213.10 12:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : no article on any wiki, the armiger is just the webmaster of heraldique-europeenne.org. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends 195.220.213.10 12:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. And in addition, the uploaded hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 17 results for this name (and it is a family name...), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his friends 195.220.213.10 12:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete clearly out of scope. And in addition, the uploaded hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : banner of a fictionnal order with no article on any wiki 195.220.213.10 12:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete clearly out of scope. And in addition, the uploaded hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author of this map is National Bolshevik Party of Russia. No info on permission. A.Savin 12:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fair-use material in the poster Motopark (talk) 12:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fair-use material in the poster Motopark (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fair-use material in the poster Motopark (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fair-use material in the poster Motopark (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File with low resolution; there is File:Amphetamine formula.png that it's identical and has an higher resolution. Gce (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:6. Jay Rosen tweet - Chicago Now - Flickr - Knight Foundation.jpg

Commons:Derivative work for web sites other then Knight Foundation. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown persons see description, not used Motopark (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seriously blurred, better photo's of same person available Judithcomm (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred beyond any usefulness Judithcomm (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image IS NOT from the mentioned source. Link is broken or wrong. Yanguas (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Site is now under construction

The mentioned site was not under construction when I got there Turibio Santos's photo. Today I don't know how to justify the correction of my procedure. Sorry. --Olimor (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

I found at Flickr, the same photo, with copyright. It's here. So, no doubt that it must be deleted. Sorry, again. --Olimor (talk) 14:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, useless content Judithcomm (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I mistook it as a 2D work when I uploaded it. It should be deleted. 如沐西风 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred beyond its usefulness Judithcomm (talk) 16:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seriously blurred. Please don't upload this kind of stuff Judithcomm (talk) 16:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Another user also claims to be the author of the photo (See File:Arika Sato YouTube avatar.jpg). Jespinos (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jo Lorib as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.telenews.xpg.com.br/tntEconomia.html
Converted by me to DR, as the image has been uploaded already in 2009. Though the cited website (said to be from July 2012) is surely not the source of our version, it credits the photo to "Adepb Bahia / TeleNews Torres". So, at least it needs a permission from the true author or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred and useless, sorry Judithcomm (talk) 16:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Mars Express MARSIS instrument is a joint project between NASA and the Italian Space Agency (ASI). No agreement for releasing material under a free license is known, and merely appearing on the NASA.gov site does not mean image is public domain. Image credit also supports this idea, with ASI indicated as the lead agency. Huntster (t @ c) 16:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, watermarked and missing EXIF. The image is likely not own work. Jespinos (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be vandalism of File:John searle2.jpg; no educational use, per COM:SCOPE Эlcobbola talk 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to have been taken from this page. Other images uploaded by the same user seem to be watermarked, but there's no clear relationship between the user and the website where the images are taken from. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other images uploaded by the same user which also seem like copyvios (they are all on the ebcworldwide site or elsewhere as listed):
The rest of this user's uploads look suspicious given the number of copyvios. I'd welcome experienced Commons users having a look over them. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of photo from a yearbook cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correct! made by me with my own camera on the hood of a car at Six Harbour. So what is the problem. I made this image.NED33 (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What did you create, the image of the cover or the original photo which had been put on the cover? --Túrelio (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The image of the cover. Like the image of a building can be made with a camera.NED33 (talk) 18:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
O.k., thanks. That's what I suspected. Please be aware that a photography (or anything else which is copyrightable) is copyrighted, even if it is printed onto something. (The only exception of that principle is explained in Commons:Freedom of panorama, but not applicable here.) By creating a reproduction that work, you violate the copyright of the creator of the original work. As the image is in color, it's clearly not a very old image and thereby still copyrighted. --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Clear violation of the yearbook's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover artwork is likely still copyrighted. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this is a photo I have taken myself. It presents a book lying on the table in my house. When uploading I have stated clearly that I am the copyright holder and I grant anyone the right to use it under the Creative Commons licence Dd1495 (talk) 11:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That was never in doubt. However, the cover of the books contains copyrightable artwork. Your photo is a derivative of this artwork. Whether this is legitimate can only be decided when we know who created the artwork on the bookcover. --Túrelio (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover artwork is likely still copyrighted. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this is a photo I have taken myself. The photo pictures two books that I have, lying on the table in my house. When uploading the photo using the standard template, I have stated that I am the copyright the holder of this work, and I have irrevocably granted anyone the right to use this work under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 license - Dd1495 (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was never in doubt. However, the covers of both books contain copyrightable artwork. Your photo is a derivative of these artworks. Whether this is legitimate can only be decided when we know who created the artwork on the bookcovers. --Túrelio (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Domain name watermark Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 24.134.38.14 17:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My own upload, a mistaken duplicate (at lower resolution) of File:Brian Eno, Danny Hillis by Pete Forsyth 04.jpg Pete F (talk) 20:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

