greg minissale
Professor of Art History, University of Auckland.
PROFILE for publications:
https://profiles.auckland.ac.nz/g-minissale
Address: Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
PROFILE for publications:
https://profiles.auckland.ac.nz/g-minissale
Address: Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
less
InterestsView All (11)
Uploads
Papers by greg minissale
examples. In particular, there is an underlying formal arrangement
shared by traditional and contemporary art, which I would like to
suggest has much in common with reading maps. In fact, many of
these artworks actually feature maps that alert us to different ways
of ‘reading’ this tradition of formalism, stimulating different levels of
description.
examples. In particular, there is an underlying formal arrangement
shared by traditional and contemporary art, which I would like to
suggest has much in common with reading maps. In fact, many of
these artworks actually feature maps that alert us to different ways
of ‘reading’ this tradition of formalism, stimulating different levels of
description.
connects the brain and body to the world, and the world of abstract art. The book features new readings of artworks by Matisse, Pollock, Dubuffet, Tàpies, Benglis, Len Lye, Star Gossage, Shannon Novak, Simon Ingram, Lee Mingwei, L. N. Tallur and many others. Such art challenges centuries of philosophical and aesthetic order that has elevated the substance of mind over
the substance of matter. This is a multidisciplinary study of different metastable patterns and rhythms: in art, the body and the brain. This focus on the propagation of rhythm across domains represents a fresh art historical approach and provides important opportunities for art and science to cooperate.
histories allow for constructive interaction between the global and the local,
which is not just an example of one dominating the other? Do the issues of
cultural hybridity and diasporas represent an opportunity for art history to rethink
traditional assumptions about cultural identity and interactions between
cultures? Is it possible for there to be a globally aware, yet locally grounded art
history, where the methods and approaches of one kind of art history can enrich
the other? How are issues of art history and modernity mediated in global and
local contexts?
At the outset, then, the