Comment - I actually find File:Warwick Castle 2015.jpg clearest in its depiction of the castle, and thus more useful, even if the sky is perhaps a bit too greenish in that picture. What do you think, and should we add that photo as a choice in this most valued review? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - While it is of a high resolution, the sharpness of the image is rather underwhelming, much like Warwick Castle in the morning.jpg. Lighting and composition are inferior as well – the shadows are too dark and make up too much of the image to be visually efficient. This, combined with the fact that the castle itself is less prominent in the image that the other two nominated, a good amount of this image can be cropped. Favouring the nomination of Warwick Castle May 2016.jpg for best in scope instead. -- Philip Terry Graham (talk) 12:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This image is clearly the best one. It is the highest resolution of the three, with the best image quality and sharpness. The castle is framed better, making the best use of space in the image without overlapping or cropping out any important context, such as the river in the foreground. It is also well lit, with all aspects of the image clearly visible under the sunlight. This is the best in scope. -- Philip Terry Graham12:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've taken some new photos of this cultivar. This one here became VI 3 years ago and it's no longer the best photo of the Raja cultivar. It should be listed as "former VI" when the MVR I've started is over. All current photos in category Pyrus pyrifolia that are of the Raja cultivar are photos of the same tree and start with the name "Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) ....".PumpkinSkytalk17:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Agreed. There are other photos in scope that are better, especially when considering their use as thumbnails in articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Very slightly inferior to the cropped version, I think. By the way, is there any way all 3 photos in this faceoff could have the same scope, phrased the same way? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