KTY Catherine Poulain is born in 1965. Copyright violation. 83.204.160.185 21:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy daftly declined. Image appeared here before upload to Commons. COM:OTRS requires a ticket. Further, image there attributed to Ruud Voost, which is not "Addfuel" or "Diogo Machado". Diogo Machado may be the artist for the cover (per the blog), but this is an image of a 3D object: both the cover artist and photographer must grant permission. Unambiguous copyvio. Эlcobbola talk 18:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete obvious copyvio : when an artwork is edited, both artist and editor must give their authorisation. In my mind, it should have been speedied. Kathisma (talk) 15:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Fritz Spitzkohl (talk) 16:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in France JurgenNL (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Fritz Spitzkohl (talk) 16:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in France JurgenNL (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inget allmänintresse Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 18:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, commons not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, no relevant content Judithcomm (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 15:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of performing rights Lymantria (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only educational value this might have would derive from its portrayal of a copyrighted character. Copyright violation. Pete F (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appeared here before upload to Commons; COM:OTRS requires a ticket. Blog says "all pics by Pedro Seixo Rodrigues", which is not "Addfuel" or "Diogo Machado". Unambiguous copyvio. No reason for speedy to have been declined other than incompetence. Эlcobbola talk 18:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photo has been published before 1923. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, but why upload this at all? Judithcomm (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Domain name watermark Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, no EXIF-data, not used, some homepage pictures Motopark (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is without any doubt a photo of Bertold Brecht[42], not of the claimed Otto Falkenberg. Besides, its copyright status is rather unclear. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please deleteNED33 (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad scan of this image : Lacrimae mundi.png 83.204.244.60 20:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used before here : http://florencek.com/images/gallery/01_Photo_de_presse.jpg , need OTRS --MGuf (d) 10:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, not used Motopark (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Fritz Spitzkohl (talk) 16:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in France JurgenNL (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

need OTRS, copyvio from http://florencek.com/ --MGuf (d) 10:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not the real club's badge (See official site) and never used by Olimpo before. - Fma12 (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Banfield - Amenazas aquí 10:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marc Petit is born in 1961. Copyright violation. 83.204.160.185 21:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This picture is taken in the garden of Marc Petit, with the authorization of the artiste. --Croucrou (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Validationvia com:OTRS is nescecary. Natuur12 (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate raster versions of the same orders, tend to be of poorer quality.

Mahir256 (talk) 03:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Fritz Spitzkohl (talk) 16:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in France JurgenNL (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CRONI K (talk · contribs)

edit

Logos, Cassette or DVD covers, likely not "own work" of uploader, possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enovar (talk · contribs)

edit

Text documents outside of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also probable copyvios. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Addfuel (talk · contribs)

edit

Uploaded in batch of copyvios with same subject matter (e.g. File:Add Fuel street 05.jpg, File:Add Fuel street 04.jpg and File:Add Fuel ceramic 03.jpg). Lower resolution; no camera EXIF. Quack?

