Understanding realization is the most series enquiry that involves having deeper insights among d... more Understanding realization is the most series enquiry that involves having deeper insights among differing fields of the studies. Because everything that exist has a relation, and within such a relation there is realization. This implies that there are at least two distinct realities in realization. These are: (a) the subject realizer and (b) the object realized. However, one can encounter a dilemma while he/she attempts to grasp the full connotation/intension of realization. The first one is that the dilemma (problem) of whether or not the subject (realizer) is related to the object (realized) or vice versa. And the second problem is linked to identifying the process of realization (that is, 'realizing') since it locates itself as a medium between realizer and realized within the relation of ... This is completely philosophical discourses related to: what is reality in realization? Is reality one or many in realization? What is/are the relationships between realities in realization? How to know those realities and the forces/principles that connects those realities (or the whole with the pats)? Such questions really involve an investigation of epistemological and metaphysical spheres of subjectobject dichotomy. At the end, epistemology of metaphysics becomes the main curios sphere in which phenomenological-realism will be uncovered while searching the logic behind such process.
'Philosophy' is a controversial term which can be refuted and defended within intellectuals wheth... more 'Philosophy' is a controversial term which can be refuted and defended within intellectuals whether or not it is an issue of academic/scientific sphere. Most dominantly among the intellectual discourses of science is simply an attempt of examining the secret of nature and social beliefs. However, when we look from object to subject introspectively one can find the philosophical questions of philosophy itself, intellectual, and environment. Explicitly it raise questions such as: what is philosophy, who is 'intellectual', what is environment, what is the standard to be called intellectual, and how the 'object'/'environment'/'body' appears to such person. Providing an explanatory response to those questions involve careful analysis and/or enquiry of both philosophy and science itself. To do so it starts from analyzing of antiphilosophical consideration of philosophy as an 'activity' rather than science. While following in such perspective it is our duty to show that it is possible to apply the claim of 'activity' upon philosophy itself. The result will be: philosophy of philosophy, philosophy of mind and philosophy of nature. This further involves dismantling of those concepts in which metaphysics, epistemology and axiology appear from branches of philosophy. Thus, holistic philosophy becomes burst itself to show the interconnection between philosophy and antiphilosophy. Such holistic philosophy is derived from positive psychology in which both negativity and positivity are handled equally. In holism everything is seen through itself not a means to other end. Therefore, axiological test of ethics through anthropocentrism and nonanthropocentrism will appear in order to clarify our understanding of what is: man, nature, environment and wellbeing.
Understanding realization is the most series enquiry that involves having deeper insights among d... more Understanding realization is the most series enquiry that involves having deeper insights among differing fields of the studies. Because everything that exist has a relation, and within such a relation there is realization. This implies that there are at least two distinct realities in realization. These are: (a) the subject realizer and (b) the object realized. However, one can encounter a dilemma while he/she attempts to grasp the full connotation/intension of realization. The first one is that the dilemma (problem) of whether or not the subject (realizer) is related to the object (realized) or vice versa. And the second problem is linked to identifying the process of realization (that is, 'realizing') since it locates itself as a medium between realizer and realized within the relation of ... This is completely philosophical discourses related to: what is reality in realization? Is reality one or many in realization? What is/are the relationships between realities in realization? How to know those realities and the forces/principles that connects those realities (or the whole with the pats)? Such questions really involve an investigation of epistemological and metaphysical spheres of subjectobject dichotomy. At the end, epistemology of metaphysics becomes the main curios sphere in which phenomenological-realism will be uncovered while searching the logic behind such process.
'Philosophy' is a controversial term which can be refuted and defended within intellectuals wheth... more 'Philosophy' is a controversial term which can be refuted and defended within intellectuals whether or not it is an issue of academic/scientific sphere. Most dominantly among the intellectual discourses of science is simply an attempt of examining the secret of nature and social beliefs. However, when we look from object to subject introspectively one can find the philosophical questions of philosophy itself, intellectual, and environment. Explicitly it raise questions such as: what is philosophy, who is 'intellectual', what is environment, what is the standard to be called intellectual, and how the 'object'/'environment'/'body' appears to such person. Providing an explanatory response to those questions involve careful analysis and/or enquiry of both philosophy and science itself. To do so it starts from analyzing of antiphilosophical consideration of philosophy as an 'activity' rather than science. While following in such perspective it is our duty to show that it is possible to apply the claim of 'activity' upon philosophy itself. The result will be: philosophy of philosophy, philosophy of mind and philosophy of nature. This further involves dismantling of those concepts in which metaphysics, epistemology and axiology appear from branches of philosophy. Thus, holistic philosophy becomes burst itself to show the interconnection between philosophy and antiphilosophy. Such holistic philosophy is derived from positive psychology in which both negativity and positivity are handled equally. In holism everything is seen through itself not a means to other end. Therefore, axiological test of ethics through anthropocentrism and nonanthropocentrism will appear in order to clarify our understanding of what is: man, nature, environment and wellbeing.
Uploads
Papers by lelisa daniel