Эlcobbola talk 17:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Argentine works related to es:Esteban Laureano Maradona (1895—1995), published/created or sourced with (as indicated): 1986 licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2081 (+95 years).

Gunnex (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe these photos were uploaded by a fan, not by the very same en:Dominique Young Unique; a pair of them for example are on http://dominiqueyoungunique.org/photos/ , and this user has some bad editions like blanking pages. I suggest COM:OTRS for the uploader.

UAwiki (talk) 02:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CrimeanArtist (talk · contribs)

edit

These images are all drawings or 2D works by "Eugene Badusev" and all are from the Deviant Art websites listed in the description line of each image. However, Deviant Art pages are all Copyright. These images are possible COM:COPYVIOs due to that copyright notice and also from lack of permission of the photographer of the 2D art.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete if the uploader cannot prove that he has been granted authorization to publish these artworks under free license, these must be removed. Kathisma (talk) 21:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Note that permission from the photographer is NOT required for simple photos of 2D art, but permission of the artist absolutely is required. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chadbrophy (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused images with insufficient description, lack of categories and unused. Some of the images have words overlain; others are tutorials or instruction notecards. All are out of COM:SCOPE, must be realistically useful for an educational purpose.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commerical game -- these mostly violate COM:ADVERT. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bisousx (talk · contribs)

edit

Low resolutions and/or missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused media file containing only a irrelevant brazilian political ads Lugusto 04:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel to give free license for these images and I would like this image removed immediately. Andy Santoso (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I think political ads are rarely irrelevant or out of scope, but this one is a clear copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Kw0 (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cheerfulls (talk · contribs)

edit

Stock images, not free of rights. example

SamuelFreli (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All should be deleted. There are still two images more, who are stolen from the Web. Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cheerfulls (talk · contribs)

edit

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cheerfulls

SamuelFreli (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The soul mate one is from http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-674365-shadow-of-love.php ; I've asked for speedy deletion, as I just did with File:4 Steps to Summon the Love You Deserve.png, File:4 Steps to Summon the Love You Deserve.png, File:Embracing Uncertainty in Life and Love.png and File:How to Spot a Cheater.png, which were all published on other Web sites. Rybec (talk) 11:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Love and Fear is based in part on http://depositphotos.com/2595723/stock-photo-Beautiful-woman-in-love.html. Five tips is based on http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-753957-stop-gesture.php?st=0058442. Tabercil (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cheerfulls (talk · contribs)

edit

other uploads appeared to be copyright violations, because the underlying images are for sale from stock photo services

Rybec (talk) 17:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the images are clearly from stock: File:Psychic Dreams.png is based on http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-479476-woman-asleep.php?st=e6dea9e and File:It's All About.png is from http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-3440009-amazing-couple-portraits.php. Tabercil (talk) 22:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cheerfulls (talk · contribs)

edit

Again... not considering the warnings

SamuelFreli (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image is based on http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-2564399-human-pretzel.php. Tabercil (talk) 22:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... five images at random checked, all five turned out to be based on stock photos. At this point I'm going to be bold and take a cue from EN - specifically their WP:DUCK policy: "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck...". I'll killing ALL of the images as probable copyright violations, and Mr Cheerfulls just earned himself a 3 day vacation from Commons. Tabercil (talk) 22:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Tabercil (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, no EXIF-data, not used, some homepage pictures Motopark (talk) 20:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ari1314 (talk · contribs)

edit

Do not appear to be uploader's work; uploaded among copyvios (e.g., File:Trendnet copia-plagio 02.jpg and File:Captura de pantalla de 2014-02-14 17 02 23.png) and user blocked for vandalism and copyios after warnings.

Эlcobbola talk 17:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, in addition to the questionable copyright, also out of COM:SCOPE. --Túrelio (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juacoo31 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamnavin elias (talk · contribs)

edit

Images from copyright website [43] here, marked copyright. Possible COM:COPYVIOs, as well as possible promotion / self-promotion. Commons isn't an advertising venue.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: These files have been used for a new article at en-wp which was declined more than a month ago due to insufficient quality and as its notability has not been proven. There was no activity since then. Independent from this, such images need to be processed through COM:ORTS to be kept. AFBorchert (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ndmd1234 (talk · contribs)

edit

The two images of the author are possible COM:COPYVIOs because same image appears here [44], marked © 2014 Francesco Redi.

The book cover is one of two cover versions which load on the author's webpage [45] here.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: These files need to be processed through COM:OTRS to be kept. AFBorchert (talk) 10:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Penepoderoso (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 17:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HripsimeMargaryan (talk · contribs)

edit

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mirjanaperic (talk · contribs)

edit

Four images from this website [46], possible COM:COPYVIO.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julien06200 (talk · contribs)

edit

These images are not as described in their license statements. They contain too much information about non-notable living subjects, outside of COM:SCOPE and possibly COM:COPYVIO. User's other images are photos with no meta data.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most of these images can be found by searching around this website [47]. The uploader credited some pictures to "Photo: Dimitrije Ostojic, GSS, Serbia, December 2013 Kopaonik", others to different photographers. Uploader therefore cannot be creator of all these images. These are lovely photos, but without proper attribution they're possible COM:COPYVIOs. They are also uncategorized and unused on the project.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fuerza943fm (talk · contribs)

edit

The four images of the performer are found all over the internet, some are marked or watermarked, all are possibly COM:COPYVIOs. The logo is labeled "from my business" leading to the conclusion that a user named "Fuerza943fm" with a logo "Fuerza943fm" (Force 94.3 FM in English) may be involved in promotion or self-promotion. At a minimum, the name is too similar to a business.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This appears to be a bunch of copyvios as the photographs are watermarked by different photographers. AFBorchert (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Gulmamedli (talk · contribs)

edit

Scans of paintings by Cavadov who died in 1963, and of 1960s photographs; all without info on permission.

A.Savin 13:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mantellinipedro (talk · contribs)

edit

This user has uploaded an entire photoalbum of himself with dignitaries. He has a [[48]] Wikipedia user page which reads like a Linked In or resume entry. All his images are from different cameras, of various quality and unused on the project. Wiki isn't a personal photo album, nor the place for self-promotion. The images are likely COM:COPYVIOs, since they're not selfies.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramank257 (talk · contribs)

edit

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as copyvios. AFBorchert (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramank257 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document of questionable notability. Should be replaced with wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Migueluy666 (talk · contribs)

edit

Insufficient information about creator of 2D art rephotographed by uploader, makes these three images of same painting possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We allow leeway with respect to Scope, but never with respect to copyright violations. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RodriPM123 (talk · contribs)

edit

Low resolutions and/or missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kendri Bracho (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Koyocogempro (talk · contribs)

edit

Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KandruHarish (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giogagoshidze (talk · contribs)

edit

Artwork and portrait of artist unused in the project make the images out of COM:SCOPE Incidentally, all need proper licenses from the actual photographers, else COM:COPYVIO as well.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HDR TMK mbh (talk · contribs)

edit

The Helios Klinkum is found [51] here, marked copyright.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Der User HDR TMK mbh besitzt das uneingeschränkte Nutzungsrecht für die eingestellten Fotos. Alle Fotografen sind mit der Bereitstellung ihrer Fotos in der Enzyklopädie Wikipedia einverstanden. Das Foto vom Johannes Wesling Klinikum ist ein Foto und kein Screenshot. HDR TMK ist eine construction company und baut Krankenhäuser und Laborgebäude. Es ist ein Firmeneintag. Als Architekturunternehmen baut HDR TMK Gebäude, die in der breiten öffentlichen Wahrnehmung stehen.

Was kann ich an dem Eintrag verbessern? What can I do to make a better entry?

(translated by google translate) "The user HDR TMK mbh has the unrestricted right to use the uploaded photos. All photographers are happy with the provision of their photos in the Wikipedia. The photo of John Wesling Clinic is a photo and not a screenshot. HDR TMK is a construction company and builds hospitals and laboratory building. It is a Firmeneintag. As an architecture firm builds HDR TMK buildings that are in the general public perception. What can I improve about the entry? What can I do to make a better entry?
 Comment I translated the unsigned addition from the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Hallo HDR TMK mbh, wir benötigen für die Bilder eine schriftliche Freigabe, die an unser Support-Team einzureichen ist. Sie erreichen uns unter [email protected]. Da der Löschantrag hier bereits läuft, müsste dies umgehend erfolgen. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Validation via com:OTRS is required Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SCLEzequiel (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, most likely cropped & grabbed from internet, as all the other (deleted) uploads, see User talk:SCLEzequiel. File:LizSCL.jpg (mysteriously edited) most likely grabbed from (similar watermark) Gente Online.

Gunnex (talk) 08:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smronr (talk · contribs)

edit

Possible copyvios or images out of project scope.

Jespinos (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Many of these are blatant copyvios and qualify for speedy deletion; for the rest, I'm invoking the precautionary principle. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Veronikaz (talk · contribs)

edit

Four images related to same performer, none appear to be the "own work" of the uploader. Two have overwritings indicating possible use as CD covers, the other two are "star shots". Possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zezengorri (talk · contribs)

edit

All four images are from a tourism/ city site [55] possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Världensände (talk · contribs)

edit

Promotional images of performing group and album covers, possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teatro (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. No evidence of permission(s) for posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete files beginning with a number come from facebook. As they come from at least 5 different users, the uploader cannot be the author of all of them. Kathisma (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Leonard Klofutar (1).jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 23:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too noisy picture. 134.96.231.113 13:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 02:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inget allmänintresse Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 06:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by an updated image Abhsn (talk) 03:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Request open by uploader. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by another updated image Abhsn (talk) 03:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Request open by uploader. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by another updated image Abhsn (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Request open by uploader. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 22:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License problem. ویرایشگر-1 (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This gif -animation is a derivative work of YOU TUBE video High Contrast (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. But I don't know which way did it land on YouTube, naming a Russian airport, the source of this shot was sent me by my uncle a few years ago, who was earlier an operator officer on that airport. There must be a misadvertance somewhere. - Orion 8 (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the creator of the original video? --High Contrast (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. I thought he was that, I've never meditated on it. Maybe somebody of his colleague made it. As I wrote, this is my own work, created years ago from a VHS video. I don't know whether it was originally shot on S8 or 16 mm film, a good deal of stuff was taking refuges after the great windup. Where or how did you find the link to YouTube? On a collector's page? - Orion 8 (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We need permission from the actual creator. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I really would present it with pleasure but my uncle, one month after he sent the files for me, died in brain tumor. He annihilated the most of the recordings he owned so the sources and other data are inaccessible now. What a pity. - Orion 8 (talk) 19:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this image does not come up in Google, it is very similar to all five other uploads of this user, all of which were taken from a copyrighted web site and have, therefore, been deleted. This also has a strong feeling of violating COM:ADVERT. A WP:EN article on the subject has been deleted for lack of notability and copyright violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 07:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 07:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong title Cuddlebear (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 07:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong title Cuddlebear (talk) 20:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 07:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong title Cuddlebear (talk) 20:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 07:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xkya (talk · contribs)

edit

The project has sufficient images of this type without extras. The categories Frenulum piercing and Foreskin contain may better photos of this same topic.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xkya (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:PENIS

Эlcobbola talk 17:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 04:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by McLaud9404 (talk · contribs)

edit

Last versions of these images have been uploaded under a non-free license «This copyright object is permitted to use on the resource wikipedia.org and any off-site using without the author's permission is illegal» (watermark on images).

Angry Red Panda (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete File:Памятник Ленину г.Ейск.jpg - there is no freedom of panorama in Russia.
  2.  Keep and revert File:Ан-72 на посадке в Ейске.jpg to initial version, hide new version. GFDL can not be withdrawn such way. Alex Spade (talk) 13:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Jim -FASTILY 08:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it is the piece of a scan from a photo i take in 2011--Timokabel1 (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you are the uploader, please upload the original image. FASTILY 08:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google search [57] shows this image in use all over the web. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment User's gallery is wall to wall Bollywood stars, some of the pages have a template which says the images were created as publicity images for Bollywood, but with no further proof of that statement, and these images all over the web, including (as this one) on the star's own Facebook page, I am nominating one image to ask for expert editorial advice on this user's gallery. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The image has been derived from this source. The license has been provided in the file information. The images around the internet have been derived either from the original source or the Wikipedia page. As such, I don't believe this is a copvio. --Krimuk90 (talk) 08:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The page you cite as the source of the page clearly reads "Copyright © 2014 Hungama Digital Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.", hence why this image would be a possible COM:COPYVIO. I do not see the licensing information as the uploader claims based on the given source of the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All the images on Wikipedia from Bollywood Hungama are used with permission. The licensing is provided in the file description of the image, if you see carefully. Please read Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama. --Krimuk90 (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentI see the template (please see the first comment above), however, I also see a very firm copyright statement on this and other pages. I would like to know how the average editor is to know that an image marked "copyright" firmly on the source page can also be "used with permission?" I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination, but would point out that there is no reasonable way to know that this was fairly taken from the site as the website is marked copyright. I also don't see how we know this image was created by their photographers, etc. as it says on the template. There are a lot of fan galleries in Wikicommons that have used images which were not open permission, and my question relates to "how do we tell" if an image is being fairly used, or not like this. I did not intend to cause angst, but I have seen a pile of images with clearly stated "this is ok," that aren't. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about other images, but this one has been properly licensed and used, so I fail to see the problem. Can we have some input from other users? --Krimuk90 (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Krimuk. In regards to the Google Image search, I think people might have copied the picture from Bollywood Hungama or even Wikipedia since that picture's been on her article for almost 2 years now. And, if BH has stated that their images are allowed to be used under the cc-by-3.0 license, then I see no problem in this image being on Commons. Don't think it's a copyright violation.AB01 (talk) 02:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 08:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no es el escudo oficial de Espiel 83.61.49.253 10:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep La imagen está correctamente referenciada y atribuida y sigue fielmente la información ofrecida por la fuente de referencia. --Macucal (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ? FASTILY 09:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license irregularity: uploader claims "own work" but mentions Gabriel Muñoz Mendoza as author 195.220.213.10 12:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Hardly an "irregularity", you'll find that all over Commons. Basic design is PD, not enough of a change. Fry1989 eh? 01:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The work is signed. Unless the uploader can prove he has been granted authorization by the author, the file must be removed. Kathisma (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Signatures mean nothing. Fry1989 eh? 19:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tell that to a lawyer. Since its first version (4 june 2013), the file has been described as a work made by Gabriel Muñiz Mendoza and signed with corresponding initials. Uploader must give evidences that he has been granted authorization by the author of the drawing to publish it under free license. Kathisma (talk) 20:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have to tell that to anybody. Just because you sign something you made doesn't mean it's automatically copyrighted. There are multiple regulations regarding the complexity of an image which garnish it copyright, not your signature. Fry1989 eh? 21:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 08:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by   (exhCONTgq) of the revised BSicon ID rule (c.f.   (CONTgq),   (utCONTgq)). Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These are the differences between the two files. I don't see any difference in the way they are rendered. -<?xmlversion="1.0"encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
-<!DOCTYPEsvgPUBLIC"-//W3C//DTDSVG1.1//EN""http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd">
-<svgxmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
-width="500"height="500"viewBox="00500500">
+<?xmlversion="1.0"encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<svgxmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"width="500"height="500"viewBox="00500500">
Rybec (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]